Second Jassy–Kishinev offensive

• 1. Strategic Context And Background

  ›

  The Red Army had advanced past Romania's pre-war borders in the Uman, Botoșani offensive in early April 1944. By late April, German-Romanian allies managed to stabilize the frontline on the Carpathians-Târgu Frumos-lower Dniester alignment. On May 6, the Stavka ordered Soviet troops to switch to a defensive posture. Historian David Glantz claims the Soviets made an unsuccessful attack in the same sector from the 8th of April to the 6th of June 1944. In 1944, the Wehrmacht had been pressed back along its entire front line in the East. By May 1944, the South Ukraine Army Group was pushed back towards the prewar Romanian frontier. The German 6th Army managed to establish a line on the lower Dniester River after the conclusion of the Soviet Odessa Offensive. The line, however, was breached in two places, with the Red Army holding bridgeheads. After June, calm returned to the sector, allowing the rebuilding of German formations. Heeresgruppe Südukraine had been one of the most powerful German formations in terms of armour until June 1944. During the summer, most of its armoured units were transferred to the Northern and Central fronts. These transfers aimed to stem Red Army advances in the Baltic states, Belarus, northern Ukraine, and Poland. On the eve of the offensive, the only armoured formations left were the 1st Romanian Armored Division and the German 13th Panzer and 10th Panzergrenadier Divisions.

  17

• 2. Deception And Intelligence Failure

  ›

  Soviet deception operations prior to the attack worked well for the Red Army. The German command staff believed that the movement of Soviet forces along the front line was a result of a troop transfer to the north. Exact positions of Soviet formations were also not known until the final hours before the operation. By contrast, the Romanians were aware of the imminent Soviet offensive and anticipated a rerun of Stalingrad. They expected major attacks against the 3rd and 4th Armies and an encirclement of the German 6th Army. Such concerns were dismissed by the German command as alarmist. Marshal Ion Antonescu suggested a withdrawal of Axis forces to the fortified Carpathian, Focșani, Nămoloasa, Brăila, Danube line. Friessner, the commander of Army Group South Ukraine, was unwilling to consider such a move. He had already been dismissed by Hitler from Army Group North for requesting permission to retreat. This intelligence failure allowed the Soviets to strike with overwhelming force at a time when the Germans felt secure in their defensive lines.

  5614

• 3. Order Of Battle And Force Composition

  ›

  The 2nd Ukrainian Front was commanded by Army General Rodion Malinovsky. It included the 6th Guards Tank Army under Major General Andrei Kravchenko. The 18th Tank Corps was led by Major General V. I. Polozkov. A Cavalry-Mechanized Group Gorshkov operated under Major General Sergey Gorshkov. Other units included the 5th Guards Cavalry Corps and the 23rd Tank Corps under Lieutenant General Alexey Akhmanov. The 4th Guards Army was commanded by Lieutenant General Ivan Galanin. The 27th Army fell under Lieutenant General Sergei Trofimenko. Colonel General Konstantin Koroteyev led the 52nd Army. Colonel General Mikhail Shumilov commanded the 7th Guards Army. Lieutenant General Filipp Zhmachenko led the 40th Army. Lieutenant General Ivan Managarov commanded the 53rd Army. The 3rd Ukrainian Front was led by Army General Fyodor Tolbukhin. Its forces included the 5th Shock Army under Lieutenant General Nikolai Berzarin. The 4th Guards Mechanized Corps was commanded by Major General Vladimir Zhdanov. The 7th Mechanized Corps fell under Major General Fyodor Katkov. Lieutenant General Nikolai Gagen led the 57th Army. Lieutenant General Ivan Shlemin commanded the 46th Army. Major General Mikhail Sharokhin led the 37th Army. Axis forces were organized into Army Group South Ukraine under Generaloberst Johannes Friessner. This group included Army Group Dumitrescu and Army Group Wohler.

