Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Science

~9 min read · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • Science is a systematic discipline that builds and organises knowledge as testable hypotheses and predictions about the universe. The earliest identifiable predecessors to it date to the Bronze Age, in Egypt and Mesopotamia, roughly 3000 to 1200 BCE. From there the thread runs through Greek natural philosophy, medieval scholarship, and a Scientific Revolution that began in the 16th century. Yet for most of that span, the word itself meant something else. There was no scientist. There was a natural philosopher, or a man of science. So how did a synonym for plain knowledge become a method that reshaped how humans understand reality? Who decided what counted as proof? And why do some people, even now, refuse to believe what science finds? The answers run from a Sumerian medical prescription to the first image of a black hole.

  • Natural science, social science, and formal science are the three major branches into which modern science is commonly divided. Natural science studies the physical world, splitting into life science and physical science, with physics, chemistry, astronomy, and earth science among its specialisms. Social science studies human behaviour and societies, spanning anthropology, economics, history, human geography, political science, psychology, and sociology. Formal science generates knowledge using formal systems, the abstract structures that infer theorems from axioms by fixed rules. Logic, mathematics, and theoretical computer science sit here, and they are treated as separate. They rely on deductive reasoning rather than the scientific method, which is why there is disagreement about whether they constitute science at all. Both natural and social sciences are empirical. Their knowledge rests on observations that other researchers can test under the same conditions. The formal sciences are a priori, needing no empirical evidence to verify their abstract concepts. Then there are the applied sciences, which use scientific knowledge for practical goals. Engineering invents, designs, and builds machines, structures, and technologies. Medicine maintains and restores health through prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Calculus shows how the boundaries blur. It was first invented to understand motion in physics.

  • Women likely played a central role in prehistoric science, as did religious rituals. Science has no single origin. Scientific thinking emerged gradually over tens of thousands of years, taking different forms around the world, and few details survive about the earliest developments. Some scholars use the term protoscience for past activities that resemble modern science in some features but not all. That label has been criticised as denigrating, or too suggestive of presentism, judging the past only against modern categories. From the 3rd millennium BCE, the ancient Egyptians developed a non-positional decimal numbering system, solved practical problems with geometry, and built a calendar. Their healing therapies mixed drug treatments with the supernatural, including prayers, incantations, and rituals. Ancient Nubians pioneered early antibiotics and used a trigonometric methodology comparable to their Egyptian counterparts. The ancient Mesopotamians knew the properties of natural chemicals well enough to manufacture pottery, faience, glass, soap, metals, lime plaster, and waterproofing. They studied animal physiology, anatomy, and behaviour, and they read astrology for divinatory purposes. The earliest known medical prescriptions appeared in Sumerian during the Third Dynasty of Ur. These people studied subjects with practical or religious uses, and showed little interest in satisfying mere curiosity.

  • Thales of Miletus founded the Milesian school, and with his successors Anaximander and Anaximenes, was among the first to explain natural phenomena without relying on the supernatural. Before that, the same words described the natural way a plant grows and the way a tribe worships a god. Distinguishing nature from convention is part of why these men are called the first philosophers in the strict sense. Leucippus and his student Democritus developed the theory of atoms, indivisible particles, and Epicurus later built a full cosmology on atomism with a canon of physical standards for scientific truth. The Greek doctor Hippocrates founded the tradition of systematic medical science, earning the name The Father of Medicine. Socrates applied philosophy to human matters, including human nature, political communities, and knowledge itself. The Socratic method, documented in Plato's dialogues, is a dialectic of hypothesis elimination. Better hypotheses survive as those leading to contradictions are steadily removed. In the 3rd century BCE, the astronomer Aristarchus of Samos became the first to propose a heliocentric model, the Sun at the centre with the planets orbiting it. His model was widely rejected as a violation of the laws of physics. Ptolemy's Almagest, with its geocentric Solar System, was accepted instead, and it held through the early Renaissance.

