Apollo program
The Apollo program landed the first humans on the Moon in 1969, and roughly 650 million people worldwide watched it happen on television. That number alone tells you something about the moment. A species that had never left its own planet's orbit suddenly stood on another world. Twelve people would walk on the lunar surface across six landings, the last in December 1972. They brought back rocks older than almost anything on Earth. But the part most people never hear is how close the whole thing came to never happening, and how a single argument among engineers decided the shape of the spacecraft that got there. There is a fire that killed three men strapped into a capsule on the ground. There is an oxygen tank that exploded a quarter of the way to the Moon. There is a president who knew almost nothing about rockets and was put off by the price. How does a goal that sounded impossible in 1961 become a flag standing in lunar dust eight years later? And why, after all of it, did the rockets end up in museums?
NASA manager Abe Silverstein chose the name Apollo at home one evening, early in 1960. He later said, "I was naming the spacecraft like I'd name my baby." The image that decided it was the Greek god Apollo riding his chariot across the Sun, which Silverstein felt fit the grand scale of what NASA was proposing. At that point the program had nothing to do with landing on the Moon. The focus was an advanced crewed spacecraft, the Apollo command and service module, meant to succeed the one-astronaut Mercury capsule. Where Mercury could carry one person on a limited Earth orbit, Apollo would carry three. The early list of possible missions included ferrying crews to a space station and flights that would loop around the Moon without landing. A lunar landing became the program's central purpose only in 1961. Until then, the harder job of testing advanced spaceflight technique fell to a different effort, Project Gemini, which slotted in between Mercury and Apollo.
On the 12th of April 1961, Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin became the first person to fly in space. The shock reinforced an American fear of being left behind. John F. Kennedy, elected the previous November on a campaign promising superiority over the Soviet Union in space and missiles, had so far been cautious. He knew little about the technical side of spaceflight and was put off by the enormous cost of a crewed Moon landing. When NASA Administrator James E. Webb asked for a 30 percent budget increase, Kennedy backed the booster program but deferred the bigger decision. On the 20th of April Kennedy sent a memo to Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, asking him to assess where America stood and whether it could catch up. Johnson reported back about a week later that the country was "neither making maximum effort nor achieving results necessary" to lead, but judged a crewed Moon landing distant enough that the United States could likely get there first. On the 25th of May 1961, twenty days after the first American crewed flight, Freedom 7, Kennedy stood before Congress and committed the nation to "landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth" before the decade was out. The following September, at Rice University in Houston, he sharpened the case: "We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard."
Tom Dolan at Vought and John Houbolt at Langley Research Center fought for an idea most NASA engineers distrusted. The mission planners had four ways to reach the Moon. Direct Ascent would fly one giant spacecraft straight to the surface, demanding a launcher even bigger than the Saturn V, the Nova-class rocket. Earth Orbit Rendezvous would launch parts separately, up to fifteen times in some plans, and assemble them in orbit. Lunar Surface Rendezvous would send an automated fuel vehicle to the surface first. The fourth, Lunar Orbit Rendezvous, kept a command module in lunar orbit while a small lander carried two astronauts down and back. In early 1961, direct ascent was the favorite. Many engineers feared that rendezvous and docking, never attempted even in Earth orbit, would be nearly impossible around the Moon. Houbolt campaigned through 1960 and 1961, bypassing the NASA hierarchy and writing directly to Associate Administrator Robert Seamans, admitting he spoke "somewhat as a voice in the wilderness." The Marshall Space Flight Center engineers, invested in direct ascent, held out the longest, but Wernher von Braun announced their conversion at a briefing on the 7th of June 1962. Even then it was not settled. Kennedy's science advisor Jerome Wiesner, who opposed human spaceflight, blurted "No, that's no good" in front of the press during a presentation by von Braun at Marshall. Space historian James Hansen concluded that without NASA adopting this "stubbornly held minority opinion in 1962," the country might still have reached the Moon, but almost certainly not by Kennedy's deadline.
