Rigveda

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The first word of the Rigveda is Agni. Not a greeting, not a declaration of purpose, but the name of a god: the sacrificial fire. That opening word has now stood for somewhere between three thousand and four thousand years, recited aloud through every generation, never written down for most of its existence, passed from teacher to student with an exactness that scholars call unparalleled in the history of human memory. The Rigveda is the oldest known text in Vedic Sanskrit, and its earliest layers rank among the oldest surviving compositions in any Indo-European language. Some of its verses are still spoken at Hindu weddings today.

  What survives is a collection of 1,028 hymns gathered into ten books, containing around 10,600 verses. They were composed by poet-sages known as rishis, attributed to specific clans, and arranged with a deliberateness that took centuries to complete. The language itself preserves grammatical structures so old that they help modern scholars reconstruct Proto-Indo-European, the lost ancestor language of Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, English, and dozens of others.

  How does a text survive three millennia without paper, without printing, and for much of its life without any writing at all? And what kind of world produced it? Those are the questions this documentary will try to answer.

• 2. A Text Without Paper

  ›

  Scholars writing in 2014 described the dating of the Rigveda as something that "has been and is likely to remain a matter of contention and reconsideration." The core of the text is generally placed between c. 1500 and 1000 BCE, with some estimates extending as far back as c. 1900 BCE. No written records from those early centuries survive, if any were ever made at all.

  The oldest surviving manuscripts were discovered in Nepal and date to around 1040 CE. Michael Witzel has pointed to one tradition suggesting written copies may have existed as early as c. 800-1000 CE, and the Upanishads, a later layer of the same body of literature, were likely committed to writing around the mid-first millennium CE. There were even attempts to write the Vedas toward the end of the first millennium BCE, though those early efforts may have stalled because Smriti rules actively forbade writing the texts down.

  For those thousands of years in between, the Rigveda existed only in human minds. The oral tradition prescribed extremely structured enunciation: breaking Sanskrit compounds into stems and inflections, applying precise permutations of sound, and maintaining what the Padapatha format achieved by isolating each word in pausal form. The Samhitapatha version combined words according to sandhi rules and served as the memorized text for recitation. This constant engagement with sound gave rise, as a byproduct, to a scholarly tradition of morphology and phonetics that would eventually shape the work of Panini and the entire history of Sanskrit grammar.

  Today, thirty manuscripts of the Rigveda are held at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, collected in the nineteenth century by Georg Buhler, Franz Kielhorn, and others from locations including Kashmir, Gujarat, and the Central Provinces. The oldest manuscript in that Pune collection is dated to 1464 CE. In 2007, all thirty were added to UNESCO's Memory of the World International Register.

• 3. Clans, Sages, and the Battle of Ten Kings

  ›

  Books 2 through 7, the so-called family books, are the oldest portion of the Rigveda. Each is associated with a specific clan of rishis: Book 3 with the Vishvamitra clan, Book 6 with the Bharadwaja family, Book 7 with Vasishtha. These books are arranged by the decreasing length of their hymns and together account for 38 percent of the entire text.

  Ten families of rishis account for more than 95 percent of the verses across the whole collection. Most hymns are attributed to a single composer, and for each the Rigveda includes a lineage-specific hymn of formulaic structure. Tradition also names women among the composers: figures such as Apala Atreyi, cited at RV 8.91; Ghosa Kakshivati, at RV 10.39 and 10.40; and Lopamudra, at RV 1.179.12. Women appear disproportionately as speakers in dialogue hymns, and scholars note they come across as outspoken and more sexually confident than their male counterparts.

  The codification of the collection as a whole took place around c. 1200 BCE, according to Michael Witzel, when the center of Vedic culture shifted east from the Punjab into what is now Uttar Pradesh. Witzel traces the initial act of compilation to the aftermath of the Battle of the Ten Kings, fought under the Bharata king Sudas against other Puru rulers. Bringing together hymns from clans that had been on opposing sides was, on this reading, a political act, an effort to reconcile factions newly unified under a single kingdom. Asko Parpola places the final systematization of the Rigveda around 1000 BCE, at the time of the Kuru kingdom.

• 4. Ten Books, Ten Thousand Verses

  ›

  The first mandala has 191 hymns and 2,006 verses, making it the largest single book in the collection. The tenth mandala also contains 191 hymns but 1,754 verses. Together those two books account for 37 percent of the text. Language analysis indicates that the tenth mandala was composed and added last, and its authors appear to have known and relied on the contents of the preceding nine books.

  The arrangement within each mandala follows a strict logic. Hymns to each deity are grouped together, with Agni coming first and Indra second. Within each deity-group, hymns are ordered by the number of stanzas, descending. If two hymns share the same stanza count, the one with more syllables per metre comes first. This mathematical approach to ordering made memorization across generations more predictable and error-resistant.

  The ninth mandala stands apart from all the others. Its 114 hymns are entirely dedicated to Soma Pavamana, the purification of the sacred ritual drink, and they are arranged by prosody structure as well as length. The trishtubh metre, with four lines of eleven syllables, dominates the Rigveda at 40 percent of all verses. The gayatri metre, at 25 percent, is the next most common; it is also the metre of verse 3.62.10, the Gayatri Mantra, still among the most recited passages in Hinduism.

  The most studied surviving recension, the Shakala, contains 1,017 regular hymns plus an appendix of 11 additional ones, for a total of 1,028. The 1877 edition of Aufrecht counted the complete text at 10,552 individual verses and 39,831 padas, the smallest metrical unit. The Shatapatha Brahmana gives the number of syllables as 432,000.

