Skip to content

Thorium

Ch. 1 of 8
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Contents

Thorium

8 sections
  • Thorium, element number 90, has an isotope called thorium-232 whose half-life is 14.0 billion years. That is roughly the age of the universe itself. The metal is soft and bright silver, and it tarnishes olive grey when it meets air. Ground to a fine powder, it can ignite on its own. Yet this slowly decaying element is estimated to be over three times as abundant in the Earth's crust as uranium. Its story begins with a mistake. It later lit rooms through gas mantles, ended up in camera lenses, and was even injected into patients. Today governments still debate whether it could fuel a new generation of reactors. How did one element end up in so many roles? Why was it announced twice? And why has a metal this plentiful stayed so far in the background?

  • In 1815, the Swedish chemist Jöns Jacob Berzelius examined an unusual sample of gadolinite from a copper mine in Falun, central Sweden. He saw traces of a white mineral in it and cautiously guessed that it was an oxide of an unknown element. Berzelius had already discovered cerium and selenium. He had also once announced an element called gahnium, which turned out to be zinc oxide. In 1817 he privately named the suspected element thorium, and its oxide thorina, after Thor, the Norse god of thunder. Then, in 1824, more deposits of the same mineral turned up in Vest-Agder, Norway. Berzelius retracted his claim. The mineral, later named xenotime, was mostly yttrium orthophosphate.

    In 1828, a black mineral turned up on Løvøya island, in Telemark county, Norway. Its finder was Morten Thrane Esmark, a priest who served as vicar in Telemark and studied its minerals as an amateur. He habitually mailed the most interesting specimens to his father, Jens Esmark. The elder Esmark was a noted mineralogist and a professor at the Royal Frederick University in Christiania, today called Oslo. He could not match the rock to any known mineral, so he sent a sample to Berzelius. This time the chemist concluded that it held a new element. He published his findings in 1829, having isolated an impure sample by reducing potassium pentafluorothorate(IV) with potassium metal. He reused the old name for the element and called the source mineral thorite.

    Berzelius got some things right and one thing wrong. He measured the mass ratio of thorium to oxygen in the oxide at 7.5, close to the true value of about 7.3. But he took the element to be divalent rather than tetravalent. That error put his atomic mass at 7.5 times oxygen's, or 120, when the true figure is 15 times oxygen's. Pure metal had to wait much longer. In 1914, the Dutch entrepreneurs Dirk Lely Jr. and Lodewijk Hamburger isolated metallic thorium for the first time.

  • Thorium-232 was formed in the r-process, short for rapid neutron capture, which probably takes place in supernovae and neutron star mergers. Those violent events scattered the element across the galaxy. Stars cannot build elements heavier than iron by ordinary fusion, because fusing past iron-56 absorbs energy instead of releasing it. Neutron capture is the only route. Stability drops abruptly past bismuth-209, so the r-process is the only stellar process that can make thorium and uranium.

    Across the universe, thorium ranks 77th in abundance, which makes it one of the rarest primordial elements. Only thulium, lutetium, tantalum, rhenium and uranium are rarer. Part of the reason is that thorium has been decaying away since the moment it formed.

    On Earth the picture changes. Thorium is the 37th most abundant element in the crust, at 12 parts per million. It tends to form oxide minerals that stay in the crust instead of sinking into the core, which is why chemists classify it as a lithophile. Because it is only a minor constituent of most minerals, people long assumed it was rare.

    Its decay also warms the planet. Thorium-232 is the largest single contributor to the Earth's internal heat, followed by uranium-238, potassium-40 and uranium-235. Because of that slow decay, the planet now holds about 80% of the thorium it started with.

    Monazite, a yellow or brown sand made mostly of rare-earth phosphates, is the main commercial source. Large deposits lie in India, South Africa, Brazil, Australia and Malaysia. The sand averages around 2.5% thorium, and some deposits reach 20%. It is chemically unreactive, which makes the thorium hard to extract. Thorite, the mineral in which thorium was first found, holds more thorium still. Radiation from the element wrecks the crystal structure of the minerals that contain it. Ekanite almost never occurs in an undamaged form for exactly this reason.

