Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Apollo 4

~9 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
7 sections
  • Apollo 4 announced itself with a sound that one Columbia University scientist described as one of the loudest noises, natural or artificial, in all of human history - short only of nuclear explosions. On the 9th of November 1967, five F-1 engines ignited eight seconds before liftoff, and the shock wave rolled outward from Launch Complex 39 at Kennedy Space Center. More than five kilometers away, dust shook loose from the ceiling of the Launch Control Center and settled across the consoles of mission controllers. CBS commentator Walter Cronkite pressed his hands against a trailer window to stop it from shattering as ceiling tiles fell around him. He would later say it was the most frightening space mission he ever covered.

    This was not the flight that carried men to the Moon. No one was aboard. But Apollo 4 - also known as SA-501 - was the first test flight of the Saturn V, the rocket that would eventually do exactly that. Everything had to work the first time. Every stage had to fire in sequence, the heat shield had to survive a simulated return from lunar orbit, and a third stage engine had to restart in space - something no Saturn rocket had ever done in flight. The questions that day were existential: Was the Saturn V actually capable of what America needed it to do? And could it do it before the end of the decade, as President Kennedy had promised six years earlier?

  • George Mueller, head of NASA's Office of Manned Space Flight, issued a memo in 1963 that upended the way NASA tested rockets. His directive was blunt: the first Saturn V flight would carry every stage fully functional, plus a working Apollo spacecraft. Nothing would be tested incrementally. Everything would fly live from day one.

    This approach, known as all-up testing, was not invented for Apollo. Mueller had seen it work on the Air Force's Minuteman ICBM program, and he believed it could compress Apollo's timeline enough to meet Kennedy's 1970 deadline. Wernher von Braun's team at Marshall Space Flight Center had always tested new rockets stage by stage; Mueller's way meant discarding that caution entirely.

    The consequences of choosing all-up testing were significant on paper. It eliminated four test missions from the schedule, meaning there was less margin for error and less time to catch problems before committing to crewed flights. Apollo program managers agreed to the approach, but not without reluctance - they understood that incremental testing, the conventional route, would inevitably push the lunar landing past 1970. Mueller's decision forced the entire program to compress.

    The numbering scheme Mueller approved on the 24th of April 1967 reflected another deliberate choice: after the deaths of the three Apollo 1 astronauts in the January fire on the launch pad, Mueller resumed the sequence at Apollo 4, leaving Apollo 2 and 3 undesignated. The widows of the Apollo 1 crew had requested that designation for their husbands' mission.

  • Major General Samuel C. Phillips, the Apollo Program Director, had scheduled SA-501 for January 1967. The target slipped almost immediately. A liquid oxygen line explosion at Launch Complex 39 threatened a multi-week delay before the first stage had even arrived. North American Aviation, the contractor responsible for both the S-II second stage and the Apollo command and service module, was struggling with cost, schedule, and quality problems severe enough that Phillips led an investigation team to North American's California facility in late 1965.

    The S-II arrived late. It had originally been planned to reach Kennedy Space Center in July 1966; it did not arrive until the 21st of January 1967 - six months behind schedule. During that gap, NASA had stacked a spool-shaped spacer in its place so work in the Vehicle Assembly Building could continue. When the S-II finally arrived, inspectors discovered hairline cracks in a different S-II then under construction, forcing its removal for inspection as well.

    The fire that killed the Apollo 1 crew on the 27th of January 1967 added a new layer of scrutiny to an already delayed vehicle. Though SA-501 carried no crew, NASA officials examined its command and service module carefully. What they found was alarming: 1,407 separate errors in the spacecraft, including haphazardly routed and stripped wires that were prime material for short circuits. One J-2 engine contained an extra bolt that did not belong there, and NASA had to determine both how to remove it and how it had arrived.

    A March 1967 meeting attended by Phillips disclosed twelve hundred problems with the Saturn V overall. Technicians proposed addressing them at a rate of eighty per day. The countdown demonstration test, scheduled for the 20th of September 1967, did not begin until the evening of the 27th, was interrupted by a computer failure, and ultimately took three weeks to complete rather than the expected week. Concerned about Teflon seal rings and drain valves weakened by months of exposure to Florida sun, Phillips postponed the final launch from the 7th of November to the 9th.

