Apollo command and service module
The Apollo command and service module flew nineteen times, nine of those voyages taking astronauts to the Moon and home again. North American Aviation began building it in November 1961, a decade before the last one left the launchpad. The program's total cost reached $36.9 billion in 2016 dollars. Every mission ended with a deliberate sacrifice. The larger of the two spacecraft sections was cut loose just before reentry and left to burn in the atmosphere. The smaller piece plunged to splashdown, carrying the crew. What kind of engineering produces a machine where half the structure is designed to be thrown away? And why did a launchpad fire force engineers to rebuild the original design almost entirely before anyone had reached the Moon? North American Aviation had initially designed the spacecraft for direct descent to the Moon, with no means of docking with a separate vehicle. Switching to a plan that used a separate lunar lander required the addition of a docking hatch and probe, hardware the original design had no room for.
At 12 feet 10 inches across its base, the conical command module formed one of two halves of the Apollo CSM. The cylindrical service module beside it measured 14 feet 10 inches long, with the main engine nozzle adding height to a total of 24 feet 7 inches. These two sections served entirely different roles. The command module was the pressurized capsule the crew lived in; the service module was the unpressurized workhorse that kept them alive. It carried propulsion, electrical power, oxygen, and water for missions lasting more than a week in deep space. A single umbilical bundled all wiring and plumbing between the two sections throughout the voyage. Just before the command module hit the atmosphere, a pyrotechnic guillotine severed that connection. The service module's thrusters then fired automatically to push it clear, ensuring it broke up faster and followed a different trajectory. Three tension ties and six compression pads had held the two sections together from launch until that moment. The pressurized crew cabin inside the command module held just 210 cubic feet of habitable space.
566 switches crowded the command module's control panels, joined by 24 instruments, 40 event indicators, and 71 lights. Those controls were arranged across a crescent-shaped main display panel measuring nearly 7 feet wide and 3 feet tall. Three panels divided the controls by crew role. The commander's section on the left managed flight controls and attitude indicators. The center panel housed the guidance computer, navigation systems, and caution-warning indicators. The right-hand panel covered fuel cells, electrical systems, and communications for the systems engineer.
Three couches built from hollow steel tubing and covered in fireproof Armalon cloth supported the crew during launch and landing. Each rested on eight shock-attenuating struts designed to absorb the force of ocean splashdown or, if needed, an emergency landing on solid ground. Six equipment bays flanking the main panels organized the cabin's storage. Food, medical supplies, survival kits, tool sets, cameras, and the contingency lunar sample container each had their designated compartment.
Five windows punctuated the command module's hull, each a three-pane glass assembly. Two side windows measured 9 inches square. Two smaller triangular rendezvous windows at the front aided docking with the lunar module. A circular hatch window above the center couch measured 9 inches in diameter. The inner two panes of each assembly were aluminosilicate glass, forming part of the pressure vessel. The outer pane was fused silica, serving as both a debris shield and a heat shield component. The Block II spacecraft that housed this interior flew for the first time on the 11th of October, 1968, as Apollo 7. Reaching that mission required rebuilding the design after a fire killed three astronauts and severely damaged their command module during a launch rehearsal.
On the 27th of January, 1967, a cabin fire broke out during a launch rehearsal for the Apollo 1 mission. It killed astronauts Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee. The mission had been planned for launch on the 21st of February of that year. The fire exposed a critical flaw in the Block I design. Its two-piece hatch required unbolting the inner section and stowing it inside the capsule before the crew could exit. In a fire, that sequence was fatal.