    Demand is so low that a mine cannot pay its way on thorium alone, so the metal is nearly always a by-product of rare-earth extraction. In 2014, world production of monazite concentrate was 2,700 tonnes. A table of lower-bound reserve estimates from that year totals 6,355 thousand tonnes worldwide.

  • In 1885, the Austrian chemist Carl Auer von Welsbach invented the gas mantle, and thorium finally had a job. The mantle was a portable light source. Burning gaseous fuel heated thorium oxide until it glowed. Thorium dioxide suits the task because it has the highest melting point of any known oxide, roughly 3300 degrees Celsius. It stays solid in a flame and makes the flame far brighter. Most substances give off light across a broad spread of wavelengths at high temperature. Thorium's light falls almost entirely in the visible range.

    Adding a little cerium dioxide changes the color. Thorium dioxide on its own gives off an intense blue light when heated in air, and mixing in cerium dioxide turns the light white. In 1901 came a surprise. A hot Welsbach mantle made with thorium dioxide and 1% cerium dioxide stayed at full glow when exposed to a cold, unlit mixture of flammable gas and air. No flame was needed. The effect is called candoluminescence. Thorium dioxide with cerium acts as a catalyst for the recombination of free radicals in a flame, and that releases large amounts of energy as light.

    Since the 1920s, thoriated tungsten wires have gone into electronic tubes and into the cathodes and anticathodes of X-ray tubes and rectifiers. A small addition of thorium lowers the energy electrons need to escape from tungsten, so they are emitted at far lower temperatures. Thorium forms a layer one atom thick on the tungsten surface. Because thorium reacts with oxygen, tube makers added an evaporated magnesium layer to trap impurities, which gave the tubes their characteristic metallic inner coating. Transistors in the 1950s cut into this use without ending it. Thorium dioxide also went into tungsten powder for lamp filaments, where it slows recrystallisation, and into welding electrodes, where it improves arc stability.

    Heat-resistant laboratory crucibles were another use for thorium dioxide, either as the main ingredient or mixed with zirconium dioxide. An alloy of 90% platinum and 10% thorium once served as a catalyst for oxidising ammonia to nitrogen oxides. It lost out to an alloy of 95% platinum and 5% rhodium, which proved more durable. Magnesium alloyed with thorium, known as Mag-Thor, found some aerospace uses.

    Thorium tetrafluoride works as an anti-reflection material in multilayered optical coatings. It is transparent to wavelengths from 0.350 to 12 micrometres, which spans near ultraviolet, visible and mid infrared light. Thorium dioxide in glass raises the refractive index and lowers dispersion, which suits high-quality camera and scientific lenses. Over years, the radiation can darken such lenses and turn them yellow, and it degrades film, though the health risks are minimal. Lengthy exposure to intense ultraviolet light can restore yellowed lenses to colourless.

  • In 1898, the German chemist Gerhard Carl Schmidt found that thorium is radioactive. Later that year the Polish-French physicist Marie Curie, working independently, reached the same result. Thorium became the second radioactive element, after the French physicist Henri Becquerel found radioactivity in uranium in 1896.

    From 1899, the New Zealand physicist Ernest Rutherford and the American electrical engineer Robert Bowie Owens studied thorium's radiation and found that it varied significantly. The cause was a short-lived gas given off by thorium, which proved to be a new element. It is now called radon, and it is the only one of the rare radioelements discovered in nature as a daughter of thorium rather than uranium. From 1900 to 1903, Rutherford worked with the British physicist Frederick Soddy and showed that thorium decays at a fixed rate into a series of other elements. That work gave science the idea of the half-life.

    The biological effect of radiation was discovered in 1903, and radioactivity excited scientists and the public alike. In the 1920s, thorium's radioactivity was promoted as a cure for rheumatism, diabetes and sexual impotence. In 1932, after a federal investigation into the health effects of radioactivity, the United States banned most of these uses. By then 10,000 people in the country had been injected with thorium during X-ray diagnosis. They were later found to suffer health problems such as leukaemia and abnormal chromosomes. Public interest in radioactivity faded by the end of the 1930s.

