Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

J. Robert Oppenheimer

~16 min read · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • J. Robert Oppenheimer stood in a control bunker near Alamogordo, New Mexico, in the early morning hours of the 16th of July, 1945, holding a post to steady himself. Brigadier General Thomas Farrell watched him grow tenser as the final seconds ticked away. Then a burst of light split the desert sky and a deep growling roar rolled across the scrub. Farrell recalled that Oppenheimer's face relaxed into an expression of tremendous relief. His brother Frank, also present, remembered his first words as simply, "I guess it worked."

    The world's first nuclear weapon had just detonated. The man responsible for building it was born Julius Robert Oppenheimer in New York City on the 22nd of April, 1904, the son of a textile importer and a painter, raised in an apartment on Riverside Drive whose walls held paintings by Pablo Picasso, Edouard Vuillard, and Vincent van Gogh. He would earn a doctorate at twenty-three, predict the existence of black holes a decade before anyone took the idea seriously, and then spend the rest of his life wrestling with what he had made.

    How did a boy who once nearly poisoned his tutor at Cambridge rise to direct the most secret scientific enterprise in American history? Why did the government he served strip him of his security clearance less than a decade after crowning him a national hero? And what did it cost him personally to become the person who, watching that desert fireball, thought of the Hindu god Vishnu and the line, "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds"? Those are the questions this documentary will answer.

  • At the Ethical Culture Society School in New York, founded by Felix Adler on the motto "Deed before Creed," Oppenheimer compressed third and fourth grades into a single year and skipped half of eighth grade. He took private music lessons from the French flutist Georges Barrere and developed a fascination with mineralogy so keen that the New York Mineralogical Club invited him to deliver a lecture when he was still a child.

    An attack of colitis contracted while prospecting in Jachymov, Czechoslovakia, delayed his entry to Harvard by a year. He spent part of that recovery in New Mexico, where he developed a love for horseback riding and the southwestern landscape that never left him. He entered Harvard College in 1922 at age eighteen and, to make up lost time, took six courses each term instead of the usual four. He graduated summa cum laude after only three years.

    At Cambridge, the fit was wrong from the start. He was accepted at Christ's College, but Ernest Rutherford was unimpressed by Bridgman's recommendation, which noted that Oppenheimer's clumsiness in the lab suggested theoretical work was his proper domain. J. J. Thomson took him anyway on condition he complete a basic laboratory course. Oppenheimer wrote to a friend that the lab work was "a terrible bore" and that he was "so bad at it that it is impossible to feel that I am learning anything." He developed an antagonistic relationship with his tutor, Patrick Blackett, a future Nobel laureate. According to his friend Francis Fergusson, Oppenheimer once confessed to leaving a poisoned apple on Blackett's desk; his parents intervened with university authorities. The episode is unverified and the book American Prometheus conceded it was unproven, but Oppenheimer did have regular sessions with a psychiatrist in Harley Street during this period.

    His inner turbulence could turn outward violently. When Fergusson tried to distract him from a period of apparent depression by describing a marriage proposal he had made to Frances Keeley, Oppenheimer jumped on him and tried to strangle him. He told his brother plainly, "I need physics more than friends." The move to Gottingen in 1926 changed the climate entirely. Max Born supervised him, and among the colleagues he made there were Werner Heisenberg, Pascual Jordan, Wolfgang Pauli, Paul Dirac, Enrico Fermi, and Edward Teller. He was so dominating in seminars that Maria Goeppert presented Born with a petition threatening a boycott of the class unless he made Oppenheimer quiet down. Born left the petition on his desk where Oppenheimer could read it, and it worked without a word being said. Oppenheimer received his doctorate in March 1927 at age twenty-three. After his oral exam, the professor administering it, James Franck, reportedly said, "I'm glad that's over. He was on the point of questioning me."

  • Linus Pauling and Oppenheimer planned a joint assault on the nature of the chemical bond after Oppenheimer arrived at the California Institute of Technology in 1927 on a National Research Council fellowship: Oppenheimer would supply the mathematics, Pauling would interpret the results. The collaboration ended abruptly after Oppenheimer invited Pauling's wife, Ava Helen Pauling, to join him on a trip to Mexico. Years later, when Oppenheimer offered Pauling the head of the Chemistry Division of the Manhattan Project, Pauling declined, saying he was a pacifist.

    At Leiden in the autumn of 1928, Oppenheimer gave lectures in Dutch despite having little prior experience with the language. His students there gave him the nickname Opje, later anglicized by his Berkeley students as "Oppie." Raymond Thayer Birge at Berkeley wanted him badly enough to agree to share him with Caltech for one term a year. Before taking up the professorship, Oppenheimer was diagnosed with a mild case of tuberculosis and spent weeks with his brother Frank at a New Mexico ranch. When he heard the ranch was available, he exclaimed, "Hot dog!" He later called it Perro Caliente, which means exactly that in Spanish, and said that "physics and desert country" were his "two great loves."

