Society

• 1. The Group That Makes Us

  ›

  The word "society" dates back to at least 1513, and it carries a quiet paradox inside it. Humans shape society, but society in turn shapes human beings. A society is a group of individuals bound by persistent social interaction, sharing the same spatial or social territory, usually under one political authority and one set of dominant cultural expectations. What holds such a group together, and what pulls it apart? Why do some societies stay small and egalitarian while others split into rulers and ruled? This documentary traces how thinkers have tried to define society, how the same word descends from a Latin term for fellowship, and how a single human group can range from a band of fewer than fifty people to a nation of millions. Along the way it asks where war comes from, why wealth piles up so unevenly, and whether the leisure of the earliest humans made them, in one anthropologist's phrase, the original affluent society.

• 2. Fellowship And Allies

  ›

  The 12th-century French word societe, meaning "company," sits at the root of the modern term, and modern French still uses societe. That French word came from the Latin societas, glossed as fellowship, alliance, or association. Behind it stands the Latin noun socius, meaning comrade, friend, or ally. The companion word "social" follows a related but distinct path. It derives from the Latin socii, meaning allies, and points in particular to the Italian Socii states, historical allies of the Roman Republic. Those allies did not stay loyal. They rebelled against Rome in the Social War of 91 to 87 BC, a revolt whose name still echoes in a vocabulary now used for cooperation and togetherness.

• 3. Wired To Belong

  ›

  Humans share the top of the social spectrum with their closest relatives, the bonobos and chimpanzees, all of them highly social animals. The biological case suggests that the sociability needed to build societies is hardwired into human nature. Yet human society departs from chimp and bonobo groups in pointed ways. Males take a parental role, language carries communication, labor splits into specialized tasks, and people build "nests," the multi-generational camps, towns, and cities that no ape constructs. The entomologist E.O. Wilson pushed the comparison further. He categorized humans as eusocial, placing them alongside ants at the highest level of sociability in animal ethology, though others disagree. One proposal holds that social group living evolved through group selection in physical environments that made bare survival difficult.

• 4. Three Lenses On The Social

  ›

  Western sociology rests on three dominant paradigms: functionalism, also called structural functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism. Each reads the bond between person and group differently. Functionalists imagine individuals working together like organs in a body, producing emergent behavior sometimes called collective consciousness. The 19th-century thinkers Auguste Comte and Émile Durkheim treated society as a separate level of reality, distinct from biological and inorganic matter, with individuals merely transient occupants of stable social roles. Conflict theorists invert the picture. Karl Marx saw society resting on an economic base supporting a superstructure of government, family, religion, and culture, with the base determining the rest and change driven by struggle between laborers and those who own the means of production. Marx also held that people are by definition social beings who cannot meet their needs except through cooperation, entering relations of production "independent of their will." Max Weber narrowed the lens to action, calling an act "social" when its subjective meaning "takes account of the behavior of others, and is thereby oriented in its course." Symbolic interactionism, a microsociological theory, studies how shared language builds common symbols and meanings. Peter L. Berger called society "dialectic": created by humans, yet molding the humans who create it.

• 5. Beyond The Western Canon

  ›

  The Malaysian sociologist Syed Farid al-Attas charges that the emphasis on functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism is Eurocentric. Western thinkers, he argues, fixate on the implications of modernity, which limits the scope of their analysis of non-Western cultures. He points to two systematic non-Western thinkers. Ibn Khaldun, an Arab living in the 14th century from 1332 to 1406, understood society and the wider universe as having a "meaningful configuration," its apparent randomness traceable to hidden causes. Khaldun split social structure into two forms, nomadic and sedentary. Nomadic life carried high social cohesion, which he called asabijja, arising from kinship, shared customs, and a shared need for defense, while sedentary life brought secularization, weaker cohesion, and a taste for luxury. José Rizal, who lived from 1861 to 1896, was a Filipino nationalist of the late Spanish Colonial Period. He turned the colonizers' own charge against them. The indolence the Spanish used to justify occupation, Rizal argued, was caused by that occupation. He contrasted the pre-colonial era, when Filipinos controlled trade routes and showed higher economic activity, with the disorder and discouraged farming of colonial rule.

