Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Manhattan Project

15 min listen · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • The Manhattan Project built the first nuclear weapons in human history, yet it operated in such secrecy that most of its nearly 130,000 employees had no idea what they were working on. A sprawling research and development program led by the United States, with close collaboration from the United Kingdom and Canada, the project consumed nearly two billion dollars and stretched across dozens of sites from New Mexico to British Columbia. At its heart was a race against a terrifying possibility: that Nazi Germany might develop a nuclear bomb first. The questions worth sitting with are large. How did a theoretical discovery in a European laboratory translate, in just a few years, into weapons that could level a city? Who made the decisions, and who paid the price? And what did the project leave behind once the war was over?

  • Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann discovered nuclear fission in 1938, and within months the world of physics understood what it might mean. Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch worked out the theoretical explanation, and the implication was stark: a uranium bomb was no longer science fiction. In Britain, Rudolf Peierls and Otto Frisch at the University of Birmingham calculated in their March 1940 memorandum that the critical mass of uranium-235 was small enough to fit inside a contemporary bomber. That single calculation launched the British atomic bomb project and its MAUD Committee. Across the Atlantic, the American response was slower. Leo Szilard and Eugene Wigner drafted what became known as the Einstein-Szilard letter in August 1939, warning President Franklin D. Roosevelt of the potential for "extremely powerful bombs of a new type" and urging him to secure uranium stockpiles. Roosevelt responded by calling on Lyman Briggs to chair an Advisory Committee on Uranium, but critics inside the scientific community, including Karl T. Compton, complained that Briggs operated at a "peace-time government bureau tempo" that was dangerously out of step with the emergency at hand. The breakthrough came partly through a visit by the Australian physicist Mark Oliphant, who flew to the United States in late August 1941 and discovered that crucial MAUD Committee findings had not reached key American physicists. Oliphant spoke persuasively to Ernest O. Lawrence at Berkeley, who then spoke to James B. Conant, Arthur H. Compton, and George B. Pegram. On the 9th of October 1941, President Roosevelt approved accelerating the atomic program, forming a Top Policy Group that included Vice President Henry A. Wallace, Vannevar Bush, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, and General George C. Marshall.

  • Colonel Leslie Groves was assigned to lead the Army's component of the project in June 1942, a posting he initially did not want. He assumed command on the 23rd of September 1942, and within a single day he had already attended a Stimson meeting that established the Military Policy Committee. General George C. Marshall ordered Groves promoted to brigadier general on the logic that a general's title would hold more sway with the academic scientists he would need to manage. Groves moved quickly to consolidate control. One early obstacle was the project's supply priority rating. The War Production Board's top civilian ratings were AA-1 through AA-4, and the project had been stuck at AA-3, the same level as a TNT plant in Pennsylvania. Groves went to the chairman of the War Production Board, Donald Nelson, and pressed for broad authority to issue an emergency AAA rating. Nelson initially refused. When Groves threatened to take the matter to the president, Nelson capitulated. Even so, AAA proved too powerful for routine needs and AA-3 too weak; Groves only secured the AA-1 authority he actually wanted on the 1st of July 1944. Finding a director for the weapons design laboratory, Project Y, was equally complicated. The obvious candidates were the laboratory heads Urey, Lawrence, and Arthur Compton, but none could be spared. Compton recommended J. Robert Oppenheimer, a theoretical physicist from the University of California who was already deeply familiar with bomb design. Oppenheimer had never won a Nobel Prize, which made some scientists skeptical, and his security file raised serious concerns: his wife Kitty, his girlfriend Jean Tatlock, and his brother Frank all had communist associations. A long conversation in October 1942 convinced Groves and Nichols that Oppenheimer was the right choice. Groves personally waived the security requirements and issued Oppenheimer's clearance on the 20th of July 1943.

