Stuart period
The Stuart period of British history ran from 1603 to 1714, encompassing one of the most turbulent stretches any nation has ever lived through. In just over a century, England executed its own king, abolished its monarchy, lived under a military dictatorship, restored its crown, expelled a second king, and finally handed power to a German dynasty it had never met. The questions that shaped those 111 years are still debated today: Was the Civil War a class struggle or a religious one? Did the Glorious Revolution save England or simply change its masters? And how did a small island, racked by internal chaos, become one of the most powerful trading nations on earth? Those questions run through every chapter of the Stuart story.
From 1540 to 1640, the number of titled peers in England grew from 60 families to 160. That doubling mattered, because it meant the aristocracy was not a fixed caste but a living market for status. In 1611 James I formalised that market by creating the hereditary rank of baronet, priced at roughly £1,100, which gave buyers a title without a seat in the House of Lords.
Below the peers sat the gentry, and their numbers grew even faster. The gentry tripled from around 5,000 families to 15,000 in the century after 1540, largely because Henry VIII had seized monastery lands in the 1530s and sold them on to local landowners. By 1714, six or seven in ten of the existing peers held titles created since 1603 by Stuart kings. The aristocracy was new money wearing old names.
Religion cut across rank in ways that surprised contemporaries. Catholics had fallen to about 3% of England's total population, yet they made up roughly 12% of the gentry and nobility. That concentration near the top would become a combustible fact as the century progressed.
In 1629 Charles I dissolved Parliament and began eleven years of personal rule, a gamble that required him to find money through channels Parliament had never approved. The crown was already in debt by nearly £1.2 million, and financiers in the City of London refused new loans.
Charles signed peace with France in 1629 and Spain in 1630, cutting military costs. He sold monopolies, fined landowners for supposedly encroaching on royal forests, and revived a long-dormant medieval obligation: compulsory knighthood. Wealthy men who lacked the rank were ordered to pay a fine. Among the thousands of rural gentlemen who received that bill was Oliver Cromwell. The exercise raised £173,000 and generated bitter resentment in equal measure.
The king finally crossed the line when he levied ship money, a coastal defence tax, on inland towns. The short-term budget averaged £600,000 and was balanced. The long-term damage to the relationship between the crown and its subjects proved irreparable. When revolts broke out in Scotland over the imposition of the Book of Common Prayer, Charles had no reserve of goodwill left to draw on. The Long Parliament that assembled on the 3rd of November 1640 moved quickly, impeaching the king's leading counsellors for high treason within weeks.
The First English Civil War of 1642-1645 ended with the Parliamentarians defeating the Royalists. A second war followed in 1648-1649; Charles lost and was executed in January 1649. The monarchy was replaced by the Commonwealth of England, then by the Protectorate under Oliver Cromwell from 1653 until his death in 1658.
Cromwell was offered the crown by a reconstituted Parliament in 1657. He refused after long deliberation, having been instrumental in abolishing the monarchy. Instead his new powers were set out in the Humble Petition and Advice, a legislative instrument that replaced the earlier 1653 Instrument of Government. He ruled as king in all but name, dividing England into military districts governed by fifteen major generals and deputy major generals he called "godly governors." They supervised militias, collected taxes, and began a moral crusade in October 1655. They lasted less than a year, resented by provincials and ultimately sacrificed by Cromwell to his opponents in Parliament.
Cromwell encouraged Jews to return to England in the 1650s, aware of the role Jewish financiers had played in Holland's commercial success. England had expelled its Jewish population 350 years earlier. When Cromwell died, his son Richard proved incapable of governing, and the Puritan army's direct rule generated growing disgust across all classes. The Convention Parliament welcomed Charles II back from exile in 1660.
Historians disagree on what decided the wars. Malcolm Wanklyn has argued that superior operational decisions and decisive battlefield events were the key; Clive Holmes has argued instead for Parliament's long-run superiority in manpower and money. The wars ended definitively at the Battle of Worcester on the 3rd of September 1651.
When Charles II returned in 1660, his settlement with Parliament was built on three hard lessons the previous half-century had taught. First, king and Parliament were both necessary; troubles had piled up whenever either tried to govern alone. Second, the moralistic Puritans generated too much divisiveness. Third, England needed protection from organised political violence, which pointed toward a professional standing army.
That last lesson was the most contested. Cromwell's New Model Army of 50,000 men had demonstrated that a trained professional force was vastly more effective than militia, but it had also enabled Cromwell to seize personal control of the entire country. Parliament paid off that army and disbanded it. For decades afterward the Cromwellian model was a nightmare the Whig tradition recoiled from.
