Buddhist modernism

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Buddhist modernism is a family of religious movements that began reshaping the oldest living religion on earth during the colonial era of the 19th century. In 1893, at the World Congress of Religion in Chicago, two men stepped before a Western audience to present something they called Buddhism but that traditional Asian monasteries would barely have recognized. Their names were Anagarika Dharmapala and Soyen Shaku, and the version of Buddhism they offered their listeners was stripped of gods, cosmology, and ritual. It was rational, it was compatible with science, and it fit neatly beside the spiritual anxieties of the modern West.

  What produced this radical reinterpretation? And what happened when it traveled back to Asia, carrying Western ideas in Buddhist clothing? Those are the questions at the heart of this story. Buddhist modernism is not simply a story of Eastern wisdom flowing West. It is a story of mutual reshaping, in which Western Orientalists, reform-minded Asian Buddhists, and nationalist intellectuals each had a hand in building something new, then claiming it was ancient.

• 2. Colonial Encounters and Misreadings

  ›

  The earliest Western accounts of Buddhism came from 19th-century European travelers and Christian missionaries who, according to scholar James Coleman, portrayed it as a "heathen religion with strange gods and exotic ceremonies." These writers were not trying to understand the tradition. They were trying to debunk it.

  By mid-century, European scholars offered a new picture, but the frame was still entirely Western. They described Buddhism as a "life-denying faith" that rejected the Christian ideas of "God, man, life, eternity." Its goal, nirvana, was translated then as "annihilation of the individual" - a grim end-point for a tradition the scholars found troublingly alien.

  The shift came in 1879, when Edwin Arnold published The Light of Asia. Arnold presented the life of the Buddha in a form that emphasized the parallels between the Buddha and Jesus Christ. A sympathetic Western audience now had a way to relate to the tradition. The sociopolitical developments sweeping Europe at the same time, and the rise of scientific theories such as those of Charles Darwin, created fresh interest in Buddhism as an alternative to Christian orthodoxy. But the Buddhism that emerged from this period of study had been shaped by the very Western premises those scholars brought to the reading.

• 3. Japan and the New Buddhism

  ›

  At the onset of the Meiji period in 1868, the Japanese state briefly persecuted Buddhism as "a corrupt, decadent, anti-social, parasitic, and superstitious creed, inimical to Japan's need for scientific and technological advancement." The government dedicated itself to eradicating a tradition it saw as foreign and incapable of building national cohesion. Industrialization compounded the damage, breaking down the parishioner system that had funded monasteries for centuries.

  Out of that crisis came a reform movement known as Shin Bukkyō, or New Buddhism. Its leaders were university-educated intellectuals steeped in Western philosophy and literature. Imakita Kosen, who would become D.T. Suzuki's teacher in Zen until his death in 1892, was a central figure. Responding to Reformation critiques of elite institutionalism, Kosen opened Engakuji monastery to lay practitioners, giving students like Suzuki access that would otherwise have been impossible.

  The reformers did not simply defend Buddhism from attack. They also saw it as Japan's ticket to cultural prestige in the global arena. Kosen himself was employed by the Japanese government as a "national evangelist" during the 1870s. Soyen Shaku, who succeeded Kosen as Suzuki's Zen teacher, was explicit about the strategic opportunity. Before the 1893 World Parliament of Religions in Chicago, Shaku reportedly said: "Religion is the only force in which the Western people know that they are inferior to the nations of the East. Let us wed the Great Vehicle to Western thought at Chicago next year." Zen would be promoted as the essential Japanese religion, embodying the bushido or samurai spirit, despite being a recent invention built largely on Western philosophical ideals.

• 4. D.T. Suzuki and the Zen Export

  ›

  D.T. Suzuki's works became popular in the West from the 1930s onward, and particularly through the 1950s and 1960s. Scholars have identified him as the most influential "Buddhist Modernist" in the Western imagination. He was uniquely positioned for the role: university-educated, fluent in English, and deeply versed in Western philosophy and literature.

  As Suzuki presented it, Zen Buddhism was a highly practical religion. Its emphasis on direct experience made it comparable to the forms of mysticism that scholar William James had described as the fountainhead of all religious sentiment. But scholar David McMahan has argued that Suzuki did something more specific: "In his discussion of humanity and nature, Suzuki takes Zen literature out of its social, ritual, and ethical contexts and reframes it in terms of a language of metaphysics derived from German Romantic idealism, English Romanticism, and American Transcendentalism."

  Suzuki himself went further than most modernists, claiming that the Zen element was not exclusively Buddhist but was present in Christianity, Islam, Taoism, and even Confucianism. Scholar Robert Sharf has argued that such claims also reveal a nationalist undercurrent: Suzuki had described Zen as the essence of the Japanese people, so to claim that Zen underlies all true religion was to imply a hierarchy with Japan at its summit. The reformulation had roots that scholar Martin Verhoeven traced clearly: though Japan was economically and technologically outmatched by Western powers, its leaders saw religion as the domain where cultural superiority could be reasserted.