• 5. A World Glimpsed in Verse

  ›

  The Rigveda offers almost no direct description of the society that produced it. Jamison and Brereton have stated plainly that it contains no evidence of any elaborate, pervasive, or structured caste system. Social stratification appears embryonic, more an ideal than an observed reality. What the hymns do reveal is a semi-nomadic pastoral community, with evidence of cattle raising and horse racing, and mentions of the plow and of agricultural divinities, suggesting farming was already present.

  Hymns such as 8.83, 8.70, 8.77, and 1.61 mention rice and porridge, though rice cultivation is not discussed. The term ayas, meaning metal, appears in the text but it is unclear which metal is meant. Iron is absent entirely, a gap scholars have used as one argument for dating the text before 1000 BCE. Hymn 5.63 refers to "metal cloaked in gold", suggesting that metalworking of some sophistication was underway.

  The linguistic composition of the text hints at early contact between different peoples. Sanskrit scholar Frits Staal has identified roughly 300 words in the Rigveda that belong to neither Indo-Aryan nor any other Indo-European language. Many of them, including kapardin, kumara, kumari, and kikata, appear to derive from Munda or proto-Munda languages associated with the eastern and northeastern regions of the subcontinent. Others trace to Dravidian languages from southern India, while a small number of non-Indo-European words, among them terms for camel, mustard, and donkey, may belong to a Central Asian language now otherwise lost. Michael Witzel has concluded from this evidence that Rigvedic Sanskrit speakers already knew and interacted regularly with Munda and Dravidian speakers.

  Hymn 10.117 explicitly addresses the ethics of generosity, arguing that helping someone in need ultimately benefits the helper. Hymns 9.112 and 9.113, noted by Jamison and Brereton, offer a more philosophical observation: that what all living beings fundamentally want is gain or an easy life, and that even a drop of water has a goal, namely to seek Indra.

• 6. Gods, Fire, and the Question of One

  ›

  Indra, the heroic god credited with slaying the enemy Vrtra, receives more hymns in the Rigveda than any other deity. Agni, the sacrificial fire, whose name is the text's very first word, follows closely. Soma, the sacred potion or the plant from which it was made, receives an entire mandala to himself. Alongside these three stand the Adityas, including Mitra-Varuna and Ushas the dawn goddess, as well as Savitr, Vishnu, Rudra, and a range of deified natural forces: the sky, the earth, the sun, the wind, the waters, and named rivers including the Sarasvati.

  The older hymns reflect a world of sacrifice and praise addressed to multiple gods. But the younger sections, particularly mandalas 1 and 10, move into territory that is harder to categorize. Hymn 1.164.46 is one of the most frequently cited passages in the entire text. It reads: "They call him Indra, Mitra, Varuna, Agni, and he is heavenly nobly-winged Garutman. To what is One, sages give many a title they call it Agni, Yama, Matarisvan." Max Muller coined the term "henotheism" specifically to describe the theology this verse expresses, one god perceived through many names, without the exclusive claims of monotheism.

  The Nasadiya Sukta, hymn 10.129, takes the questioning further. It speculates on the origin of the universe, considers multiple possible answers, and then openly asks whether anyone, even the god who oversees the highest heaven, actually knows the answer. Some scholars read an atheistic streak into passages like hymn 10.130. Others have argued that the Rigveda encompasses monotheism, polytheism, henotheism, and pantheism simultaneously, with the listener's own preference determining which frame applies.

  The concept of Rta, glossed as active realization of truth or cosmic harmony, appears in the text and would later develop into the Hindu concept of Dharma. The Rigvedic verses present it as effected by Brahman, a formulation Witzel describes as a significant and non-self-evident truth.

• 7. Translating the Untranslatable

  ›

  Friedrich August Rosen produced the first European translation of any part of the Rigveda, a partial Latin rendering of 121 hymns published in 1830, working from manuscripts brought back from India by Henry Thomas Colebrooke. In 1849, Max Muller published the first printed edition of the text in German, a six-volume work that became the most studied translation of the nineteenth century.

  H. H. Wilson produced the first English translation, issued between 1850 and 1888, in six volumes. Wilson's work was grounded in the fourteenth-century Sanskrit commentary of Sayancharya, a scholar who had studied at the Sringeri monastery. Muller later translated Sayana's commentary into English in 1856; Wilson's English version of the same work appeared that same year.

  Karl Friedrich Geldner completed the first serious scholarly German translation in the 1920s, but it was published only after his death, in 1951. Shorter anthologies have attracted significant readership, including those by Wendy Doniger in 1981 and Walter Maurer in 1986, though Jamison and Brereton have observed that such selections tend to create a distorted view of the text as a whole. In 2014, Jamison and Brereton themselves published a three-volume complete English translation through Oxford University Press, funded by the United States National Endowment for the Humanities beginning in 2004.

  Frits Staal has described the Rigveda as the most "obscure, distant and difficult for moderns to understand" of all ancient texts. The difficulty, he notes, means it is often misinterpreted or, in his words, "used as a peg on which to hang an idea or a theory." Karen Thomson, working at the University of Texas at Austin, has argued that much of the apparent obscurity is not intrinsic to the text but stems from the persistence of assumptions about ritual meaning inherited from the Vedic tradition itself, assumptions that linguists including Muller, Rudolf von Roth, and William Dwight Whitney had already begun to question in the nineteenth century. In 1994, Barend A. van Nooten and Gary B. Holland published the first attempt to restore the complete text to its original poetic form, identifying and correcting the sound changes and sandhi combinations that had altered the metre across centuries of oral transmission.