Charles managed to maintain four regiments he called his guards, at a cost of £122,000 from his general budget. This became the foundation of the permanent British Army. By 1685 it had grown to 7,500 soldiers in marching regiments and 1,400 in garrisons. A rebellion that year let James II raise the force to 20,000. William III expanded it to 74,000 in 1689 and then to 94,000 in 1694. Parliament, alarmed, cut the cadre back to 7,000 in 1697.
Charles II himself was remembered for reaching out across factional lines. He gave high positions to old allies and symbolic ones to former enemies. The most important role went to Edward Hyde, made Earl of Clarendon and Lord Chancellor in 1660. When the Second Anglo-Dutch War ended in failure in 1667, Hyde was accused of treason and banished to France.
In 1688 King James II was overthrown. Historian Steven Pincus argues this was the first modern revolution: violent, popular, and divisive, and not the polite aristocratic coup or simple Dutch invasion that older accounts described. The English elite could not tolerate James's closeness to the French throne, his Roman Catholicism, and his absolutist modernisation of the state.
What they got instead, Pincus argues, was the vision of William of Orange: consent of all the elites, religious toleration of all Protestant sects, free debate in Parliament, and aggressive promotion of commerce.
In December 1689 Parliament passed the Bill of Rights, one of the fundamental constitutional documents in English history. It barred the crown from suspending parliamentary laws, levying taxes without consent, raising a standing army in peacetime without consent, and inflicting cruel and unusual punishments. It also guaranteed Protestant subjects the right to bear arms. William opposed being constrained in these ways but chose not to fight Parliament over it.
The Toleration Act 1689 guaranteed religious freedom to Protestant nonconformists, though it did not extend that liberty to Catholics, non-trinitarians, or non-Christians. William's foreign-policy priorities were shaped less by English concerns than by his war to contain Louis XIV of France. In May 1689 he declared war on France, and England and France would fight almost continuously until 1713. Private investors created the Bank of England in 1694 to help finance those wars by giving bankers a sound system to lend through. Historian Stephen B. Baxter wrote that William's government "was very expensive" but that the new taxes "made England a great power."
The first coffee houses appeared in the mid-1650s and spread to every city and many small towns with striking speed. By 1708, London alone had about 600. Admission cost a penny, and a customer could stay as long as they liked, reading newspapers and magazines, buying coffee, tea, chocolate, sandwiches, and small goods. Widows were often the proprietors.
Historian Mark Pendergast observed that each coffee house drew its own clientele: one served physicians, others served Protestants, Puritans, Catholics, Jews, merchants, army officers, actors, lawyers, or Tories and Whigs. Lloyd's Coffee House opened in 1686 specialising in shipping news for merchants, insurers, and shipowners; within a few years it migrated to a private office that eventually became the insurance exchange Lloyd's of London.
At the same time, the royal court after 1660 introduced a level of hedonism England had never seen. Historian Harris described it as a libertine court of restoration rakes given more to drinking, gambling, swearing, and pleasure than to godliness, presided over by Charles II and his brother James, Duke of York. The theatres returned and played a major role in London high society. Historian George Clark noted that Restoration dramatists did not merely say what they liked but intended to glory in it and shock those who did not.
In science, the Royal Society was formed in 1660. Isaac Newton, Robert Boyle, and Robert Hooke led a period of discovery that produced the laws of gravity and motion, Boyle's law, and microscopy among other advances. Newton also oversaw the Mint, where he and engraver John Croker produced the high-quality gold medals that Anne began awarding for outstanding political and military achievements.
England's exports stood at £2.5 million between 1613 and 1669, then soared to £6.5 million by 1700, £14.7 million by 1760, and £43.2 million by 1800. Wool was the engine behind those numbers. England's sheep numbered around 11 million, and raw wool and wool cloth made up between 75% and 90% of all exports. London and the towns bought raw wool from dealers and sent it to rural households where family labour washed, carded, spun, and wove it into cloth.
Government intervention turned that system briefly into a disaster. A new company persuaded Parliament to ban the export of unfinished cloth on the grounds that finished cloth earned more. The Dutch retaliated by refusing to import any finished English cloth. Exports fell by a third. The ban was lifted quickly, but the trade losses became permanent.