North American Aviation won the contract for the command and service module on the 28th of November 1961, even though its bid was not rated as highly as a rival proposal from the Martin company. Webb, Dryden and Seamans chose it for North American's longer association with NASA. The command module was the cone-shaped crew cabin, 11.42 feet tall and 12.83 feet across, the only major component to survive from the early study designs without big changes. Its exterior carried an ablative heat shield, and parachutes slowed it to an ocean splashdown. Behind it sat the cylindrical service module, holding the main engine, propellants and a fuel cell power system running on liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation built the lunar module, overseen by Thomas J. Kelly. Because it never had to survive Earth's atmosphere, its fuselage was designed with no aerodynamic shaping at all, in extremely lightweight construction. It split into a descent stage and an ascent stage, each with its own engine. Wernher von Braun's team at Marshall developed the launch vehicle, the three-stage Saturn V, which stood 363 feet tall and 33 feet wide with its lunar payload. Its first stage burned a kerosene fuel with liquid oxygen for a rated 7,500,000 pounds of thrust, later upgraded to 7,610,000. The choice of lunar orbit rendezvous on the 11th of June 1962 is what let the Saturn V replace the far larger Nova.
On the morning of the 27th of January 1967, Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee climbed into their command module for a "plugs-out" test on Launch Complex 34. The crew had named their flight Apollo 1 as a motivational focus on the first crewed flight. The test was plagued from the start. The crew noticed a strange odor in their spacesuits, which delayed sealing the hatch, and then communications problems forced a hold in the simulated countdown. During that hold an electrical fire began in the cabin and spread fast in the high-pressure, pure oxygen atmosphere. Pressure rose until the cabin's inner wall burst, letting flame erupt onto the pad and frustrating rescue. The astronauts were asphyxiated before the hatch could be opened. An accident review board, watched by both houses of Congress, concluded that "deficiencies existed in command module design, workmanship and quality control." Webb forced North American to remove Harrison Storms as command module program manager and reassigned program office manager Joseph Francis Shea, replacing him with George Low. The fixes reshaped the spacecraft. Engineers switched to a nitrogen and oxygen mixture before and during launch, stripped flammable materials from cabin and suits, and adopted a quick-release, outward-opening hatch. NASA retired the Apollo 1 designation to honor the crew, at their widows' wishes, and renumbered the next flight Apollo 4.
Apollo 8 was supposed to be a simple Earth-orbiting test, but in the summer of 1968 it became clear the lunar module would not be ready in time. Rather than waste a Saturn V, manager George Low proposed sending the crew to orbit the Moon instead. The Soviet Union had just sent tortoises, mealworms and wine flies around the Moon aboard Zond 5 on the 15th of September 1968, and it was feared cosmonauts might follow. Frank Borman, Jim Lovell and William Anders made ten lunar orbits in 20 hours, transmitting television pictures of the surface on Christmas Eve. The following March, Apollo 9 demonstrated the lunar module in Earth orbit, with Russell Schweickart testing the full lunar suit and its portable life support system outside the spacecraft. In May 1969, Apollo 10 flew the lunar module to within 50,000 feet of the surface as a dress rehearsal. Then on the 20th of July 1969, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed at the Sea of Tranquility while Michael Collins stayed in lunar orbit. They spent about 21 hours and 36 minutes on the surface, and 2 hours 31 minutes outside walking, photographing, and deploying instruments, broadcasting black-and-white television back to Earth. Armstrong's words have outlasted everything else from that day: "That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind."
Apollo 13 launched James Lovell, Jack Swigert, and Fred Haise in April 1970, bound for the Fra Mauro formation, when a liquid oxygen tank exploded two days out. The blast disabled the service module and left the command ship without electrical power. The crew survived by using the lunar module as a "lifeboat," drawing on it for propulsion, power and life support to get home. The advantage had been discussed years earlier. A 1964 study at the Manned Spacecraft Center had actually dropped the lifeboat idea, concluding no single reasonable failure of the command and service module could be identified that would require it. The investigation traced the cause to damage to the tank in the factory and a subcontractor who had not built a component to updated specifications. After the first landings, public and political interest faded, and President Nixon wanted to rein in federal spending. NASA's budget could not sustain missions that cost on average 445 million dollars each while developing the Space Shuttle. Apollo 20 was cancelled so a Saturn V could launch the Skylab laboratory, and missions 18 and 19 were cut by 1971. The whole program cost 25.4 billion dollars and at its peak employed over 400,000 people across some 20,000 firms and universities. Apollo 17, in December 1972, was the only Saturn V night launch and carried NASA's first scientist-astronaut, geologist Harrison Schmitt, who had been lobbied onto the final flight by the lunar geology community. After Apollo, no human would leave low Earth orbit until the Artemis II flyby planned for 2026.