The Apollo 204 Review Board's investigation found that many Block I flaws had already spread into Block II modules then under construction. Engineers set about redesigning Block II to address the board's findings. The new Block II hatch was a single piece operated by a pump handle that drove fifteen latches simultaneously, openable in an emergency without unbolting anything. Weight was also reduced. The Block I Apollo 1 spacecraft had weighed approximately 45,000 pounds. The redesigned Block II Apollo 7 came in at 36,400 pounds, a reduction achieved through both safety fixes and deliberate weight reduction work. By January 1964, North American had already been presenting Block II design details to NASA; the fire made those plans essential rather than optional. The revised Block II heat shield was then tested on the uncrewed Apollo 4 and Apollo 6 flights before any crew relied on it. Those tests had to confirm the shield could survive temperatures sufficient to melt most metals on the return from the Moon.
Phenolic formaldehyde resin coated the outside of the command module, bonded to a steel and aluminum honeycomb outer shell. During reentry, this resin charred and melted in a controlled process, carrying heat away from the capsule's structure beneath. The shield was thickest at the aft base: 2 inches of material at the end that faced forward during reentry. It tapered to just half an inch at the forward portions. Its total weight was roughly 3,000 pounds. The resin carried several outer coverings. A pore seal and a white moisture barrier topped the ablative layer. A silver Mylar thermal coating gave the surface an appearance similar to aluminum foil.
Above the heat shield, the capsule's lift-to-drag ratio of about 0.368 gave the crew some directional control during descent. Astronauts steered by rotating the capsule with thrusters; when no correction was needed, they spun it slowly to cancel out the lift effects. At 24,000 feet, four pressurized-gas compression springs ejected the forward heat shield, exposing the parachute compartment. Two conical ribbon drogue parachutes deployed first, slowing the capsule to 125 miles per hour. At 10,700 feet, the drogues were jettisoned and three main ringsail parachutes opened, each 83.5 feet in diameter, slowing the capsule to 22 miles per hour for splashdown.
On Apollo 15, only two of those three mains deployed. The system had been designed to land safely on two, with the third serving as a redundancy. Four crushable ribs built into the capsule's base provided a final layer of impact absorption. Starting with Apollo 14, the service module was fitted with an auxiliary 400 Ah battery as an emergency power reserve. On Apollo 13 in April 1970, before that backup existed, an oxygen tank rupture had nearly stranded three astronauts far from Earth.
The AJ10-137 engine produced 20,500 pounds of thrust, a figure settled by an April 1962 contract with Aerojet-General. That contract came just months before NASA officially chose the lunar orbit rendezvous approach in July 1962. The engine turned out to be twice as powerful as the revised mission required. Its original design purpose had been to lift the entire spacecraft off the lunar surface on a direct landing concept. It ended up serving instead for mid-course corrections, for placing the spacecraft into lunar orbit, and for breaking out of it. The propellants were pressure-fed from two 40-inch-diameter spherical tanks storing gaseous helium at 3,600 pounds per square inch.
Electrical power came from three hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells in Sector 4 of the service module. Each cell measured 44 inches tall by 22 inches in diameter and weighed 245 pounds. As a byproduct of combining hydrogen and oxygen to generate electricity, the cells produced drinkable water that was piped into the crew cabin. Apollo 12 was struck twice by lightning during its November 1969 launch, placing unusual demands on the spacecraft's power systems. On Apollo 13, one oxygen tank ruptured and punctured a second. The loss cut off all oxygen to the fuel cells, forcing the crew to rely on command module batteries for the return. After that mission, a third oxygen tank was added to the service module, allowing the tanks to never operate below half capacity. That change also allowed removal of the stirring-fan equipment inside the tanks, which had contributed to the failure. Three CSMs were then modified to carry crews to the Skylab station in 1973 and 1974. Each had one fuel cell removed. The otherwise-empty fuel and oxidizer storage tanks were stripped out as well, leaving only the partially filled sump tanks.
CSM-116 launched to Skylab on the 25th of May, 1973, the first of three crewed missions to the orbital station. Two more followed that year: CSM-117 on the 28th of July, and CSM-118 on the 16th of November. These Earth-orbital missions needed less propellant than the lunar flights, so each spacecraft launched with less than half the full SPS propellant load. The high-gain S-band antenna was omitted from all three; omnidirectional antennas sufficed for ground communications at Earth orbital distances. Each command module was partially painted white to help manage its temperature during the extended time it would spend docked and largely unoccupied.