    A 1981 study by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States estimated that using a thorium gas mantle every weekend would be safe for a person. It was not safe for the people who manufactured mantles, nor for the soils around some factory sites. The reason lies in the decay products. The daughters of thorium have much lower melting points than thorium dioxide, so they volatilise whenever a mantle is heated. In the first hour of use, large fractions of radium-224, radium-228, lead-212 and bismuth-212 escape. Most of a user's dose comes from inhaling radium, up to 0.2 millisieverts per use, about a third of the dose from a mammogram.

    In the 1990s, most uses that did not depend on thorium's radioactivity declined quickly as safer replacements were found. Some mantle makers switched to materials such as yttrium, and rare-earth oxides such as lanthanum took over in lenses. Yet as recently as 2007, some companies still sold thorium mantles without adequate information about their radioactivity. A few even claimed falsely that the mantles were non-radioactive.

    Thorium itself is odourless and tasteless. Its chemical toxicity is low, because the metal and its common compounds barely dissolve in water. Once inside the body, about three-quarters of it accumulates in the skeleton, and the kidneys and faeces clear it slowly. Symptoms can take as much as thirty years to appear after ingestion. Breathing thorium dust raises the risk of cancers of the lung, pancreas and blood. Workers who process monazite were found with thorium above recommended limits, but no adverse health effects appeared at those moderately low levels.

    The metal also carries a risk of fire. In 1956, the Sylvania Electric Products explosion occurred in New York City during the reprocessing and burning of thorium sludge. Nine people were injured, and one died of complications from third-degree burns. In 1964, the United States Department of the Interior listed thorium as "severe" in a table of ignition and explosibility of metal powders. Dust clouds ignited at 270 degrees Celsius.

    The average human body contains about 40 micrograms of thorium and takes in about three micrograms a day, mostly by inhaling dust. In the Tamil Nadu coastal areas of India, residents may receive a natural radiation dose ten times above the worldwide average. On the northern coast of Brazil, from south Bahia to Guarapari, radiation levels reach up to 50 times the world average. Guarapari is a city with radioactive monazite sand beaches. Thorium dust from weapons testing ranges has also been blamed for a high incidence of birth defects and cancer at Salto di Quirra, on the Italian island of Sardinia. Thorium is used in the guidance systems of some missiles.

  • Dmitri Mendeleev's periodic table of 1869 put thorium and the rare-earth elements outside the main body of the table, after the alkaline earth metals. At that time chemists believed these metals were divalent. Once the rare earths proved mostly trivalent and thorium tetravalent, Mendeleev moved cerium and thorium into group IV in 1871. Cerium was soon placed in a separate lanthanide series. Thorium stayed with group 4, because it resembled titanium and zirconium.

    Up to the late 19th century, chemists unanimously agreed that thorium and uranium were the heaviest members of group 4 and group 6. They considered the existence of the lanthanides in the sixth row a one-off fluke. In 1892, the British chemist Henry Bassett suggested a second extra-long row to hold known and undiscovered elements, treating thorium and uranium as analogues of the lanthanides. In 1913 the Danish physicist Niels Bohr published his model of the atom. It implied that the seventh row should fill f-shells before d-shells, just as the sixth row did with the lanthanides.

    Acceptance came slowly. The first transuranic elements showed that, from plutonium onward, elements have dominant +3 and +4 oxidation states like the lanthanides. So the actinides really were filling f-orbitals, and the transition-metal-like chemistry of the early actinides was the exception. In 1945, the American physicist Glenn T. Seaborg and his team discovered americium and curium. Seaborg then proposed the actinide concept. It made thorium the second member of an f-block series, not the heavier relative of hafnium.

    The chemistry still carries traces of the confusion. Thorium sits in the f-block, yet its outer electrons mostly occupy 6d orbitals, not 5f. Relativistic effects, which grow stronger near the bottom of the periodic table, cause this oddity. Thorium almost always loses all four valence electrons and appears with a +4 charge. In its ionization energies and redox potentials it resembles zirconium and hafnium more than cerium. Its +4 compounds are usually colourless or yellow.