    Berkeley promoted him to full professor in 1936 at an annual salary of $3,300. Hans Bethe, who saw him in his element there, said that the most important thing Oppenheimer brought to his teaching was "his exquisite taste." Bethe described a group of around eight to ten graduate students and about six postdoctoral fellows who might spend a single afternoon discussing quantum electrodynamics, cosmic rays, electron pair production, and nuclear physics in sequence. His students were so taken with him that they adopted his walk, his speech patterns, his personal mannerisms, and even his habit of reading texts in their original languages.

    Not everyone was charmed. Associates fell into two camps: one saw him as an aloof and impressive genius; the other as a pretentious and insecure poseur. Oppenheimer repeatedly attempted to secure a position at Berkeley for Robert Serber but was blocked by Birge, who said that "one Jew in the department was enough." Oppenheimer's most significant scientific papers from this period included a 1939 collaboration with his student Hartland Snyder, "On Continued Gravitational Contraction," which predicted what would eventually be called black holes. After the war, physicists Luis Alvarez and Jeremy Bernstein suggested that if Oppenheimer had lived long enough to see these predictions confirmed by experiment, he might have won the Nobel Prize. When the historian Abraham Pais asked Oppenheimer what he considered his most important contributions, Oppenheimer cited his work on electrons and positrons, not gravitational contraction.

  • Sanskrit came to Oppenheimer from Arthur W. Ryder at Berkeley in 1933. He had already begun reading classical Hindu texts in English translation after Harvard, drawn to them because they were difficult, and difficulty was what he sought. He eventually read the Bhagavad Gita and the Meghaduta in the original and cited the Gita as one of the books that most shaped his philosophy of life. He called it "the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue," gave copies to friends as gifts, and kept a worn personal copy on the bookshelf by his desk at Los Alamos. He quoted a passage from it at a memorial service for President Franklin Roosevelt held at Los Alamos. He nicknamed his car Garuda, the mount bird of the Hindu god Vishnu.

    His close colleague Isidor Isaac Rabi observed this quality from a long vantage, having known Oppenheimer across his Berkeley, Los Alamos, and Princeton years. Rabi wrote that Oppenheimer's immersion in Hindu thought "resulted in a feeling for the mystery of the universe that surrounded him almost like a fog" and that "at the border he tended to feel there was much more of the mysterious and novel than there actually was." Yet Rabi also concluded that it was this very spiritual quality, expressed in Oppenheimer's speech and manner, that formed the basis of his charisma: "He never expressed himself completely. He always left a feeling that there were depths of sensibility and insight not yet revealed."

    Politics entered his life with similar intensity in the 1930s. He claimed he did not read newspapers in his twenties and learned of the Wall Street crash of 1929 only while on a walk with Ernest Lawrence, six months after it happened. From 1934 onward, he earmarked three percent of his annual salary, about one hundred dollars, for two years, to support physicists fleeing Nazi Germany. He attended a longshoremen's rally during the 1934 West Coast Waterfront Strike with students including Melba Phillips and Robert Serber. After the Spanish Civil War broke out in 1936, he hosted fundraisers for the Republican cause. Biographer Ray Monk wrote that in terms of time, effort, and money spent on party activities, Oppenheimer "was a very committed supporter" of the Communist Party, though Oppenheimer himself denied formal membership and described himself at the 1954 hearings as a "fellow traveler": someone who agrees with many of communism's goals but is not willing to blindly follow orders from any party apparatus. When his father died in 1937, leaving $392,602 to be divided between Oppenheimer and his brother Frank, Oppenheimer promptly wrote a will bequeathing his estate to the University of California to fund graduate scholarships.

  • Brigadier General Leslie R. Groves appointed Oppenheimer to head the Los Alamos Laboratory in late 1942, a decision that surprised many observers because Oppenheimer had neither a Nobel Prize nor any record of running a large organization. Groves was not troubled by the Nobel gap; he was impressed instead by what he called Oppenheimer's "overweening ambition" and his singular grasp of the practical aspects of an enterprise that would span physics, chemistry, metallurgy, ordnance, and engineering simultaneously. Rabi described the appointment as "a real stroke of genius on the part of General Groves, who was not generally considered to be a genius."

    Oppenheimer suggested the laboratory site himself: a flat mesa near Santa Fe, New Mexico, that he knew well because it was close to his ranch. The site was home to the Los Alamos Ranch School, a private boys' school. Engineers worried about the poor access road and the water supply but otherwise considered it ideal. Oppenheimer actually went so far as to order a lieutenant colonel's uniform and take the Army physical, which he failed. Doctors found him underweight at 128 pounds, diagnosed his chronic cough as tuberculosis, and flagged his chronic lumbosacral joint pain. The plan to commission the scientists as soldiers collapsed when Rabi and Robert Bacher refused.