CM-119 was set aside as a Skylab Rescue vehicle. Two jump-seat couches were installed in its aft equipment bay to carry stranded crew members back if their own capsule became unusable. It sat ready on the ground but was never needed.
The final CSM to fly, CSM-111, launched on the 15th of July, 1975. It docked with the Soviet craft Soyuz 19 as part of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project, the first international crewed spaceflight. That capsule is now on display at the California Science Center in Los Angeles. Two CSMs that were never fully completed, the vehicles intended for the canceled Apollo 19 and Apollo 20 missions, still survive. CSM-115 stands in the Saturn V display at Johnson Space Center in Houston, its SPS engine nozzle never installed. The hardware for CSM-115a was sent to Japan for an exhibition in 1978 and never returned. It remains at the Space LABO in Kitakyushu.
Continue browsing
Updated
Common questions
What was the Apollo command and service module used for?
The Apollo command and service module carried three astronauts to and from lunar orbit on nine missions between 1968 and 1972. It also ferried crews to the Skylab space station in 1973 and 1974, and completed the first international crewed spaceflight by docking with the Soviet Soyuz 19 craft in 1975. A total of nineteen were launched across the entire program.
How many Apollo command and service modules flew in space?
Nineteen Apollo command and service modules were launched into space. Nine flew humans to the Moon, two conducted crewed Earth orbital test flights, four flew as uncrewed test vehicles, three carried crews to the Skylab space station, and one flew the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project mission in 1975.
What caused the Apollo 1 fire and how did it change the command module design?
On the 27th of January, 1967, a cabin fire during a launch rehearsal killed astronauts Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee. The Apollo 204 Review Board found that the Block I design's two-piece hatch could not be opened quickly in an emergency. The Block II redesign replaced it with a single quick-release hatch driven by fifteen simultaneous latches, and corrected numerous construction shortcomings identified by the investigation.
How did the Apollo command module heat shield protect the crew during reentry?
The command module's heat shield was made of phenolic formaldehyde resin, which charred and melted in a controlled way during reentry, carrying heat away from the capsule's metal structure. The shield weighed roughly 3,000 pounds and varied from 2 inches thick at the aft base to half an inch at the forward sections. The aft base faced forward during reentry to absorb the maximum heat load.
What missions did the Apollo command and service module fly after the Moon landings?
Three Apollo command and service modules ferried crews to the Skylab space station in 1973 and 1974, beginning with CSM-116 on the 25th of May, 1973. The final CSM, designated CSM-111, launched on the 15th of July, 1975, and docked with the Soviet Soyuz 19 craft as part of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project. That capsule is now on display at the California Science Center in Los Angeles.
How much did the Apollo command and service module program cost?
The total cost of the Apollo command and service module program was $36.9 billion in 2016 dollars, adjusted from a nominal total of $3.7 billion using the NASA New Start Inflation Indices. This figure covered both development costs and all units produced.
