Addiction to power in The Lord of the Rings
In the fires of Mount Doom during the Second Age, the Dark Lord Sauron forged the One Ring to control all who wore other Rings of Power. When the Stoorish Hobbit Sméagol saw his friend Déagol find this object in the River Anduin, he killed him to take it for himself. The wizard Gandalf later explained that Gollum was wholly corrupted and addicted to the Ring over centuries. This addiction transformed a basically amoral being into a miserable creature, afraid of everything and friendless. His personality disintegrated as he talked to himself in two halves, Sméagol and Gollum. Eventually, the pull of the Ring destroyed him completely. The corrupting power is not limited to those who possess the Ring. Characters like Tom Bombadil are unaffected because they belong to an earlier time. The giant spider Shelob is unquestionably evil but remains uninterested in the Ring. She cares only about food and gluttony.
When Frodo offered the Ring to the wizard Gandalf, he rejected it immediately out of fear that it would overpower him. Elrond, Galadriel, Aragorn, and Faramir also refused to use the Ring for similar reasons. They understood that absolute power leads to tyranny rather than good. Saruman, however, succumbed to pride and the lust for power even without possessing the Ring. He sought to be powerful like Sauron and turned to evil through his own choices. When Gandalf visited the ruins of Isengard to offer freedom instead of slavery, Saruman was too corrupted to choose any other path. His triad of Knowledge, Rule, and Order sounded oppressive, like Nazi slogans from Germany. This contrasted sharply with Elrond's description of strength, domination, and hoarded wealth versus understanding, making, and healing. The softer things proved more powerful than conventional weapons. Galadriel admitted her heart desired to ask what Frodo offered yet passed the test by choosing to diminish and go into the West. She remained herself as an immortal Elf while others fell.
The theme of a corrupting ring dates back to Plato's Republic where the Ring of Gyges gave invisibility and allowed its owner to get away with crime. Scholar Eric Katz notes that Tolkien shows corruption through character thoughts and actions unlike Plato's abstract argument. Glaucon thought people were only good because they feared being caught if they were not. Plato argued immoral life corrupts one's soul whereas moral life brings peace and happiness. Katz states that Tolkien demonstrates various responses to whether a just person would be corrupted by unlimited power. Gollum is weak and destroyed by desire for the Ring over five hundred years. Boromir begins virtuous but becomes corrupted by temptation even though he wants to use it for good. He redeems himself by defending the hobbits to his own death. The strong and virtuous Galadriel sees clearly what she would become if she accepted the ring and rejects it. Tom Bombadil remains exempt from both the corrupting power and the gift of invisibility. Sam uses the ring in a moment of need without being seduced by visions of himself as Hero of the Age. Frodo is gradually corrupted but saved by earlier mercy shown to Gollum. Katz concludes that Tolkien answers why we should be moral simply by saying to be yourself.
Tolkien witnessed with disgust the rise of communism and fascism in the years after the First World War. Jack Brown notes that Gandalf rejects using the Ring for fear that it would lead to tyranny. Some characters recognize absolute power is too dangerous while others fail to do so. Agnes Perkins and Helen Hill analyze how different groups respond to power in their book A Tolkien Compass. They view the scheme as having five groups of three characters each affected differently. Sauron represents unrelieved evil who put much of his power into the Ring to gain control. Servants of Sauron are wholly taken over by other Rings of Power. Saruman succumbs to desire for power while Gandalf rejects the Ring when offered. Men of Gondor like Boromir urge use of the Ring to defend against Sauron yet Denethor is destroyed by pride. Faramir understands the danger and chooses not to take it. Shippey points out authors contemporary with Tolkien dealing with corrupting influence including George Orwell's Animal Farm from 1945 and William Golding's Lord of the Flies from 1954. He sees this attitude toward corruption as anachronistic since medieval thought believed power revealed character rather than changing it.
