Skip to content

Saṃsāra

Ch. 1 of 8
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Contents

Saṃsāra

8 sections
  • Saṃsāra, written संसार in Devanagari, is a Sanskrit word that carries two meanings at once: wandering, and world. Join them and the world becomes a place you drift through without ever arriving. In everyday terms the word suggests running around in circles. For a great many thinkers in India, that image describes the condition of every living being, who circles endlessly through life, death and rebirth. Where did this idea come from, if the oldest sacred hymns barely mention it? Why would a heaven of rewards require a second death? And what did each tradition say about the way out?

  • The Sanskrit scholar Monier-Williams traced saṃsāra to a verbal root, sṛ, joined to the prefix saṃ. Together they mean to go round, to revolve, to pass through a succession of states. The prefix sam stands for samyak, meaning well, and sar simply means to move. An older relative of the word, saṃsaraṇa, appears in ancient texts. It describes going around through successive states, including the birth and rebirth of living beings and of the world, without obstruction.

    Another cousin is saṃsṛti, defined as the "course of mundane existence, transmigration, flow, circuit or stream". The scholar Stephen J. Laumakis reads the word as "aimless and directionless wandering". English phrases for the same idea include the wheel of life, the karmic cycle and transmigration. Saṃsāra always stands against its opposite, liberation from the cycle. That freedom has several names: moksha, mukti, nirvāṇa, which Pali texts spell nibbāna, and kaivalya.

    Many scholarly books drop the diacritics and write simply samsara. A lesser-used word for the same idea is Punarjanman, and the origins of the belief it names are obscure.

  • Among the oldest layers of Vedic writing, the afterlife was a matter of accounting. Virtue earned a place in heaven, and vice earned a place in hell. Later Vedic sages, the Rishis, found that picture too simple. People do not live equally good or equally bad lives. Some good people are better than others, and evil comes in degrees.

    The sages argued that it would be unfair for the god Yama to sort everyone into one of two bins. So they proposed an afterlife proportioned to merit. Once the merit is spent, the soul comes back and is born again. Passages such as section 6:31 of the Mahabharata and section 6.10 of the Devi Bhagavata Purana describe this round of life, death, rebirth and redeath.

    This line of questioning began with a blunt puzzle: what is the true nature of a human being, and do people die only once? Out of it came two early terms, Punarmṛtyu, meaning redeath, and Punaravṛtti, meaning return. Thinkers described two realities in each person. One was the unchanging Atman, the Self, tied to Brahman, the immortal and blissful ultimate reality. The other was the ever-shifting body, living in the phenomenal world of maya. Redeath marked the end of blissful years in svarga, heaven, and sent the being back to that world.

    What these thinkers did not supply was a mechanism, and that gap shapes the whole later history of the idea.

  • The Rigveda, the oldest of the Vedas, hides only traces of the idea, in sections 1.164, 4.55, 6.70 and 10.14. Scholars note that its hymns hint at rebirth without ever explaining it. Damien Keown places the notion of cyclic birth and death around 800 BC. By then the word saṃsāra itself had arrived, paired with moksha in several Principal Upanishads. It appears in verse 1.3.7 of the Katha Upanishad, verse 6.16 of the Shvetashvatara Upanishad, and verses 1.4 and 6.34 of the Maitri Upanishad.

    According to Sayers, the earliest Vedic layers center on ancestor worship, including the rite of sraddha, which offered food to the ancestors. Later works, the Aranyakas and the Upanishads, show a different outlook. They lean on reincarnation, care little about ancestor rites, and begin to interpret the old rituals philosophically. Even there the doctrine stays unfinished, and the early Upanishads give no specific mechanics.

    The idea was not only Indian. Notions of reincarnation turn up in the texts of ancient Greece during the first millennium BCE as well. The detailed doctrines bloomed from about the middle of that millennium, in Buddhism, in Jainism and in various schools of Hindu philosophy. The Sramana movements, which include Buddhism and Jainism, brought new emphasis from about the 6th century BC. They put human suffering at the center and started religious life from rebirth, redeath and the truth of pain. Early Buddhist Pali Suttas discuss this with terms such as Āgatigati.

    Who borrowed from whom is hard to say, since the evidence is slim and speculative. The theories most likely grew in parallel, with traditions influencing one another.