    Los Alamos grew from a few hundred people in 1943 to over 6,000 by 1945. Because scientists were paid their existing salaries, Oppenheimer, coming from a state university, initially earned less than some of his subordinates. Groves quietly raised his salary to match the others without informing him. Victor Weisskopf described Oppenheimer's leadership as physically present at every decisive step: "He was present in the laboratory or in the seminar rooms, when a new effect was measured, when a new idea was conceived."

    The design path was not straight. In 1943, development centered on a plutonium gun-type weapon called Thin Man. When Los Alamos received its first plutonium sample from the X-10 Graphite Reactor in April 1944, a problem emerged: reactor-bred plutonium contained five times more plutonium-240 than the cyclotron-generated variety, making it unsuitable for a gun-type weapon. In July 1944, Oppenheimer abandoned Thin Man for an implosion design; a simpler gun-type version using highly enriched uranium became Little Boy in February 1945. The more complex implosion device, the "Christy gadget" named after his student Robert Christy, was finalized as Fat Man in a meeting in Oppenheimer's office on the 28th of February, 1945.

    On Groves's order of the 20th of July, 1943, Oppenheimer's security clearance was granted without delay because, as the directive stated, he was "absolutely essential to the project." His past associations were noted but overridden. Throughout the project, the FBI and the Manhattan Project's own security arm kept him under surveillance, following him during a visit to Jean Tatlock in California in June 1943. Tatlock killed herself on the 4th of January, 1944, leaving Oppenheimer deeply grieved.

  • According to a 1949 magazine profile, the lines Oppenheimer recalled at the moment of the Trinity detonation came from the Bhagavad Gita: "If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one... Now I am become Death, the shatterer of worlds." In 1965 he described the scene this way: "We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent."

    Rabi, watching him cross the base afterward, said: "I'll never forget his walk... like High Noon... this kind of strut. He had done it."

    At an assembly at Los Alamos on the evening of the 6th of August, 1945, the night Hiroshima was bombed, Oppenheimer took the stage and clasped his hands together like a prize-winning boxer while the crowd cheered. He expressed regret only that the weapon had not been ready in time for use against Nazi Germany. Eleven days later, on August 17, he traveled to Washington to hand-deliver a letter to Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson expressing his revulsion and his desire to see nuclear weapons banned. In October, he told President Harry S. Truman, "Mr. President, I feel I have blood on my hands." Truman responded that he alone bore responsibility for the decision and later said he did not want to see Oppenheimer in his office again. For his work directing Los Alamos, Truman awarded Oppenheimer the Medal for Merit in 1946.

    He was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Physics four times, in 1946, 1951, 1955, and 1967, but never won. His student Willis Lamb won the 1955 Nobel for the Lamb shift, a discovery Oppenheimer had anticipated in a 1931 paper co-written with Harvey Hall. Carl David Anderson won the 1936 Nobel for the positron, which Oppenheimer had essentially predicted in a 1930 paper based on Dirac's equation. The prizes went to others; the regret registered only in retrospect.

  • Oppenheimer arrived at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton in 1947 with a salary of $20,000 per year, rent-free accommodation in a 17th-century manor set among 265 acres of woodland, a cook, and a groundskeeper. He collected French Post-Impressionist and Fauvist artworks, adding Cezanne, Rembrandt, and Renoir to a collection that already included Van Gogh and Picasso. He brought poets and diplomats to reside alongside physicists, inviting scholars like T. S. Eliot and George F. Kennan for temporary fellowships. Some of the mathematics faculty resented the humanities presence; Oppenheimer later told Abraham Pais that one of his personal failures at the institute was being unable to fully bridge the natural sciences and the humanities.

    As chairman of the General Advisory Committee of the Atomic Energy Commission from 1947, he lobbied for international arms control and pushed against the development of a hydrogen bomb. When the GAC recommended in October 1949 against pursuing the "Super," as the hydrogen bomb was known, the committee's language was unambiguous: a thermonuclear weapon could only be strategically used against civilian populations, and "its use therefore carries much further than the atomic bomb itself the policy of exterminating civilian populations." Truman overruled the recommendation on the 31st of January, 1950.

    By 1953, Oppenheimer's accumulated influence across multiple government panels had made him an enemy of the advocates of strategic bombardment. On the 7th of November, 1953, William Liscum Borden, formerly the executive director of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, wrote to J. Edgar Hoover stating that "more probably than not J. Robert Oppenheimer is an agent of the Soviet Union." Eisenhower ordered a "blank wall" placed between Oppenheimer and government secrets on December 3. Lewis Strauss, an AEC commissioner who had harbored long-standing resentment toward Oppenheimer partly for the way Oppenheimer had once discussed the export of radioactive isotopes before Congress, calling them "less important than electronic devices but more important than, let us say, vitamins," now moved against him with the FBI's files in hand.