    The metal's crystal structure gives away its true family. If thorium kept a pure 6d arrangement, it would be hexagonal close packed like titanium, zirconium and hafnium. Instead it is face-centred cubic, which can only be explained by involving the 5f states. That proves it is metallurgically a true actinide. In January 2021, researchers observed aromaticity in a cluster anion of 12 bismuth atoms stabilised by a single thorium cation at its center. The compound proved surprisingly stable.

  • Thorium-232 cannot sustain a chain reaction on its own. It is fertile rather than fissile, because it can be converted into fissile uranium-233. In the thorium fuel cycle, slow neutrons strike thorium-232, which captures one to become thorium-233. That isotope decays in 21.8 minutes to protactinium-233, which then takes 27 days to become uranium-233. A rarer isotope, thorium-229, is fissionable. Its bare critical mass is estimated at 2839 kilograms, dropping to 994 kilograms with steel reflectors.

    The arithmetic of neutrons is tight. The fission of uranium-233 yields 2.48 neutrons on average. One neutron keeps the reaction going and one more breeds a new atom from the fertile material. That leaves a margin of 0.45 neutrons, about 18% of the neutron flux, for losses. The cycle parallels the uranium cycle in fast breeder reactors, where uranium-238 becomes plutonium-239.

    Supporters point to several advantages. Uranium-233 has a 92.0% chance of fission upon neutron capture, against 85.5% for uranium-235 and 73.5% for plutonium-239. A single neutron capture by uranium-238 produces transuranic waste alongside plutonium-239. Thorium-232 produces that waste only after five captures, which never happens to 98-99% of its nuclei. Thorium dioxide also has a higher melting point and thermal conductivity than uranium dioxide, plus a lower thermal expansion. It does not oxidise into a less dense compound as uranium dioxide does. Thorium is particularly suitable as fertile material in molten salt reactors.

    The disadvantages are just as specific. Used fuel is difficult and dangerous to reprocess, because many daughters of thorium-232 and uranium-233 are strong gamma emitters. Every route to uranium-233 leaves some uranium-232, which decays into the strong gamma emitter thallium-208. That makes uranium-233 easy to detect and dangerous to handle. The impracticality of separating it also limits its use for proliferation. Protactinium-233, with its 27-day half-life, soaks up neutrons as a poison. Molten salt reactors therefore extract it from the active zone during operation. Protactinium-231, with a half-life of 32,760 years, contributes to the long-term radiotoxicity of spent fuel.

    The International Nuclear Energy Agency's critics are not the only skeptics. The Nuclear Energy Agency predicts that the thorium cycle will never be commercially viable while uranium remains abundant, a situation it says may persist "in the coming decades". Mastering the irradiation and processing of thorium-232 also demands more advanced technology than the uranium and plutonium cycle. One country has stronger reasons than most to look past uranium.

  • In 1943, the Manhattan Project contracted two private companies, Union Carbide and Chevron, to quietly survey uranium and thorium deposits around the world. The focus was uranium, but thorium joined the survey early. Monazite sands turned up in Brazil, the Netherlands East Indies and Travancore in India. The project pursued none of them.

    Thorium also appeared in a wartime design problem. When gram quantities of plutonium were first made, the minor isotope plutonium-240 turned out to undergo significant spontaneous fission. That threatened the viability of a gun-type plutonium weapon. While the Los Alamos team worked on an implosion design, the Chicago team looked for reactor solutions. Eugene Wigner proposed using the contaminated plutonium to drive the conversion of thorium into uranium-233 in a special converter reactor. Concerns about contamination from uranium-232 were voiced. Implosion progressed well enough that the converter was never developed. Its design still had enormous influence. It was the first detailed description of a highly enriched, water-cooled, water-moderated reactor, similar to later naval and commercial power reactors.

    During the Cold War, the United States explored thorium-232 as a source of uranium-233 for a nuclear bomb and fired a test bomb in 1955. It concluded that a uranium-233 bomb would be very potent. But it offered few sustainable technical advantages over the uranium-plutonium bombs of the day, partly because pure uranium-233 is difficult to produce. Thorium metal also went into the radiation case of at least one deployed American design, the W71.