Beyond wool, the government chartered a series of monopoly trading companies: the Muscovy Company in 1555 to trade with Russia; the East India Company in 1599; the Hudson's Bay Company in 1670 in Canada; and the Company of Royal Adventurers Trading to Africa in 1662, reestablished as the Royal African Company in 1672, focused on the slave trade. The British gained dominance in the trade with India and largely dominated the slave, sugar, and commercial trades originating in West Africa and the West Indies. The 13 American colonies provided land for migrants, naval masts, food for West Indies slaves, and tobacco for home consumption and re-export. Daniel Defoe boasted by the 1720s that Britain was "the most diligent nation in the world," pointing to its "vast trade, rich manufactures, mighty wealth, universal correspondence, and happy success."
Updated
Common questions
When did the Stuart period of British history begin and end?
The Stuart period lasted from 1603 to 1714, beginning with the accession of James I after the death of Queen Elizabeth I and ending with the death of Queen Anne and the accession of King George I from the House of Hanover. The period spanned 111 years and included six Stuart monarchs.
Why was King Charles I executed during the Stuart period?
Charles I was executed in January 1649 following his defeat in the First and Second English Civil Wars, fought between his Royalist supporters and the Parliamentarians. His belief in the divine right of kings, his eleven years of personal rule without Parliament from 1629 to 1640, and his defeat in battle led to his trial and execution by the victorious Parliamentary forces.
What was the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and why did it happen?
The Glorious Revolution was the overthrow of King James II in 1688. The English elite could not tolerate James's closeness to the French throne, his Roman Catholicism, and his absolutist modernisation of the state. James was replaced by his Protestant daughter Mary II and her Dutch husband William III, and Parliament passed the Bill of Rights in December 1689, establishing fundamental constitutional limits on royal power.
What role did Oliver Cromwell play in the Stuart period?
Oliver Cromwell was the dominant figure in England from 1649 to 1658. He led the Parliamentarian forces to victory in the Civil Wars and ruled first as a member of the Commonwealth of England and then as Lord Protector from 1653 until his death in 1658. He refused an offer of the crown in 1657, divided England into military districts run by fifteen major generals, and encouraged Jews to return to England after a 350-year banishment.
How did the Acts of Union 1707 bring Scotland and England together?
Queen Anne worked to unite the entirely separate kingdoms of Scotland and England through the Acts of Union 1707. Scottish public opinion was generally hostile, but elite support was secured with generous financial terms and bribes, including the refunding of Scottish investors' losses from the failed Darien colonial venture. Scotland retained its Presbyterian church, its own legal and educational systems, and its own nobility, while gaining access to English trade and colonies.
What was the Stuart period's impact on English trade and exports?
English exports grew from £2.5 million between 1613 and 1669 to £6.5 million by 1700 and £14.7 million by 1760. Wool and wool cloth made up between 75% and 90% of exports. The government chartered monopoly trading companies including the East India Company in 1599, the Hudson's Bay Company in 1670, and the Royal African Company in 1672, establishing British dominance in trade with India, West Africa, and the West Indies.
All sources
124 references cited across the entry
- 1For in-depth coverage, start with Lawrence Stone, The crisis of the aristocracy: 1558–1641 (abridged edition, 1967) pp 23–61.
- 2BookEnglish Society 1580–1680Keith Wrightson — Routledge — 2002
- 3Mark Kishlansky, A Monarchy Transformed, Britain 1630–1714 (1997) pp 19–20, 24–25.
- 4BookHistorical Dictionary of Stuart England, 1603–1689Ronald H. Fritze et al. — Greenwood Publishing Group — 1996
- 5David Loades, ed. Reader's Guide to British History (2003) 2:1200–1206; J.H. Hexter, On History (1979) pp. 149–236
- 6Robert Tombs, The English and Their History (2015) p 210.
- 7Tyler Blethen and Curtis Wood, eds., Ulster and North America: transatlantic perspectives on the Scotch-Irish (1997).
- 9BookThe personal rule of Charles IKevin Sharpe — Yale University Press — 1992
- 10BookCharles I and the road to personal ruleLovell J. Reeve — Cambridge University Press — 2003
- 11BookEarly StuartsGodfrey Davies — Clarendon Press — 1959
- 14Pauline Gregg, King Charles I (1981), pp 324–26.
- 17Peter Gaunt, The English Civil War: A Military History (2014) pp 223–29.
- 18Michael Lynch, The interregnum: 1649–60 (1994); and Angela Anderson, The civil wars 1640-9 (1995).
- 19J.S. Morrill, Oliver Cromwell and the English revolution (1990).
- 20Nicole Greenspan, Selling Cromwell's Wars: Media, Empire and Godly Warfare, 1650–1658 (2016).
- 21Blair Worden, The Rump Parliament 1648–53 (1977).