    The secret hearing, held in April and May of 1954, focused on Oppenheimer's communist associations and his opposition to the hydrogen bomb. Edward Teller testified that he considered Oppenheimer loyal but that Oppenheimer's actions had been "exceedingly hard to understand" and that he would "feel personally more secure if public matters would rest in other hands." Teller's testimony outraged the scientific community and left him virtually ostracized from academic science. Ernest Lawrence refused to appear, pleading ulcerative colitis, but a recorded interview in which he condemned Oppenheimer was admitted as evidence. Rabi said the security suspension was unnecessary: "he is a consultant, and if you don't want to consult the guy, you don't consult him, period."

    The board revoked Oppenheimer's clearance by a 2-1 vote, unanimously clearing him of disloyalty but finding that 20 of the 24 charges were true or substantially true. The AEC upheld the findings on the 29th of June, 1954, by a 4-1 decision, with Strauss writing the majority opinion stressing Oppenheimer's "defects of character." Wernher von Braun told a Congressional committee: "In England, Oppenheimer would have been knighted."

  • In 1963, President Lyndon B. Johnson's administration awarded Oppenheimer the Enrico Fermi Award for his contributions to theoretical physics, a formal gesture of rehabilitation that fell short of restoring his clearance. He served as director of the Institute for Advanced Study until 1966, stepping down because of failing health; he is the longest-serving director the institute has had.

    Oppenheimer died on the 18th of February, 1967. The security clearance revocation that had defined his final decade was vacated in 2022, when the U.S. Department of Energy formally rescinded the 1954 decision, a recognition that the hearing had been fundamentally flawed. The full transcript of the 1954 hearings had already been made public in 2014 by the Department of Energy, decades after a redacted version was published in June 1954.

    His brother Frank, fired from his University of Minnesota position after testifying before the House Un-American Activities Committee that he had been a Communist Party member, spent years as a cattle rancher in Colorado before teaching high school physics and eventually founding the San Francisco Exploratorium. The family's trajectory after the bomb years was not simple. Peter, born in May 1941, and Katherine, born at Los Alamos on the 7th of December, 1944, grew up as the children of a man who had become simultaneously a national symbol and a national casualty. The papers Oppenheimer exchanged with Ruth Tolman, with whom he maintained a close friendship into her final years in 1957, are among the few private documents that survive to suggest the person behind the public figure: letters in which he addressed her as "My Love."

Common questions

Why is J. Robert Oppenheimer called the father of the atomic bomb?

Oppenheimer earned the title because he served as director of the Manhattan Project's Los Alamos Laboratory from 1943, overseeing the scientific development that produced the first nuclear weapons. He assembled the team, directed both theoretical and experimental work, and was present at the Trinity test on the 16th of July, 1945, the first successful detonation of a nuclear device.

What did J. Robert Oppenheimer say when the Trinity bomb detonated?

Oppenheimer's brother Frank recalled his first words as "I guess it worked." According to a 1949 magazine profile, Oppenheimer thought of lines from the Bhagavad Gita at the moment of the explosion: "Now I am become Death, the shatterer of worlds." In 1965 he recalled that most of those watching were silent.

Why did J. Robert Oppenheimer lose his security clearance?

A 1954 AEC hearing revoked Oppenheimer's security clearance by a 2-1 vote, citing his past associations with Communist Party members and his opposition to developing the hydrogen bomb. The board unanimously cleared him of disloyalty but found 20 of 24 charges true or substantially true. The decision was vacated by the U.S. Department of Energy in 2022.

What scientific contributions did J. Robert Oppenheimer make beyond the Manhattan Project?

Oppenheimer co-authored the Born-Oppenheimer approximation for molecular wave functions, predicted the existence of positrons in 1930, and co-wrote a 1939 paper with Hartland Snyder predicting what became known as black holes. He also developed the Oppenheimer-Phillips process in nuclear fusion with Melba Phillips, and his student Willis Lamb won the 1955 Nobel Prize for work Oppenheimer had anticipated in a 1931 paper.

What was J. Robert Oppenheimer's connection to the Bhagavad Gita?

Oppenheimer learned Sanskrit under Arthur W. Ryder at Berkeley in 1933 and eventually read the Bhagavad Gita in the original text. He called it "the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue," gave copies to friends, and kept a worn personal copy on his desk at Los Alamos. He quoted from it at President Franklin Roosevelt's Los Alamos memorial service.

Did J. Robert Oppenheimer win the Nobel Prize in Physics?