  • CSM-017, the Block I command and service module aboard Apollo 4, was not built for the Moon. Block I designs lacked the ability to dock with a lunar module - that capability was reserved for the Block II spacecraft that would actually fly lunar missions. CSM-017 was assembled from command module CM-017 and service module SM-020, which had been swapped in after SM-017 was damaged in an explosion and scrapped.

    Several Block II features were retrofitted to CSM-017 specifically so they could be flight-tested without risking a crew. The heat shield was upgraded to Block II standards. A Block II-style umbilical connector linking the command and service modules was installed, along with Block II-pattern VHF and S-band antennae. The hatch window was replaced with a test panel designed to certify the seals and exterior heat shield. A redesigned hatch - created after the Apollo 1 fire revealed that the original could not be quickly opened in an emergency - was not scheduled to fly until Apollo 6, but its seals would get their first flight qualification here.

    Inside the S-IVB's payload adapter rode a Lunar Module Test Article designated LTA-10R, a stand-in for the real thing. Its descent stage was flight-type construction minus landing gear, with fuel and oxidizer tanks filled with a mixture of water, glycol, and freon rather than propellant. An aluminum ballast mockup occupied the ascent stage position. The entire assembly was instrumented to measure the stresses the Saturn V imposed during its climb to orbit. LTA-10R was never meant to survive the mission; it would be destroyed when the S-IVB re-entered the atmosphere. The Saturn V itself, at 3,000 tons, was described in North American's press handout as comfortably outweighing a good-sized navy destroyer.

  • The countdown began at 10:30pm EST on the 6th of November 1967, requiring 89 trailer-truck loads of liquid oxygen, 28 trailer loads of liquid hydrogen, and 27 rail cars of RP-1 - a highly refined kerosene. Built-in holds in the countdown absorbed the minor problems that arose, and none of them delayed the launch.

    At 7:00am EST on the 9th of November, Apollo 4 lifted off exactly on schedule. The Saturn V placed its payload into a nearly circular orbit at 100 nautical miles - the same parking orbit planned for the actual lunar missions. After two orbits, the S-IVB ignited again in space for the first time, pushing the spacecraft into an elliptical path with an apogee of 9,297 nautical miles and a perigee aimed 45.7 nautical miles below Earth's surface, ensuring the command module would hit the atmosphere at high speed and the S-IVB would burn up.

    The service module engine then fired for 281 seconds, driving re-entry speed to 36,639 feet per second at an altitude of 400,000 feet and a flight path angle of negative 6.93 degrees - conditions designed to match a return from the Moon. One burn ran eleven seconds longer than planned, and a separate burn put the craft about one kilometer higher than the target orbit, but both outcomes fell within acceptable tolerances. The command module's environmental control system held cabin temperature and pressure within spec throughout, rising by only 5.6 degrees Celsius during atmospheric entry.

    The CM landed approximately 8.6 nautical miles from its target northwest of Midway Island in the North Pacific. The prime recovery ship recovered both the spacecraft and one of its parachutes within two hours of splashdown - the first Apollo parachute ever retrieved for post-flight inspection. Less than nine hours had passed since liftoff. The spacecraft was flown to Hawaii for deactivation, then trucked to North American's facility in Downey, California, for analysis.

  • Two motion-picture cameras were bolted to the Saturn V to capture stage separations. After the first stage separated, each camera pod was ejected, fell toward the Atlantic Ocean under parachutes guided by radio beacons, and was recovered approximately 470 nautical miles downrange from Kennedy Space Center.

    The command module carried a separate automatic 70-millimeter film camera. For two hours and thirteen minutes as the spacecraft climbed toward and passed its apogee, it photographed Earth through the Command Pilot's forward-looking window at altitudes ranging from 7,295 to 9,769 nautical miles. The camera took 755 color images in that window. At the time, these were the highest-altitude color photographs of Earth ever taken. The resolution was not fine enough to yield detailed scientific data, but they attracted significant interest among earth scientists.

  • President Lyndon Johnson called the Saturn V launch "the largest rocket ever flown" and described it as a symbol of power harnessed for peaceful exploration. Von Braun called it "an expert launching all the way through, from lift-off exactly on time to performance of every single stage." Mueller stated publicly that Apollo 4 had raised his confidence that astronauts could land on the Moon by mid-1969.