  • John Bowker calls a human birth a "rare opportunity to break the sequence of rebirth, thus attaining Moksha, release". That sentence captures how Hindu thought treats the whole cycle. In Hinduism, saṃsāra is the journey of the Ātman, which is eternal, indestructible and blissful. The body dies, but the Self does not. In fact the Ātman never reincarnates at all, since it cannot change. What is born, changes and dies is the body and personality.

    Karma links one life to the next. Good intent and good action shape a good future, and bad intent and bad action shape a bad one. This applies both to circumstances within the present life and to the forms and realms of later lives. Living by dharma is believed to improve the future. The journey gives the Ātman repeated chances to act well or badly and to pursue moksha.

    Hindu traditions name four main paths toward that release: bhakti, or devotion; karma, or work; jñāna, or knowledge; and raja, or meditation. The Upanishads concentrate on self-liberation, and the Bhagavad Gita surveys several paths. Harold Coward finds in the Upanishads a "very optimistic view regarding the perfectibility of human nature". The goal is a continuing journey of self-knowledge, ending in the discovery of the true Self within.

    All Hindu schools accept saṃsāra, but they disagree about what freedom looks like. Madhvacharya's Dvaita Vedanta holds that the individual Self and Brahman, identified with Vishnu and Krishna, are two different realities. Loving devotion and the grace of Vishnu bring release, which comes only after death, a state called videhamukti.

    Adi Shankara's Advaita Vedanta argues the opposite. For this nondualist school, the Ātman and Brahman are identical, and suffering comes from ignorance, impulsiveness and inertia. Meditation and self-knowledge lead to moksha, and this liberation can be reached within a single lifetime, which is called jivanmukti.

    Not every tradition agreed that the exit lay in knowledge or devotion. Some said it lay in stopping action altogether.

  • Jain teachers hold that each soul passes through 8,400,000 birth-situations as it circles through saṃsāra. The ancient Ajivika tradition shared this number, but Hindu and Buddhist thought did not. According to Padmanabh Jaini, the soul moves through five kinds of body: earth, water, fire, air and plant life.

    This makes ordinary life morally charged. Rainfall, farming, eating and even breathing all involve tiny living beings being born or dying, their souls changing bodies. Harming or killing any life form, a human being included, is a sin with negative karmic effects. Jain texts explicitly condemn injuring plants and minor life forms. Buddhist texts, by contrast, do not clearly condemn it, though some Buddhist and Hindu texts do warn against harming plants and seeds.

    In Jainism, saṃsāra and karma sit at the foundation of theology, and the tradition developed pioneering ideas on both from its earliest days. Saṃsāra means worldly life, marked by continuous rebirth and suffering. Souls begin in a primordial state and move along a continuum of consciousness. Karma pushes some souls upward and others backward. Unlike the Hindu view, the Jain cycle has a definite beginning and end.

    Jainism accepts the soul, called jiva, and gives it free will. That separates it from the Ajivikas, who joined saṃsāra to the belief that there is no free will. Jain teachers saw saṃsāra as bondage and urged asceticism and the stopping of action as the way out. Souls are plural, each in its own karma-saṃsāra cycle, so Jainism rejects both Hindu and Buddhist nondualism.

    One class of souls, the Ābhāvya, can never be liberated. A soul enters that state after an intentional and shockingly evil act. A freed soul is a Siddha, omniscient and eternal at the apex of the universe.

    Who can reach that apex has been argued within the faith. In the Digambara sect, women must first earn merit to be reborn as men. The Shvetambara sect holds that women too can win liberation.

  • Jeff Wilson describes Buddhist saṃsāra as the "suffering-laden cycle of life, death, and rebirth, without beginning or end". Buddhists picture it as a wheel, the Bhavacakra, and often use the term punarbhava, meaning re-becoming. Escaping the wheel, which is nirvāṇa, is the foundation and chief purpose of the religion.

    Paul Williams stresses that karma drives the wheel. Short of enlightenment, each person is reborn according to the "completely impersonal causal nature" of their own karma. The Four Noble Truths, accepted by every Buddhist tradition, aim to end this re-becoming and the suffering that goes with it.

    Buddhists built a detailed map of where beings are reborn. Early traditions counted five realms: hells (niraya), hungry ghosts (pretas), animals (tiryak), humans (manushya) and gods (devas). Later traditions listed six, splitting off the demi-gods, the asuras, who had been counted among the gods. In many Buddhist traditions today, the hungry ghost, heavenly and hellish realms correspond to the ritual, literary and moral spheres.