  • John Philoponus, a Byzantine scholar in the 6th century, began questioning Aristotle's physics and introduced the theory of impetus. Galileo Galilei would cite his works extensively ten centuries later. The collapse of the Western Roman Empire brought an intellectual decline in the 5th century, with Latin encyclopaedists such as Isidore of Seville preserving most general ancient knowledge as Greek conceptions faded in Western Europe. The Byzantine Empire, resisting its invaders, preserved and improved earlier learning, and Arabic translations of Greek texts were made by Christians, mainly Nestorians and Miaphysites. By the 6th and 7th centuries, the Sasanian Empire's medical Academy of Gondishapur was regarded by Greek, Syriac, and Persian physicians as the most important medical hub of the ancient world. The House of Wisdom in the Abbasid capital of Baghdad became a centre of Aristotelian study until the Mongol invasions of the 13th century. Ibn al-Haytham, known as Alhazen, used controlled experiments in his study of optics. Avicenna compiled The Canon of Medicine, used until the 18th century. In 1088, the University of Bologna emerged as the first university in Europe, and in the 13th century its medical teachers and students began opening human bodies, producing the first anatomy textbook based on human dissection by Mondino de Luzzi.

  • Around 1440, a single print shop in Mainz, Germany began producing movable type. By the end of the 15th century the press had spread to roughly 270 cities across Central, Western, and Eastern Europe and had produced more than 20 million volumes. Printing ended the manuscript culture where facts were few and far between, replacing it with reliable, documented facts that proliferated as a foundation for knowledge. In the 16th century Nicolaus Copernicus placed the Sun near the centre of the Universe, motionless, with Earth and the planets orbiting in circular motions modified by epicycles. His model challenged Ptolemy's geocentric system but never displaced it. Ptolemy fell from favour 70 years later, after Galileo's telescopic observations of 1610. Tycho Brahe's unprecedentedly accurate observations in the late 16th century combined with Galileo's early 17th-century telescope to turn astronomy into the first modern science. Johannes Kepler used Brahe's data to find that planets move in elliptical, not circular, orbits, and he derived the laws of planetary motion. Because of Kepler, astronomical events came to be seen as governed by physical laws. The New Science that emerged by the end of the 17th century was more mechanistic, more integrated with mathematics, and obsessed with acquiring and interpreting new evidence.

  • Wilhelm Wundt founded the first laboratory for psychological research in 1879, splitting psychology from philosophy. The 19th century gave science many of its modern features. Precision instruments came into frequent use, terms such as biologist, physicist, and scientist emerged, and science journals appeared as those studying nature grew professionalised. Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace independently proposed the theory of evolution by natural selection in 1858, and Darwin set it out in detail in On the Origin of Species in 1859. In 1865, Gregor Mendel presented Experiments on Plant Hybridisation, outlining the principles of biological inheritance that became the basis for modern genetics. Early in the century John Dalton proposed modern atomic theory, returning to Democritus's idea of indivisible atoms. The steam engine and the Industrial Revolution revealed that not all energy converts equally to useful work, leading to the laws of thermodynamics and the rule that a closed universe's entropy increases over time. Electromagnetic theory was built by Hans Christian Orsted, Andre-Marie Ampere, Michael Faraday, James Clerk Maxwell, Oliver Heaviside, and Heinrich Hertz. The discovery of X-rays inspired Henri Becquerel and Marie Curie to discover radioactivity in 1896. Marie Curie then became the first person to win two Nobel Prizes. The next year brought the first subatomic particle, the electron.

  • An explanatory hypothesis is put forward using parsimony principles, and it is expected to seek consilience, fitting with other accepted facts. The scientific method seeks to explain nature objectively in a reproducible way. It rests on assumptions scientists take for granted. There is an objective reality shared by all rational observers, governed by natural laws, discovered through systematic observation and experimentation. A hypothesis is used to make falsifiable predictions, typically posted before being tested, and disproof of a prediction counts as evidence of progress. If a hypothesis survives testing it may be adopted into a scientific theory, which describes much broader sets of observations and can bind many hypotheses together. The Austrian-British philosopher Karl Popper proposed replacing verifiability with falsifiability as the landmark of scientific theories. He argued that observation is made in the light of theories, not the reverse. Thomas Kuhn argued that observation and evaluation take place within a paradigm, a logically consistent portrait of the world, and that revolutionary science occurs when one paradigm overtakes another in a paradigm shift. The replication crisis, named in the early 2010s, shows the stakes. A 2026 replication study found low replication rates across business, economics, education, political science, psychology, and sociology. The physicist Richard Feynman coined cargo cult science for work that looks like science but lacks the honesty to let its results be rigorously evaluated.