    Apollo 6, the second Saturn V flight, launched on the 4th of April 1968. It experienced pogo oscillation in its first stage and lost a second-stage engine early. NASA decided a third uncrewed flight was not needed. The Saturn V flew with a crew for the first time on Apollo 8.

    CM-017 was transferred to the Smithsonian Institution in January 1969 and displayed there for a year. In January 1974 it was moved by truck from Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland to the North Carolina Museum of Life and Science. The Smithsonian recalled it in 1984. The module was subsequently placed on display at NASA's Stennis Space Center, and it remained there until 2017. It now sits at the Infinity Science Center in Pearlington, Mississippi - the visitor center for Stennis - where any member of the public can stand a few feet from the spacecraft that proved the Saturn V could reach the Moon.

Common questions

What was Apollo 4 and why was it significant?

Apollo 4, also known as SA-501, was the first uncrewed test flight of the Saturn V launch vehicle, which launched on the 9th of November 1967. It was significant because it was the first all-up test in NASA history, meaning every stage and the spacecraft were fully functional on a single initial flight. The mission proved the Saturn V could perform, an essential step toward landing astronauts on the Moon before the end of the 1960s.

When did Apollo 4 launch and where did it lift off from?

Apollo 4 launched on the 9th of November 1967 at 7:00am EST from Launch Complex 39 at Kennedy Space Center in Florida. It was the first mission ever launched from KSC and the first to use Launch Complex 39, which had been built specifically to accommodate the Saturn V.

What is all-up testing and did NASA use it on Apollo 4?

All-up testing means every stage of a rocket and the spacecraft it carries are fully functional on the very first flight, with no incremental stage-by-stage testing. George Mueller, head of NASA's Office of Manned Space Flight, mandated this approach in a 1963 memo and it was applied to Apollo 4. The method eliminated four test missions from the Apollo schedule and was borrowed from the Air Force's Minuteman ICBM program.

Why was Apollo 4 delayed from its original January 1967 launch date?

Apollo 4 was delayed by a combination of contractor problems, hardware defects, and the Apollo 1 fire. North American Aviation delivered the S-II second stage six months late, and post-fire inspections uncovered 1,407 errors in the command and service module including haphazardly routed wiring. A problematic countdown demonstration test in late September and early October 1967 took three weeks instead of the expected one, and a final postponement from the 7th to the 9th of November was ordered due to concerns about Teflon seal rings degraded by Florida sun exposure.

How loud was the Apollo 4 Saturn V launch?

William Donn of Columbia University described the Apollo 4 launch as one of the loudest sounds, natural or artificial, in human history, exceeded only by nuclear explosions. The sound pressure was much stronger than expected, buffeting the Vehicle Assembly Building and Launch Control Center more than five kilometers away. CBS commentator Walter Cronkite pressed his hands against a trailer window to keep it from shattering as ceiling tiles fell around him.

Where is the Apollo 4 command module today?

The Apollo 4 command module, designated CM-017, is currently on display at the Infinity Science Center in Pearlington, Mississippi, the visitor center for NASA's Stennis Space Center. It was transferred to the Smithsonian Institution in January 1969, moved to the North Carolina Museum of Life and Science in January 1974, recalled by the Smithsonian in 1984, and placed at Stennis Space Center, where it remained until 2017.

All sources

18 references cited across the entry

  1. 1webMaster Satellite ListJonathan McDowell — Jonathan's Space Pages
  2. 2webApollo 11 Mission OverviewNASA — December 21, 2017
  3. 3bookMoonport: A History of Apollo Launch Facilities and OperationsCharles D. Benson et al. — NASA — 1978
  4. 4webNASA Apollo Mission Apollo-1-- Phillips ReportNASA History Division — October 22, 2004
  5. 5journal'Fire in the Cockpit!'Kelly A. Giblin — American Heritage Publishing — Spring 1998
  6. 8bookThe Apollo Spacecraft: A ChronologyIvan D. Ertel et al. — NASA — 1969–1978
  7. 10webApollo 4 pre-launch press conferenceNASA — November 8, 1967
  8. 12newsSaturn V places Apollo in Orbit in Smooth TestJohn Noble Wilford — November 10, 1967
  9. 13bookAnalysis of Apollo AS-501 Mission Earth PhotographyJohn E. Dornbach — Manned Spacecraft Center, NASA — February 1968
  10. 14webThe curious case of the Apollo 4 Earth imagesJason Davis — The Planetary Society — May 23, 2018