  • The Manhattan Project required industrial infrastructure on a scale that had never existed before, and it had to be constructed in near-total secrecy. The site in Tennessee that became Oak Ridge was selected partly because the Tennessee Valley Authority could supply ample electric power and the rivers could cool the reactors. On the 29th of September 1942, Under Secretary of War Robert P. Patterson authorized the acquisition of roughly 56,000 acres by eminent domain at a cost of about three and a half million dollars. Around 1,000 families were displaced; some received only two weeks' notice to leave farms their families had worked for generations. The population of Oak Ridge swelled far beyond initial projections, peaking at 75,000 in May 1945, by which time more than 82,000 people were employed at the Clinton Engineer Works alone. The weapons design laboratory at Los Alamos in New Mexico was chosen on Oppenheimer's recommendation, partly because he owned a ranch nearby and expressed a strong personal preference for the site, citing its natural beauty. Patterson approved the purchase on the 25th of November 1942. Groves initially set aside $300,000 for construction, three times Oppenheimer's own estimate, but by the time the contractor Sundt finished work on the 30th of November 1943, over seven million dollars had been spent. The Hanford Engineer Works in Washington state was established to house the plutonium production reactors, selected because it was isolated and sat beside the Columbia River. Colonel Franklin Matthias reported that the Hanford Site near Richland was "ideal in virtually all respects." At its peak, the construction camp at Hanford was the third most populous settlement in the state of Washington, operating a fleet of more than 900 buses, a larger fleet than the city of Chicago ran at the time.

  • Natural uranium is overwhelmingly composed of uranium-238, the non-fissile isotope, with uranium-235 making up only 0.7 percent. Separating the two was one of the project's central engineering challenges. Three technologies ultimately succeeded: electromagnetic separation, gaseous diffusion, and thermal diffusion, and in February 1943 Groves devised the scheme of feeding the output of one plant directly into the next as the input. The electromagnetic separation plant, designated Y-12, ran on a technology called the calutron, a name derived from California, university, and cyclotron. The process required an extraordinary amount of electrical copper, which was in desperately short supply. So the project borrowed silver instead, eventually using 14,700 short tons of bullion transferred from the West Point Bullion Depository. The operators who ran the calutrons were known as the Calutron Girls, trained Tennessee Eastman employees who had no idea what the machines actually did. Their calutrons initially enriched uranium-235 to between 13 and 15 percent. By January 1945, strenuous recovery efforts had raised the proportion of uranium feed that emerged as usable product to 10 percent. The gaseous diffusion plant, K-25, was a four-story structure half a mile long arranged in a U shape and containing 54 contiguous buildings. The total cost, including the later K-27 addition, reached $480 million. The thermal diffusion plant, S-50, built in just two months beginning in July 1944, became the first stage in the final cascade: it raised enrichment from 0.71 to 0.89 percent, the K-25 plant then brought it to roughly 23 percent, and Y-12 boosted it to approximately 89 percent. About 50 kilograms of uranium enriched to 89 percent were delivered to Los Alamos by July 1945.

  • Plutonium existed in nature only in trace amounts, and producing it in usable quantities meant building the world's first industrial-scale nuclear reactors. On the 2nd of December 1942, a team led by Enrico Fermi initiated the first artificial self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction beneath the bleachers of Stagg Field at the University of Chicago, in an experimental reactor called Chicago Pile-1. Fermi used a coded phone call to report the success to Conant in Washington, describing himself as "the Italian navigator" who had just landed in the new world. The far larger reactors at Hanford followed. Work began on Reactor B, the first of the planned 250-megawatt reactors, on the 10th of October 1943. When it was powered up beginning on the 13th of September 1944, disaster struck almost immediately. Shortly after midnight on the 27th of September, the power level began dropping and by 06:30 the reactor had shut down completely. The culprit, identified by physicist Chien-Shiung Wu, was neutron poisoning from xenon-135, whose nuclear cross section turned out to be 30,000 times that of uranium. The reactor could only recover because a DuPont engineer, George Graves, had added 504 tubes beyond the original design of 1,500, filling in the corners in a move the scientists had regarded as wasteful overengineering. By loading all 2,004 tubes, the reactor could overpower the xenon poisoning. Plutonium, once produced, presented a second problem at the weapon design stage. Los Alamos received its first sample of reactor-bred plutonium in April 1944, and within days Emilio Segrè discovered that it contained a much higher concentration of plutonium-240 than cyclotron plutonium, causing up to five times the spontaneous fission rate. Inserting this material into a gun-type weapon would cause a premature chain reaction, a failure mode the scientists called a fizzle. This discovery killed the gun-type plutonium design entirely and forced the project to bet everything on the more complex implosion approach.