    39% of Americans held the notion that COVID-19 was not a major health threat to the US in August 2021. In late 2019 and early 2020-40% believed climate change was not a major threat. Psychologists point to several drivers of this rejection. Scientific authorities are sometimes seen as inexpert, untrustworthy, or biased. Some marginalised social groups hold anti-science attitudes partly because they have been exploited in unethical experiments. And scientific messages may contradict deeply held beliefs or morals. Fear of rejection within social groups often seems to be the cause. Climate change is perceived as a threat by only 22% of Americans on the political right, but by 85% on the left. Someone on the left who dismissed the threat might face contempt and rejection, so people may deny an accepted fact rather than jeopardise their social status. Politics shapes attitudes in other ways too. Governments, businesses, and advocacy groups have used legal and economic pressure on researchers, and politicisation often works by emphasising the uncertainty in scientific evidence. The same pattern of pressure surfaced in the global warming controversy and in disputes over the health effects of pesticides and tobacco. The replication crisis now feeds a field called metascience, which studies how to improve the quality and integrity of research itself.

Up Next

Continue Browsing

Common questions

What is science and how is it defined?

Science is a systematic discipline that builds and organises knowledge as testable hypotheses and predictions about the universe. It is commonly divided into three major branches: natural science, social science, and formal science, with applied sciences such as engineering and medicine using scientific knowledge for practical goals.

When did science first begin in history?

The earliest identifiable predecessors to modern science date to the Bronze Age civilisations of Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, roughly 3000 to 1200 BCE. These cultures produced the earliest written records in the history of science, contributing to mathematics, astronomy, and medicine.

Who coined the word scientist?

William Whewell introduced the term scientist in 1834, in a review of Mary Somerville's book On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences. He credited it to some ingenious gentleman, possibly himself. Before this, a researcher was called a natural philosopher or a man of science.

What are the three branches of science?

The three major branches of science are natural science, social science, and formal science. Natural science studies the physical world, social science studies human behaviour and societies, and formal science generates knowledge using formal systems such as mathematics and theoretical computer science.

What is the scientific method in science?

The scientific method seeks to explain nature objectively in a reproducible way, using hypotheses that make falsifiable predictions tested by experimentation. Karl Popper proposed replacing verifiability with falsifiability as the landmark of scientific theories, and disproof of a prediction is treated as evidence of progress.

Why do some people reject science?

Psychologists point to several drivers, including viewing scientific authorities as inexpert or biased, holding beliefs that contradict scientific messages, and fear of rejection within social groups. Climate change is perceived as a threat by 22% of Americans on the political right but by 85% on the left.

What was the Scientific Revolution in the history of science?

The Scientific Revolution began in the 16th century as new ideas departed from previous Greek conceptions. Tycho Brahe's accurate observations and Galileo Galilei's telescopic observations turned astronomy into the first modern science, and Johannes Kepler used Brahe's data to discover that planets move in elliptical orbits.

