Internet censorship in Russia

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Internet censorship in Russia did not arrive overnight. In 2004, only 8% of Russians had internet access, and observers who visited that year praised the web as the freest corner of Russian media. Television and newspapers were already under government thumb, but the internet seemed genuinely open. That gap between the controlled broadcast world and the comparatively free online world set up a decades-long struggle. How did Russia go from a country where a Council of Europe human rights commissioner admired the speed and quality of its online journalism, to one that had blocked roughly 138,000 websites in the three years following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine? The story runs through a quietly built blacklist, a surveillance architecture borrowed in part from China, and a series of laws that each extended the state's reach a little further.

• 2. Building the Blacklist

  ›

  Russia's State Duma passed the internet blacklist law in July 2012, and it took effect on the 1st of November 2012. The official name in Russian runs to nearly a full sentence: a register of domain names, page locators, and network addresses pointing to prohibited information. At launch, the stated purpose was narrow: blocking child pornography, instructions for suicide methods, and material promoting drug use. A Lenta.ru editorial noted at the time that the criteria were already so broad that even the ruling United Russia party's website could, in theory, be added. That observation proved accurate almost immediately.

  In 2013, a legislative amendment widened the criteria to include content suspected of extremism, calls for illegal meetings, inciting hatred, and anything violating the established order. The flexibility that critics had warned about became routine. A public transport safety video called Dumb Ways to Die was blocked as suicide propaganda. Websites discussing federalization of Siberia were blocked as attacks on the constitutional order. A poem published in support of Ukraine was treated as incitement to hatred. A Pussy Riot logo was blocked as an insult to religious believers.

  By July 2017, the blacklist contained over 70,000 entries. A September 2012 Levada Center survey had found that 63% of Russian respondents supported internet censorship in principle, even though the country's own constitution banned censorship outright. That public support gave the early expansion a degree of political cover that later, more aggressive measures could no longer claim.

• 3. Surveillance Infrastructure

  ›

  Russia's System of Operational-Investigatory Measures, known as SORM, predates the internet blacklist by decades and was adapted for the digital age. Telecommunications operators are legally required to install hardware provided by the Federal Security Service, the FSB, which can then monitor phone calls, email traffic, and web browsing without obtaining a warrant. In 2014, the system was expanded to cover social media platforms, and the Ministry of Communications ordered companies to install equipment capable of deep packet inspection.

  The Bloggers Law, passed in July 2014, layered on data localization requirements, forcing web services to store Russian users' data on servers within the country. Sites that did not comply by September 2016 could be added to the blacklist. A parallel rule passed in August 2014 required operators of public Wi-Fi hotspots in restaurants, libraries, and cafes to identify users by passport and retain their data.

  The Yarovaya Law, passed in July 2016, went further still. Telecom operators were required to store recordings of phone conversations, text messages, and internet traffic for up to six months, and metadata for up to three years. All of it was available to authorities on request, with no court order required. Since 2015, Russian officials have worked directly with Chinese Great Firewall security experts to build out their data retention and filtering systems, a collaboration that observers later described as the foundation of an emerging IT curtain.

• 4. Deep Packet Inspection and the Navalny Test

  ›

  In September 2019, Roskomnadzor began installing equipment called TSPU across Russian mobile networks. The acronym translates roughly as technical measures for threat protection. The official rationale was defending the Russian internet from external cyberattacks. Activists argued from the start that the real purpose was tightening content censorship that had repeatedly failed through earlier, cruder methods.

  In April 2021, TSPU was used to throttle Twitter traffic. Roskomnadzor targeted domains including t.co, twimg.com, and twitter.com. Because the system used wildcard matching on the Server Name Indication field of the TLS handshake, it accidentally throttled every domain containing the string t.co, including microsoft.com. The incident illustrated, unintentionally, how blunt the instrument was. Players of World of Warships also reported significant problems, caused by the TSPU devices blocking a broad range of UDP ports as a side effect.

  The clearest demonstration of TSPU's actual purpose came in July 2021. The GlobalCheck monitoring project documented, for the first time, widespread DPI deployment across large mobile providers that efficiently blocked domains associated with political activist Alexei Navalny across roughly 50% of Russian networks. Ahead of September 2021 State Duma elections, Roskomnadzor also targeted Navalny's Smart Voting app and website. An agricultural company called Woolintertrade had obtained a trademark on the phrase Smart Voting, then secured injunctions forcing Google and Yandex to censor related search queries. The campaign also triggered a brief block of Google Docs when Navalny published Smart Voting materials there, and connectivity problems at the Central Bank of Russia when Roskomnadzor targeted Google Public DNS.

• 5. Post-2022 Acceleration

  ›

  Facebook was throttled starting the 26th of February 2022, and Twitter on the 27th, by order of Roskomnadzor, as Russian forces moved into Ukraine. Both restrictions became near-total by the 4th of March. Internet rights monitor NetBlocks confirmed the sequential rollout. The legal basis was that the platforms had permitted content deemed hostile toward Russians.

  The broader post-invasion crackdown targeted foreign and independent media simultaneously. BBC News, Deutsche Welle, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Voice of America, and Ukrainian outlets were blocked. Independent Russian outlets including Current Time TV, Interfax, and Meduza faced orders. Federal law prohibited distributing any information about the Russian military that differed from official government statements. In March 2022, Belarusian political police arrested Mark Bernstein, a Minsk-based Russian Wikipedia editor who had been working on the article about the invasion, accusing him of spreading anti-Russian materials. Between April and July 2022, Russian authorities added several Wikipedia articles to their forbidden sites list and ordered search engines to mark Wikipedia as a violator of Russian law.

  By late 2022, Russian authorities had blocked approximately 138,000 websites since the invasion began. The government simultaneously invested heavily in domestic platforms including Rutube, VK, and Yandex to fill the gap left by departing Western services. Discord was blocked, formally on child abuse grounds, a decision opposed even by pro-Russian bloggers. YouTube remained accessible longer than most Western platforms but by 2024 required a VPN for reliable access, even without a formal ban. The strategy mirrored China's ecosystem: domestic alternatives backed by state investment, foreign platforms squeezed out through escalating restrictions.

• 6. Criminalizing the Search Bar

  ›

  On the 22nd of July 2025, the Russian State Duma passed legislation that criminalized searching for extremist content online. The vote was 306 in favor, 67 against, and 22 abstaining. The bill then moved to the upper house. What made the law historically significant was its target: it punished users for consuming banned material, not merely distributing it. Every prior censorship instrument had focused on publishers, platform operators, or distributors.

  The Russian extremist register, maintained by the Ministry of Justice, contained 5,473 entries at the time the law passed and ran to over 500 pages. First-time offenders face fines of 3,000-5,000 rubles, roughly $64 for the maximum first-offense amount. The same legislation addressed VPN use directly. Advertising a VPN service carries fines ranging from 50,000-80,000 rubles for individuals up to 200,000-500,000 rubles for legal entities. Using a VPN in the commission of any crime is designated an aggravating factor.

  Also in 2025, on the 26th of May, Vladimir Putin publicly called for throttling foreign services including Microsoft and Zoom, citing Russian national interests and framing domestic software development as the preferred alternative. The June 2020 ruling by the European Court of Human Rights, which found Russia had violated the free speech rights of plaintiffs whose websites were blocked including that of chess champion Garry Kasparov, now sits alongside a Freedom House score of 17 out of 100 for internet freedom, a rating of not free that reflects how far conditions have shifted since Russia scored 49 and was still rated partly free in 2009.