  • Physicist Seth Neddermeyer had been working on implosion since 1943 as an alternative weapon design: the idea was to use precisely shaped explosive charges to squeeze a subcritical sphere of fissile material into a smaller, denser configuration faster than a gun assembly could manage. In September 1943, John von Neumann, who had experience with shaped charges, proposed using a spherical configuration rather than the cylindrical one Neddermeyer had been pursuing. When reactor-bred plutonium ruled out the gun-type bomb in mid-1944, Oppenheimer reorganized the entire Los Alamos laboratory in August of that year to concentrate on implosion, creating two new divisions: X Division for explosives, led by George Kistiakowsky, and G Division for the gadget itself, led by Robert Bacher. The final design used 32 explosive lenses arranged to focus the detonation inward in a spherical shape, with 20 hexagonal and 12 pentagonal lenses, each weighing about 80 pounds, resembling a soccer ball. Getting the detonation timing precisely right required exploding-bridgewire detonators, a new invention developed at Los Alamos by a group led by Luis Alvarez, with two detonators per lens for reliability. To study converging shock waves, Robert Serber developed the RaLa Experiment, which placed a gamma ray source inside a metal sphere surrounded by explosive lenses and used an ionization chamber to capture what was effectively an X-ray movie of the implosion. David Hawkins later wrote in his history of the Los Alamos project that "RaLa became the most important single experiment affecting the final bomb design." Inside the assembly, a polonium-beryllium neutron initiator called an "urchin" was designed to start the chain reaction at precisely the right moment; the chemistry and metallurgy work on polonium was directed by Charles Allen Thomas of the Monsanto Company through what became known as the Dayton Project, which required up to 500 curies of polonium per month.

  • Despite the project's intense security apparatus, Soviet atomic spies penetrated the program. The identities of those spies, and the extent of what they passed on, became some of the defining intelligence questions of the early Cold War. The British scientists who arrived at Los Alamos in December 1943, a group that included Niels Bohr, Otto Frisch, Klaus Fuchs, Rudolf Peierls, and Ernest Titterton, were among the project's most valuable contributors. Fuchs was later identified as one of the Soviet sources. Through Operation Alsos, Manhattan Project personnel also worked in Europe, sometimes behind enemy lines, gathering nuclear materials and documents and rounding up German scientists to assess how far Germany's own nuclear program had advanced. The first nuclear device ever detonated was an implosion bomb, tested at White Sands Proving Ground in New Mexico on the 16th of July 1945 in the Trinity test. The two weapon designs used in the war were Little Boy, a gun-type uranium bomb, and Fat Man, the implosion plutonium design. Fat Man had originally been a lower-priority fallback, but plutonium's incompatibility with gun-type assembly had made it the primary design. The Hyde Park Aide-Memoire, signed by Roosevelt and Churchill in late September 1944, had already suggested that once a bomb was "finally available" it might be used against Japan, who should be warned that bombardment would be repeated until surrender. In August 1945, Little Boy was dropped on Hiroshima and Fat Man on Nagasaki. The Manhattan Project maintained control over American atomic weapons research and production until the formation of the United States Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947, an institution whose existence it had made both necessary and inevitable.

Common questions

Who directed the Manhattan Project and where was it headquartered?

Major General Leslie Groves of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers directed the Manhattan Project from 1942 to 1946, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. J. Robert Oppenheimer served as director of the Los Alamos Laboratory, where the weapons were designed. The project's name came from its first Army headquarters in Manhattan, at 270 Broadway in New York.

How many people worked on the Manhattan Project and what did it cost?

At its peak the Manhattan Project employed nearly 130,000 people. The total cost was nearly two billion U.S. dollars. Over 80 percent of that cost went toward building and operating the facilities that produced the fissile material, rather than the weapons themselves.

What were the main production sites of the Manhattan Project?

The three principal sites were the Clinton Engineer Works at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, where enriched uranium was produced; the Hanford Engineer Works near Richland, Washington, where plutonium was produced in the world's first industrial-scale nuclear reactors; and the Los Alamos Laboratory in New Mexico, where the weapons were designed. Dozens of supporting facilities operated across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

Why did the Manhattan Project abandon the gun-type plutonium bomb design?

