State (polity)
A state is something most people are born inside and never think to question, yet scholars cannot agree on what it actually is. There is no academic consensus on the definition of the state. The sociologist Max Weber offered the line most often repeated: a state is a human community that successfully claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory. The earliest forms of states arose about 5,500 years ago. For most of prehistory, before that, people lived in stateless societies with no concentrated authority at all. How did a handful of farming communities harden into the institutions that now carve up almost the entire inhabitable surface of the planet? Why did grain, of all things, sit at the center of it? And why do thinkers from Charles Tilly to Michel Foucault disagree so sharply about whether the state protects us or preys on us?
Status, the Latin word meaning condition or circumstances, is the ancestor of state and its cousins across Europe: stato in Italian, estado in Spanish and Portuguese, etat in French, Staat in German and Dutch. Latin status derives from stare, meaning to stand, or to remain or be permanent, lending the political entity a sense of something fixed and almost sacred.
The English noun arrived in Middle English around 1200, both from Old French and directly from Latin, and at first carried only the generic sense of condition. With the revival of Roman law in 14th-century Europe, the word came to mark the legal standing of persons, including the various estates of the realm: noble, common, and clerical. The highest estates, those with the most wealth and social rank, were the ones that held power.
The early 16th-century works of Machiavelli, especially The Prince and The Discourses on Livy, helped popularize the word in something close to its modern sense. In his time, stato still referred mainly to the position of a person or group holding political power over individuals. The contrasting of church and state also dates to the 16th century. The phrase attributed to Louis XIV, L'Etat, c'est moi, meaning I am the State, is probably apocryphal and is recorded only in the late 18th century.
Walter Scheidel found a common thread running through mainstream definitions: centralized institutions that impose rules and back them with force over a territorially bounded population, a distinction between rulers and ruled, and an element of autonomy, stability, and differentiation. These features separate the state from looser arrangements like the exercise of chiefly power.
Max Weber's formulation remains the most commonly used, describing the state as a compulsory political organization with a centralized government holding a monopoly on legitimate force within a territory. A state is not the same as a nation, an error that turns up constantly in casual talk. A nation concerns political identity and cultural or historical factors, and lacks the geographic boundaries, officials, and claim to a monopoly on force that a state possesses.
A state is also distinct from a government, the particular group of people who control the apparatus at a given time. States are immaterial, nonphysical social objects served by a continuous succession of different governments. Neuberger offered a contrasting view, calling the state a primordial, essential, and permanent expression of the genius of a specific nation. The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States in 1933 listed four qualifications: a permanent population, a defined territory, government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.
Charles Tilly went so far as to say that states resemble a form of organized crime and should be viewed as extortion rackets. The state, he argued, sells protection from itself, which raises the question of why anyone should trust a state when they cannot trust one another. He defined states as coercion-wielding organizations distinct from households and kinship groups, exercising clear priority over all other organizations within substantial territories.
Tilly's predatory view stands against the contractarian one, which holds that states form because people benefit from cooperation and that without a state there would be chaos. John Locke gave the goal of the state as the preservation of property, meaning not only possessions but one's life and liberty. Adam Smith saw the provision of public goods, which would otherwise be underprovided, as a central function. Robert Nozick argued that the use of force naturally tends toward monopoly.
Tilly listed a state's essential minimal activities: war making, state making, protection, extraction, adjudication, distribution, and production. War making meant eliminating outside rivals; state making meant eliminating rivals inside one's own territory. Above all, Tilly insisted that war is essential to state-making, that wars create states and states create wars. The contrast appears in African states, which he and others link to weakness born from the absence of the wars that European states relied upon.
Grain, of all crops, turns out to be a maker of hierarchies. Mayshar and colleagues, in work from 2020, showed that societies cultivating grains tended to develop hierarchical structures with a ruling elite that collected taxes, while societies relying on root crops did not. Perishable goods like fish and dairy spoiled quickly and held little interest for either looters or the king. Grains such as wheat, barley, rice, and corn could be stored for extended periods, making them ideal for taxation and worth protecting.
Mesopotamia is generally considered the location of the earliest civilization, the world's first literate one, which formed the first sets of written laws. Agriculture and writing accompanied state formation almost everywhere, writing because it allowed the centralization of vital information, with the Inca quipus serving as an equivalent. The first known states arose in Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, China, Mesoamerica, and the Andes. Bronze metallurgy spread within Afro-Eurasia from around 3000 BC, driving a military revolution in bronze weaponry that helped states rise.