    The earliest thorium-based reactor was built in 1962 at the Indian Point Energy Center in Buchanan, New York. Progress stayed slow in most countries because uranium was relatively abundant. In the 20th century, three reactors were built in India and twelve elsewhere. India's case is different. It has the largest estimated thorium reserves in the world and only sparse uranium. In the 1950s it targeted energy independence through a three-stage nuclear power programme.

    Alvin Radkowsky of Tel Aviv University in Israel was head designer of the Shippingport Atomic Power Station in Pennsylvania, the first American civilian reactor to breed thorium. He founded a consortium to develop thorium reactors. It drew in Raytheon Nuclear Inc. and Brookhaven National Laboratory in the United States, and the Kurchatov Institute in Russia. The International Atomic Energy Agency began large-scale research on thorium reactors in 1996. A year later the United States Department of Energy started its own.

    In the 21st century, thorium's potential for reducing nuclear proliferation and its waste characteristics revived interest in the fuel cycle. In 2009, the chairman of the Indian Atomic Energy Commission said that India has a "long-term objective goal of becoming energy-independent based on its vast thorium resources." India has projected meeting as much as 30% of its electrical demand with thorium-based nuclear power by 2050. In February 2014, the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre in Mumbai presented its design for the Advanced Heavy Water Reactor, which burns thorium in its fuel core.

    China may be the first to have tried to commercialise the technology. On the 16th of June 2023, its National Nuclear Safety Administration licensed the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, to operate TMSR-LF1. This is a 2 MWt liquid-fuel thorium molten salt experimental reactor, completed in August 2021. China is believed to hold one of the largest thorium reserves in the world. The exact size has not been disclosed, but it is estimated to be enough to meet the country's total energy needs for more than 20,000 years.

Updated

Common questions

Who discovered thorium and how did it get its name?

Jöns Jacob Berzelius identified thorium in 1828 from a black mineral found by Morten Thrane Esmark on Løvøya island in Norway. He named it after Thor, the Norse god of thunder, reusing a name from an earlier mistaken claim.

Why was thorium used in gas mantles?

Thorium dioxide has the highest melting point of any known oxide and stays solid in a flame. It makes the flame much brighter, and its light falls almost entirely in the visible range.

How long does thorium-232 take to decay?

Thorium-232 has a half-life of 14.0 billion years, roughly the age of the universe. It starts the thorium decay series, which ends at stable lead-208.

Why is thorium considered as a nuclear fuel?

Thorium-232 is fertile and can be converted into fissile uranium-233. Supporters point to its abundance, to less long-lived transuranic waste, and to a fuel that melts at a higher temperature than uranium dioxide.

Is thorium dangerous?

Its chemical toxicity is low, but breathing its dust raises cancer risk and its decay products are more hazardous. Powdered thorium metal is also pyrophoric and ignites spontaneously in air.