In April 1944, physicist Emilio Segrè discovered that plutonium produced in reactors contained a much higher concentration of plutonium-240 than cyclotron plutonium, causing up to five times the spontaneous fission rate. In a gun-type weapon this would trigger a premature chain reaction before the components could fully assemble, producing a fizzle rather than a full explosion. The project shifted entirely to the more complex implosion design as a result.

What was the Trinity test and when did it take place?

Trinity was the first detonation of a nuclear device in history. It took place on the 16th of July 1945 at White Sands Proving Ground in New Mexico. The device tested was an implosion-type plutonium bomb, the same design as Fat Man, which was later used at Nagasaki.

How did the United Kingdom contribute to the Manhattan Project?

Britain contributed foundational research through the MAUD Committee and its earlier Tube Alloys program, which was more advanced than the American project in 1940 and 1941. A British Mission arrived at U.S. sites in December 1943 and included scientists such as Niels Bohr, Otto Frisch, Klaus Fuchs, and Rudolf Peierls. Groves later said there probably would have been no bomb dropped on Hiroshima without Britain's impetus, particularly Winston Churchill's. The Quebec Agreement of August 1943 formalized the joint effort and established that nuclear weapons could not be used against another country without the mutual consent of both nations.

All sources

332 references cited across the entry

  1. 4Wellerstein (2021) p. 35Wellerstein — 2021
  2. 5Rhodes (1986) p. 337–338Rhodes — 1986
  3. 7Past ChancellorsBerkeley Office of the Chancellor
  4. 8Rhodes (1986) p. 322–325Rhodes — 1986
  5. 9Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 42Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  6. 10Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 39–40Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  7. 11Rhodes (1986) p. 372–374Rhodes — 1986
  8. 12Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 43–44Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  9. 13Jones (1985) p. 30–33Jones — 1985
  10. 14Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 45Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  11. 15Jones (1985) p. 35Jones — 1985
  12. 16Williams (1960) p. 3–4Williams — 1960
  13. 17Nichols (1987) p. 32Nichols — 1987
  14. 18Jones (1985) p. 35–36Jones — 1985
  15. 19Jones (1985) p. 37–39Jones — 1985
  16. 20NewsWhy They Called It the Manhattan ProjectWilliam J. Broad — 30 October 2007
  17. 21Jones (1985) p. 41–44Jones — 1985
  18. 22Fine, Remington (1972) p. 652Fine, Remington — 1972
  19. 23Nichols (1987) p. 174Nichols — 1987
  20. 24Groves (1962) p. 40Groves — 1962
  21. 25Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 76–78Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  22. 26Fine, Remington (1972) p. 654Fine, Remington — 1972
  23. 27Jones (1985) p. 57–61Jones — 1985
  24. 28Fine, Remington (1972) p. 657Fine, Remington — 1972
  25. 29Rhodes (1986) p. 416Rhodes — 1986
  26. 30Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 103Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  27. 31Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 42–44Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  28. 32Groves (1962) p. 41Groves — 1962
  29. 33Serber, Rhodes (1992) p. 21Serber, Rhodes — 1992
  30. 34Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 54–56Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  31. 35Rhodes (1986) p. 417Rhodes — 1986
  32. 36Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 44–45Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  33. 37Bethe (1991) p. 30Bethe — 1991
  34. 38Rhodes (1986) p. 419Rhodes — 1986
  35. 39Ignition of the Atmosphere with Nuclear BombsE. J Konopinski et al. — Los Alamos National Laboratory — 1946
  36. 40Bethe (1991) p. xi, 30Bethe — 1991
  37. 41MagazineScience:Atomic Footprint17 September 1945
  38. 42Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 81Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  39. 43Jones (1985) p. 74–77Jones — 1985
  40. 44Groves (1962) p. 4–5Groves — 1962
  41. 45Fine, Remington (1972) p. 659–661Fine, Remington — 1972
  42. 46Groves (1962) p. 27–28Groves — 1962
  43. 47Groves (1962) p. 44–45Groves — 1962
  44. 48Groves (1962) p. 22–23Groves — 1962
  45. 49Jones (1985) p. 80–82Jones — 1985
  46. 50Groves (1962) p. 61–63Groves — 1962
  47. 51Nichols (1987) p. 72–73Nichols — 1987
  48. 52JournalThe British MissionFakley, Dennis C. — Winter–Spring 1983
  49. 53Hyde Park Aide-Mémoire (18 September 1944)Atomic Heritage Foundation — 2022