Scholar Tom Shippey replies to doubts about inconsistency with one word: addictive. This sums up Gandalf's whole argument that addiction can be shaken off easily enough in early stages. For those not yet addicted, its pull resembles any other temptation. Bilbo could give the Ring away willingly though with considerable difficulty. Later he experienced a powerful longing to hold it again at Rivendell. Frodo also shows features of addiction ultimately becoming unable to relinquish the Ring on his own accord. In Peter Jackson's film trilogy effects on Bilbo and Frodo are obsessions compared with drug addiction. Actor Andy Serkis cited drug addiction as inspiration for playing Gollum. Douglas Kellner examines whether the work serves as an allegory despite Tolkien's denial. He writes that Gollum is torn apart by need for the destructive substance while knowing its force. The film presents a parable of addiction where deprivation makes him crave his precious talisman. Each use progressively increases the hold the Ring has over its bearer. Usage may begin innocently or accidentally but seductive power gradually wears down resistance. The progressive forces of corruption destroy anyone who possesses or uses the One Ring.
Samwise Gamgee remains saved by love for Frodo and his still unconquered plain hobbit-sense. He imagines himself as Samwise the Strong striding across darkened land with flaming sword yet quickly sees defeat would follow. He rejects using the ring because he understands where it leads. Patrick Curry argues overcoming addiction requires countless acts of courage kindness and help from unknown people. These small and great actions provide opportunity to do right in unforeseen circumstances. Commitment to simple good things like food water green growing things creates appreciation for life itself. This natural and spiritual value succeeds against overwhelming temptation. When Sam faced the Ring at Mount Doom he saw clearly what it offered. He imagined the vale of Gorgoroth becoming garden of flowers trees fruit yet knew he would be defeated. His refusal demonstrates that simple virtue triumphs over ambition. Unlike others who fall under pressure, Sam gives up the Ring willingly when needed most. He remains himself throughout the journey while others lose their souls. The narrative offers hope in real world through ordinary goodness rather than extraordinary power.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
How did Sméagol become Gollum in The Lord of the Rings?
Sméagol killed his friend Déagol to take the One Ring from the River Anduin during the Second Age. Over centuries, the wizard Gandalf explained that this addiction transformed him into a miserable creature who talked to himself in two halves.
Why did Saruman fall to evil without possessing the One Ring?
Saruman succumbed to pride and lust for power even though he never possessed the Ring. He sought to be powerful like Sauron and turned to evil through his own choices while refusing freedom when offered by Gandalf at Isengard.
What is the historical origin of the corrupting ring theme in Plato's Republic?
The theme dates back to Plato's Republic where the Ring of Gyges gave invisibility and allowed its owner to get away with crime. Scholar Eric Katz notes Tolkien shows corruption through character thoughts and actions unlike Plato's abstract argument about moral life.
How does Samwise Gamgee resist the One Ring compared to other characters?
Samwise remains saved by love for Frodo and his unconquered plain hobbit-sense. He rejects using the ring because he understands where it leads and gives up the Ring willingly when needed most at Mount Doom.
When was George Orwell's Animal Farm published relative to The Lord of the Rings?
George Orwell published Animal Farm from 1945 before William Golding released Lord of the Flies from 1954. Tom Shippey points out these authors dealt with corrupting influence contemporaneously with Tolkien during the years after the First World War.
All sources
8 references cited across the entry
- 1harvnbTolkien (1954)Tolkien — 1954
- 2harvnbTolkien (1977)Tolkien — 1977
- 3harvnbSpacks (2004) p. 52–67Spacks — 2004
- 4harvnbKatz (2003) p. 5–20Katz — 2003
- 5harvnbPerkins, Hill (1975) p. 57–68Perkins, Hill — 1975
- 6harvnbTolkien (1955) p. book 6, ch. 1 "The Tower of Cirith Ungol"Tolkien — 1955
- 7harvnbTolkien (1954) p. book 2, ch. 2 "[[The Council of Elrond]]"Tolkien — 1954
- 8harvnbRutledge (2003) p. 109Rutledge — 2003