Secular Buddhism

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Secular Buddhism begins with a question that cuts to the heart of an ancient tradition: does the Buddha's teaching point to a stairway to heaven, or to full human flourishing here on earth? That question, posed by scholar Winton Higgins, sits at the center of a modern western movement that has spent decades trying to retrieve what it sees as the original force of the dharma, stripped of rebirth, karma across multiple lifetimes, and the authority of monastic hierarchies.

  How did a tradition rooted in ancient India come to shed its enchanted canons in western living rooms and university hospitals? And what happens to Buddhism when you take the rebirth out of it?

• 2. Roots in Buddhist Modernism

  ›

  Buddhist modernism was born in Sri Lanka in the 19th century, not in a monastery but as an act of resistance. Buddhist leaders there began reshaping their tradition along what scholars describe as Protestant lines, making meditation and canonical texts available to lay practitioners while colonial Christian missionaries pressed hard against the tradition's legitimacy.

  That "form of resistance" spread rapidly to Japan, Burma, Thailand, and other Asian Buddhist countries. It challenged Christianity directly, presenting Buddhism as a "scientific religion" compatible with western rationalism. At the same time, it appealed to the Romantic reaction against rationalism that ran parallel through western culture. This double appeal - to science and to feeling - gave Buddhist modernism its traction in the west from the 1960s onward.

  But Buddhist modernism carried contradictions inside it. It inherited the discourses of modernity: Protestantism, scientific rationalism, and Romanticism, all of which pushed toward a world-affirming stance and individual introspection. Yet it also dragged along ancestral Buddhism's enchanted canons, belief in rebirth, and what Higgins calls "commentarial displacement" - the gradual replacement of the Buddha's original teachings with later commentarial traditions that vary markedly from the canon itself.

  Two persistent naivetes haunted Buddhist modernism, according to Higgins. The first was a reverence for tradition as an unchanging source of truth. The second was deference to monastic institutions, whose power structures and alliance with prevailing political and social orders went largely unexamined. Theravada Buddhism, for instance, reserved exclusive monastic status for male monks. These unexamined inheritances made a deeper acculturation of Buddhism in western host societies difficult, and set the stage for the secular response.

• 3. The Secular Break

  ›

  From the 1960s onward, as Buddhist centers multiplied across the west, practitioners began noticing the incongruities Higgins had named. What followed was a triple movement: demythologisation, detraditionalisation, and what scholars call the psychologicalisation of Buddhism.

  Detraditionalisation meant rejecting power structures legitimated by orthodox Buddhist metaphysics. Secular Buddhism refused what Higgins describes as "enchanted truth claims" and the authority of monasticism. It also rejected a fundamentalist reading of what the Buddha really meant, insisting instead on contextual interpretation - treating the ancient texts as responses to their own historical moment, applicable to present-day life but not binding as timeless truths.

  Higgins draws a parallel to the Reformation's effect on Christianity. Taylor's account of secularity describes how the Reformation shattered the "Ancient Regime" of self-evident truth-claims, sparked self-examination, fostered individuation, and undermined the authority of a priestly class. Secularity, in this account, is not simply the triumph of science over religion. It is a shift within religious frameworks themselves. Higgins applies the same logic to Buddhism in the west: the secular move is not a rejection of Buddhism but a transformation from within.

  Taylor's periodization helps clarify the timeline. He identifies 1800-1960 as an era of mobilization of religious institutions, with growing denominational diversity and an individualizing of conscience. Then the 1960s arrived and shattered that too, sacralizing individual authenticity at the expense of communal integration. In that climate, no single faith tradition could hold itself out as the one true way. Buddhism arrived in the west precisely at the moment when spiritual seekers faced a wide open marketplace of religious alternatives.

• 4. Meditation Under Scrutiny

  ›

  Insight meditation, the practice most associated with western vipassana centers, comes in for sharp criticism within secular Buddhist thought. Higgins argues that formulaic, technical approaches to meditation "actually deflects and short-circuits the inward probe" because so much of real meditative experience falls outside the template and gets rejected as "not meditation."

  When insight meditation was absorbed into cognitive behavioral therapy, Higgins argued the problem deepened. The technique, in that clinical framing, leaves the patient's subjectivity unexamined and functions as a form of conditioning aimed at mental hygiene that merely suppresses symptoms. Practitioners Brad Magid and Jason Siff extended the criticism further, questioning the idea that Buddhist practice is essentially about gaining proficiency in standardized techniques endorsed by a traditional school or teacher.