Irrigation tells a parallel story. In ancient Egypt, no individual farmer could control the floods of the Nile alone, and managing the annual floods required an elaborate network of canals. Bentzen, Kaarsen, and Wingender, writing in 2017, showed that regions dependent on irrigation-intensive agriculture experienced higher levels of land inequality. The concentration of land and water strengthened elite power, and even today countries relying on irrigated agriculture tend to be less democratic than those relying on rain-fed farming.
Around 990 states appeared in Europe, by Tilly's reckoning, becoming particularly prominent after 1490. He traced states in the archaeological record as far back as 6000 BC. During medieval times the European state organized itself on the principle of feudalism, with the lord and vassal relationship at the center of social life. Struggles over taxation between the monarch and the nobility and cities gave rise to the Standestaat, the state of Estates, with parliaments where key groups negotiated with the king. From the 15th century, centralization gave rise to the absolutist state.
Hendrik Spruyt identified two main ways the modern state differs from earlier polities: a greater capacity to intervene in society, and the backing of international legal sovereignty and the judicial equivalence of states. Michael Hechter and William Brustein listed four traits that set the modern state apart, including unprecedented control over social, economic, and cultural activities, ruling institutions separate from other institutions, and a ruler far better at monopolizing the means of violence. Edmund Burke, born in Dublin in 1729 and died at Beaconsfield in 1797, wrote that a state without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation.
Sovereign equality did not become fully global until after World War II, amid decolonization. Adom Getachew dates the legal context for popular sovereignty to the 1960 Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper argue that Westphalian sovereignty has more to do with 1948 than 1648. Today the international community comprises around 200 sovereign states, most of them represented in the United Nations.
Vatican City, Monaco, and Singapore are the modern independent city-states, survivors of a form once common and often successful. Other city-states persist as federated states, like the present-day German city-states, or as autonomous entities with limited sovereignty, like Hong Kong, Gibraltar, and Ceuta. Urban secession, the creation of a new city-state, continued to be discussed in the early 21st century in cities such as London.
Josep Colomer distinguished empires from states by noting that empires were vastly larger, lacked fixed boundaries, combined diverse groups with asymmetric links to the center, and held multi-level overlapping jurisdictions, whereas a state pursued a monopoly and homogenization within fixed borders. Tilly's typology of empires, theocracies, city-states, and nation-states included those forms but excluded tribes, lineages, firms, and churches.
A federated state forms part of a federation, having transferred a portion of its sovereign powers to a federal government, which invites comparison with confederations such as Switzerland. The nation-state, ideally co-terminous with a nation, grew popular in 20th-century Europe but appeared rarely elsewhere. Some states made a virtue of their multi-ethnic character, such as Habsburg Austria-Hungary and the Soviet Union, while others, often fascist or authoritarian, promoted notions of racial superiority. The res publica of ancient Rome and the Rzeczpospolita of Poland-Lithuania echo in the modern idea of the republic.
The state is no more than a composite reality and a mythologized abstraction, Michel Foucault said, whose importance is far more limited than many of us think. He judged political theory too state-centric, arguing the state had no essence and that scholars should examine changes in the practice of government rather than the properties of a reified abstraction. He developed the concept of governmentality, and named new forms of technology biopower and biopolitics, insisting the nation state was a deliberate production rather than a historical accident.
Marxist theorists drew the opposite map. The Communist Manifesto called the state nothing more than a committee for managing the common affairs of the bourgeoisie. Ralph Miliband argued that the ruling class uses the state as its instrument, with state officials sharing the background and interests of the capitalist class. Antonio Gramsci held that state power is bolstered by ideological domination through civil society, its churches, schools, and mass media, while Nicos Poulantzas contributed the idea of the relative autonomy of the state.
Anarchists regard the state as inherently an instrument of domination, holding that the state apparatus should be completely dismantled rather than seized. Various Christian anarchists, such as Jacques Ellul, identified the state and political power as the Beast in the Book of Revelation. Anarcho-capitalists like Murray Rothbard reach similar conclusions for different reasons, relying on the principles of consent and non-initiation; in Power and Market, Rothbard argued that any government function, including defense, infrastructure, and legal adjudication, could be better fulfilled by private actors.
Pluralists such as Robert Dahl saw the state instead as a neutral arena for contending interests, naming this kind of state a polyarchy. Critics countered with surveys showing that most people in high leadership positions come from the wealthy upper class. Where state capacity collapses, the state fails: in David Samuels's words, a failed state occurs when sovereignty over claimed territory has collapsed or was never effective at all. Samuels traced weak states to late formation under colonization, where arbitrary borders mixed cultural groups and strongmen captured the social order, a fragmentation that still impedes the consolidation of strong states.