  50. 54Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 116–117Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  51. 55Groves (1962) p. 25–26Groves — 1962
  52. 56Jones (1985) p. 78Jones — 1985
  53. 57Johnson, Jackson (1981) p. 39–43Johnson, Jackson — 1981
  54. 58Fine, Remington (1972) p. 663–664Fine, Remington — 1972
  55. 60Jones (1985) p. 327–328Jones — 1985
  56. 61Johnson, Jackson (1981) p. 49Johnson, Jackson — 1981
  57. 62Johnson, Jackson (1981) p. 8Johnson, Jackson — 1981
  58. 63Johnson, Jackson (1981) p. 14–17Johnson, Jackson — 1981
  59. 64Jones (1985) p. 88Jones — 1985
  60. 65Jones (1985) p. 443–446Jones — 1985
  61. 67Johnson, Jackson (1981) p. 168–169Johnson, Jackson — 1981
  62. 68Jones (1985) p. 83–84Jones — 1985
  63. 69Fine, Remington (1972) p. 664–665Fine, Remington — 1972
  64. 71Groves (1962) p. 66–67Groves — 1962
  65. 72Jones (1985) p. 328–331Jones — 1985
  66. 73Secretary of Agriculture granting use of land for Demolition RangeLos Alamos National Laboratory — 8 April 1943
  67. 74Civilian Displacement: Los Alamos, NMAtomic Heritage Foundation — 2017-07-26
  68. 77Hunner (2004) p. 31–32Hunner — 2004
  69. 78Hunner (2004) p. 29Hunner — 2004
  70. 79Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 230–232Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  71. 80Jones (1985) p. 67–71Jones — 1985
  72. 81FRONTIERS Research Highlights 1946–1996Office of Public Affairs, Argonne National Laboratory — 1996
  73. 82JournalA Manhattan Project PostscriptJohn Walsh — 19 June 1981
  74. 83Libby (1979) p. 214–216Libby — 1979
  75. 84CP-1 (Chicago Pile 1 Reactor)Argonne National Laboratory; U.S. Department of Energy
  76. 85Compton (1956) p. 144Compton — 1956
  77. 86Jones (1985) p. 195–196Jones — 1985
  78. 87JournalThe Development of the first chain reaction pileEnrico Fermi — 1946
  79. 89Groves (1962) p. 58–59Groves — 1962
  80. 90Groves (1962) p. 68–69Groves — 1962
  81. 91Jones (1985) p. 108–111Jones — 1985
  82. 92Jones (1985) p. 342Jones — 1985
  83. 93Jones (1985) p. 452–457Jones — 1985
  84. 94Thayer (1996) p. 16Thayer — 1996
  85. 95Jones (1985) p. 401Jones — 1985
  86. 96Jones (1985) p. 463–464Jones — 1985
  87. 97Canada's historical role in developing nuclear weaponsCanadian Nuclear Safety Commission
  88. 99Waltham (2002) p. 8–9Waltham — 2002
  89. 100ZEEP – Canada's First Nuclear ReactorCanada Science and Technology Museum
  90. 101Jones (1985) p. 8, 62Jones — 1985
  91. 102Jones (1985) p. 107–108Jones — 1985
  92. 103Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 201–202Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  93. 104Smyth (1945) p. 39Smyth — 1945
  94. 105Smyth (1945) p. 92Smyth — 1945
  95. 107Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 85–86Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  96. 108Nichols (1987) p. 47Nichols — 1987
  97. 109Jones (1985) p. 295Jones — 1985
  98. 110Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 285–288Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  99. 111Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 291–292Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  100. 112Ruhoff, Fain (1962) p. 3–9Ruhoff, Fain — 1962
  101. 113Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 31Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  102. 114Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 87–88Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  103. 115Smyth (1945) p. 154–156Smyth — 1945
  104. 116Jones (1985) p. 157Jones — 1985
  105. 117Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 22–23Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  106. 118Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 30Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  107. 119Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 64Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  108. 120Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 96–97Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  109. 121Nichols (1987) p. 64Nichols — 1987
  110. 122Kemp (2012) p. 281–287, 291–297Kemp — 2012
  111. 123Jones (1985) p. 117–119Jones — 1985
  112. 124Smyth (1945) p. 164–165Smyth — 1945
  113. 125Fine, Remington (1972) p. 684Fine, Remington — 1972
  114. 126Nichols (1987) p. 42Nichols — 1987
  115. 127Jones (1985) p. 133Jones — 1985
  116. 128Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 153Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  117. 129The Calutron GirlsSmithDRay
  118. 130Jones (1985) p. 126–132Jones — 1985
  119. 131Jones (1985) p. 138–139Jones — 1985
  120. 132Jones (1985) p. 140Jones — 1985
  121. 133Nichols (1987) p. 131Nichols — 1987