Oppenheimer was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Physics four times, in 1946, 1951, 1955, and 1967, but never won. Some physicists and historians have since suggested his work on gravitational collapse and the theory of neutron stars and black holes may have been his most important contribution, though it was not recognized by the Nobel committee during his lifetime.

All sources

301 references cited across the entry

  1. 1harvnbPais (2006) p. 355 (end plates)Pais — 2006
  2. 2harvnbSmith, Weiner (1980) p. 1Smith, Weiner — 1980
  3. 3harvnbSchweber (2008) p. 283Schweber — 2008
  4. 4harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 5–11Cassidy — 2005
  5. 5harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 16, 145, 282Cassidy — 2005
  6. 6harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 10Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  7. 7harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 12Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  8. 8harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 35Cassidy — 2005
  9. 9harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 23, 29Cassidy — 2005
  10. 10harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 16–17Cassidy — 2005
  11. 11harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 43–46Cassidy — 2005
  12. 12harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 61–63Cassidy — 2005
  13. 13harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 75–76, 88–89Cassidy — 2005
  14. 14harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 90–92Cassidy — 2005
  15. 15harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 94Cassidy — 2005
  16. 17webOppenheimer and the poisoned appleCambridge University Library Special Collections — August 15, 2023
  17. 18harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 39–40, 96, 258Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  18. 19harvnbSmith, Weiner (1980) p. 91Smith, Weiner — 1980
  19. 20harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 35–36, 43–47, 51–52, 320, 353Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  20. 21harvnbSmith, Weiner (1980) p. 135Smith, Weiner — 1980
  21. 22harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 108Cassidy — 2005
  22. 23harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 60Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  23. 24thesisZur Quantentheorie kontinuierlicher SpektrenJulius Robert Oppenheimer — 1927
  24. 25harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 109Cassidy — 2005
  25. 26magazineThe Eternal ApprenticeNovember 8, 1948
  26. 27harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 112Cassidy — 2005
  27. 28harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 115–116Cassidy — 2005
  28. 29harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 142Cassidy — 2005
  29. 30harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 151–152Cassidy — 2005
  30. 31harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 73–74Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  31. 32harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 84Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  32. 33harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 75–76Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  33. 34webThe Early YearsUniversity of California, Berkeley — 2004
  34. 35harvnbConant (2005) p. 75Conant — 2005
  35. 36harvnbHerken (2002) p. 14–15Herken — 2002
  36. 37harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 96–97Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  37. 38harvnbBethe, 1968a
  38. 39harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 91Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  39. 40harvnbConant (2005) p. 141Conant — 2005
  40. 41harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 88Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  41. 42journalOn the Theory of Electrons and ProtonsJ.R. Oppenheimer — 1930
  42. 43journalThree Notes on the Quantum Theory of Aperiodic EffectsJ.R. Oppenheimer — January 1, 1928
  43. 44journalOn the Quantum Theory of the Autoelectric Field CurrentsJ.R. Oppenheimer — 1928
  44. 45journalThe Early History of Quantum TunnelingEugen Merzbacher — August 1, 2002
  45. 46journalRelativistic Theory of the Photoelectric EffectJ.R. Oppenheimer et al. — 1931
  46. 47harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 173Cassidy — 2005
  47. 48journalThe quantum theory of the electronP. A. M. Dirac — 1928
  48. 49harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 162–163Cassidy — 2005
  49. 50journalOn the Stability of Stellar Neutron CoresJ.R. Oppenheimer et al. — 1938
  50. 51journalOn Massive Neutron CoresJ.R. Oppenheimer et al. — 1939
  51. 52journalOn Continued Gravitational ContractionJ.R. Oppenheimer et al. — 1939
  52. 53harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 89–90Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  53. 54harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 375Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  54. 55harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 98Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  55. 56harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 128Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  56. 57harvnbHerken (2002) p. 12Herken — 2002
  57. 58harvnbChilds (1968) p. 145Childs — 1968
  58. 59harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 104–107Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  59. 60harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 184–186Cassidy — 2005
  60. 61magazineThe BrothersJune 27, 1949
  61. 62webFBI file: Katherine OppenheimerFederal Bureau of Investigation — May 23, 1944
  62. 63webA LifeUniversity of California, Berkeley
  63. 64harvnbHaynes (2006) p. 147Haynes — 2006
