Faith in Buddhism

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Faith in Buddhism carries a Sanskrit name, saddha, that literally means "to have conviction" and "to uphold": sustaining confidence, remaining steadfast, supporting trust in the sense of abiding firmly. That etymology hints at something surprising. Many people in the modern West picture Buddhism as a purely rational, meditative path, a philosophy without gods, without prayer, without the surrender that the word "faith" implies. But the reality is that faith has been central to Buddhist practice for more than two thousand years, and its role has not shrunk over time. It has expanded, shifted, and sparked political revolutions. It drove Japanese monks into exile. It filled ceremonial halls with the repeated invocation of a single Buddha's name. And in 1956 it brought half a million people to a single conversion ceremony in India. What does faith actually mean inside a tradition that insists on personal verification of spiritual truth? How did a teaching that began by warning against blind trust in teachers eventually produce schools that said a single heartfelt recitation was enough to guarantee salvation? And what happened when the rational values of the nineteenth century arrived on Buddhist shores and tried to strip faith out of the picture entirely?

• 2. Two Words for Devotion

  ›

  Saddha and pasada are the two earliest Pali terms the tradition uses, and they describe different textures of the same interior state. Saddha is the older and more active of the two, rooted in the idea of commitment to practice and trust in another person. The monk Ananda, the attendant of Gautama Buddha, and Vakkali, another disciple, are cited in the tradition as traditional exemplars of this quality. Saddha's opposite is asraddha, the incapacity to develop trust in a teacher or teachings, and therefore the inability to generate energy on the spiritual path. Pasada carries a more affective, quieter tone. Its Sanskrit roots mean to sink down and to sit, and scholar Sung-bae Park defines it as "being firmly seated in a state of clearness and tranquility." Where saddha is an act of commitment, pasada is a condition of the mind, a settled, luminous quality that arises when the devotee rests in the greatness of the object of devotion. In Mahayana traditions, East Asian Buddhism added two more terms: xin in Chinese, shin in Japanese. These can refer to trust, but they also describe an unquestioned acceptance of the object of one's devotion, and they carry a specifically Chan and Zen sense of confidence that the Buddha nature is already within one's own mind. Pure Land Buddhists divided the experience even more finely, distinguishing between shinjin, the mind awakened by devotion and humility toward Amitabha Buddha, and shingyō, the joy and confidence of knowing one will meet Amitabha. The sheer proliferation of these terms signals that Buddhist thinkers across centuries found faith too complex and too important to leave with a single word.

• 3. The Triple Gem and Verification

  ›

  Faith in early Buddhism oriented itself toward the Triple Gem: the Buddha, the dharma, and the sangha. Taking refuge in these three was the foundational act of commitment, expressed through a short verbal formula naming each in turn. But early Buddhism did not allow this act of refuge to become an uncritical posture. In the discourse known as the Kalama Sutta, the Buddha argues explicitly against following sacred authority, tradition, or logic, or respecting teachers merely because they are one's teachers. Knowledge grounded in such sources, he says, is shaped by greed, hatred, and delusion, and should be considered impartially rather than blindly accepted or blindly rejected. The Canki Sutta pushes further, warning that belief in anything does not warrant the conclusion "Only this is true, anything else is false." A person should instead preserve the truth with the awareness that "This is my belief," remaining open rather than closed. Even more strikingly, in the Vimanasaka Sutta the Buddha instructs his disciples to investigate even him as to whether he is truly enlightened and pure in conduct, by observing him for a long time. This was not a rhetorical gesture. Several people are described in the Pali Canon doing exactly that, arriving at what the tradition calls well-grounded faith. Indologist Richard Gombrich draws out the implication: the Buddha did not aim to create a religion that focuses on devotion to his own person, though Gombrich acknowledges such devotion had already begun while the Buddha was still alive. Scholar André Bareau framed the contrast even more sharply, arguing that Buddhism has no comparable idea of pure faith as in Christianity and that blind faith in a master's word goes completely against the spirit of early Buddhism. Translator Caroline Rhys Davids disagreed, countering that faith is no less important in Buddhism than it is for all religions worthy of the name.