    All six realms are linked, and beings travel through them life after life. Ignorance, desire and purposeful karma, meaning ethical and unethical acts, keep them turning. Death is merely a state on the way to another existence.

    Buddhism also parts company with the Hindu account of the self. Where Hindu schools affirm the Ātman, Buddhist traditions deny that any such soul exists and teach Anattā, no self. They describe nirvāṇa through Anattā and Śūnyatā, emptiness, rather than through Ātman and Brahman.

    Steven Collins observes that the fuller Buddhist theory of rebirth grew out of fear of redeath. The antidote was called amata, the death-free, a state treated as another name for nirvāṇa.

  • Guru Nanak founded Sikhism in the 15th century, and Cole and Sambhi say he took up both the cyclical view of existence and the cyclical view of time from ancient Indian religions. In Sikh texts the word is sometimes spelled Saṅsāra. Sikhism holds that the body is perishable, that rebirth recurs, and that each cycle brings suffering.

    The Sikh view still differs from many Hindu schools. Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair points out that Sikhism firmly rests salvation on the grace of God. Its teachings urge bhakti, devotion, to the One Lord as the path to mukti. In this respect it resembles some devotional sub-traditions within Hinduism, such as Vaishnavism.

    Sikhism parts ways with Jainism on the question of asceticism. It does not accept that an ascetic life leads to liberation. Instead it values social engagement and the life of the householder, joined with devotion to One God as Guru. Here, the way out of the cycle runs through family and community life instead of through renunciation.

Updated

Common questions

What does saṃsāra mean?

It is a Sanskrit word meaning both wandering and world, and it names the cycle of life, death and rebirth that living beings are believed to undergo.

Is saṃsāra described in the Vedas?

Only faintly. The Rigveda hints at it in a few sections, but the idea develops fully in the early Upanishads and then in Buddhism, Jainism and Hindu philosophical schools.

What is the opposite of saṃsāra?

Liberation from the cycle, called moksha, mukti, nirvāṇa or kaivalya depending on the tradition.

How do Hindu and Buddhist views of saṃsāra differ?

Hindu traditions hold that an unchanging Ātman is the essence of each being, while Buddhist traditions deny a soul and teach Anattā, no self.

What is distinctive about the Jain view?

Jainism counts 8,400,000 birth-situations, holds that souls pass through earth, water, fire, air and plant bodies, and says the cycle has a definite beginning and end.

How does Sikhism view saṃsāra?

Sikhism accepts rebirth and suffering in each cycle, but it relies on the grace of God, devotion to One Lord and householder life rather than asceticism.