All sources

150 references cited across the entry

  1. 1Marshall, James L., and Virginia R. Marshall. "Rediscovery of the Elements: Thorium—Løvøya, Langesundsfjord, Norway." The Hexagon, vol. 93, no. 1, 2001, pp. 4-6.
  2. 3BookSmithells Metals Reference BookW. F. Gale et al. — Butterworth-Heinemann — 2003
  3. 4BookNon-organic chemistry in three volumesAcademy — 2007
  4. 5JournalAnomalous fcc crystal structure of thorium metal.B. Johansson et al. — 1995
  5. 6BookRadiochemistry and Nuclear ChemistryS. Nagy — EOLSS Publications — 2009
  6. 7BookHandbook of Nuclear ChemistryH. C. Griffin — Springer Science+Business Media — 2010
  7. 8BookConcepts of Modern PhysicsA. Beiser — McGraw-Hill Education — 2003
  8. 10Mineral Yearbook 2012United States Geological Survey
  9. 11JournalAn efficient chelator for complexation of thorium-227Thomas Ramdahl et al. — September 2016
  10. 14JournalFirst observation of spontaneous fission and search for cluster decay of ThR. Bonetti et al. — 1995
  11. 15JournalNew isotope Th and odd-even staggering in α-decay energies for nuclei with Z > 82 and N < 126H. B. Yang — 2022
  12. 16JournalOccurrence of the (4n + 1) series in natureD. F. Peppard et al. — 1952
  13. 17JournalNuclear structure of ThE. Ruchowska et al. — 2006
  14. 19JournalDirect detection of the Th nuclear clock transitionL. von der Wense et al. — 2016
  15. 20BookThe Feynman Lectures on PhysicsR. Feynman et al. — Addison-Wesley — 1977
  16. 223–6: Uranium Thorium DatingInstitute for Structure and Nuclear Astrophysics, University of Notre Dame
  17. 23Uranium-Thorium DatingO. Davis — Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona
  18. 24Geochronology, Dating, and Precambrian Time: The Beginning of the World As We Know ItJ. P. Rafferty — Rosen Publishing — 2010
  19. 25Handbook of Nuclear ChemistryA. Vértes — Springer Science+Business Media — 2010
  20. 27JournalSynthesis, structure, and reactivity of crystalline molecular complexes of the {C5H3(SiMe3)23Th}1– anion containing thorium in the formal +2 oxidation stateBill Evans — 2014
  21. 28JournalGround Levels and Ionization Potentials for Lanthanide and Actinide Atoms and IonsW. C. Martin et al. — July 1974
  22. 29BookThe Periodic LawDavid Johnson — The Royal Society of Chemistry — 1984
  23. 30BookInorganic Chemistry of Main Group ElementsR. Bruce King — Wiley-VCH — 1995
  24. 31BookThe Elements, in Handbook of Chemistry and PhysicsC. R. Hammond — CRC Press — 2004
  25. 32BookThe radiochemistry of thoriumHyde, E. K. — National Academy of Sciences — 1960
  26. 33JournalNitric Acid Dissolution of Thorium. Kinetics of Fluoride-Catalyzed ReactionRobert Lee Moore et al. — May 1957
  27. 34JournalThermal expansions of NpO2 and some other actinide dioxidesToshiyuki Yamashita et al. — 1997
  28. 35JournalHistorical perspective on the physics of artificial lightingClaude Weisbuch — March 1, 2018
  29. 36JournalHydrated metal ions in aqueous solution: How regular are their structures?I. Persson — 2010
  30. 37BookLanthanide and Actinide ChemistryS. Cotton — John Wiley & Sons — 2006
  31. 38MagazineHeavy-metal cluster sets size record for metal aromaticityKatrina Krämer — 2021-01-04
  32. 39JournalSynthesis, structure, and reactivity of crystalline molecular complexes of the {C5H3(SiMe3)23Th}1− anion containing thorium in the formal +2 oxidation stateRyan R. Langeslay et al. — 2015
  33. 40JournalIsolation and Characterization of Elusive Tetrabenzylthorium ComplexesSuzanne Bart — August 2, 2023
  34. 41JournalAbundances of the elements in the solar systemA.G.W. Cameron — September 1973
  35. 42JournalThe formation of the heaviest elementsAnna Frebel et al. — January 2018
  36. 43JournalThe End of Nucleosynthesis: Production of Lead and Thorium in the Early GalaxyI. U. Roederer et al. — 2009
  37. 44JournalSynthesis of the Elements in StarsE. Margaret Burbidge et al. — 1 October 1957
  38. 45BookPrinciples of Stellar Evolution and NucleosynthesisD. D. Clayton — McGraw-Hill Education — 1968