All sources
60 references cited across the entry
- 1Aerojet AJ10-137 ArchivesDecember 25, 2022
- 2NewsProject Olympus (1962)David S. F. Portree — 2013-09-02
- 3ch1W. D. Compton et al. — January 1983
- 4BookChariots for Apollo: A History of Manned Lunar SpacecraftCourtney G Brooks et al. — NASA — 1979
- 5BookThe Apollo Spacecraft: A ChronologyMary Louise Morse et al. — NASA — September 20, 2007
- 6BookApollo by the NumbersRichard Orloff — National Aeronautics and Space Administration — 1996
- 7NASA New Start Inflation IndicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
- 8NewsApollo 11 Press KitNASA — July 6, 1969
- 9The Making Of Apollo's Command Module: 2 Engineers Recall Tragedy And TriumphJacob Margolis — 16 July 2019
- 10How Downey, California helped put Apollo 11 on the moon (and get the astronauts back safely)Steve Chiotakis et al. — 15 July 2019
- 11CSM06 Command Module Overview pp. 39–52National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- 13The Apollo docking systemKenneth Bloom — January 1, 1971
- 16BookApollo by the numbers : a statistical referenceRichard Orloff — National Aeronautics and Space Administration — 2000
- 17Making lemons into lemonadeDwayne Day — 2009-05-26
- 18NewsOut of the blackDay, Dwayne Allen — 2012-06-11
- 19BookWe Reach the Moon: The New York Times Story of Man's Greatest AdventureJohn Wilford — Bantam Paperbacks — 1969
- 20Apollo CSMEncyclopedia Astronautica
- 21BookSpace EngineeringA. L. Feldman et al. — Springer Netherlands — 1970
- 22Apollo CSM SPSEncyclopedia Astronautica
- 24BookApollo 11 Mission Report – Performance of the Command and Service Module Reaction Control SystemNASA – Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center — December 1971
- 25BookSM2A-03-BLOCK II-(1), Apollo Operations HandbookNational Aeronautics and Space Administration — 1969
- 28Reduced Apollo Block II service propulsion system for Saturn IB MissionsEncyclopedia Astronautica
- 29BookManned Spacecraft, Second RevisionKenneth Gatland — Macmillan Publishing Co. — 1976
- 34CM-007James H. Gerard — 22 November 2004
- 36Permanent ExhibitsUSS Hornet museum — December 8, 2015
- 37NewsBurned Apollo I capsule moved to new storage facility in HamptonDiane Tennant — February 17, 2007
- 3850 years later, NASA displays fatal Apollo capsuleJanuary 25, 2017
- 39CSM ContractNASA
- 40BookAPOLLO/SKYLAB ASTP AND SHUTTLE --ORBITER MAJOR END ITEMSNASA Johnson Space Center — 1978
- 41CSM Block IMark Wade — Encyclopedia Astronautica — 10 December 1999
- 44Location of Apollo Command ModulesSmithsonian National Air and Space Museum
- 45Apollo 7 Command Module and Wally Schirra's Training Suit Leave Science and Tech Museum After 30 YearsCanada Science and Technology Museum — March 12, 2004
- 46BP-22James H. Gerard — 11 July 2007
- 47Historic Apollo–Soyuz Spacecraft Gets New Display at CA Science CenterRobert Pearlman — February 23, 2018
- 49Apollo–Soyuz spacecraft gets new display at CA Science CenterRobert Pearlman
- 50Book1971 NASA Authorization: Hearings, Ninety-first Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 15695 (superseded by H.R. 16516)United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Astronautics — U.S. Government Printing Office — 1970
- 51NewsExploring NASA's Johnson Space Center with the cast of The MartianLee Hutchinson — September 19, 2015
- 52BookApollo: The Lost and Forgotten MissionsDavid Shayler — Springer Science & Business Media — 2002
- 53Book1974 NASA Authorization: Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, First Session, on H.R. 4567 (superseded by H.R. 7528).United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Astronautics — U.S. Government Printing Office — 1973
- 54BookSpace Shuttle-Skylab 1973: Status Report for the Committee on Science and AstronauticsUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Astronautics — 1973
- 55Book1979 NASA Reauthorization (Program Review)United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Astronautics — October 1977
- 56Johnson Space Center (1978) p. 6Johnson Space Center — 1978
- 57Item – National Naval Aviation Museum2015-09-05
- 58Skylab space capsule lands at Cleveland's Great Lakes Science CenterLiz Navratil — June 23, 2010
- 59Oklahoma History Center celebrating 15th anniversary with free admission, new exhibit 'Launch to Landing: Oklahomans and Space'Brandy McDonnell — 17 November 2020