Common questions
What is the definition of a state in politics?
A state is a political entity that regulates society and the population within a definite territory, often referred to as the country itself with its administrative divisions. There is no academic consensus on the definition, but Max Weber's is the most commonly used, describing the state as a compulsory political organization that maintains a monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.
When did the earliest states first arise?
The earliest forms of states arose about 5,500 years ago. Charles Tilly traced states in the archaeological record as far back as 6000 BC, and the first known states were created in Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, China, Mesoamerica, and the Andes.
What is the difference between a state and a nation?
A state is a political unit with sovereignty over a given territory, possessing geographic boundaries, officials, and a monopoly on the legitimate use of force. A nation is a cultural-political community concerned with political identity and cultural or historical factors, and it lacks those organizational characteristics.
Why did grain agriculture lead to the formation of states?
Grains such as wheat, barley, rice, and corn could be stored for extended periods, making them ideal targets for taxation by rulers and theft by looters, which created a need for protection and strong governance. Mayshar and colleagues showed in 2020 that grain-cultivating societies developed hierarchical structures with tax-collecting elites, while societies relying on perishable root crops did not.
How did Charles Tilly view the state?
Charles Tilly argued that states resemble a form of organized crime and should be viewed as extortion rackets that sell protection from themselves. He defined states as coercion-wielding organizations and insisted that war is essential to state-making, holding that wars create states and states create wars.
What is a failed state?
A failed state, in David Samuels's words, occurs when sovereignty over claimed territory has collapsed or was never effectively held at all. Such states cannot fulfill basic functions like providing security, maintaining law and order, and delivering public services, a shortfall tied to state capacity.
How many sovereign states exist in the world today?
The international community comprises around 200 sovereign states, the vast majority of which are represented in the United Nations. Since the late 19th century, virtually all of the world's inhabitable land has been divided into areas with more or less definite borders claimed by various states.
All sources
133 references cited across the entry
- 1JournalOrganizational complexity and demographic scale in primary statesDavid S. Sandeford — May 2018
- 3JournalThe Rise of the Nation-State across the World, 1816 to 2001Andreas Wimmer et al. — October 2010
- 6Journal'Failed' States and Global Security: Empirical Questions and Policy DilemmasStewart Patrick — 10 December 2007
- 9JournalOn the Impersonality of the Modern State: A Comment on Machiavelli's Use of StatoHarvey C. Mansfield — 1983
- 10BookMadison to Schaeffer, 1821James Madison — J.B. Lippincott & Company — 1865
- 12BookThe Oxford Handbook of the State in the Ancient Near East and MediterraneanWalter Scheidel — Oxford University Press — 2013
- 13BookHuman Evolution and the Origins of Hierarchies: The State of NatureDubreuil, Benoít — Cambridge University Press — 2010
- 14BookControlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to TodayGordon, Scott — Harvard University Press — 2002
- 15BookRoutledge Encyclopedia of International Political EconomyColin Hay — Routledge — 2001
- 16BookPeople, power, and politics: an introduction to political scienceDonovan, John C. — Rowman & Littlefield — 1993
- 17BookWar and genocide: organized killing in modern societyShaw, Martin — Wiley-Blackwell — 2003
- 18BookFrom Max Weber: Essays in SociologyMax Weber — Psychology Press — 1991
- 19BookComparative PoliticsDavid Samuels — Pearson Education — 2013
- 20JournalWar and the State in AfricaJeffrey Herbst — 1990
- 21JournalState and Nation in African ThoughtBenyamin Neuberger — 1977
- 24BookFoundations of Comparative PoliticsWilliam Roberts Clark et al. — CQ Press — 2018
- 25BookCoercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1992Charles Tilly — Blackwell — 1992
- 27JournalAnomaly and commonplace in European political expansion: realist and institutional accountsDavid Strang — 1991