  John Kabat-Zinn represents a different chapter in this story. His secularization of mindfulness began at a retreat in 1979, when he asked himself how to take the heart of Buddha-dharma and bring it into the world without diluting or profaning it, yet also without locking it into a culturally bound framework that would make it impenetrable to people who were suffering and might find it useful. He subsequently developed the Mindfulness-based stress reduction program, an eight-week course that began drawing wider attention in the 1990s following his 1990 book Full Catastrophe Living. Zindel Segal, John Teasdale, and Mark Williams then built Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on that foundation.

  Kabat-Zinn's work pushed so far in the secular direction that mindfulness in many clinical contexts became almost completely divorced from Buddhist terminology, metaphysics, and soteriology altogether. Whether that counts as secular Buddhism or simply secular mindfulness is a question the tradition has not fully resolved.

• 5. The Proponents and Their Differences

  ›

  Nanavira Thera, born Harold Edward Musson in 1920 and ordained in Sri Lanka in 1950, was one of the earliest figures now associated with secular Buddhist thought. His book Notes on Dhamma, later published with his letters under the title Clearing the Path, reinterpreted dependent origination as applying only to suffering in one's present existence - not across three successive lifetimes as orthodox Theravada held. He died in 1965, but his work went on to influence Stephen Batchelor, who recognized a like-minded spirit in him.

  Nanavira is identified as an "existential Buddhist" because he recommended Sartre, Camus, Kierkegaard, and Heidegger to those trying to understand how the Buddha's teachings relate to modern thought. He drew a careful distinction, though: the existential philosophers find questions about existence ultimately unanswerable, while the Buddha's teachings, in Nanavira's reading, actually provide an answer.

  S. N. Goenka, born in Burma in 1924 and a student of Sayagyi U Ba Khin, taught that his vipassana practice was not a sectarian doctrine but "an art of living" from which people of every background could benefit. David L. McMahan regards Goenka as a marker of secularized Buddhism moving beyond Theravada's confines. Recent scholarship, however, has noted that such framings were in large part rhetorical: teachers like Goenka retained traditional religious commitments even while presenting their work in secular terms. Goenka died in 2013.

  Gil Fronsdal, a former Zen Buddhist later trained by senior Theravada teachers in Burma, prefers the term "Naturalistic Buddhism" to secular Buddhism. Fronsdal finds "secular" too oppositional to "religious" and "spiritual," and considers his own practice deeply religious - though by "religious" he means a sense of appreciation for the world so total it feels sacred. Unlike Batchelor, Fronsdal does not insist on directly confronting the supernatural roots of the tradition; he simply sees no need to include them in his own practice. Bhikkhu Bodhi has suggested this orientation might be better categorized as something other than secular Buddhism altogether.

  Jack Kornfield, a former Theravadin monk, co-founded the Insight Meditation Society in Massachusetts with Joseph Goldstein and Sharon Salzberg. From the IMS's beginning in 1976, Kornfield said the center wanted to present Buddhist meditation "without the complications of rituals, robes, chanting and the whole religious tradition." But scholars note that stripping away religious trappings does not by itself make a practice genuinely secular or naturalistic.

• 6. Stephen Batchelor's Reconfiguration

  ›

  Stephen Batchelor stands out among secular Buddhism's proponents because his project is not a modification of traditional Buddhism but a reconfiguration of the dharma's core elements. He arrived at that position through direct experience: he trained as a monk in Tibetan Buddhism and later in Zen, and found both wanting for a practitioner who needed a more secular and agnostic framework.

  In Buddhism Without Beliefs, published in 1998, Batchelor described Siddhartha Gautama as a historic person rather than an idealized religious icon, and scrutinized traditional doctrines of the afterlife. In Confession of a Buddhist Atheist, published in 2010, he went further, arguing that the Buddha did not teach rebirth and karma in the sense that later Buddhist traditions insisted. He sought to recover the original teachings of Siddhattha Gautama in their own historical context - the culture of the Gangetic plains in the fifth century BCE - while showing their relevance to contemporary life. Both moves are, as Batchelor notes, literally secular in that they invoke the Latin root saeculum: a particular age or generation.