  64. 65webChevalier to Oppenheimer, July 23, 1964Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller
  65. 66webExcerpts from Barbara Chevalier's unpublished manuscriptBrotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller
  66. 67webExcerpts from Gordon Griffith's unpublished memoirBrotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller
  67. 68harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 137–138Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  68. 69magazineRegarding Scientist XRachel Teukolsky — Spring 2001
  69. 70harvnbUnited States Atomic Energy Commission (1954) p. 9United States Atomic Energy Commission — 1954
  70. 71webOppenheimer's Letter of Response on Letter Regarding the Oppenheimer AffairOppenheimer, J. R. — Nuclear Age Peace Foundation — March 4, 1954
  71. 72harvnbStrout (1963) p. 4Strout — 1963
  72. 74harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 199–200Cassidy — 2005
  73. 75harvnbMonk (2012) p. 244Monk — 2012
  74. 76harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 111–113Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  75. 77harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 153–161Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  76. 78harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 160–162Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  77. 79harvnbStreshinsky, Klaus (2013) p. 111–119Streshinsky, Klaus — 2013
  78. 80harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 186–187Cassidy — 2005
  79. 81harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 231–233Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  80. 82harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 232–234, 511–513Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  81. 83harvnbHerken (2002) p. 101–102Herken — 2002
  82. 84harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 249–254Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  83. 85harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 363–365Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  84. 86harvnbStreshinsky, Klaus (2013) p. 290–292Streshinsky, Klaus — 2013
  85. 87magazineThe TIME Vault: November 8, 1948November 8, 1948
  86. 88harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 99,102Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  87. 89harvnbHijiya (2000) p. 133Hijiya — 2000
  88. 90journal"Voices of Man. The Meaning and Function of Language", by Mario Pei (Book Review)Soren Egerod — November 1963
  89. 91harvnbRhodes (1977) p. 149Rhodes — 1977
  90. 92harvnbKelly (2006) p. 128Kelly — 2006
  91. 93harvnbFeldman (2000) p. 196–198Feldman — 2000
  92. 94harvnbHufbauer (2005) p. 31–47Hufbauer — 2005
  93. 95harvnbPais (2006) p. 33Pais — 2006
  94. 96harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 178Cassidy — 2005
  95. 97webNomination Archive – Robert J. OppenheimerNobel Media AB — April 2020
  96. 98webMaking the Jitterbug Work–Marcus Oliphant and the Manhattan ProjectAtomic Heritage Foundation — May 30, 2019
  97. 100harvnbHewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 72–74Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  98. 101harvnbHewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 81–82Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  99. 102harvnbGroves (1962) p. 63Groves — 1962
  100. 103harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 210Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  101. 104harvnbHewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 230–232Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  102. 105harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 221–222Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  103. 106harvnbHoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 226–229Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  104. 107harvnbHewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 312–313Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  105. 108harvnbHoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 245–248Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  106. 109harvnbHoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 248–249Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  107. 110webNuclear Files: Library: Biographies: Robert ChristyNuclear Age Peace Foundation
  108. 111harvnbHoddeson, Henriksen, Meade (1993) p. 312Hoddeson, Henriksen, Meade — 1993
  109. 112harvnbJones (1985) p. 530–532Jones — 1985
  110. 113harvnbRhodes (1986) p. 642–643Rhodes — 1986
  111. 114harvnbSzasz (1984) p. 88Szasz — 1984
  112. 115journalLetters : Bomb in the HeadJeremy Bernstein — April 26, 2018
  113. 117magazineScience: Atomic FootprintSeptember 17, 1945
  114. 118newsJ. Robert OppenheimerOctober 10, 1949
  115. 119av media'Now I am become death...'Atomic Archive — 1965
  116. 120webBhagavad Gita XI.12Gita Supersite by Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur — September 2, 2017
  117. 122harvnbHijiya (2000)Hijiya — 2000
  118. 124harvnbJungk (1958) p. 201Jungk — 1958
  119. 125harvnbHijiya (2000) p. 123–124Hijiya — 2000
  120. 126webDebate over how to use the bombU.S. Department of Energy History Office
  121. 128harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 253Cassidy — 2005
  122. 130harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 344–347Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  123. 131harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 333–335Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  124. 132harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 351Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  125. 133harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 360–365Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  126. 134harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 369Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  127. 135webOppenheimer, J. Robert, 1904–1967Archives Directory for the History of Collecting
