D. T. Suzuki

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  D. T. Suzuki was born Teitarō Suzuki in Honda-machi, Kanazawa, the fourth son of a physician, and he would spend the better part of a century dismantling the wall between Eastern and Western thought. His Buddhist name, Daisetsu, was given to him by a Zen master, and the kanji characters carry a quietly paradoxical meaning: "Great Humility", but also "Greatly Clumsy". That tension between profundity and plainness would run through his entire career. He was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1963. He translated sacred texts from Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Sanskrit. Analytical psychologist Carl Jung wrote a thirty-page commentary on one of his books. Yet the questions Suzuki wrestled with were, at their core, simple and personal ones: what does it mean to wake up, and how does a tradition shaped in the monasteries of Tang dynasty China survive contact with industrial modernity? The story involves a widow raising her son in poverty after feudalism collapsed, a mansion in Illinois, a Radcliffe graduate, a contested record on wartime nationalism, and decades of packed lecture halls from Columbia to London. What drew Suzuki to Zen in the first place, and what did he change in the process of explaining it?

• 2. Poverty, Samurai, and Early Seeking

  ›

  Suzuki's father died while Suzuki was still young, and the samurai class into which the family had been born was already dissolving with the end of feudalism in Japan. His mother, a Jōdo Shinshū Buddhist, raised him in impoverished circumstances. A small monument, a tree with a rock at its base, now marks the former site of his birthplace in Honda-machi, though the neighborhood itself no longer exists. Facing the uncertainty of his circumstances, the young Suzuki began searching across different religious traditions for answers. His philosophical temperament made him skeptical of many of the cosmologies he encountered. He studied at Waseda University and the University of Tokyo, where he set about learning Chinese, Sanskrit, Pali, and several European languages. During those student years in Tokyo, he began Zen practice at Engaku-ji in Kamakura, first under Kosen Roshi. After Kosen's death in 1892, he continued with Kosen's successor, Soyen Shaku. Soyen Shaku would later become the first Zen master to teach in America, and his connection to Suzuki would shape the decades that followed.

• 3. Illinois and the Hegeler Carus Mansion

  ›

  Soyen Shaku attended the World Parliament of Religions in Chicago in 1893, where he met scholar Paul Carus. Carus, who had established himself in LaSalle, Illinois, asked Shaku to help translate and prepare Eastern spiritual literature for Western readers. Shaku recommended his student Suzuki instead, and so Suzuki found himself living at Carus's home, the Hegeler Carus Mansion, working through ancient texts. His first major translation project there was the classic Tao Te Ching from ancient Chinese. He also began his early work Outlines of Mahayana Buddhism during this period. Carus had already written his own overview of Buddhism, titled The Gospel of Buddha; Soyen Shaku wrote the introduction, and Suzuki translated the book into Japanese. Around the turn of the century, a loose international community, including Carus, Shaku, and Suzuki himself, was actively participating in a worldwide Buddhist revival that had been gathering momentum since the 1880s. It was in Illinois that Suzuki's English-language writing career effectively began, though he would later describe his work translating and ghost-writing portions of Soyen Shaku's 1906 book as the true opening of that chapter.

• 4. The Professorial Life

  ›

  Back in Japan after time in the United States and Europe, Suzuki became an assistant professor at Gakushuin University and the University of Tokyo in 1909. By 1921, he had joined the faculty at Ōtani University in Kyoto, a post he would hold for two decades. That same year, he and his wife founded the Eastern Buddhist Society, which published the scholarly journal The Eastern Buddhist and offered lectures and seminars on Mahayana Buddhism. In 1911, Suzuki had married Beatrice Erskine Lane Suzuki, a Radcliffe graduate and theosophist with connections to the Baháʼí Faith in both America and Japan. The two collaborated closely in spreading Mahayana Buddhist scholarship to international audiences. Suzuki delivered a paper at the World Congress of Faiths in 1936 at the University of London while serving as an exchange professor. He then went on a lecture tour of American universities in 1951 before teaching at Columbia University from 1952 to 1957. In his later years, he also gave guest lectures on Jōdo Shinshū Buddhism at the Buddhist Churches of America. Japan's National Medal of Culture was among the honors he received over his career.