  In After Buddhism, published in 2015, Batchelor drew a hard line. Groups like Soka Gakkai, Shambhala, and many mindfulness-meditation centers, he argued, retain an ambivalent relationship with inherited dogmas and hierarchies. They may reduce overt religiosity in their centers, but they have not critically reexamined the underlying worldview of Buddhism, still embedded in the cosmology and metaphysics of ancient India. For Batchelor, these movements qualify as secular Buddhist only if they directly confront and rearticulate the traditional doctrines of karma, rebirth, heavens, hells, and supernormal powers.

  Batchelor connects his skeptical approach to the Hellenistic philosophical tradition of Pyrrhonism. He suspects that Pyrrho encountered Buddhism while traveling in India as part of Alexander the Great's conquest, and that Pyrrhonism may reflect the skepticism of early Buddhism before it hardened into dogma. Writing in 2012, Higgins noted that secular Buddhism still lacked elaborated statements on the ultimate aim of dharma practice, but detected a stance of immanence - of locating flourishing within this life - in Batchelor's writings.

• 7. Ambedkar and the Caste System

  ›

  Bhim Rao Ambedkar, born in 1891, approached Buddhism from a direction entirely unlike the western figures discussed above. His concern was not with western scientific rationalism or the incongruities of Buddhist modernism in a new host culture. His concern was the caste system in India, and his engagement with Buddhism was inseparable from that political and social struggle.

  In 1956, the year of his death, Ambedkar established Navayana Buddhism - a highly secularized teaching derived from the Pali Canon that focused on ethical and social implications and deliberately stripped away the metaphysical claims that had underpinned the caste hierarchy he opposed. Though the emergence of Secular Buddhism as a distinct named movement is placed in the last decade of the 20th century, some scholars have retrospectively recognized Ambedkar's work as a significant precursor and included it within the movement's scope. His interpretation of Buddhism is also considered a branch of engaged Buddhism, which focuses on social and political application of Buddhist principles.

  The distance between Ambedkar's project and Batchelor's is instructive. Batchelor's secularism is primarily epistemological - skeptical of metaphysical claims, concerned with recovering authentic early teachings. Ambedkar's secularism was primarily political - a tool for dismantling a social order that weaponized traditional religious authority. Both rejected supernatural Buddhist cosmology, but for reasons rooted in very different contexts. That both are now housed within the same category of secular Buddhism speaks to how wide a tent the movement pitches.

• 8. Phenomenology and Finitude

  ›

  Nanavira Thera and Stephen Batchelor were both shaped by Heidegger's Sein und Zeit, and Higgins argues this is not coincidental. Phenomenology offers secular Buddhism what he calls "a conceptually rich post-metaphysical meeting point for ancient and modern thought and practice" far from the arena of gladiatorial truth-claims.

  Higgins draws on Taylor's concept of "excarnation" - the way religious systems, both Christian and Buddhist, have stripped human experience of its embodied character. Phenomenology, he argues, returns practitioners to a strong sense of embodiment. This aligns with the earliest Buddhist teachings, which emphasize the immediacy of embodied conscious experience in the awakening process.

  The question of finitude is where Higgins locates secular Buddhism's deepest potential. He argues that fully accepting the human condition means confronting mortality, and cites classical Greek mythology and philosophy as traditions that located the dignity of the mature human spirit precisely in that confrontation - in exercising agency in the face of aspects of life that impact a human being unpredictably and implacably. Heidegger's concept of "being-toward-death," part of his larger theory of embodied human agency under the rubric Dasein, resonates with this reading.

  Higgins cites Martha Nussbaum's Homer's Spirit, published in 1990, which argues against the aspiration to leave behind altogether the constitutive conditions of humanity as incoherent. In contrast, Nussbaum writes of "internal transcendence" - a bewildered human grace that comes from cultivating fine-tuned attention and responsiveness to human life. That phrase points toward what secular Buddhism at its most developed might become: not a ladder out of the human condition, but a way of inhabiting it more fully. John R. Tate's 2024 article in the Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies introduced a secular reading of the Lotus Sutra along related lines, proposing to replace Nichiren's phrase "Mystic Law" with "the conditional emergence of benevolence as gifted by time, process, and potential" - a formulation that reaches back to Tominaga Nakamoto's 1738 argument that the true core of the Lotus Sutra was a common principle of good.