  122. 134Jones (1985) p. 143–148Jones — 1985
  123. 135Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 30–32, 96–98Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  124. 136Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 108Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  125. 137Jones (1985) p. 150–151Jones — 1985
  126. 138Jones (1985) p. 154–157Jones — 1985
  127. 139Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 126–127Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  128. 140Jones (1985) p. 158–165Jones — 1985
  129. 141Jones (1985) p. 167–171Jones — 1985
  130. 142Smyth (1945) p. 161–162Smyth — 1945
  131. 143Jones (1985) p. 172Jones — 1985
  132. 144Jones (1985) p. 175–177Jones — 1985
  133. 145Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 170–172Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  134. 146Jones (1985) p. 178–179Jones — 1985
  135. 147Jones (1985) p. 180–183Jones — 1985
  136. 148Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 300–302Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  137. 149Hansen, 1995b p. V-112Hansen, 1995b
  138. 150Smyth (1945) p. 130–132Smyth — 1945
  139. 151Jones (1985) p. 204–206Jones — 1985
  140. 152Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 208–210Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  141. 153Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 211Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  142. 154Jones (1985) p. 209Jones — 1985
  143. 155Groves (1962) p. 78–82Groves — 1962
  144. 156Jones (1985) p. 210Jones — 1985
  145. 157Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 222–226Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  146. 158Thayer (1996) p. 139Thayer — 1996
  147. 159Hanford Cultural and Historic Resources Program (2002) p. 1.16Hanford Cultural and Historic Resources Program — 2002
  148. 160Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 216–217Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  149. 161Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 304–307Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  150. 162Jones (1985) p. 220–223Jones — 1985
  151. 163Howes, Herzenberg (1999) p. 45Howes, Herzenberg — 1999
  152. 164Libby (1979) p. 182–183Libby — 1979
  153. 165Thayer (1996) p. 10Thayer — 1996
  154. 166Thayer (1996) p. 141Thayer — 1996
  155. 167Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 184–185Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  156. 168Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 204–205Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  157. 169Jones (1985) p. 214–216Jones — 1985
  158. 170Jones (1985) p. 212Jones — 1985
  159. 171Thayer (1996) p. 11Thayer — 1996
  160. 172Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 219–222Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  161. 173Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 226–229, 237Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  162. 174Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 242–244Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  163. 175Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 312–313Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  164. 176Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 246Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  165. 177Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 129–130Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  166. 178Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 130–131Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  167. 179Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 245–248Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  168. 180Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 311Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  169. 181Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 245Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  170. 182Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 294–296Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  171. 183Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 299Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  172. 184Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 301–307Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  173. 185Alvarez (1987) p. 131–136Alvarez — 1987
  174. 186Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 148–154Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  175. 187Hawkins, Truslow, Smith (1961) p. 203Hawkins, Truslow, Smith — 1961
  176. 188Hansen, 1995a p. I-298Hansen, 1995a