• 4. Faith as First Step

  ›

  In the Cula-hatthipadopama Sutta, the path to enlightenment is described as beginning with faith in the Buddha, then proceeding through virtue, meditation, and wisdom, and only then culminating in enlightenment itself. This sequential structure appears across progressive lists in early Buddhist teaching: faith comes first, wisdom comes last. For a beginning practitioner, this early trust provides the confidence to continue. But early Buddhism was equally clear that faith is insufficient on its own. The arahant, a practitioner who has reached the final stage of the Buddhist path, no longer relies on faith at all: wisdom has replaced it entirely, though a form of realized faith is sometimes described at that stage. The monk Vakkali stands out in this picture precisely because he is the one figure the Buddha praises as "the highest of those who had faith." Even so, the Buddha's response to Vakkali is to teach him to concentrate on the teaching rather than on the Buddha's person. Ānanda, the beloved attendant, is admonished in similar terms. The Pali Canon distinguishes explicitly between faith grounded in superficial features, such as the physical appearance of the Buddha, and faith rooted in the teaching. The first kind, the texts warn, is prone to leading to affection and anger and is an impediment to enlightenment. The second deepens into what early texts call pasada, an unshakeable quality accompanied by clarity of mind and spiritual insight. The faithful lay devotee, called an upasaka or upasika, needed no formal ritual to take up that role. Commentators like Buddhaghosa noted that a Buddhist layman could, by the strength of faith alone, reach heaven, though other passages list faith alongside morality as jointly required virtues.

• 5. Mahayana and Pure Land

  ›

  During the period of Emperor Ashoka, a shift began: Buddhist communities placed greater emphasis on devotion, worship of stupas increased, and faith-based Avadana literature grew in volume. Depiction of the Buddha through images became more common, and this new devotionalism paved the way for Mahayana Buddhism. Mahayana extended the Triple Gem to include Buddhas in other world systems and what it called buddhafields. Central among these was the transcendent Buddha Amitabha, whose name means Limitless Light. The Longer Sukhavatīvyuha Sutra describes Amitabha as a monk who, practising under a Buddha in a previous age, vowed to create a Pure Land through his spiritual powers and declared that simply calling his name would be enough for living beings to be born there. Devotion to Amitabha arose in India around the beginning of the Common Era and spread widely across Japan, Korea, China, and Tibet. The most important Pure Land master in Chinese history was Shandao, who lived from 613 to 681, and who emphasized recitation of the name of the Buddha Amitabha, the practice called nianfo in Chinese and nembutsu in Japanese. He combined this with several other practices as a way for ordinary people to reach the Pure Land. In Japan, the decisive figures were Hōnen, who lived from 1133 to 1212, and his student Shinran, who lived from 1173 to 1262. Hōnen initially taught that repeating the nembutsu made salvation more certain. Shinran went further: the number of repetitions did not matter, even a single utterance would be enough for salvation, a teaching he called ichinengi. Subsequent repetitions, Shinran argued, were expressions of gratitude to Amitabha rather than meritorious acts. Shinran went further still, concluding that meditation and even moral practice did not contribute to birth in the Pure Land for a person with shinjin, and that some practices such as meditation were actually detrimental to reliance on Amitabha. Shinran's concept of shinjin drew on Shandao's teaching of the three minds: sincere belief in the person of Amitabha, deep trust in his vow and awareness of one's own low nature, and the desire to dedicate merit toward birth in the Pure Land. Together these were called isshin, singleness of heart. When the emperor found that some of Hōnen's monastics were behaving inappropriately, Hōnen was banished to a remote province for four years. Shinran was banished as well for teaching against celibacy, which he interpreted as indicating a lack of trust in Amitabha. In the fifteenth century, Rennyo, who lived from 1415 to 1499, popularized and reformed the Jōdo Shinshū sect. Today Shinshū is the largest Buddhist sect in Japan.

