Agriculture in ancient Rome

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Agriculture in ancient Rome was never just a matter of survival. Cicero, one of Rome's greatest orators, declared that "of all the occupations by which gain is secured, none is better than agriculture, none more profitable, none more delightful, none more becoming to a free man." That claim came from a civilization that stretched across Europe, northern Africa, and the Middle East, governing territory for over a thousand years. What did it take to feed all of that? How did a society built on small family plots transform into an empire dependent on grain shipped from Egypt and Africa? And who paid the price for that transformation?

• 2. The Idealized Life of the Farmer

  ›

  Cicero's admiration for farming was not simply personal taste. When a client of his was mocked in court for preferring a rural life, Cicero defended country life as "the teacher of economy, of industry, and of justice" - using the Latin terms parsimonia, diligentia, and iustitia. Land ownership was the primary measure of social standing in Rome. The more land a Roman controlled, the greater his influence in the city. This connection between soil and status shaped who farmed, how they farmed, and who benefited from the harvest.

  Cato the Elder, writing his agricultural handbook in the 2nd century BC, laid out what he considered the ideal farm. The best farms, he wrote, began with a vineyard and worked their way down through an irrigated garden, a willow plantation, an olive orchard, meadowland, grain fields, forest trees, vineyard trained on trees, and finally acorn woodlands. Soldiers returning from military campaigns were often rewarded with parcels of land by their commanders. Inheritance through wills also moved farmland between generations, with fathers specifying their heirs to prevent disputes.

• 3. Grain, Olives, and Grapes

  ›

  Three crops sat at the center of Roman agricultural life: grains, olives, and grapes. Grain, baked into bread, provided 70 to 80 percent of the calories in an average Roman diet. The Roman scholar Varro recorded that common wheat and durum wheat were introduced to Italy as crops around 450 BC. Durum, or hard wheat, became the preferred variety among urban Romans because it could be baked into leavened bread and grew more easily than common wheat in Mediterranean conditions. Emmer and spelt, older species of wheat, were also cultivated; Columella noted that emmer resisted moisture better than standard wheat.

  Olive oil contributed roughly 12 percent of the calories and about 80 percent of the necessary fats in the diet of the average Roman. The olive tree demanded poor, rocky soil and low precipitation, thriving near the Mediterranean but intolerant of the colder climates further north. Viticulture arrived in southern Italy and Sicily with Greek colonists, but it was the Phoenicians of Carthage who passed on much of the knowledge of winemaking. By 160 BC, large estates in Italy were cultivating grapes using slave labor, and wine had become a widespread drink across the empire. Roman authorities tried to protect their wine industry by prohibiting grape cultivation outside Italy, but the effort failed. By the 1st century AD, provinces such as Spain and Gaul were exporting wine back to Italy.

• 4. The Latifundia and Slave Labor

  ›

  In the 5th century BC, Roman farms were small and family-owned. That picture changed dramatically over the following centuries. Starting around 200 BC, the Punic Wars drew peasant farmers away from their land for extended military service. Many returned to find their holdings economically unviable. Wealthy Romans bought those struggling plots, assembling vast estates called latifundia, defined as holdings over 500 iugera - one iugerum being roughly 0.65 acres or a quarter of a hectare.

  These estates ran on slave labor. Cato the Elder described his vision of a well-run farm of 100 iugera: it required a foreman, a foreman's wife, ten laborers, an ox driver, a donkey driver, a man for the willow grove, and a swineherd - sixteen people in total, along with two oxen, two donkeys for wagon work, and a donkey for the mill. Scholars caution that this description was as much a political self-portrait of Cato as a practical guide. Mass displacement of small farmers by wealthy landlords created lasting social friction. As one source puts it, "mass eviction of the poor by the rich underlay the political tensions and civil wars of the last century of the Roman Republic." Some scholars now argue that large-scale agriculture did not fully dominate Italian farming until the 1st century BC, making the transition a longer and more contested process than older accounts suggested.

• 5. Feeding a City of One Million

  ›

  Rome's population at its height reached an estimated one million people. Supplying them required a vast and coordinated grain trade. Egypt, northern Africa, and Sicily were the principal sources. Egypt's role grew after Augustus incorporated it into the empire between 27 BC and 14 AD. By the 70s AD, the historian Josephus claimed Africa was feeding Rome for eight months of the year, with Egypt supplying the remaining four - though historians treat that ratio with caution.

  Scholar Rickman estimated that Rome needed 40 million modii, equivalent to around 200,000 tonnes, of grain each year. Erdkamp calculated a figure of at least 150,000 tonnes, working from an assumption that each resident consumed 200 kg of grain annually. Mattingly and Aldrete put imported grain at 237,000 tonnes for one million inhabitants, an amount that would yield roughly 2,326 calories per person per day before accounting for meat, seafood, fruit, or dairy. The Historia Augusta records that the emperor Severus left 27 million modii of grain in storage - understood as a figure representing reserves sufficient for 800,000 inhabitants at 500 pounds of bread per person per year. In 100 AD, Pliny the Younger argued in his speech the Panegyricus that Rome no longer depended on Egypt, pointing to a crisis in 99 AD when inadequate flooding had threatened the grain supply.

• 6. Mills, Reapers, and Aqueducts

  ›

  Roman agriculture did not rely solely on human and animal effort. At Barbegal in southern France, near Arles, the most impressive surviving example of Roman milling technology still stands. Sixteen overshot water wheels, arranged in two columns, were fed by the main aqueduct to the city of Arles; the outflow from each wheel became the supply for the next one below it. Operational from the end of the 1st century AD until roughly the end of the 3rd century, the complex could produce an estimated 4.5 tonnes of flour per day - enough bread for the 12,500 inhabitants of the town then known as Arelate.

  Vitruvius described vertical water wheels in his De architectura of 25 BC, and Pliny the Elder mentioned them in his Naturalis Historia of AD 77. In northern Gaul, a different machine solved a different problem. Bas-relief carvings show farmers using a device called the vallus, or gallic vallus, apparently invented by the Treveri people. Pushed by oxen or horses, it cut the ears of grain without the straw. Pliny the Elder documented it in the Naturalis Historia. Despite its ingenuity, the vallus was cumbersome and expensive, and it fell out of use after the 4th century AD. For most Roman harvests, scythes and sickles remained the standard tools.

• 7. The Agronomists and Their Legacy

  ›

  Roman agricultural knowledge survived because several writers committed it to detailed texts. Cato the Elder's De agri cultura is the oldest such surviving work. Varro and Columella expanded on it, addressing livestock management, viticulture, and soil classification. Palladius contributed additional practical guidance. Pliny the Elder covered agriculture across books XII to XIX of his Naturalis Historia, including a full chapter on the natural history of grain.

  Columella's soil classifications reveal how sophisticated this thinking became. He divided terrain into three types: sloping plains, gently rising hills, and wooded mountain highlands. Of soil quality, he identified six properties - fat or lean, loose or compact, moist or dry - noting that their combinations produced many different varieties. He quoted the poet Vergil's observation that loose soil is "what we rival when we plough." Columella also rated manures: poultry manure ranked best, cow manure among the worst, while donkey manure was best for immediate application and horse manure, according to Varro, was especially good for meadows because "it promotes a heavy growth of grass plants like grass." Lost to history is the Rusticatio, an agricultural treatise attributed to Mago the Carthaginian, originally written in Punic, later translated into Greek and Latin, and studied as a possible early source for Near Eastern and Classical agricultural traditions.