  3810

• 4. Tactical Execution And Encirclement

  ›

  Stavka's plan for the operation was based on a double envelopment of German and Romanian armies. The 2nd Ukrainian Front was to break through north of Iași. It would then commit mobile formations to seize the Prut River crossings before withdrawing German units could reach it. The front was to unleash the 6th Tank Army to seize the Siret River crossings and the Focșani Gate. The 3rd Ukrainian Front was to attack out of its bridgehead across the Dniester near Tiraspol. Mobile formations would head north to meet those of the 2nd Ukrainian Front. This strategy aimed to encircle German forces near Chișinău. Both fronts undertook a major effort, leading to a double envelopment of the German Sixth Army. The German, Romanian front line collapsed within two days of the start of the offensive. The initial breakthrough in the 6th Army's sector was deep. Rear-area supply installations were destroyed by the evening of the 21st of August. By the 23rd of August, the 13th Panzer Division was no longer a coherent fighting force. The German 6th Army had been encircled to a depth that cut off retreat into Hungary. Isolated pockets of German units tried to fight their way through. Only small remnants managed to escape the encirclement.

  914

• 5. Romanian Coup And Political Shift

  ›

  A coup d'état led by King Michael of Romania on the 23rd of August deposed Antonescu. It withdrew Romania from the Axis alliance. By this time, the bulk of the German and Romanian armies had either been destroyed or cut off by the Soviet offensive. Hitler immediately ordered special forces under Otto Skorzeny and Arthur Phleps to intervene. These forces were stationed in nearby Yugoslavia. They targeted remaining German troops concentrated around Bucharest, Ploiești, Brașov, and Giurgiu. General Alfred Gerstenberg, commander of Luftwaffe defenses at Ploiești, ordered motorized troops to attack Bucharest on the evening of the 23rd of August. Open hostilities between German and Romanian forces began the following morning on the city's northern outskirts. After capturing the airfield at Otopeni, the attack stalled. By the 28th of August, Gerstenberg and remaining German forces surrendered. The fighting featured the only instance of cooperation between Romanian and Western Allied forces during the campaign. Romanian ground troops requested a USAAF bombing raid on the Băneasa Forest. Poor coordination led to friendly fire when American bombers accidentally hit a company of Romanian paratroopers.

  131718

• 6. German Collapse And Special Forces

  ›

  Brandenburger special forces landed at Boteni and țăndărei airfields on the 24th of August. Their attempt to immobilize Romanian aircraft failed as they were overpowered by Romanian paratroopers. A proposed operation to rescue Antonescu could not materialize because his whereabouts were unknown even to the Romanian government until the 30th of August. He was handed over to the Soviets and shipped to Moscow. Another group of Brandenburgers joined Gerstenberg's unsuccessful drive on Bucharest on the 25th of August. They were captured three days later. Altogether, these events constituted one of the worst defeats suffered by German special forces in the war. The German situation was further complicated by the loss of Brașov and the Predeal Pass. Both were secured by the Romanian 1st Mountain Division by the 25th of August. This cut off the most direct route of reinforcement or retreat for remaining Wehrmacht formations. The following day, the Romanian 2nd Territorial Corps captured Giurgiu. It neutralized German AA units there and took 9,000 prisoners. The 25,000-strong German presence around Ploiești became locked in a stalemate with the Romanian 5th Territorial Corps. Over the following days, Germans were gradually confined to the city's immediate surroundings. On the 30th of August, an attack reduced them to a pocket around the village of Păulești. They surrendered the following day after a failed breakout attempt. About 2,000 Germans escaped to Hungarian lines across the Carpathians.

  111215

• 7. Human Cost And Postwar Consequences

  ›

  German formations suffered significant irrecoverable losses during the offensive. Over 115,000 prisoners were taken from Axis forces. Soviet casualties were unusually low for an operation of this size. The Red Army advanced into Yugoslavia and forced rapid withdrawal of German Army Groups E and F. Together with Yugoslav Partisans and Bulgaria, they liberated Belgrade on the 20th of October. On the political level, the offensive triggered King Michael's coup d'état. Romania switched allegiance from the Axis to the Allies. Almost immediately, border hostilities between Romania and Hungary erupted over territory ceded in 1940. Romania's defection meant loss of vital oil sources for Germany. This led to serious fuel shortages in the Wehrmacht by end of 1944. Hitler admitted that the war was lost. Following success, Soviet control over Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina was re-established. Soviet forces proceeded to collect and expel remaining Romanian troops. Anatol Petrencu states over 170,000 Romanian soldiers were deported. Forty thousand were incarcerated at a prisoner-of-war camp at Bălți. Many died of hunger, cold, disease, or execution. In Soviet history, this offensive was listed as one of Stalin's ten blows.

  315