Pre-sectarian Buddhism
The fertile Indo-Gangetic plains witnessed the rise of sixteen powerful kingdoms and republics known as Mahajanapadas during the lifetime of Gautama Buddha. This era marked a period of intense urbanization in ancient India that fostered new religious movements called śramañas. These wandering philosophers rejected the authority of Vedas and Brahmanic priesthood while seeking escape from sañsāra through ascetic practices. The śramaña movement included diverse schools such as Yoga, Jainism, and Cārvāka alongside early Buddhism itself. Concepts like sañsāra representing endless cycles of birth and death emerged across these traditions during this time. Orthodox Hindu philosophy labeled these groups heterodox because they refused to accept Vedic epistemic authority. Vedic rituals aimed at entrance into heaven failed to provide everlasting liberation for many seekers. This failure drove the search for alternative means to achieve moksha or release from the cycle. The ideas of karma and rebirth developed from single existence judgments to multiple existences with rewards or punishments. Release from this endless series became the central aim of the Śramañic movement.
Samuel Beal published comparative translations of the Pali Patimokkha and Chinese Dharmaguptaka Pratimoksa in 1859 showing virtual identity between them. He followed up with comparisons between Chinese sutras and Pali suttas in 1882 accurately predicting most Pali Suttas would appear in Chinese form. Scholars like Rupert Gethin and Peter Harvey argue that oldest recorded teachings reside within first four Nikayas of Sutta Pitaka plus monastic rules surviving in various Patimokkha versions. Edward Conze held that absence of hard facts meant all scholarly attempts to reconstruct original teachings were mere guesswork since no sayings preserved their original form. French Indologist Émile Senart argued Buddha's life legends derived from pre-Buddhist myths about solar deities in his Essai sur la legende du Buddha published in 1875. Japanese Buddhologist Kogen Mizuno noted material possessed may not contain actual words because they were compiled after death without recording as spoken. Ronald M. Davidson wrote little confidence exists that much surviving scripture is actually word of historical Buddha given extraordinary extent passing under rubric word of Buddha. American scholar Gregory Schopen claimed inability to know anything definite about doctrinal content before fourth century C.E. due to heavily edited manuscript traditions lacking objective dating criteria.
The Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta regarded by tradition as first discourse originally pointed only at Middle Way being core teaching pointing toward practice of dhyana. Some scholars believe Four Truths added later under pressure from developments seeing liberating insight as essence of moksha. Tilmann Vetter concluded earliest version lacked word noble added subsequently while Lambert Schmithausen saw four truths as later development. Carol Anderson notes four truths missing critical passages entering Sutta Pitaka from Vinaya rules for monastic order. Bronkhorst and Anderson suggest Four Truths became substitution for prajna or liberating insight replacing terms preceding Four Dhyanas. Description of Buddhist path initially simple term Middle Way elaborated over time resulting description Eightfold Path found Culahatthipadopama Sutta sequence beginning layman hearing Buddha teach coming faith deciding ordination monk adopting moral precepts guarding six sense-doors practicing mindfulness self-possession reflection impurities body finding isolated spot sitting cross-legged purifying mind hindrances attaining first rupa-jhana second jhana third jhana fourth jhana recollecting many former existences observing death rebirth beings according karmas bringing destruction inflows mental bias profound realization Four Noble Truths perceiving liberation done what needed done.
Johannes Bronkhorst argued dhyana was Buddhist invention whereas Alexander Wynne claimed incorporated Brahmanical practices Nikayas ascribed to Aara Kalam and Uddaka Ramaputta. Louis de La Vallée-Poussin famously voiced core problem relation between dhyana and insight in text Musila et Narada Le Chemin de Nirvana published 1936. Schmithausen noted mention Four Noble Truths constituting core liberating insight attained mastering Rupa Jhanas later addition texts such Majjhima Nikaya 36. Vetter discerned three possible roads liberation described suttas adding sole practice dhyana itself original liberating practice: four Rupa Jhanas themselves constituted core liberating practice early Buddhism c.q. Buddha; mastering four Rupa Jhanas whereafter liberating insight attained; mastering four Rupa Jhanas four Arupa Jhanas where-after liberating insight attained; liberating insight itself suffices. Richard Gombrich sequence four rupa-jhanas describes two different cognitive states namely concentration followed sharpened attention. Words expressing inculcation awareness sati sampajano upekkha mistranslated particular factors meditative states referring particular way perceiving sense objects according Wynne. Later tradition falsified jhana classifying quintessence concentrated calming kind meditation ignoring higher element.