- 22C.H. Midgley, "Political thinking and the creation of the Assembly of 1653." The Seventeenth Century 31.1 (2016): 37–56.
- 23Austin Woolrych, Commonwealth to protectorate (1982).
- 26Blair Worden, "History's Heroic Age" History Today (2012) 62#4.
- 28David Ogg, England in the Reigns of James II and William III (1955) pp 195–221.
- 29Bucholz and Key, Early Modern England, pp 265–66.
- 30J.G.A. Pocock, The Machiavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition (1975) pp 406–13.
- 31Tim Harris, Restoration: Charles II and his Kingdom 1660–1685 (2003), pp 43–51.
- 32Francis, Richard. Judge Sewall's Apology. p. 41
- 33Harris, p 53
- 34J.P. Kenyon, Stuart England (1985) pp 195–213.
- 35Correlli Barnett, Britain and her army, 1509–1970: a military, political and social survey (1970) pp 90–98, 110–25.
- 36Harris, p 46
- 37David G. Chandler, ed., The Oxford history of the British army (1996) pp 24–45.
- 38Lord Macaulay The History of England from the accession of James the Second (C.H. Firth ed. 1913) 1:136-38
- 39Chandler, ed., The Oxford history of the British army (1996) pp 46–57.
- 40Steven Pincus, 1688: The First Modern Revolution (2011)
- 41Steven C. A. Pincus, England's Glorious Revolution 1688–1689: A Brief History with Documents (2005)
- 42E.N. Williams, ed., The Eighteenth-century Constitution 1688–1815 (1960) pp 1–66.
- 43David Ogg, England in the Reigns of James II and William III (1955) pp 231–33.
- 44Wout Troost, William III, The Stadholder-king: A Political Biography (2005) p 219.
- 45Ogg, England in the Reigns of James II and William III (1955) pp 241–45.
- 46Troost, William III pp 212–214
- 47Julian Hoppit, A land of liberty?: England 1689–1727 (2000), pp 13–50.
- 48George Clark, The Later Stuarts, 1660–1714 (2nd ed. 1956) pp 148–53.
- 50Clark, The Later Stuarts, 1660–1714 (1956) pp 160–74.
- 51For the European context, see J.S. Bromley, ed. The New Cambridge Modern History, VI: The Rise of Great Britain and Russia, 1688–1725 (1970) pp 154–192, 223–67, 284–90, 381–415, 741–54.
- 52John Brewer, The sinews of power: War, money, and the English state, 1688–1783 (1989) p 133.
- 53Clark, The Later Stuarts, 1660–1714 (1956) pp 174–79.
- 55For summaries of foreign policy see J.R. Jones, Country and Court: England, 1658–1714 (1979), pp 279–90; Geoffrey Holmes, The Making of a Great Power: Late Stuart and Early Georgian Britain, 1660–1722
- 56BookWilliam III and the Defense of European Liberty, 1650–1702Stephen B. Baxter — Greenwood Press — 1966
- 57George Clark, The Later Stuarts 1660–1714. (2nd ed. 1955) pp 200–262.
- 58Edward Gregg, Queen Anne (Yale UP, 2001) pp viii–ix
- 59Anne (1665–1714)Edward Gregg — January 2012
- 60James Anderson Winn, Queen Anne: Patroness of Arts (2014).
- 62T.M. Devine, The Scottish Nation: A History, 1700–2000 (1999) pp 1–30.
- 63Karin Bowie, Scottish Public Opinion and the Anglo-Scottish Union, 1699–1707 (2007).
- 64Devine, The Scottish Nation: A History, 1700–2000 (1999) pp 31–48.
- 65G.N. Clark, The Later Stuarts, 1660–1714 (2nd ed. 1956) pp 290–93.
- 66BookMy Scotland, Our Britain: A Future Worth SharingGordon Brown — Simon & Schuster UK — 2014
- 67E.A. Wrigley and R.S. Schofield, The population history of England 1541–1871 (1981) p 528
- 68J.A. Sharpe, Early modern England: a social history 1550–1760 (1997) pp 36–42.
- 69John Clapham, A concise economic history of Britain: From the earliest Times to 1750 (1949), pp 188–89.
- 71JournalThe Framework for Scottish Witch-Hunting in the 1590sJulian Goodare — October 2002
- 72Keith Thomas, Religion and the Decline of Magic (1971).
- 73Jonathan Barry, "Introduction: Keith Thomas and the problem of witchcraft" in Jonathan Barry et al. eds., Witchcraft in early modern Europe: Studies in Culture and Belief (1996) pp. 1–46
- 74Alan Macfarlane, Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England: A Regional and Comparative Study (1970).