All sources

258 references cited across the entry

  1. 1bookConsilience: The Unity of KnowledgeE. O. Wilson — Vintage — 1999
  2. 2bookThe Oxford Companion to the History of Modern ScienceJ. L. Heilbron — Oxford University Press — 2003
  3. 4bookSocial Science: An Introduction to the Study of SocietyDavid C. Colander et al. — Routledge — 2019
  4. 5encyclopediaSocial ScienceRobert A. Nisbet et al. — 16 October 2020
  5. 6bookMathematical Enculturation: A Cultural Perspective on Mathematics EducationAlan Bishop — Kluwer — 1991
  6. 7bookPhilosophy of Science: Volume 1, From Problem to TheoryMario Bunge — Routledge — 1998
  7. 8bookComputers and Cognition: Why Minds are not MachinesJames H. Fetzer — Kluwer — 2013
  8. 9bookPhilosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation ProblemThomas Nickles — The University of Chicago Press — 2013
  9. 10journalThinking and acting scientifically: Indispensable basis of medical educationM. R. Fischer et al. — 2014
  10. 12bookContributions to a Philosophy of TechnologyM. Bunge — Springer — 1966
  11. 13bookThe beginnings of Western science: the European Scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional contextDavid C. Lindberg — University of Chicago Press — 2007
  12. 14bookA History of Natural Philosophy: From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth CenturyEdward Grant — Cambridge University Press — 2007
  13. 16bookIndia: A historyJohn Keay — Atlantic Monthly Press — 2000
  14. 18bookScientific Revolution: A Very Short IntroductionLawrence M. Principe — Oxford University Press — 2011
  15. 19bookFrom Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century ScienceUniversity of Chicago Press — 2003
  16. 20bookWrestling with Nature: From Omens to ScienceBernard Lightman — University of Chicago Press — 2011
  17. 21bookThe Territories of Science and ReligionPeter Harrison — University of Chicago Press — 2015
  18. 22bookScientific Research as a CareerFinlay MacRitchie — Routledge — 2011
  19. 23bookResearch Methods for ScienceMichael P. Marder — Cambridge University Press — 2011
  20. 25bookCommercialization Secrets for Scientists and EngineersMichael Szycher — Routledge — 2016
  21. 26dictionaryScience
  22. 27dictionarysciōMichiel de Vaan — 2008
  23. 28bookFrom natural philosophy to the sciences: writing the history of nineteenth-century scienceDavid Cahan — University of Chicago Press — 2003
  24. 29journalScientist: The story of a wordSydney Ross — 1962
  25. 30bookAncient Africa: A Global History, to 300 CEChristopher Ehret — Princeton University Press — 20 June 2023
  26. 31citationThe roots of scientific reasoning: infancy, modularity and the art of trackingPeter Carruthers — Cambridge University Press — 2 May 2002
  27. 32journalTracking the Evolution of Causal Cognition in HumansMarlize Lombard et al. — 2017
  28. 33bookThe Dawn of EverythingDavid Graeber et al. — 2021
  29. 34journalThe Faerie Smith Meets the Bronze Industry: Magic Versus Science in the Interpretation of Prehistoric Metal-MakingPaul Budd et al. — 1995
  30. 35bookRational Changes in ScienceRaimo Tuomela — Springer — 1987
  31. 36journalScience on the Move: Recent Trends in the History of Early Modern SciencePamela H. Smith — 2009
  32. 37journalFundamental Themes in Physics from the History of ArtRobert Fleck — March 2021
  33. 38encyclopediaScience for the West, Myth for the Rest?Colin Scott — Duke University Press — 2011
  34. 39journalHistoriography of Not-So-Recent SciencePeter Dear — 2012
  35. 40bookWrestling with Nature: From Omens to ScienceFrancesca Rochberg — University of Chicago Press — 2011
  36. 41bookGroundbreaking Scientific Experiments, Inventions, and Discoveries of the Middle Ages and the RenaissanceRobert E. Krebs — Greenwood Publishing Group — 2004
  37. 42bookThe Nile: Histories, Cultures, MythsḤaggai Erlich et al. — Lynne Rienner — 2000
  38. 45journalGnomons at Meroë and Early TrigonometryLeo Depuydt — 1 January 1998
  39. 46webNeolithic SkywatchersAndrew Slayman — 27 May 1998