Modern scholars Rupert Gethin Richard Gombrich Paul Williams hold goal early Buddhism nirvana means blowing out extinguishing greed aversion delusion flame going out signifies permanent cessation samsara rebirth. Donald Swearer journey nirvana not journey separate reality but move towards calm equanimity nonattachment nonself Thomas Kasulis notes early texts often describe nirvana negative terms including cessation absence craving detachment absence delusion unconditioned asamskrta. Edward Conze argued Nirvana kind Absolute mentioning ideas person pudgala assumption eternal consciousness Saddhatu Sutra identification Absolute invisible infinite consciousness shining everywhere Digha Nikaya XI 85 traces belief consciousness nonimpermanent centre personality constituting absolute element contingent world. M Falk argues early Buddhist view nirvana abode place prajna gained enlightened nirvanic element essence pure consciousness immanent within samsara three bodies concentric realities stripped abandoned leaving nirodhakaya liberated person similar view defended C Lindtner precanonical Buddhism Nirvana state mind instead concrete place elements survived canonisation filtering reappeared Mahayana Buddhism Nagarjuna tried harmonise different ideas taking paradoxical stance regarding nirvana rejecting positive description Alexander Wynne holds no evidence Sutta Pitaka Buddha held view best shows some early Buddhists influenced Brahminic peers.
Pre-sectarian Buddhism existed before various Early Buddhist schools developed around 250 BCE followed later subsects Buddhism. Contents teachings deduced reconstructed earliest Buddhist texts already sectarian whole subject intensely debated scholars not all believe meaningful reconstruction possible Paul J Griffiths Steven Collins consider period from time historical Buddha reign Ashoka c 268 to 232 BCE first documented split occurred between second third Buddhist councils Lamotte Hirakawa maintain schism sangha occurred during reign Ashoka Collett Cox states actual separation did occur until after his death. First post-schismatic groups often stated Sthavira Nikaya Mahasamghika eventually eighteen different schools came existence later Mahayana schools preserved ideas abandoned orthodox Theravada Three Bodies doctrine idea consciousness vijñāna continuum devotional elements worship saints. Etienne Lamotte argues impossible say certainty doctrine historical Buddha nonetheless fact appreciate early Buddhism only valid indication basic agreement Nikayas one hand Agamas other Hajime Nakamura writes word traced unquestionable authority Gotama Sakyamuni although must exist sayings phrases derived him. Scholars critically search early scriptures oldest layer material find original Buddhism Nakamura held earliest material Gathas verses found Sutta Nipata Sagatha-vagga Samyutta Nikaya Itivuttaka Udana use less doctrinal material developed other texts promote wilderness solitude communal living terminology similar Jain ideas.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What was the historical context for the rise of pre-sectarian Buddhism?
Pre-sectarian Buddhism rose during the lifetime of Gautama Buddha on the fertile Indo-Gangetic plains. This era featured sixteen powerful kingdoms and republics known as Mahajanapadas that fostered intense urbanization in ancient India.
When did Samuel Beal publish comparative translations of early Buddhist texts?
Samuel Beal published comparative translations of the Pali Patimokkha and Chinese Dharmaguptaka Pratimoksa in 1859. He followed up with comparisons between Chinese sutras and Pali suttas in 1882 to show virtual identity between them.
Who argued that dhyana was a Buddhist invention versus Brahmanical practice?
Johannes Bronkhorst argued that dhyana was a Buddhist invention while Alexander Wynne claimed it incorporated Brahmanical practices from Nikayas. Louis de La Vallée-Poussin famously voiced the core problem regarding the relation between dhyana and insight in his text Musila et Narada Le Chemin de Nirvana published 1936.
What is the scholarly consensus on when pre-sectarian Buddhism ended?
Pre-sectarian Buddhism existed before various Early Buddhist schools developed around 250 BCE. Scholars debate whether the first documented split occurred during the reign of Ashoka from 268 to 232 BCE or after his death.
How did modern scholars define the goal of early Buddhism compared to later traditions?
Modern scholars like Rupert Gethin Richard Gombrich and Paul Williams hold that the goal of early Buddhism meant nirvana as blowing out the flame of greed aversion and delusion. This view signifies permanent cessation of samsara rebirth rather than a journey to a separate reality.