• 6. The Lotus Sutra and Nichiren

  ›

  The Lotus Sutra was composed in the first two centuries of the Common Era, and it stands as one of the most worshiped texts in Southeast Asia. Mahayanists honoured it as they had previously honoured relic stupas, and scribes in some copies depicted every letter as a Buddha enshrined in its own stupa. The Chinese Tiantai school in the sixth century and its later Japanese form, Tendai, promoted the Lotus Sutra while combining it with devotion to Amitabha Buddha. These schools held the sutra to be supreme among all of the Buddha's teachings and believed it could lead to enlightenment within the present lifetime. The Japanese teacher Nichiren, who lived from 1222 to 1282, took this reverence to its furthest point. He believed that only devotion to the Lotus Sutra, and specifically the chanting of its title, led society toward an ideal Buddha land. He criticized other schools sharply and promoted this practice on faith alone, while paradoxically de-emphasizing the study of the sutra itself. Nichiren saw the sutra as a prophecy of his own movement's mission. He believed devotion to it would allow practitioners to unite with a primordial Buddha of whom all Buddhas are manifestations. The Kamakura period, spanning the twelfth through fourteenth centuries, produced several schools that selected a single practice as the correct vehicle for the Age of Dharma Decline. Nichiren's movement was one of these. Today more than forty organizations continue the Nichiren tradition, some of which are lay organizations.

• 7. Millenarianism and Political Power

  ›

  Faith in Buddhism has not been confined to monasteries and meditation halls. Political scientist William Miles describes millenarian movements as a form of cultural defiance, resisting "the attempt to put reason and logic over faith." Buddhism has produced more millenarian energy than any other non-western tradition. Central to this energy is the figure of Maitreya, the future Buddha who is expected to appear during an age of crisis and usher in a new era of happiness. Early Theravada Pali texts mention Maitreya briefly, but early schools like the Mahasanghika gave him a much more prominent role. In China, from the fourteenth century onward, White Lotus sectarianism organized itself around the anticipated arrival of Maitreya during an apocalyptic age. Devotees of White Lotus societies believed that their faith in correct teachings would save them when the new era came. These beliefs proved durable, surviving into the nineteenth century and becoming associated with political revolution. During most of China's history, faith in the coming of Maitreya's age inspired rebellions aimed at transforming society. Some of those rebellions led to the destruction of royal dynasties. Yet Chinese Studies scholar Daniel Overmyer cautions against reducing this millenarianism to political strategy: it was, in his words, "rooted in continuously existing cultic life." Japan's version of millenarian thinking was most visible in the concept of the Age of Dharma Decline that shaped Nichiren Buddhism. More fully developed millenarian movements in Japan arose from the nineteenth century onward, alongside the emergence of new religions.

• 8. Modernity and Dissent

  ›

  By the end of the nineteenth century, western writers such as Edwin Arnold were presenting Buddhism to European and American audiences as the rational answer to the tension between science and religion. This framing reached Asia. In Sri Lanka, British-educated intellectuals and westerners together promoted what scholars now call Buddhist modernism, or protestant Buddhism: a Buddhism stripped of relic worship and devotional practice, aligned with science, and freed from what they regarded as cultural corruptions. They incorporated Victorian values into their account of the tradition, often without recognizing what they were doing. From the Meiji period onward, Japanese Buddhism faced a parallel critique, attacked as a foreign and superstitious system. The Buddhist response in Japan was a movement called New Buddhism, shin bukkyo, which emphasized rationalism and modernism. In the twentieth century, two Japanese academics, Hakamaya Noriaki and Matsumoto Shiro, developed Critical Buddhism, a school of thought that criticized Chinese and Japanese Buddhist ideas for undermining critical thinking and promoting blind faith. Noriaki's own alternative definition of faith is striking: true Buddhist faith, he argues, is the uncompromising critical capacity to distinguish between true and false Buddhism, and to commit to what is true. East Asian Studies scholar Peter Gregory counters that the Critical Buddhist search for a pure, unadulterated Buddhism ironically reeks of the same essentialism it criticizes. From the 1980s onward, scholars including Richard Gombrich and anthropologist Gananath Obeyesekere observed a resurgence of devotional religiosity, magical practices, and deity worship in Sri Lankan Buddhism, as the influence of protestant Buddhism weakened. In 1956, the Indian dalit leader Ambedkar, who lived from 1891 to 1956, led a mass conversion to Buddhism that reached as many as 500,000 people in a single ceremony, starting a movement called Navayana. Scholars have debated whether Ambedkar's Buddhism was secular and modernist or whether it involved traditional devotional elements; scholar Gauri Viswanathan argues that his dalit conversions gave belief a more central, worldly role than it had carried before. In the 2010s, violent incidents affecting dalits led to a revival of mass conversions in Gujarat and other Indian states.