- 75JournalWomen and the Witch-Hunt in ScotlandJulien Goodare — October 1998
- 77JournalThe Privy Council and the Witches: The Curtailment of Witchcraft Prosecutions in Scotland, 1597-1628Micheal Wasser — April 2003
- 78Peter Elmer, Witchcraft, Witch-Hunting, and Politics in Early Modern England (2016) ch 5.
- 79Andrew Sneddon, "Witchcraft belief and trials in early modern Ireland." Irish Economic and Social History 39.1 (2012): 1–25.
- 81BookA Social History of Education in EnglandJohn Lawson et al. — Routledge — 2013
- 82Alexander Broadie, ed. The Scottish Enlightenment (1999) pp 10–14
- 83Jackie Eales, "To booke and pen: Women, education and literacy in Tudor and Stuart England." Historian 119 (2013): 24:24–29.
- 84Dorothy Gardiner, English Girlhood at School: A Study of Women's Education through twelve centuries (1929)
- 86George Clark, The Later Stuarts, 1660–1714 (1956) p 369.
- 91Michael Hunter, Science and society in Restoration England (1981).
- 92JournalSeeing Like a Statesman in Early Stuart EnglandN. Millstone — 2014-05-01
- 95BookThe Grand Tour and the Great Rebellion: Richard Lassels and "The Voyage of Italy" in the Seventeenth CenturyEdward Chaney — Slatkine — 1985
- 96Boris Ford, ed., The Cambridge Cultural History of Britain: Volume 4, Seventeenth Century Britain (1992), pp 52–103, 276–307.
- 98BookThe Birth of Modern London: The Development and Design of the City 1660–1720Elizabeth McKellar — Manchester University Press — 1999
- 99Charles Phythian-Adams, Societies, Cultures and Kinship, 1580–1850: Cultural Provinces and English Local History (Leicester, 1996), pp. 9–23.
- 100H.J. Dyos and D.H. Aldcroft, British transport: an economic survey from the seventeenth century to the twentieth (1969) pp 19–44, 99–102.
- 101Julian Hoppit, A Land of Liberty?: England 1689–1727 (2000) p 344
- 103D.C. Coleman, The economy of England, 1450–1750 (1977), pp 48–55, 130–45.
- 104E. Lipson, The Economic History of England (1931) p 188-89.
- 106Eric J. Evans, The forging of the modern state: early industrial Britain, 1783–1872 (1996) p 31.
- 107G.D. Ramsay, The English woollen industry, 1500–1750 (1982).
- 108E. Lipson, The Economic History of England: vol 2: The age of mercantilism (7th 1964) pp 10–92.
- 110C.G.A. Clay, Economic Expansion and Social Change: England 1500–1700: Volume 2, Industry, Trade and Government (1984) pp 119–20.
- 111JournalAlderman Cockayne's Project and the Cloth Trade. The Commercial Policy of England in its main Aspects, 16031625Astrid Friis et al. — December 1929
- 112Roger Lockyer, James VI and I (1998) pp 138–58.
- 113Malcolm Smuts, "The making of Rex Pacificus: James VI and I and the Problem of Peace in an Age of Religious War," in Daniel Fischlin and Mark Fortier, eds., Royal Subjects: Essays on the Writings of J
- 114W. B. Patterson, "King James I and the Protestant cause in the crisis of 1618–22." Studies in Church History 18 (1982): 319–334.
- 115Godfrey Davies, The Early Stuarts: 1603–1660 (1959), pp 47–67
- 116Jonathan Scott, England's Troubles: 17th-century English Political Instability in European Context (Cambridge UP, 2000), pp 98–101
- 117G.M.D. Howat, Stuart and Cromwellian Foreign Policy (1974) pp 17–42.
- 118Joyce Lorimer, "The failure of the English Guiana ventures 1595–1667 and James I's foreign policy." Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 21#.1 (1993): 1–30.
- 119Albert J. Loomie, Spain & the Early Stuarts, 1585–1655 (1996).
- 120Steven C. A. Pincus, Protestantism and Patriotism: Ideologies and the Making of English Foreign Policy, 1650–1668 (1996)
- 122Gijs Rommelse, "The role of mercantilism in Anglo‐Dutch political relations, 1650–74." Economic History Review 63#3 (2010): 591–611.
- 123BookCommonwealth Of England: Documents Of The English Civil Wars, The Commonwealth And Protectorate, 1641–16602012
- 124BookEnglish Historical Documents, 1603–16602011