  177. 189Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 235Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  178. 190Gilbert (1969) p. 3–4Gilbert — 1969
  179. 191Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 308–310Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  180. 192Hansen, 1995b p. V-123Hansen, 1995b
  181. 193Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 244–245Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  182. 194Baker, Hecker, Harbur (1983) p. 144–145Baker, Hecker, Harbur — 1983
  183. 195Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 288Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  184. 196Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 290Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  185. 197Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 330–331Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  186. 199Jones (1985) p. 465Jones — 1985
  187. 200Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 318–319Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  188. 201Jones (1985) p. 478–481Jones — 1985
  189. 202Book100-ton Test: Piezo Gauge MeasurementsRaymond L. Walker — U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Technical Information Division — 1950
  190. 203BookBirthplace of the Atomic Bomb: A Complete History of the Trinity Test SiteWilliam S. Loring — McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers — 2019
  191. 204Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 360–362Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  192. 205Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 174–175Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  193. 206Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 365–367Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  194. 207Jones (1985) p. 512Jones — 1985
  195. 208Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 367–370Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  196. 209Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 372–374Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  197. 210Jones (1985) p. 514–517Jones — 1985
  198. 211Bhagavad Gita As It Is, 11: The Universal Form, Text 12A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
  199. 212MagazineJ. Robert OppenheimerLincoln Barnett
  200. 213MagazineThe Eternal Apprentice1948-11-08
  201. 214JournalThe 'Gita' of J. Robert OppenheimerJames A. Hijiya — June 2000
  202. 215Groves (1962) p. 303–304Groves — 1962
  203. 216Jones (1985) p. 344Jones — 1985
  204. 217How many people worked on the Manhattan Project?Alex Wellerstein — Restricted Data — 1 November 2013
  205. 219Howes, Herzenberg (1999) p. 14–15Howes, Herzenberg — 1999
  206. 220Jones (1985) p. 353Jones — 1985
  207. 221News1,000 were at Pasco8 August 1945
  208. 222Jones (1985) p. 349–350Jones — 1985
  209. 223Jones (1985) p. 358Jones — 1985
  210. 224Jones (1985) p. 361Jones — 1985
  211. 225Nichols (1987) p. 123Nichols — 1987
  212. 226Jones (1985) p. 410Jones — 1985
  213. 227Jones (1985) p. 430Jones — 1985
  214. 228Wellerstein (2021) p. 43, 52–96Wellerstein — 2021
  215. 229Groves (1962) p. 140Groves — 1962
  216. 230NewsManhattan Project: Its Scientists Have Harnessed Nature's Basic ForceFrancis Sill Wickware — 20 August 1945
  217. 232Oak Ridge Confidential, or Baseball for BombsAlex Wellerstein — Restricted Data — 16 April 2012
  218. 233NewsThe Difficulties of Nuclear ContainmentSam Roberts — 29 September 2014
  219. 234Sweeney (2001) p. 196–198Sweeney — 2001
  220. 235Holloway (1994) p. 76–79Holloway — 1994
  221. 236Jones (1985) p. 253–255Jones — 1985
  222. 237Sweeney (2001) p. 198–200Sweeney — 2001
  223. 238NewsNo News Leaked Out About Bomb8 August 1945
  224. 239Jones (1985) p. 263–264Jones — 1985
  225. 240Jones (1985) p. 267Jones — 1985
  226. 241Jones (1985) p. 258–260Jones — 1985
  227. 242Jones (1985) p. 261–265Jones — 1985
  228. 243Groves (1962) p. 142–145Groves — 1962
  229. 244Hewlett, Duncan (1969) p. 312–314Hewlett, Duncan — 1969
  230. 245Hewlett, Duncan (1969) p. 472Hewlett, Duncan — 1969
  231. 246NewsA Spy's Path: Iowa to A-Bomb to Kremlin HonorWilliam J. Broad — 12 November 2007
  232. 247Holloway (1994) p. 222–223Holloway — 1994
  233. 248BookRed Cloud at Dawn: Truman, Stalin, and the End of the Atomic MonopolyMichael D. Gordin — Farrar, Straus, and Giroux — 2009
  234. 249Groves (1962) p. 191–192Groves — 1962
  235. 250Groves (1962) p. 187–190Groves — 1962
  236. 251Jones (1985) p. 281Jones — 1985
  237. 252Groves (1962) p. 191Groves — 1962
  238. 253Jones (1985) p. 285Jones — 1985
  239. 254Jones (1985) p. 282Jones — 1985
  240. 255Groves (1962) p. 194–196Groves — 1962
  241. 256Groves (1962) p. 200–206Groves — 1962