  40. 47bookA History of Ancient Mathematical AstronomyO. Neugebauer — Springer Science & Business Media — 2004-09-17
  41. 48bookAncient Mesopotamia: New PerspectivesJane R. McIntosh — ABC-CLIO — 2005
  42. 49journalScientific Astronomy in AntiquityAsger Aaboe — 2 May 1974
  43. 50journalMedicine, Surgery, and Public Health in Ancient MesopotamiaR. D. Biggs — 2005
  44. 51bookWrestling with Nature: From Omens to ScienceDaryn Lehoux — University of Chicago Press — 2011
  45. 52bookThe Greek Concept of NatureGerard Naddaf — SUNY Press — 2006
  46. 53bookAn Introduction to Political Philosophy: Ten Essays by Leo StraussLeo Strauss et al. — Wayne State University Press — 1989
  47. 54bookThales of Miletus: The Beginnings of Western Science and PhilosophyPatricia F. O'Grady — Routledge — 2016
  48. 55bookLore and Science in Ancient PythagoreanismWalter Burkert — Harvard University Press — 1 June 1972
  49. 56bookThe Atom in the History of Human ThoughtBernard Pullman — Oxford University Press — 1998
  50. 58bookThe Story of MedicineRoberto Margotta — Golden Press — 1968
  51. 59bookMedieval Science, Technology, and Medicine: An EncyclopediaAlain Touwaide — Routledge — 2005
  52. 60bookFrom Witchcraft to World HealthSamuel Leff et al. — Macmillan — 1956
  53. 63bookNicomachean EthicsAristotle
  54. 64bookScience and Technology in World History: An IntroductionJames E. III McClellan et al. — Johns Hopkins University Press — 2015
  55. 65bookThe History of Ptolemy's Star CatalogueGerd Graßhoff — Springer — 1990
  56. 66bookHipparchs HimmelsglobusSusanne M. Hoffmann — Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden — 2017
  57. 67bookThe Historical Development of the CalculusC. H. Jr. Edwards — Springer — 1979
  58. 68bookScience in the Ancient World: An EncyclopediaRussell M. Lawson — ABC-CLIO — 2004
  59. 69bookPliny the Elder's Natural History: The Empire in the EncyclopediaTrevor Morgan Murphy — Oxford University Press — 2004
  60. 70bookPliny's Encyclopedia: The Reception of the Natural HistoryAude Doody — Cambridge University Press — 2010
  61. 71bookA People's History of Science: Miners, Midwives, and "Low Mechanicks"Clifford D. Conner — Nation Books — 2005
  62. 73encyclopediaPhiloponusChristian Wildberg — Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University — 1 May 2018
  63. 74encyclopediaAristotle on CausalityAndrea Falcon — Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University — 2019
  64. 75bookThe Cambridge history of IranW. B. Fisher — Cambridge University Press — 1968–1991
  65. 76encyclopediaBayt al-Hikmah
  66. 77bookHistory of Islamic PhilosophyRoutledge — 2001
  67. 78bookAlhacen's Theory of Visual Perception: A Critical Edition, with English Translation and Commentary, of the First Three Books of Alhacen's De Aspectibus, the Medieval Latin Version of Ibn al-Haytham's Kitāb al-Manāẓir: Volume TwoA. Mark Smith — American Philosophical Society — 2001
  68. 79journalReviewed work: Ibn al-Haythams Weg zur Physik, Matthias SchrammG. J. Toomer — 1964
  69. 80bookHow modern science came into the world. Four civilizations, one 17th-century breakthroughH. Floris Cohen — Amsterdam University Press — 2010
  70. 82journalGratian, Irnerius, and the Early Schools of BolognaJosiah C. Russell — 1959
  71. 83encyclopediaSt. Albertus Magnus
  72. 84bookGalileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and ReligionRonald Numbers — Harvard University Press — 2009
  73. 85bookThe Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific RevolutionDavid Wootton — Penguin — 2015
  74. 90bookReappraisals of the Scientific RevolutionDavid C. Lindberg — Cambridge University Press — 1990
  75. 91bookThe Beginnings of Western ScienceDavid C. Lindberg — University of Chicago Press — 2007
  76. 92bookThe Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyEva Del Soldato — Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University — 2016
  77. 93bookA History of Natural PhilosophyEdward Grant — Cambridge University Press — 2007