Up Next
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What was the Apollo program and what did it achieve?
The Apollo program was the United States human spaceflight program led by NASA that landed the first humans on the Moon in 1969. Across six landings, twelve people walked on the lunar surface, and the program returned over 382 kilograms of lunar rocks and soil to Earth.
When did the Apollo program run and when was the first Moon landing?
Apollo ran from 1961 to 1972, with its first crewed flight in 1968. The first Moon landing came on Apollo 11, when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin touched down at the Sea of Tranquility on the 20th of July 1969.
Why did President Kennedy commit the United States to landing on the Moon?
Kennedy committed to the Moon landing on the 25th of May 1961, after Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin became the first person in space on the 12th of April 1961, deepening American fears of falling behind. Kennedy used the goal as a measure of national leadership, telling Congress the nation should land a man on the Moon and return him safely before the decade was out.
What happened in the Apollo 1 fire?
On the 27th of January 1967, astronauts Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee died when an electrical fire spread through their command module during a launch pad test. The pure oxygen, high-pressure cabin let the fire spread quickly, and the crew were asphyxiated before the hatch could be opened.
How did the Apollo 13 crew survive the oxygen tank explosion?
The Apollo 13 crew survived by using the lunar module as a lifeboat after an oxygen tank exploded two days into the flight in April 1970. The lunar module provided propulsion, electrical power, and life support to return James Lovell, Jack Swigert, and Fred Haise safely to Earth.
Why did the Apollo program end?
The Apollo program ended as public and political interest waned after the first landings and President Nixon sought to rein in federal spending. NASA could not sustain missions costing on average 445 million dollars each while also developing the Space Shuttle, leading to the cancellation of Apollo 18, 19, and 20, with Apollo 17 the final mission in December 1972.
All sources
127 references cited across the entry
- 1How much did the Apollo program cost?The Planetary Society
- 2Apollo 11 Moon Landing Stories2021-02-25
- 3NASA Adds Mission to Artemis Lunar Program, Updates ArchitectureNASA — 2026-02-27
- 4Press release1969 Apollo 11 News ReleaseCharles E. Kelsey — Lewis Research Center — July 14, 1969
- 5MagazineProject Olympus (1962)David S. F. Portree — September 2, 2013
- 6Brooks, Grimwood, Swenson (1979) p. Ch. 1.7: "Feasility Studies". pp. 16–21.Brooks, Grimwood, Swenson — 1979
- 7Journal"Who Ever Believed in the 'Missile Gap'?": John F. Kennedy and the Politics of National SecurityChristopher A. Preble — 2003
- 8Memorandum for Vice PresidentJohn F. Kennedy — John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum — April 20, 1961
- 9BookApollo: A Retrospective AnalysisRoger D. Launius — NASA — July 1994
- 10Memorandum for the PresidentLyndon B. Johnson — John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum — April 28, 1961
- 11VideoSpecial Message to Congress on Urgent National NeedsJohn F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum — May 25, 1961
- 13NewsSoviets Planned to Accept JFK's Joint Lunar Mission OfferFrank Sietzen — October 2, 1997
- 17BookThis New Ocean: A History of Project MercuryLoyd S. Jr. Swenson et al. — NASA — 1989
- 18BookSuddenly Tomorrow Came ... A History of the Johnson Space CenterHenry C. Dethloff — National Aeronautics and Space Administration — 1993