  242. 257Jones (1985) p. 283–285Jones — 1985
  243. 258Goudsmit (1947) p. 70–71Goudsmit — 1947
  244. 259Jones (1985) p. 286–288Jones — 1985
  245. 260Groves (1962) p. 237Groves — 1962
  246. 261Jones (1985) p. 289–290Jones — 1985
  247. 262Goudsmit (1947) p. 174–176Goudsmit — 1947
  248. 263Groves (1962) p. 333–340Groves — 1962
  249. 264Jones (1985) p. 530–532Jones — 1985
  250. 265Notes of Meeting of the Interim Committee, June 1, 1945The Harry S Truman Library and Museum
  251. 266Holloway (1994) p. 116–117Holloway — 1994
  252. 268BookRed Cloud at Dawn: Truman, Stalin, and the End of the Atomic MonopolyMichael Gordin — Farrar, Straus and Giroux — 2009
  253. 269Order to Drop the Atomic Bomb, Handy to Spaatz, July 25, 1945Office of History and Heritage Resources, US Department of Energy
  254. 270BookFive Days in August: How World War II Became a Nuclear WarMichael Gordin — Princeton University Press — 2007
  255. 271Groves (1962) p. 315–319Groves — 1962
  256. 272Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 392–393Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  257. 273JournalCounting the dead at Hiroshima and NagasakiAlex Wellerstein — 4 August 2020
  258. 277Sklar (1984) p. 22–29Sklar — 1984
  259. 278Groves (1962) p. 343–346Groves — 1962
  260. 279Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 396–397Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  261. 281Lawrence Litz's Interview (2012)Manhattan Project Voices
  262. 282The Third Core's RevengeAlex Wellerstein — Restricted Data — 16 August 2013
  263. 283Wallace (1973) p. 474Wallace — 1973
  264. 284JournalEclipsed by Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Early Thinking about Tactical Nuclear WeaponsBarton J. Bernstein — Spring 1991
  265. 285Ahnfeldt (1966) p. 886–889Ahnfeldt — 1966
  266. 286Home, Low (1993) p. 537Home, Low — 1993
  267. 287Groves (1962) p. 348–362Groves — 1962
  268. 289The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II, A Collection of Primary SourcesWilliam Burr — George Washington University — 13 August 1945
  269. 290Frisch (1970) p. 107–115Frisch — 1970
  270. 291Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 399–400Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  271. 293Nichols (1987) p. 226Nichols — 1987
  272. 294Jones (1985) p. 600Jones — 1985
  273. 295Jones (1985) p. 592–593Jones — 1985
  274. 296Hansen, 1995b p. V-152Hansen, 1995b
  275. 297Nichols (1987) p. 225–226Nichols — 1987
  276. 298Nichols (1987) p. 216–217Nichols — 1987
  277. 299Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 624Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  278. 300Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 630, 646Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  279. 301Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 625Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  280. 302Nichols (1987) p. 234Nichols — 1987
  281. 303Jones (1985) p. 594Jones — 1985
  282. 304Weisgall (1994) p. 141–144Weisgall — 1994
  283. 305Groves (1962) p. 394–398Groves — 1962
  284. 306Grodzins, Rabinowitch (1963) p. viiGrodzins, Rabinowitch — 1963
  285. 307Gosling (1994) p. 55–57Gosling — 1994
  286. 308Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 723–724Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  287. 309Nichols (1987) p. 34–35Nichols — 1987
  288. 311Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 723Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  289. 312Origins of the Nuclear Blcak BudgetAlex Wellerstein — Restricted Data — 5 December 2011
  290. 313Wellerstein (2021) p. 77–82Wellerstein — 2021
  291. 315O'Brien (2015) p. 47–48O'Brien — 2015
  292. 317Niagara Falls Storage Site, New YorkU.S. Army Corps of Engineers — 31 August 2011
  293. 318JournalModel City USA: The Environmental Cost of Victory in World War II and the Cold WarAndrew Jenks — July 2002
  294. 320NewsDrama of the Atomic Bomb Found Climax in July 16 TestWilliam L. Laurence — 26 September 1945
  295. 321Sweeney (2001) p. 204–205Sweeney — 2001
  296. 322Holloway (1994) p. 59–60Holloway — 1994
  297. 323Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 633–637Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  298. 324Weinberg (1961) p. 161Weinberg — 1961
  299. 326Hewlett, Duncan (1969) p. 74–76Hewlett, Duncan — 1969
  300. 327Hewlett, Duncan (1969) p. 72–74Hewlett, Duncan — 1969
  301. 328Hewlett, Duncan (1969) p. 490–493, 514–515Hewlett, Duncan — 1969
  302. 329Hewlett, Duncan (1969) p. 252–253Hewlett, Duncan — 1969
  303. 330Walker (2009) p. 2–3Walker — 2009
  304. 332Hewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 655Hewlett, Anderson — 1962