• 5. How Zen Became Suzuki's Subject

  ›

  Suzuki's years of Zen training at Engaku-ji, one of the Five Mountains of Kamakura, were not primarily academic. Under Soyen Shaku, the practice was largely internal and non-verbal, centered on long periods of sitting meditation. Suzuki himself described the process as four years of mental, physical, moral, and intellectual struggle. He later wrote about that life in The Training of the Zen Buddhist Monk, characterizing the training's core elements as a life of humility, a life of labor, a life of service, a life of prayer and gratitude, and a life of meditation. His scholarly work on Zen came directly out of this experiential foundation. He was especially interested in how the tradition had developed during its formative centuries in China, and much of his English writing examined the Chan texts the Biyan Lu (Blue Cliff Record) and the Wumenguan, which preserve the teaching styles of classical Chinese masters. His book Zen and Japanese Culture explored how the tradition, once transplanted into Japan, had shaped Japanese character and history. American philosopher William Barrett compiled many of Suzuki's articles and essays into a 1956 anthology entitled Zen Buddhism, extending Suzuki's reach to readers who had not encountered the original works.

• 6. Shin Buddhism and Other Paths

  ›

  Between 1949 and 1953, Suzuki published numerous works and lectures on Pure Land Buddhism and Jōdo Shinshū. His mother had practiced Jōdo Shinshū, and he returned to it seriously in his later years. In his book Buddha of Infinite Light, originally titled Shin Buddhism, published in 2002, he declared that the Shin teaching of Pure Land Buddhism was the most remarkable development Mahayana Buddhism had achieved in East Asia. He came to see the Shin doctrine of Tariki, the other power of the Buddha, as a form of releasing the self, and understood Shin and Zen as complementary practices rather than competing ones. He also brought the Myokonin, the Shin Buddhist saints, to audiences outside Japan, being among the first to do so. His interests extended further still: he took an interest in Christian mysticism and compared figures such as Meister Eckhart with the Myokonin. He produced a partial English translation of the Kyogyoshinsho, the principal work of Shinran, the founder of the Jōdo Shinshū school, though the translation was never completed. Philosopher Charles A. Moore observed that Suzuki in his later years was not just a reporter or an expositor of Zen, but a significant contributor to its development and enrichment.

• 7. Contested Legacy

  ›

  In a series of articles published in the Japanese Buddhist newspaper Chūgai Nippō in October 1936, Suzuki recorded views on the Nazi movement that scholar Brian Victoria later brought to light in lectures delivered in Germany in 2012. In the articles, Suzuki quoted a relative living in Germany as saying that people there had never felt greater peace of mind, and wrote that he was in agreement with this view. He also wrote that Hitler's expulsion of the Jews, while a very cruel policy, might be a necessary extreme action when viewed from the perspective of the happiness of the German people, though he expressed sympathy for individual Jews. At the same time, scholars such as Kemmyō Taira Satō have argued on the basis of Suzuki's articles, public talks, and private letters that he consistently expressed distrust of State Shinto, right-wing thought, and the forces pushing Japan toward militarism, and that he showed an interest in socialism and a healthy skepticism toward government propaganda. The tension is genuine and has not been resolved by a single interpretation. Separately, Hu Shih as early as 1951 criticized Suzuki for presenting an idealized picture of Zen, and David McMahan argued that Suzuki drew on German Romantic idealism, English Romanticism, and American transcendentalism to frame Zen for Western audiences. Scholar Robert Sharf and Zen monk G. Victor Sogen Hori noted that the style of Zen most familiar to Western practitioners traces to relatively recent Japanese lay movements lacking formal sanction from the Rinzai or Sōtō monastic institutions. Carl Jung, writing the thirty-page introduction to An Introduction to Zen Buddhism, expressed a different verdict, describing Suzuki's works as among the best contributions to the knowledge of living Buddhism.