- 19Address at Rice University on the Nation's Space EffortJohn F. Kennedy — John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum — September 12, 1962
- 2150—Statement About Signing a Bill Designating the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston, Texas, as the Lyndon B. Johnson Space CenterRichard M. Nixon — University of California, Santa Barbara — February 19, 1973
- 22Dr. Kurt H. DebusNASA — February 1987
- 23Executive Orders Disposition Tables: Lyndon B. Johnson – 1963: Executive Order 11129National Archives and Records Administration
- 24VAB Nears CompletionNASA
- 261976 Standard Atmosphere PropertiesLuizmonteiro, LLC
- 27BookStages to SaturnRoger E. Bilstein — National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA History Office — January 1996
- 28NewsSamuel C. Phillips, Who Directed Apollo Lunar Landing, Dies at 68Alfonso A. Narvaez — February 1, 1990
- 29'One Giant Leap' Explores The Herculean Effort Behind The 1969 Moon LandingDave Davies — 2019-06-12
- 30BookApollo by the Numbers: A Statistical Reference. Launch Vehicle/Spacecraft Key Facts – 2nd tableRichard W. Orloff — NASA History Division — September 2004
- 31ReportManaging NASA in the Apollo Era
- 32BookSurvivors: True Tales of Endurance: 500 Years of the Greatest Eyewitness AccountsJohn B. Letterman — Simon & Schuster — 2003
- 33Apollo-13 (29)Jim Dumoulin — NASA — June 29, 2001
- 34Apollo Program Summary ReportNASA — April 1975
- 36NewsT. J. Kelly, 72, Dies; Father of Lunar ModuleWarren E. Leary — March 27, 2002
- 39BookApollo Systems DescriptionNASA — February 1, 1964
- 40Apollo SA-11Mark Wade
- 42BookSaturn IB News ReferenceNASA; Chrysler Corporation; McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company; International Business Machines Corporation; Rocketdyne — December 1965
- 45Astronaut Bio: Deke Slayton 6/93NASA — June 1993
- 46Astronaut Bio: Harrison SchmittNASA — December 1994
- 47First Apollo flight crew last to be honoredRobert Z. Pearlman — Robert Pearlman — October 20, 2008
- 48BookManned SpacecraftKenneth Gatland — MacMillan — 1976
- 49BookApollo 12 Mission ReportJames A. McDivitt — NASA Manned Spacecraft Center — March 1970
- 51Apollo: Where are they now?David R. Williams — NASA
- 53BookApollo 14 Mission ReportJames A. McDivitt — NASA Manned Spacecraft Center — April 1971
- 54BookPostlaunch Report for Mission AS-201 (Apollo Spacecraft 009)NASA — May 6, 1966
- 55BookPostlaunch Report for Mission AS-202 (Apollo Spacecraft 011)NASA — October 12, 1966
- 56Evaluation of AS-203 Low Gravity Orbital ExperimentChrysler Corp. — NASA — January 13, 1967
- 58A1C
- 59JournalApollo Experience Report – Development of the Extravehicular Mobility UnitCharles C. Lutz et al. — November 1975
- 60How Donn Eisele Became "Whatshisname," the Command Module Pilot of Apollo 7Amy Shira Teitel — December 4, 2013
- 61Apollo 1: The Fire1967-01-27
- 62BookMoonport: A History of Apollo Launch Facilities and OperationsCharles D. Benson et al. — Scientific and Technical Information Office, NASA — 1978
- 63The Phillips ReportNASA History Office — October 22, 2004
- 64BookReport of Apollo 204 Review BoardRobert C. Jr. Seamans — NASA History Office — April 5, 1967
- 65BookReport of Apollo 204 Review BoardRobert C. Jr. Seamans — NASA History Office — April 5, 1967
- 66Brooks, Grimwood, Swenson (1979) p. "The Slow Recovery"Brooks, Grimwood, Swenson — 1979
- 67Apollo 11 30th Anniversary: Manned Apollo MissionsNASA History Office — 1999
- 68BookApollo Expeditions to the MoonGeorge M. Low — Scientific and Technical Information Office, NASA — 1975
- 69Mission ObjectiveJuly 8, 2015
- 70Mission ObjectiveJuly 8, 2009
- 71BookA Man on the Moon: The Voyages of the Apollo AstronautsAndrew Chaikin — Viking — 1994
- 72MagazinePoised for the LeapDecember 6, 1968
- 73Apollo 9