All sources

96 references cited across the entry

  1. 1BookVedic Cosmology and Ethics: Selected StudiesBrill Publishers — 2019
  2. 2Hinduism and Tribal ReligionsGarima Yadav — Springer Netherlands — 2018
  3. 3Flood, Gavin D. (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press
  4. 4A.M. Boyer: Étude sur l'origine de la doctrine du samsara. Journal Asiatique, (1901), Volume 9, Issue 18, S. 451–53, 459–68
  5. 5Yuvraj Krishan: . Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1997,
  6. 6BookBuddhism After Patriarchy: A Feminist History, Analysis, and Reconstruction of BuddhismRita M. Gross — State University of New York Press — 1993
  7. 7BookA Sanskrit-English DictionaryMonier Monier-Williams — Oxford University Press — 1923
  8. 8"Samsara" Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Mandala Publishing, 2013, pp. 147.
  9. 9BookKarma and Rebirth in Classical Indian TraditionsWendy Doniger — University of California Press — 1980
  10. 10BookDying, Death and Bereavement in a British Hindu CommunityShirley Firth — Peeters Publishers — 1997
  11. 11HinduismDavid J. Goa et al. — 2014-08-21
  12. 12BookEncyclopædia of Religion and EthicsJames Hastings et al. — T. & T. Clark — 1922
  13. 13BookYama, the Glorious Lord of the Other WorldKusum P. Merh — Penguin — 1996
  14. 14BookThe Penguin Swami Chinmyananda ReaderAnita Raina Thapan — Penguin Books — 2006
  15. 17Yuvraj Krishan (1988), Is Karma Evolutionary?, Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, Volume 6, pp. 24–26
  16. 18BookThe way to Nirvana: six lectures on ancient Buddhism as a discipline of salvationLouis de La Vallée-Poussin — Cambridge University Press — 1917
  17. 23BookEncyclopedia of Reincarnation and KarmaNorman C. McClelland — McFarland — 2010
  18. 24BookEncyclopedia of Death and the Human ExperienceClifton D. Bryant et al. — SAGE Publications — 2009
  19. 25A.M. Boyer (1901), Étude sur l'origine de la doctrine du samsara, Journal Asiatique, Volume 9, Issue 18, pp. 451–53, 459–68
  20. 27Gavin D. Flood (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, , p. 86, Quote: "The origin and doctrine of Karma and Samsara are obscure. These concepts were certainly circulating amo
  21. 28Padmanabh S. Jaini 2001 "Collected Paper on Buddhist Studies" Motilal Banarsidass, , p. 51, Quote: "Yajnavalkya’s reluctance to discuss the doctrine of karma in public (...) can perhaps be explained b
  22. 29Govind Chandra Pande, (1994) Life and Thought of Sankaracarya, Motilal Banarsidass , p. 135, Quote: (...) They Sramanas could have been connected with the Harappan Civilization which is itself enigmat
  23. 30BookThe Encyclopedia of World ReligionsRobert S. Ellwood et al. — Infobase Publishing — 2007
  24. 31Klaus Klostermaier, Mokṣa and Critical Theory, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Jan., 1985), pp. 61–71
  25. 32Norman E. Thomas (April 1988), Liberation for Life: A Hindu Liberation Philosophy, Missiology, Volume 16, Number 2, pp. 149–60
  26. 33Gerhard Oberhammer (1994), La Délivrance dès cette vie: Jivanmukti, Collège de France, Publications de l'Institut de Civilisation Indienne. Série in-8°, Fasc. 61, Édition–Diffusion de Boccard (Paris),
  27. 34M. von Brück (1986), Imitation or Identification?, Indian Theological Studies, Vol. 23, Issue 2, pp. 95–105
  28. 35Paul Deussen, , pp. 356–57
  29. 37BookThe Princeton Dictionary of BuddhismRobert E. Buswell Jr. et al. — Princeton University Press — 2013
  30. 38BookBuddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian TraditionPaul Williams et al. — Routledge — 2000
  31. 39BookPali–English DictionaryThomas William Rhys Davids et al. — Motilal Banarsidass — 1921
  32. 43BookBuddhism and Interfaith DialogueMasao Abe et al. — University of Hawaii Press — 1995
  33. 44JournalEnlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?David Loy — 1982
  34. 46BookIntroduction to World ReligionsChristopher Partridge — Fortress Press — 2013
  35. 47BookDevotional Hinduism: Creating Impressions for GodMukul Goel — iUniverse — 2008
  36. 48Christopher Chapple (1986), Karma and creativity, State University of New York Press, , pp. 60–64
  37. 49BookMoksha and the Hindu World ViewR.C Mishra — SAGE Publications — 2013
  38. 50Hindu conceptsGavin Flood — BBC — 2009-08-24
  39. 51BookThe Bloomsbury Companion to New Religious MovementsGeorge D. Chryssides et al. — Bloomsbury Academic — 2014
  40. 52BookOriental Thought: An Introduction to the Philosophical and Religious Thought of AsiaYong Choon Kim et al. — Rowman & Littlefield — 1981