  128. 136harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 371–377Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  129. 137harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 269–272Cassidy — 2005
  130. 138harvnbSpangenburg, Moser (2004) p. 41–44Spangenburg, Moser — 2004
  131. 140harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 347–349Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  132. 141harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 353Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  133. 142harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 264–267Cassidy — 2005
  134. 143harvnbHewlett, Duncan (1969) p. 380–385Hewlett, Duncan — 1969
  135. 144harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 1–2Young, Schilling — 2019
  136. 145harvnbHewlett, Anderson (1962) p. 104, 240Hewlett, Anderson — 1962
  137. 146harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 418Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  138. 147harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 36Young, Schilling — 2019
  139. 148harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 293–295Cassidy — 2005
  140. 149harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 46Young, Schilling — 2019
  141. 150harvnbRhodes (1995) p. 399–400Rhodes — 1995
  142. 151harvnbHewlett, Duncan (1969) p. 384Hewlett, Duncan — 1969
  143. 152harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 10Young, Schilling — 2019
  144. 153harvnbPais (2006) p. 172Pais — 2006
  145. 154harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 423–424Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  146. 155harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 62–64Young, Schilling — 2019
  147. 156harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 429Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  148. 157harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 300Cassidy — 2005
  149. 158harvnbHewlett, Duncan (1969) p. 535–537Hewlett, Duncan — 1969
  150. 159harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 443Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  151. 160harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 85, 92, 160–161, 164Young, Schilling — 2019
  152. 161harvnbPolenberg (2002) p. 110–111Polenberg — 2002
  153. 162harvnbRhodes (1995) p. 496Rhodes — 1995
  154. 163harvnbRhodes (1995) p. 496–497Rhodes — 1995
  155. 164harvnbMcMillan (2005) p. 145–149McMillan — 2005
  156. 165harvnbHewlett, Holl (1989) p. 47–48Hewlett, Holl — 1989
  157. 166harvnbNichols (1987) p. 264Nichols — 1987
  158. 167harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 90, 102Young, Schilling — 2019
  159. 168harvnbPais (2006) p. 189Pais — 2006
  160. 169harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 450Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  161. 170harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 125–126Young, Schilling — 2019
  162. 171harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 445–446Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  163. 172harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 126–127Young, Schilling — 2019
  164. 173magazineAir Defense of North AmericaAugust 1957
  165. 174harvnbPais (2006) p. 126–128Pais — 2006
  166. 175harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 68Young, Schilling — 2019
  167. 176harvnbMcMillan (2005) p. 4McMillan — 2005
  168. 177harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 118–119Young, Schilling — 2019
  169. 178harvnbMcMillan (2005) p. 152–153McMillan — 2005
  170. 179harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 121Young, Schilling — 2019
  171. 180harvnbMcMillan (2005) p. 154McMillan — 2005
  172. 181harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 92–93Young, Schilling — 2019
  173. 182harvnbMcMillan (2005) p. 140–141McMillan — 2005
  174. 183harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 451Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  175. 184harvnbBundy (1988) p. 289Bundy — 1988
  176. 185harvnbPais (2006) p. 194–195Pais — 2006
  177. 186harvnbRhodes (1995) p. 528Rhodes — 1995
  178. 187journalAtomic Weapons and American PolicyJ Robert Oppenheimer — Council on Foreign Relations — July 1953
  179. 188harvnbPais (2006) p. 195Pais — 2006
  180. 189harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 124, 127Young, Schilling — 2019
  181. 190harvnbBundy (1988) p. 307–308Bundy — 1988
  182. 191harvnbStern (1969) p. 2Stern — 1969
  183. 192harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 195–201Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  184. 193harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 286Cassidy — 2005
  185. 194harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 394–396Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  186. 195harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 282–284Cassidy — 2005
  187. 196harvnbStern (1969) p. 1Stern — 1969
  188. 197harvnbRhodes (1995) p. 532–533Rhodes — 1995
  189. 198harvnbBundy (1988) p. 305Bundy — 1988
  190. 199harvnbRhodes (1995) p. 534–535Rhodes — 1995
  191. 200harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 481–484Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  192. 201harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 484Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  193. 202harvnbStern (1969) p. 229–230Stern — 1969
  194. 203harvnbUnited States Atomic Energy Commission (1954) p. 3–7United States Atomic Energy Commission — 1954
  195. 204harvnbNichols (1987) p. 305Nichols — 1987
  196. 205harvnbNichols (1987) p. 307Nichols — 1987
  197. 206harvnbRhodes (1995) p. 543–549Rhodes — 1995
  198. 207harvnbRhodes (1995) p. 550–556Rhodes — 1995
  199. 208harvnbRhodes (1995) p. 557Rhodes — 1995