  78. 94bookThe Origins of Modern ScienceOfer Gal — Cambridge University Press — 2021
  79. 95bookMaking Modern SciencePeter J. Bowler et al. — University of Chicago Press — 2020
  80. 96bookScience: A History 1543–2001John Gribbin — Allen Lane — 2002
  81. 99bookEncyclopedia of the RenaissanceFacts on File — 1987
  82. 100bookThe Rise of the Public in Enlightenment EuropeJames van Horn Melton — Cambridge University Press — 2001
  83. 102encyclopediaScientific Revolution
  84. 103bookBrock Biology of MicroorganismsPrentice Hall — 2006
  85. 105journalTaxonomy: what's in a name? Doesn't a rose by any other name smell as sweet?CH Calisher — 2007
  86. 106bookElectrodynamics from Ampère to EinsteinOlivier Darrigol — Oxford University Press — 2000
  87. 107bookCompanion to the History of Modern ScienceR. C. Olby et al. — Routledge — 1990
  88. 109journalOrigins of Sociology: The Case of the Scottish EnlightenmentAlan Swingewood — 1970
  89. 111bookA History of Psychology: From Antiquity to ModernityThomas Hardy Leahey — Routledge — 2018
  90. 112journalDarwin's enduring legacyKevin Padian — 2008
  91. 115journalIn Search of El Dorado: John Dalton and the Origins of the Atomic TheoryAlan J. Rocke — 2005
  92. 116bookA Modern Course in Statistical PhysicsLinda Reichl — Edward Arnold — 1980
  93. 117bookChemical Engineering ThermodynamicsY. V. C. Rao — Universities Press — 1997
  94. 118journalBounded energy exchange as an alternative to the third law of thermodynamicsM. Heidrich — 2016
  95. 119bookA century of X-rays and radioactivity in medicine: with emphasis on photographic records of the early yearsRichard F. Mould — Inst. of Physics Publ. — 1995
  96. 120bookPolski słownik biograficzny, vol. 4Tadeusz Estreicher — 1938
  97. 121journalCathode RaysJ. J. Thomson — 1897
  98. 123journalHow a century of ammonia synthesis changed the worldJan Willem Erisman et al. — October 2008
  99. 125journalLittle Book, Big Book: Before and After Little Science, Big Science: A Review Article, Part IJonathan Furner — 1 June 2003
  100. 126bookFlight: My Life in Mission ControlChris Kraft et al. — Dutton — 2001
  101. 127bookThinking about the UnthinkableHerman Kahn — Horizon — 1962
  102. 128bookStructures of scientific collaborationWesley Shrum — MIT Press — 2007
  103. 129bookBreaking into the Lab: Engineering Progress for Women in ScienceSue V. Rosser — New York University Press — 12 March 2012
  104. 130journalThe origin of elementsA. A. Penzias — Nobel Foundation — 2006
  105. 131bookGravitation and CosmologyS. Weinberg — John Whitney & Sons — 1972
  106. 132bookEvolutionDouglas J. Futuyma et al. — Sinauer — 2017
  107. 133bookAlbert Einstein's special theory of relativity. Emergence (1905) and early interpretation (1905–1911)Arthur I. Miller — Addison–Wesley — 1981
  108. 134bookThe Old Quantum TheoryD. ter Haar — Pergamon — 1967
  109. 135journalThe History and Status of General Systems TheoryLudwig von Bertalanffy — 1972
  110. 136journalHuman genetics and genomics a decade after the release of the draft sequence of the human genomeNasheen Naidoo et al. — October 2011
  111. 137journalInduced pluripotent stem cells: from Nobel Prizes to clinical applicationsS. Tamir Rashid et al. — March 2013
  112. 138press releaseNew results indicate that new particle is a Higgs bosonC. O'Luanaigh — CERN — 14 March 2013
  113. 139journalMulti-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star MergerB. P. Abbott et al. — 2017
  114. 140journalMerging neutron stars generate gravitational waves and a celestial light showAdrian Cho — 2017
  115. 143bookPhilosophy of Science: From Problem to TheoryMario Augusto Bunge — Transaction — 1998
  116. 144bookThe Logic of Scientific DiscoveryKarl R. Popper — Routledge — 2002a
  117. 145bookScientific Method in PracticeHugh G. Jr. Gauch — Cambridge University Press — 2003
  118. 146bookThe Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance EuropeBrian W. Oglivie — University of Chicago Press — 2008
  119. 147dictionaryNatural History