• 6. From Foraging To Factories

  ›

  Sociologists tend to sort societies by level of technology into three broad categories: pre-industrial, industrial, and post-industrial. Gerhard Lenski offered a finer list of hunting and gathering, horticultural, agricultural, and industrial, plus specialized forms such as fishing or herding. Hunter-gatherers live by daily collection of wild plants and the hunting of wild animals, moving constantly and so building no permanent villages. Their need for mobility caps community size, usually fewer than 50 people, in egalitarian bands and tribes where a chief holds influence rather than office and decisions come by consensus. Marshall Sahlins called them the "original affluent society," estimating that adults worked three to five hours per day, a view challenged by others who cite high mortality and perennial warfare. Pastoral societies, by contrast, rely on domesticated herd animals and move their herds between pastures. Their communities run to about 50 people each, yet a single pastoral society averages thousands, because open terrain eases movement and political integration. Horticultural societies, growing fruits and vegetables in cleared garden plots, emerged about 10,000 years ago after the Agricultural Revolution, rotating plots to sustain permanent or semi-permanent villages and supporting craftspeople, shamans, and traders. Agrarian societies, in Lenski's scheme, separate from horticultural ones by the plow. Their larger food surplus feeds towns of trade and a ruling class, alongside educators, craftspeople, merchants, and religious figures who grow no food. They are noted for extremes of social class and rigid mobility, with hierarchy built on landownership and a stratification of three contrasts: governing class against masses, urban minority against peasant majority, and literate minority against illiterate majority. Caste systems, historically found in South Asia, belong to this world, and the scholar Donald Brown suggests the modern Western stress on personal liberty was largely a reaction against agrarian rigidity. Industrial societies arrived in the 18th century with the Industrial Revolution, leaning on machines powered by external sources for mass production. They shifted labor from extracting raw materials to processing them, drove population booms and urbanization, and built capitalist economies of high inequality and high social mobility, with harsh factory conditions that pushed workers into labor unions. Post-industrial societies came next, dominated by information and services such as education, health, and finance rather than the production of goods.

• 7. Information And Knowledge

  ›

  An information society treats the usage, creation, distribution, manipulation, and integration of information as a significant activity. The concept has been discussed since the 1930s, but today it almost always describes how information technologies reshape education, economy, health, government, warfare, and the level of democracy. It covers the reach of computers and telecommunications into the home, the workplace, schools, and government, and the rise of new social forms in cyberspace. As access to electronic information resources grew at the beginning of the 21st century, attention extended from the information society to the knowledge society. The distinction is sharp. An information society creates and disseminates raw data, while a knowledge society transforms information into resources that let society take effective action and improve the human condition.

• 8. Norms, Kinship, And The Capacity For War

  ›

  Social norms are shared standards of acceptable behavior, ranging from informal understandings to codified rules and laws, and they rank among the most powerful drivers of human behavior. Social roles attach norms and duties to a person's status. Erving Goffman captured this with a theater metaphor, the dramaturgical lens, in which roles supply scripts that govern interaction. Kinship organizes relationships through three channels: consanguinity by descent, affinity through marriage, and fictive ties to godparents or adoptive children. Every society enforces an incest taboo, and some add rules of preferred marriage with certain kin. Ethnicity, distinct from race, forms a social category built on shared traditions, ancestry, language, or religion, and it tied closely to the rise of the nation state in the 19th and 20th centuries. Government grew as farming populations gathered in denser communities; according to The Economist, 43% of national governments were democracies, 35% autocracies, and 22% a mix, while the United Nations binds 193 member states. Trade reaches back to early Homo sapiens, whose long-distance routes for goods like obsidian gave an edge that the now-extinct Neanderthals lacked, and the oldest money took the form of cattle, with cowrie shells the most widely used. Wealth divides starkly: as of 2018 in China, Europe, and the United States, the richest tenth held more than seven-tenths of those regions' wealth. War may be innate or recent, but the evidence points to warlike behavior becoming common only about 10,000 years ago. Phylogenetic analysis predicts 2% of human deaths from homicide, matching the rate in band societies, while societies with legal systems and strong norms against violence push that figure down to about 0.01%.