  200. 210webJ. Robert Oppenheimer Personnel Hearings TranscriptsDepartment of Energy — Department of Energy (DOE) OpenNet documents
  201. 211harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 313–319Cassidy — 2005
  202. 213harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 532–534Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  203. 214magazineLarge and in chargeHaertsch Emilie — 2016
  204. 215webTestimony in the Matter of J. Robert OppenheimerNuclear Age Peace Foundation
  205. 216harvnbStern (1969) p. 288Stern — 1969
  206. 217harvnbStern (1969) p. 376, 380–381Stern — 1969
  207. 218harvnbStern (1969) p. 412–413Stern — 1969
  208. 219harvnbStern (1969) p. 413, 415–418Stern — 1969
  209. 220harvnbUnited States Atomic Energy Commission (1954) p. 145–185United States Atomic Energy Commission — 1954
  210. 221harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 513Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  211. 222harvnbPolenberg (2005) p. 267–268Polenberg — 2005
  212. 223harvnbPolenberg (2005) p. 268–272Polenberg — 2005
  213. 224harvnbBethe, 1968b p. 27Bethe, 1968b
  214. 225harvnbHaynes (2006) p. 133–144Haynes — 2006
  215. 226webWas Oppenheimer a Soviet Spy? A Roundtable DiscussionJ Schecter et al. — Wilson Center — July 7, 2011
  216. 227newsJ. Robert Oppenheimer Cleared of 'Black Mark' After 68 YearsWilliam J. Broad — December 16, 2022
  217. 231newsOppenheimer's 'Hollywood Ending'February 6, 2023
  218. 234harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 566–569Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  219. 235harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 573Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  220. 236news1954: Nuclear Scientist SpeaksDecember 27, 2004
  221. 237harvnbPais (2006) p. 291Pais — 2006
  222. 238newsOppenheimer Sets Path for MankindDecember 27, 1954
  223. 239webCondon lecture at Oregon State CollegeLibrary of Congress — Washington, D.C. : Library of Congress
  224. 240webJ. Robert OppenheimerInstitute for Advanced Study
  225. 241harvnbWolverton (2008) p. 84–87Wolverton — 2008
  226. 242harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 559–561Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  227. 243harvnbWolverton (2008) p. 227–228Wolverton — 2008
  228. 244harvnbWolverton (2008) p. 174–180Wolverton — 2008
  229. 245harvnbWolverton (2008) p. 177–182Wolverton — 2008
  230. 246newsOppenheimer's visit to JapanIan Laird — Los Alamos National Laboratory — Summer 2023
  231. 247webIn the Sky with Diamonds: Physics in the 1960sSam Holland — American Institute of Physics — February 26, 2021
  232. 249harvnbWolverton (2008) p. 105–106Wolverton — 2008
  233. 250journalJ. Robert Oppenheimer. 1904–1967H. A. Bethe — 1968a
  234. 252newsOppenheimer Gets Praise of Johnson with Fermi PrizeJohn W. Finney — December 2, 1963
  235. 253magazineTales of the BombOctober 4, 1968
  236. 254harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 574–575Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  237. 255harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 348–349Cassidy — 2005
  238. 257webRemarks Upon Presenting the Fermi Award to Dr. J. Robert OppenheimerLyndon B. Johnson — University of California, Santa Barbara — December 2, 1963
  239. 258webOppenheimer: The Library's Collection Chronicles His LifeNeely Tucker — Library of Congress — July 20, 2023
  240. 260harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 585–588Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  241. 261harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 351–352Cassidy — 2005
  242. 262harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 588Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  243. 264harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 590–591Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  244. 265harvnbWolverton (2008) p. 298Wolverton — 2008
  245. 266newsOppenheimer's Legacy on St. JohnJaime Elliott — July 1, 2014
  246. 267harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 591Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  247. 268webGibney BeachSt. John's Beach Guide
  248. 269harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 305–308Cassidy — 2005
  249. 270harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 305–306Cassidy — 2005
  250. 271harvnbYoung, Schilling (2019) p. 154, 163–164Young, Schilling — 2019
  251. 272harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 281–284Cassidy — 2005
  252. 273harvnbCarson (2005) p. 1–10Carson — 2005
  253. 274harvnbBird, Sherwin (2005) p. 3, 5, ''passim''Bird, Sherwin — 2005
  254. 275harvnbHewlett, Holl (1989) p. xxiiHewlett, Holl — 1989
  255. 276harvnbBundy (1988) p. 316Bundy — 1988
  256. 280newsTheater: Drama of Oppenheimer CaseClive Barnes — June 7, 1968
  257. 281newsThe character speaks outNovember 11, 1964
  258. 282newsPlay about him draws protests of OppenheimerSterling Seagrave — November 9, 1964
  259. 285webPeabody Award WinnersUniversity of Georgia
  260. 288webFat Man and Little Boy (1989)Popmatters — May 3, 2004
  261. 289webDay One (1989 TV Movie)Internet Movie Database
  262. 292webJ. Robert Oppenheimer Centennial at BerkeleyUniversity of California, Berkeley
  263. 293webReappraising Oppenheimer – Centennial Studies and ReflectionsOffice for History of Science and Technology, University of California, Berkeley
  264. 294webJ. Robert Oppenheimer PapersLibrary of Congress
  265. 295harvnbCassidy (2005) p. xviCassidy — 2005
  266. 296harvnbCassidy (2005) p. 175Cassidy — 2005
  267. 298harvnbAnderson, Whitaker (1982) p. 54Anderson, Whitaker — 1982
  268. 299journalDisciplining Experts: Scientific Authority and Liberal Democracy in the Oppenheimer CaseThorpe, Charles — 2002
  269. 300harvnbHollinger (2005) p. 387Hollinger — 2005
  270. 301harvnbWortham (1886) p. 15Wortham — 1886