  120. 149journalThe formal sciences: their scope, their foundations, and their unityBenedikt Löwe — 2002
  121. 150bookInfinity and the Mind: The Science and Philosophy of the InfiniteRudy Rucker — Princeton University Press — 2019
  122. 151encyclopediaFormal system
  123. 152bookLinguistics and the Formal SciencesMarcus Tomalin — 2006
  124. 153journalThe Formal Sciences: Their Scope, Their Foundations, and Their UnityBenedikt Löwe — 2002
  125. 154bookThe Nature of Statistical EvidenceThompson Bill — Springer — 2007
  126. 155bookTrick or Truth?: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and MathematicsAnshu Gupta Mujumdar et al. — Springer — 2016
  127. 157bookEssays in the philosophy of chemistryG. Restrepo — Oxford University Press — 2016
  128. 158webWhat is mathematical biologyCentre for Mathematical Biology, University of Bath
  129. 159magazineWhat is financial mathematics?Tim Johnson — 1 September 2009
  130. 160bookIs Economics Becoming a Hard Science?Hal Varian — Edward Elgar — 1997
  131. 161journalClinically oriented physiology teaching: strategy for developing critical-thinking skills in undergraduate medical studentsReem Rachel Abraham — 2004
  132. 162dictionaryEngineeringCambridge University Press
  133. 163journalThe relationship between science and technologyHarvey Brooks — 1 September 1994
  134. 164bookOxford textbook of medicineJohn Firth — Oxford University Press — 2020
  135. 165journalThe practice of clinical medicine as an art and as a scienceJ. Saunders — June 2000
  136. 166journalLimited scope of scienceBernard D. Davis — March 2000
  137. 167journalScientific medicine—fact of fiction? The contribution of science to medicineJames McCormick — 2001
  138. 170journalFruits, Salads, and Smoothies: A Working definition of InterdisciplinarityM. Nissani — 1995
  139. 172bookBecoming Interdisciplinary: An Introduction to Interdisciplinary StudiesTanya Ausburg — Kendall/Hunt Publishing — 2006
  140. 173webTo Live at All Is Miracle EnoughRichard Dawkins — RichardDawkins.net — 10 May 2006
  141. 174bookThe Investigation of the Physical WorldGiuliano Toraldo di Francia — Cambridge University Press — 1976
  142. 175bookStatistics and Scientific Method: An Introduction for Students and ResearchersPeter J. Diggle et al. — Oxford University Press — 2011
  143. 176bookConsilience: The Unity of KnowledgeEdward Wilson — Vintage — 1999
  144. 177bookScience: A Four Thousand Year HistoryPatricia Fara — Oxford University Press — 2009
  145. 178journalCorrelations Genuine and Spurious in Pearson and YuleJohn Aldrich — 1995
  146. 179bookPhilosophy, science, education and cultureRobert Nola et al. — Springer — 2005
  147. 180web"Heads I win, tails you lose": A Foray Into the Psychology of PhilosophyTim van Gelder — University of Melbourne — 1999
  148. 181webChapter 23. Deliberate bias: Conflict creates bad scienceCraig Pease — Vermont Law School — 6 September 2006
  149. 182bookPeer Review: A Critical InquiryDavid Shatz — Rowman & Littlefield — 2004
  150. 184bookThe Ethical Dimensions of the Biological and Health SciencesRuth Ellen Bulger et al. — Cambridge University Press — 2002
  151. 185webWhat is the scientific method?Patricia Ryaby Backer — San Jose State University — 29 October 2004
  152. 186bookReliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in scienceJohn Ziman — Cambridge University Press — 1978c
  153. 187journalThe proliferation of scientific literature: a natural processJ. M. Ziman — 1980
  154. 188bookScientific and Technical Information ResourcesKrishna Subramanyam et al. — CRC Press — 1981
  155. 189webScience the Endless FrontierVannevar Bush — National Science Foundation — July 1945
  156. 190bookTheory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of SciencePeter Godfrey-Smith — University of Chicago — 2003
  157. 191bookObjective KnowledgeKarl Popper — 1972
  158. 192bookThe Rationality of ScienceW. H. Newton-Smith — Routledge — 1994