  41. 54H Chaudhuri (1954), The Concept of Brahman in Hindu Philosophy, Philosophy East and West, 4(1), pp. 47–66
  42. 55BookThe Essentials of Indian PhilosophyM. Hiriyanna — Motilal Banarsidass — 1995
  43. 56BookThe JainsPaul Dundas — Routledge — 2003
  44. 57BookAhimsā, Anekānta, and JainismTara Sethia — Motilal Banarsidass — 2004
  45. 58BookCollected Papers on Jaina StudiesPadmanabh S. Jaini — Motilal Banarsidass — 2000
  46. 59BookJainism: An IntroductionJeffery D Long — I.B. Tauris — 2013
  47. 61Lambert Schmithausen (1991), Buddhism and Nature, Studia Philologica Buddhica, The International Institute for Buddhist Studies, Tokyo Japan, pp. 6–7
  48. 62Rod Preece (1999), Animals and Nature: Cultural Myths, Cultural Realities, , University of British Columbia Press, pp. 212–17
  49. 63Christopher Chapple (1990), Ecological Nonviolence and the Hindu Tradition, in Perspectives on Nonviolence, Springer, , pp. 168–77;L. Alsdorf (1962), Beiträge zur Geschichte von Vegetarismus und Rinde
  50. 65BookSaṃsāra and Rebirth, in BuddhismJeff Wilson — Oxford University Press — 2010
  51. 67BookA Companion to Buddhist PhilosophyPeter Harvey — John Wiley & Sons — 2015
  52. 68BookBuddhism: The Illustrated GuideKevin Trainor — Oxford University Press — 2004
  53. 69BookHaunting the Buddha: Indian Popular Religions and the Formation of BuddhismRobert DeCaroli — Oxford University Press — 2004
  54. 70BookBuddhist Cosmology: Philosophy and OriginsAkira Sadakata — Kōsei Publishing 佼成出版社, Tokyo — 1997
  55. 71BookBreaking the Circle: Death and the Afterlife in BuddhismCarl B. Becker — Southern Illinois University Press — 1993
  56. 72BookNirvana: Concept, Imagery, NarrativeSteven Collins — Cambridge University Press — 2010
  57. 73BookRationality and Mind in Early BuddhismFrank J. Hoffman — Motilal Banarsidass — 2002
  58. 74BookSikhism: A Guide for the PerplexedArvind-Pal Singh Mandair — Bloomsbury Academic — 2013
  59. 75BookSikhism and Christianity: A Comparative StudyW.O. Cole et al. — Springer — 2016
  60. 76BookThe Encyclopedia of SikhismH. S. Singha — Hemkunt Press — 2000
  61. 77BookThe Oxford Handbook of Sikh StudiesPashaura Singh et al. — Oxford University Press — 2014
  62. 78BookReligion: The Classical TheoriesJames Thrower — Georgetown University Press — 1999
  63. 79BookReligious Movements and Institutions in Medieval IndiaJ. S. Grewal — Oxford University Press — 2006
  64. 80BookHermeneutical Essays on Vedāntic TopicsJohn Geeverghese Arapura — Motilal Banarsidass — 1986
  65. 81JournalDharma and MoksaJ. A. B. Van Buitenen — 1957
  66. 82BookGod: A Very Short IntroductionJohn Bowker — Oxford University Press — 2014
  67. 84BookThe Perfectibility of Human Nature in Eastern and Western Thought: The Central StoryHarold Coward — State University of New York Press — 2008
  68. 85BookReligious Understandings of a Good Death in Hospice Palliative CareHarold Coward — State University of New York Press — 2012
  69. 86BookHinduism: An Alphabetical GuideRoshen Dalal — Penguin Books — 2010
  70. 87BookThe encyclopedia of religionMircea Eliade — Macmillan — 1987
  71. 88BookHinduism: Beliefs and PracticesJeaneane D. Fowler — Sussex Academic Press — 1997
  72. 89BookPerspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of HinduismJeaneane D. Fowler — Sussex Academic Press — 2002
  73. 90BookThe Continuum Companion to Hindu StudiesJessica Frazier et al. — Bloomsbury Academic — 2011
  74. 91BookFoundations of BuddhismRupert Gethin — Oxford University Press — 1998
  75. 92BookKarma and Rebirth in Classical Indian TraditionsPadmanabh Jaini — University of California Press — 1980
  76. 93BookEncyclopedia of Global ReligionMark Juergensmeyer et al. — SAGE Publications — 2011
  77. 94BookA Dictionary of BuddhismDamien Keown — Oxford University Press — 2004
  78. 95BookA Survey of Hinduism: Third EditionKlaus Klostermaier — State University of New York Press — 2010
  79. 96BookThe Meaning of Life, translated and edited by Jeffrey HopkinsDalai Lama — Wisdom — 1992
  80. 97BookAn Introduction to Buddhist PhilosophyStephen J. Laumakis — Cambridge University Press — 2008
  81. 98BookThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 2: N-ZJames Lochtefeld — Rosen Publishing — 2002
  82. 99BookBrahman: A Comparative TheologyMichael Myers — Routledge — 2013
  83. 101BookKarma and Rebirth: A Cross Cultural StudyGananath Obeyesekere — Motilal Banarsidass — 2005
  84. 102Jain Community: A Social SurveyVilas Adinath Sangave — Popular Prakashan — 1980
  85. 103BookBuddhist ThoughtPaul Williams — Routledge — 2002
  86. 104BookBuddhist ThoughtPaul Williams et al. — Routledge — 2012

Queue