- 75Apollo 11 Mission OverviewApril 17, 2015
- 76One Small Misstep: Neil Armstrong's First Words on the MoonBarbara Mikkelson et al. — Urban Legends Reference Pages — October 2006
- 77That may have been a small one for Neil...Eric Jones — NASA
- 83Three Saturn Vs on Display Teach Lessons in Space HistoryMike Wright — Marshall Space Flight Center History Office
- 84Apollo 18 through 20 – The Cancelled MissionsDavid Williams — December 11, 2003
- 85Apollo 14July 8, 2009
- 88Apollo 15July 8, 2009
- 89Apollo 16July 8, 2009
- 90Apollo 17July 30, 2015
- 91Apollo 18' Myths Debunked, NASA-styleKay Grinter — September 28, 2011
- 92Harrison Schmitt: Geologist on the MoonElizabeth Howell — April 23, 2013
- 93Apollo 13NASA — July 9, 2009
- 95NASA Lunar Sample Laboatory FacilityNASA — September 1, 2016
- 96BookA Man On the Moon: The Voyages of the Apollo AstronautsAndrew Chaikin — Penguin Books — 2007
- 97Rock Solid: JSC's Lunar Sample Lab Turns 30Kristen Erickson — NASA — July 16, 2009
- 98JournalAn Improved Cost Analysis of the Apollo ProgramCasey Dreier — 2022-05-01
- 99The Joint Confidence Level Paradox: A History of DenialGlenn Butts et al. — Cost Analysis Division — April 28, 2009
- 100BookThe World-wide Spread of Space TechnologyEugene B. Skolnikoff et al. — MIT Center for Space Research — 1968
- 101How Richard Nixon Changed NASAJason Callahan — The Planetary Society
- 102Book1974 NASA authorization hearings, Ninety-third Congress, first session, on H.R. 4567 (superseded by H.R. 7528).U.S. Govt. Print. Off. — 1973
- 103A Science Program for Manned SpaceflightW. D. Compton et al. — January 1983
- 104Manned Venus FlybyNASA — February 1, 1967
- 105What Goes Up...W. D. Compton et al. — January 1983
- 106Legacy
- 107Apollo-Soyuz: An Orbital Partnership BeginsNASA — July 10, 2015
- 108Press releaseThe 'halo' area around Apollo 15 landing site observed by Terrain Camera on SELENE(KAGUYA)Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency — May 20, 2008
- 109LRO Sees Apollo Landing SitesGrey Hautaluoma et al. — NASA — July 17, 2009
- 111Question Answered!Mark Robinson — Arizona State University — July 27, 2012
- 112NewsThe Human MoonNovember 16, 2009
- 113Apollo 11 30th Anniversary: IntroductionNASA History Office — 1999
- 114NASA Spin-offs: Bringing Space Down to EarthEleanor A. O'Rangers — January 26, 2005
- 116SearchNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
- 117BookInterplanetary Monitoring PlatformP. M. Butler — NASA — 29 August 1989
- 118JournalThe Evolution of IMP Spacecraft Mosfet Data SystemsH. D. White et al. — 1971
- 119Apollo Guidance Computer and the First Silicon ChipsSmithsonian Institution — 14 October 2015
- 120Apollo 8: Christmas at the MoonFebruary 19, 2015
- 121JournalThe blue marbleGregory A Petsko — 2011
- 122NewsApollo plus 50The Economist Newspaper Limited — May 21, 2011
- 123Houston, We Erased The Apollo 11 TapesNell Greenfieldboyce — National Public Radio, Inc. — July 16, 2009
- 124The moon shoot: film of Apollo mission on show again after 35 years in the canSam Jones — May 25, 2009
- 125TV World;NEWLN:Race to moon reviewed with NASA film on PBSJulianne Hastings — August 13, 1984
- 126Apollo 11 documentary is a time capsule for the fleeting optimism of mankind's first Moon landingLuke Goodsell — July 17, 2019
- 127MagazineMovie Review: In the Shadow of the MoonOwen Gleiberman — August 29, 2007
- 128News'Apollo 11' Review: The 1969 Moon Mission Still Has the Power to ThrillGlenn Kenny — February 27, 2019
- 129Magazine'Apollo 11' Documentary Gets Exclusive Imax ReleaseRebecca Rubin — February 13, 2019
- 130NewsIndiana Jones 5 Will Pit Indy Against Nazis Again, In 1969 – ExclusiveBen Travis — November 11, 2022
- 131You Have 60 Seconds to Get to the Moon and Back. Go.Phil Plait — 2015-10-29