  159. 193thesisThe Epistemological Status of Scientific Theories: An Investigation of the Structural Realist AccountI. Votsis — University of London, London School of Economics — 2004
  160. 194encyclopediaThomas KuhnAlexander Bird — 2013
  161. 195bookThe Structure of Scientific RevolutionsThomas S. Kuhn — University of Chicago Press — 1970
  162. 196journalCasebeer, William D. Natural Ethical Facts: Evolution, Connectionism, and Moral CognitionE. Christian Brugger — 2004
  163. 197citationWhat Does it Mean to say That Science is Value-Laden?Zina B. Ward — Routledge — 2026-03-10
  164. 198journalThe Scientific Community MetaphorW. Kornfeld et al. — 1981
  165. 199webEusocial climbersE. O. Wilson Foundation
  166. 200webOur definition of a scientistScience Council
  167. 201journalEducation: The PhD factoryDavid Cyranoski et al. — 2011
  168. 202journalFlexible working: Science in the gig economyRoberta Kwok — 2017
  169. 204journalNature's guide for mentorsAdrian Lee et al. — 2007
  170. 205bookWomen's History as ScientistsLeigh Ann Whaley — ABC-CLIO — 2003
  171. 206bookIm/partial Science: Gender Identity in Molecular BiologyBonnie Spanier — Indiana University Press — 1995
  172. 207webChronicle for Societies Founded from 1323 to 1599Jim Parrott — Scholarly Societies Project — 9 August 2007
  173. 210webLearned Societies, the key to realising an open access future?London School of Economics — 24 June 2019
  174. 212webPrince of Wales opens Royal Society's refurbished buildingThe Royal Society — 7 July 2004
  175. 218newsHow did the Nobel Prize become the biggest award on Earth?Nick Stockton — 7 October 2014
  176. 221journalThe National Science Foundation and the Debate over Postwar Research Policy, 1942–1945Daniel Kevles — 1977
  177. 223newsAustralia to Lay Off Leading Scientist on Sea LevelsMichelle Innis — 17 May 2016
  178. 227journalTen Simple Rules To Commercialize Scientific ResearchAnthony C. Fletcher et al. — 27 September 2012
  179. 228bookScience policy up closeJohn Harmen III Marburger — Harvard University Press — 10 February 2015
  180. 229bookScientific Method in BriefHugh G. Gauch — Cambridge University Press — 2012
  181. 231webScience journalism must keep a critical edgeDavid Dickson — Science and Development Network — 11 October 2004
  182. 233journalAre Journalism Students Equipped to Write About Science?S. McIlwaine et al. — 2005
  183. 234journalPopular science: Get the word outDecember 2013
  184. 236webCreative Writing – ScienceMario Petrucci
  185. 239journalWhy are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?Aviva Philipp-Muller et al. — 26 July 2022
  186. 240journalA Test of Three Theories of Anti-Science AttitudesGordon William Gauchat — 2008
  187. 241webClimate Change Remains Top Global Threat Across 19-Country SurveyJacob Poushter et al. — 31 August 2022
  188. 242bookHow Minds Change: The Surprising Science of Belief, Opinion, and PersuasionDavid McRaney — Portfolio/Penguin — 2022
  189. 245journalCounteracting the Politicization of ScienceToby Bolsen et al. — 2015
  190. 247journalInoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate ChangeSander van der Linden et al. — 2017
  191. 248journalMetascience could rescue the 'replication crisis'J. W. Schooler — 2014
  192. 249journalEditors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?Harold Pashler et al. — 2012
  193. 250journalInvestigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciencesAndrew H. Tyner et al. — 2026-04-01
  194. 251journalMeta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and PracticesJohn P. A. Ioannidis et al. — 2 October 2015
  195. 253encyclopediaScience and PseudoscienceSven Ove Hansson — 3 September 2008
  196. 255webCargo Cult ScienceRichard Feynman — Columbia University — 1974
  197. 256bookThe Skeptics' Guide to the Universe: How to Know What's Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of FakeSteven Novella — Hodder & Stoughton — 2018
  198. 258journalPolitical diversity will improve social psychological scienceJosé L. Duarte et al. — 2015