- 28BookAn Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of NationsAdam Smith — 1776
- 29BookBringing the State Back inCharles Tilly — 1985
- 30JournalGovernment: Unnecessary but InevitableRandall G. Holcombe — 2004
- 31BookAnarchy, State, and UtopiaRobert Nozick — Blackwell — 1974
- 32JournalThe Distinction Between State and Government: The Distinction Between State and GovernmentEdward Heath Robinson — August 2013
- 33BookThe Creation of States in International LawJames Crawford — Oxford University Press — 2007
- 34BookStates, War and Capitalism: Studies in Political SociologyMichael Mann — Blackwell — 1992
- 35Empires Versus StatesJosep M. Colomer — 2017
- 36JournalRegional Modes of Production and Patterns of State Formation in Western EuropeMichael Hechter et al. — 1980
- 37BookIdentity and Continuity of States in Public International LawKrystyna Marek — Library Droz — 1954
- 38JournalstateOxford University Press — 1995
- 39BookHolocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the JewsPeter Longerich — Oxford University Press — 2010
- 40BookLand and Economy in Ancient PalestineJack Pastor — Routledge — 1997
- 41BookThe Blackwell dictionary of political science: a user's guide to its termsWiley-Blackwell — 1999
- 44JournalTocqueville on Civilian Society: A Romantic Vision of the Dichotomic Structure of Social RealityPawel Zaleski — 2008
- 45BookCivil society: the critical history of an ideaEhrenberg, John — NYU Press — 1999
- 46BookCivil society: history and possibilitiesKaviraj, Sudipta — Cambridge University Press — 2001
- 47BookRoutledge Encyclopedia of International Political Economy: Entries P–ZReeve, Andrew — Taylor & Francis — 2001
- 48BookGramsci and contemporary politics: beyond pessimism of the intellectSassoon, Anne Showstack — Psychology Press — 2000
- 49BookGramsci, historical materialism and international relationsAugelli, Enrico et al. — Cambridge University Press — 1993
- 50BookLouis AlthusserFerretter, Luke — Taylor & Francis — 2006
- 51BookThe Routledge international handbook of critical educationFlecha, Ramon — Taylor & Francis — 2009
- 53BookReading Freire and Habermas: critical pedagogy and transformative social changeMorrow, Raymond Allen et al. — Teacher's College Press — 2002
- 54BookGovernanceKjaer, Anne Mette — Wiley-Blackwell — 2004
- 55BookAgainst the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest StatesJames C. Scott — Yale University Press — 2017
- 56JournalA Theory of the Origin of the StateRobert L. Carneiro — 1970
- 57JournalAgriculture and the Origins of the State in Ancient EgyptRobert C Allen — April 1997
- 58JournalTransition to agriculture and first state presence: A global analysisOana Borcan et al. — October 2021
- 59JournalOrigins of Early DemocracyAli T. Ahmed et al. — May 2020
- 60JournalGeography, Transparency, and InstitutionsJoram Mayshar et al. — August 2017
- 61BookPolitical Order and InequalityCarles Boix — Cambridge University Press — 2015
- 62JournalTerritorial expansion and primary state formationCharles S. Spencer — 20 April 2010
- 63BookState Formation in Europe, 843–1789: A Divided WorldSverre Bagge — Routledge — 2019
- 64United Nations Member StatesUnited Nations
- 65BookThe Cambridge encyclopedia of hunters and gatherersIngold, Tim — Cambridge University Press — 1999
- 66BookA dictionary of archaeologyShaw, Ian et al. — Wiley-Blackwell — 2002
- 67BookSustainability or collapse?: an integrated history and future of people on earthHassan, F.A. — MIT Press — 2007
- 69BookEncyclopedia of social historyLanger, Erick D. et al. — Taylor & Francis — 1994
- 70BookThe Early StateCohen, Ronald — Walter de Gruyter — 1978
- 71BookThe Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French RevolutionFrancis Fukuyama — Farrar, Straus and Giroux — 2012-03-27
- 72BookCambridge history of the Native peoples of the Americas: South America, Volume 3Roosevelt, Anna C. — Cambridge University Press — 1999
- 73BookThe sources of social power: A history of power from the beginning to A. D. 1760, Volume 1Mann, Michael — Cambridge University Press — 1986
- 74JournalState-in-Society 2.0: Toward Fourth-Generation Theories of the StateYuhua Wang — 2021
- 75BookState formation and political legitimacyYoffee, Norman — Transaction Publishers — 1988
- 76BookMyths of the archaic state: evolution of the earliest cities, states and civilizationsYoffee, Norman — Cambridge University Press — 2005