• 5. Ambedkar and Navayana

  ›

  B. R. Ambedkar, the Indian Dalit leader, founded a Neo-Buddhist movement in the 1950s that had almost nothing in common with the Japanese or Western versions. On the 13th of October 1956, he held a press conference announcing his rejection of many traditional interpretations of Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism, as well as of Hinduism. He then adopted Navayana Buddhism and converted between 500,000 and 600,000 Dalits to his movement. He believed conversion was necessary for advancing equality and societal change.

  Ambedkar's Navayana abandoned practices and ideas that most Buddhists consider foundational: the institution of the monk after renunciation, karma, rebirth, samsara, meditation, nirvana, and the Four Noble Truths. Ambedkar saw several of these core doctrines as pessimistic flaws that may have been inserted into Buddhist scriptures by monks of a later era, not teachings of the Buddha himself. Karma and rebirth he considered superstitions.

  His book The Buddha and His Dhamma became the holy text of Navayana followers. Scholars Christopher Queen and Sallie King note that Ambedkar's formulation contains all the elements of religious modernism, while scholar Skaria notes that it differs from Western modernism because Ambedkar wove the ideas of Karl Marx into the ancient structure of the Buddha's thought. Among Navayana followers today, according to scholar Junghare, Ambedkar himself has become a deity and is worshipped in practice.

• 6. Western Naturalized Buddhism

  ›

  Bernard Faure, a professor of Religious Studies focused on Buddhism, has described Neo-Buddhism in the West as a modernist restatement, "a sort of impersonal flavorless or odorless spirituality." It is a Buddhism "a la carte," he argues, reformulated to fill a void in the contemporary West rather than to reflect the ancient canons.

  Some Western interpreters have coined the phrase "naturalized Buddhism" for several of these movements. This deflated secular Buddhism stresses compassion, impermanence, causality, and selfless persons, while dispensing with Bodhisattvas, nirvana, and rebirth. Meditation practices such as Vipassana remain central. According to James Coleman, the focus of most vipassana students in the West "is mainly on meditation practice and a kind of down-to-earth psychological wisdom."

  The rebirth doctrine has become the defining fault line. Scholar Damien Keown, a professor of Buddhist Ethics, notes that Westerners find "the ideas of karma and rebirth puzzling." Scholar Bhikkhu Bodhi argues that rebirth is integral to the sutras despite the discomfort of modernist interpreters. Thanissaro Bhikkhu rejects what he calls the "modern argument" that one can still obtain all the results of practice without accepting rebirth, stating that "rebirth has always been a central teaching in the Buddhist tradition."

  Scholar Melford Spiro frames the philosophical stakes starkly: a Buddhism without rebirth cannot address the existential question that traditional Buddhism was designed to answer - why to continue living rather than hasten the end of suffering by ending life itself. In traditional Buddhism, rebirth continues dukkha, and the path to its cessation runs through the fourth reality of the Four Noble Truths, not through death. Scholar Christopher Gowans has suggested that for traditional Buddhists in East, Southeast, and South Asia, naturalized Buddhism might come across as a pale imitation of what Buddhism means in their lives.

• 7. A Transnational Lineage

  ›

  Scholar Donald S. Lopez Jr. has proposed that Buddhist modernism has developed into "a kind of transnational Buddhist sect," an international Buddhism that, in his words, "transcends cultural and national boundaries, creating a cosmopolitan network of intellectuals, writing most often in English." This network is rooted neither in geography nor in traditional schools, but cuts across many of them.

  The canon of this transnational sect, Lopez argues, consists mainly of works by popular and semi-scholarly authors from the formative years of modern Buddhism: Soyen Shaku, Dwight Goddard, D.T. Suzuki, Alexandra David-Neel, Shunryu Suzuki, Sangharakshita, and Alan Watts. Controversially, Lopez goes further and includes the Fourteenth Dalai Lama, Thich Nhat Hanh (Zen master and founder of Plum Village and the global movement for Engaged Buddhism), and Chögyam Trungpa (the Tibetan Buddhist master credited with distinguishing the cultural aspects of Buddhism from its fundamental teachings).

  The movements this lineage has generated are wide-ranging: Humanistic Buddhism, Secular Buddhism, Engaged Buddhism, Vipassana, Tzu Chi, Dharma Drum Mountain, Fo Guang Shan, Won Buddhism, the Triratna Buddhist Community, and the New Kadampa Tradition, among others. Diamond Way Buddhism, started by Hannah and Ole Nydahl, has built roughly 600 dharma centers worldwide and become the largest convert movement in Central and Eastern Europe, though its interpretations of Tibetan Buddhism have drawn criticism from traditional practitioners. In 2001, David Brazier published what he called a "manifesto of the New Buddhism," arguing that traditional schools had become "instruments of state policy for subduing rather than liberating the population." The first comprehensive scholarly study of Buddhist modernism as a distinct phenomenon had been published in 1966 by Heinz Bechert - and the movements it named have only multiplied in the decades since.