  39. 46Composition of the Universe – Element AbundanceAnne Helmenstine — 28 June 2022
  40. 47BookGeochemistry: an introductionF. Albarède — Cambridge University Press — 2003
  41. 48JournalThoruranium (U-236) as the extinct natural parent of thorium: The premature falsification of an essentially correct theoryT. J. Trenn — 1978
  42. 49JournalPossible Existence of Cm or Its Daughters in NatureH. Diamond et al. — 1956
  43. 50JournalCurium-248 in the Early Solar SystemM. N. Rao et al. — 1973
  44. 51JournalEffects of a Primeval Endowment of UD. B. Rosenblatt — 1953
  45. 53JournalOccurrence of the (4n + 1) Series in NatureD. F. Peppard et al. — 1952
  46. 54ReportThoriumAgency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry — 2016
  47. 55BookNature's Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the ElementsJohn Emsley — Oxford University Press — 25 August 2011
  48. 58BookNature's building blocks: an A–Z guide to the elementsJ. Emsley — Oxford University Press — 2011
  49. 59Tor's Fight with the GiantsGoogle Arts & Culture
  50. 60BookThe Analytical Chemistry of Thorium: International Series of Monographs on Analytical ChemistryD. I. Ryabchikov et al. — Elsevier — 2013
  51. 61BookA System of Chemistry of Inorganic BodiesT. Thomson — Baldwin & Cradock and William Blackwood — 1831
  52. 62BookThe Lost Elements: The Periodic Table's Shadow SideM. Fontani et al. — Oxford University Press — 2014
  53. 63JournalUndersökning af några Mineralier. 1. Phosphorsyrad Ytterjord.J. J. Berzelius — 1824
  54. 64Xenotime-(Y)Mindat database
  55. 65Morten Thrane EsmarkR. S. Selbekk — Kunnskapsforlaget — 2007
  56. 67JournalUndersökning af ett nytt mineral (Thorit), som innehåller en förut obekant jordJ. J. Berzelius — 1829
  57. 68JournalThe discovery of the elements. XI. Some elements isolated with the aid of potassium and sodium: Zirconium, titanium, cerium, and thoriumM. E. Weeks — 1932
  58. 71JournalÜber metallisches ThoriumL. F. Nilson — 1882
  59. 72ReportProduction of Rarer MetalsG. Meister — United States Atomic Energy Commission — 1948
  60. 74JournalThe Place of Zinc, Cadmium, and Mercury in the Periodic TableWilliam B. Jensen — August 2003
  61. 75JournalRayons émis par les composés de l'uranium et du thoriumM. Curie — 1898
  62. 78JournalThorium and uranium radiationRutherford, E. — 1899
  63. 81BookLow-Level Radioactive Waste Regulation-Science, Politics and FearM. Burns — CRC Press — 1987
  64. 82BookThe periodic system of chemical elementsJ. W. van Spronsen — Elsevier — 1969
  65. 83BookThe Making of the Atomic BombR. Rhodes — Simon & Schuster — 2012
  66. 84BookChemistry: Principles and reactionsW. L. Masterton et al. — Cengage Learning — 2011
  67. 85JournalEvidence for relativistic effects in the chemistry of element 104A. Türler et al. — 1998
  68. 86BookThe Chemistry of Superheavy ElementsJ. V. Kratz et al. — Springer-Verlag — 2014
  69. 87JournalComparisons between radioactive and non-radioactive gas lantern mantlesE. Furuta et al. — 2000
  70. 88JournalHealth and hazardous wasteNew Jersey Department of Health — 1996
  71. 89JournalThorium and yttrium in gas lantern mantlesTerrence P. Toepker — 1996
  72. 90JournalBeyond low-level activity: on a "non-radioactive" gas mantleK. Poljanc et al. — 2007
  73. 91Thorium Fuel for Nuclear EnergyM. Kazimi — American Scientist — 2003
  74. 92JournalChina prepares to test thorium-fuelled nuclear reactorSmriti Mallapaty — 9 September 2021
  75. 93ReportThorium fuel utilization: Options and trendsS. Majumdar et al. — International Atomic Energy Agency — 1999
  76. 94Nuclear Power in IndiaWorld Nuclear Association — 2017
  77. 97JournalMore power to thorium?John S. Friedman — September 1997
  78. 99NewsScientist urges switch to thoriumB. Evans — ABC News — 2006
  79. 103BookThe First Nuclear Era: The life and times of a technological fixerAlvin Weinberg — AIP Press — 1994
  80. 104BookNow It Can Be Told: The Story of the Manhattan ProjectLeslie R. Groves — Harper and Co — 1983