- 77JournalDisentangling the evolutionary drivers of social complexity: A comprehensive test of hypothesesPeter Turchin et al. — 2022
- 79BookPeople/states/territories: the political geographies of British state transformationJones, Rhys — Wiley-Blackwell — 2007
- 80JournalThe Economic Origins of the Territorial StateScott F Abramson — 2017
- 81Définitions: État - Dictionnaire de français LarousseÉditions Larousse
- 82JournalThe Origins, Development, and Possible Decline of the Modern StateHendrik Spruyt — June 2002
- 83JournalThe Expansion of the StateGeorge M. Thomas et al. — August 1984
- 84BookWorldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-DeterminationAdom Getachew — Princeton University Press — 2019
- 85BookEmpires in World History: Power and the Politics of DifferenceJane Burbank et al. — Princeton University Press — 2010
- 86JournalThe Origin of the State: Land Productivity or Appropriability?Joram Mayshar et al. — April 2022
- 87JournalGeography, Transparency, and InstitutionsJoram Mayshar et al. — August 2017
- 88JournalPeasants and "Modern" Leasing Strategies in Ancient EgyptChristopher Eyre — 1997-01-01
- 89JournalIrrigation and AutocracyJeanet Sinding Bentzen et al. — 2017
- 90BookDoes War Make States?Philip Gorski et al. — 2017
- 91BookThe Politics of PostanarchismNewman, Saul — Edinburgh University Press — 2010
- 92BookThe political economy of the state: Québec, Canada, U.S.A.Roussopoulos, Dimitrios I. — Black Rose Books — 1973
- 93BookChristian Anarchism: A Political Commentary on the GospelAlexandre Christoyannopoulos — Imprint Academic — 2010
- 94BookAnarchy and ChristianityJacques Ellul — Wm. B. Eerdmans — 1988
- 95BookPower and MarketMurray Rothbard — Institute for Humane Studies — 1970
- 96JournalReply to Stephen CoxRoderick T. Long — 1 December 2013
- 97JournalAyn Rand and Austrian Economics: Two Peas in a PodWalter Block — 2005
- 99JournalMarx's Critique of the Utopian SocialistsRoger Paden — 2002
- 101BookRethinking state theorySmith, Mark J. — Psychology Press — 2000
- 104BookModern Political AnalysisDahl, Robert — Prentice Hall — 1973
- 105BookTheories of democracy: a critical introductionCunningham, Frank — Psychology Press — 2002
- 106BookDiversity in the power elite: how it happened, why it mattersZweigenhaft, Richard L. et al. — Rowman & Littlefield — 2006
- 107BookDemocracy and the capitalist stateDuncan, Graeme Campbell — Cambridge University Press — 1989
- 108BookThe philosophy of HabermasEdgar, Andrew — McGill-Queen's Press — 2005
- 109BookAdorno, Habermas, and the search for a rational societyCook, Deborah — Psychology Press — 2004
- 110BookMichel Foucault and power today: international multidisciplinary studies in the history of the presentMelossi, Dario — Lexington Books — 2006
- 111BookThe Foucault effect: studies in governmentalityGordon, Colin — University of Chicago Press — 1991
- 112BookThe anthropology of the state: a readerMitchell, Timothy — Wiley-Blackwell — 2006
- 113BookFoucault, Governmentality, and CritiqueThomas Lemke — Paradigm Publishers — 2011
- 114BookSecurity, Territory, PopulationFoucault Michel — 2007
- 117JournalNicos Poulantzas: 'State, Power, Socialism'Stuart Hall — 1980-02-01
- 118Giano Rocca - Independent Researchergiano rocca
- 119BookGlobal governance: critical concepts in political scienceSklair, Leslie — Taylor & Francis — 2004
- 124BookSecond Treatise of GovernmentJohn Locke — 1690
- 125JournalRand, Paterson, and the Problem of AnarchismStephen Cox — 2013
- 126BookThe Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary AmericaCambridge University Press — 26 July 2004
- 128BookThe end of the world as we know it: social science for the twenty-first centuryWallerstein, Immanuel — University of Minnesota Press — 1999
- 129BookWeberian Sociological TheoryCollins, Randall — Cambridge University Press — 1986
- 130BookThe Max Weber dictionary: key words and central conceptsSwedberg, Richard et al. — Stanford University Press — 2005
- 131BookComparative PoliticsDavid Samuels — Pearson Higher Education — 2012
- 132BookComparative PoliticsDavid Samuels — Pearson Higher Education
- 133BookStrong societies and weak states: state-society relations and state capabilities in the Third WorldJoel Migdal — 1988
- 134BookStrong societies and weak states: state-society relations and state capabilities in the Third WorldJoel Migdal — Princeton University Press — 1988
- 135BookContemporary Critique of Historical MaterialismAnthony Giddens — Polity Press — 1987