  81. 105ThoriumWorld Nuclear Association — 2017
  82. 106ReportLRL Interest in U-233W.K. Woods — Battelle Memorial Institute — 1966
  83. 107Classification Bulletin WNP-118U.S. Department of Energy — 12 March 2008
  84. 108ThoriumUnited States Geological Survey — 2012
  85. 110ReportThorium. Statistics and InformationUnited States Geological Survey — 2017
  86. 111JournalCandoluminescence and radical-excited luminescenceH.F. Ivey — 1974
  87. 112BookThe Book of Non-electric Lighting: The classic guide to the safe use of candles, fuel lamps, lanterns, gaslights, & fire-view stovesTim Matson — Countryman Press — 2011
  88. 115BookElectronic Devices and CircuitsG.J. Pridham — Elsevier — 2016
  89. 116Book70 years of radio tubes and valves: a guide for electronic engineers, historians, and collectorsJohn W. Stokes — Vestal Press — 1982
  90. 117BookWeld Like a Pro: Beginning to advanced techniquesJ. Uttrachi — CarTech Inc. — 2015
  91. 118BookWelding: Principles and ApplicationsL. Jeffus — Cengage Learning — 2016
  92. 119Thoriated Camera Lens (ca. 1970s)Oak Ridge Associated Universities — 2021
  93. 120BookOptical Thin FilmsJ.D. Rancourt — SPIE Press — 1996
  94. 121BookOptical Interference CoatingsN. Kaiser et al. — Springer — 2013
  95. 122JournalA Rule for Determining Fissile IsotopesYigal Ronen — March 2006
  96. 123JournalSome remarks on the fissile isotopesY. Ronen — 2010
  97. 124PlutoniumWorld Nuclear Association — 2017
  98. 125Uranium 233 FissionNuclear Power — 2023
  99. 126Interactive Chart of NuclidesBrookhaven National Laboratory
  100. 127NewsThorium test beginsWorld Nuclear News — 2013
  101. 128BookIntroduction to Weapons of Mass Destruction: Radiological, Chemical, and BiologicalR. E. Langford — John Wiley & Sons — 2004
  102. 129BookFluorinated Materials for Energy ConversionTs. Nakajima et al. — Elsevier — 2005
  103. 131BookThe National Politics of Nuclear Power: Economics, Security, and GovernanceB. K. Sovacool et al. — Routledge — 2012
  104. 132Nuclear Energy FAQsArgonne National Laboratory — 2014
  105. 133BookNuclear Energy and Global Governance: Ensuring Safety, Security and Non-proliferationT. Findlay — Routledge — 2011
  106. 134Thorium: Radiation ProtectionUnited States Environmental Protection Agency — August 2000
  107. 135Natural Decay Series: Uranium, Radium, and ThoriumArgonne National Laboratory — 2005
  108. 136JournalRadioactivity released from burning gas lantern mantlesJ. W. Luetzelschwab et al. — 1984
  109. 137JournalDose estimates for exposure to radioactivity in gas mantlesC. J. Huyskens et al. — 1985
  110. 138Radioactivity in Lantern MantlesAustralian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency
  111. 139Toxicological Profile for ThoriumAgency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry U.S. Public Health Service — 1990
  112. 140ReportUntersuchungen zur radiologischen Emission des Uran-Tailings SchneckensteinB. Merkel et al. — Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Landesentwicklung — 1988
  113. 141JournalBioleaching of critical trace metals by Sphingomonas desiccabilis: substrate-driven selectivity in Earth and space analoguesLuca Tonietti et al. — 2026
  114. 142ReportExplosibility of metal powdersM. Jacobson et al. — United States Department of the Interior — 1964
  115. 145NewsSad Memories of '56 Sylvania ExplosionM. Harrington — 2003
  116. 146Thorium ToxFAQsAgency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
  117. 148JournalMeasurements of environmental radiation exposure dose rates at selected sites in BrazilPfeiffer, W. C. et al. — 1981
  118. 149NewsItalian military officials' trial ignites suspicions of links between weapon testing and birth defects in SardiniaEmma Alberici — Australian Broadcasting Corporation — 29 January 2019
  119. 150Thorium: Does Crustal Abundance Lead to Economic Availability?B. W. Jordan et al. — Colorado School of Mines — 2014

Queue