Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Paranormal

~9 min read · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • Paranormal phenomena sit at the edge of what science can explain, drawing in millions of people worldwide who believe they have encountered something that cannot be accounted for by ordinary means. Polls suggest that roughly half the United States population believes in the paranormal, and the number of people worldwide who hold parapsychological beliefs has been estimated at somewhere between three and four billion. What draws so many to these ideas? How did a loose collection of ghost stories, UFO sightings, and card-guessing experiments become a recognized field of inquiry? And what does modern psychology say about why some people believe, while others flatly do not? Those are the threads this documentary follows.

  • The term paranormal has existed in the English language since at least 1920. It is built from two pieces: para, meaning above or beyond, and normal, meaning whatever the prevailing scientific picture says the world looks like. Anything that sits outside that picture, or runs contrary to it, earns the prefix.

    Psychologist Terence Hines drew a sharper line in his 2003 book Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. For Hines, the paranormal is best understood as a subset of pseudoscience, distinguished by explanations that reach well outside the bounds of established science. Where other pseudosciences at least dress their claims in recognizable scientific language, paranormal explanations fall back on vague terms like "psychic forces" or "human energy fields". That distinction matters, because it helps clarify what separates a paranormal claim from an ordinary scientific hypothesis.

    Scientific hypotheses grow from empirical observation and experimental data gathered through the scientific method. Paranormal claims, by contrast, rest on anecdote, personal testimony, and intuition. Proponents of the paranormal do not, for the most part, argue that their evidence is reproducible under controlled conditions. The standard scientific response is that what appears paranormal is usually a misinterpretation of natural phenomena. Understanding that gap is the starting point for everything that follows.

  • Charles Fort, who lived from 1874 to 1932, is perhaps the most consequential figure in the history of paranormal inquiry, and he never ran a single laboratory experiment. He read. He clipped. He compiled. Fort is said to have assembled as many as 40,000 notes on unexplained experiences, pulling reports from mainstream magazines and newspapers such as The Times and from peer-reviewed outlets including Scientific American, Nature, and Science.

    From that archive he produced seven books, though only four survived: The Book of the Damned in 1919, New Lands in 1923, Lo! in 1931, and Wild Talents in 1932. A fifth manuscript, written between New Lands and Lo!, was eventually abandoned and folded into Lo!.

    The range of events Fort catalogued was remarkable. He gathered accounts of teleportation, a term he is generally credited with coining. He documented poltergeist events, falls of frogs and fish from the sky, crop circles, spontaneous fires, levitation, ball lightning, and giant wheels of light seen in the oceans. He also collected reports of animals found far outside their normal geographic ranges. Fort is thought to be the first person to propose alien abduction as an explanation for mysterious human disappearances, and he was an early advocate of the extraterrestrial hypothesis more broadly. Many consider him the founding figure of modern paranormalism as a discipline. The magazine Fortean Times carries that tradition forward today, publishing anecdotal accounts of the paranormal in the same spirit Fort brought to his notebooks.

  • Ghost hunting has become one of the most visible corners of paranormal culture, yet the belief it draws on is ancient. The idea that the dead persist as spirits is closely tied to animism, the belief that everything in nature carries a soul. The 19th-century anthropologist George Frazer addressed this directly in his classic work The Golden Bough, published in 1890. Frazer described the soul as the "creature within" that animated the living body.

    What is striking is how consistent this idea has been across cultures. The soul was widely understood, in many ancient traditions, as an exact copy of the body in every detail, clothing included. That image appears explicitly in the ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead, dated to around 1550 BCE. Its illustrations show the deceased appearing in the afterlife exactly as they had in life, down to the style of dress.

    In modern ghost-hunting practice, teams attempt to collect physical evidence of paranormal activity at reportedly haunted locations. One popular website for enthusiasts lists more than 300 independent ghost-hunting organizations across the United States and the United Kingdom. Television programs like Ghost Hunters have given the participant-observer approach a wide audience. One specific method used by these groups is recording electromagnetic field readings at haunted sites, though that technique carries its own criticisms beyond the general ones levelled at the approach.

  • Extraterrestrial life, by itself, is not a paranormal subject. Scientists actively search for microbial life on Mars and within meteors that have reached Earth. Projects like SETI scan the sky for radio signals that might indicate intelligent life beyond the Solar System. The paranormal dimension enters with the belief in unidentified flying objects and the phenomena attributed to them.

    Early in UFO culture, believers sorted themselves into two distinct factions. The first took a relatively conservative stance: UFO sightings were unexplained occurrences that deserved serious, systematic study. This group began calling themselves ufologists in the 1950s, and they believed that rigorous analysis of sighting reports would eventually confirm extraterrestrial visitation.

    The second camp fused ideas about extraterrestrial contact with beliefs drawn from existing quasi-religious movements. Many of these individuals came from backgrounds in occultism, Theosophy, or spiritualism, or they followed other esoteric doctrines. Over time, many of those beliefs merged into what are now called New Age spiritual movements.

    Both factions agree on one point: UFOs appear to do things that current aerodynamics and physical laws cannot account for. That shared conviction, however, has not translated into scientific acceptance. UFO sightings are typically brief and non-repeatable, which rules out the controlled re-testing that the scientific method requires. A 1996 Gallup poll found that 71% of Americans believed the government was covering up information about UFOs. A 2002 Roper poll found that 56% thought UFOs were real craft and 48% believed aliens had physically visited Earth.

  • J. B. Rhine brought the paranormal into the laboratory, using card-guessing and dice-rolling experiments to search for evidence of extrasensory perception. The methodology became famous. But those experiments were later found to contain methodological flaws and procedural errors that undermined their conclusions.

    The Parapsychological Association was formed in 1957 and became affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1969. Organized skepticism followed: the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal, now called the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, was created in 1976 and launched the periodical the Skeptical Inquirer. The National Academies of Science and the National Science Foundation both issued statements that cast doubt on parapsychology's evidence base.

    By the 2000s, paranormal research in the United States had dropped sharply from its high point in the 1970s. Most work was privately funded by then, and only a small amount was conducted in university laboratories. In 2007, Britain still had several privately funded laboratories operating within university psychology departments. Publication remained confined to a small number of specialist journals. No experimental findings from this field have achieved broad acceptance in the scientific community as valid evidence of paranormal phenomena.

    The fundamental problem is structural. A phenomenon cannot be confirmed as paranormal using the scientific method, because successfully confirming it would reclassify it as part of science instead. Confirmation would dissolve the very category being studied.

  • Researchers in anomalistic psychology approach paranormal belief as a phenomenon with entirely natural explanations rooted in cognition and psychology. Psychologist David Marks identified magical thinking, mental imagery, subjective validation, coincidence, hidden causes, and fraud as factors that can produce the impression of paranormal activity where none exists.

    Studies have found that cognitive bias underlies paranormal belief, and that fantasy proneness and dissociation correlate positively with it. In a 2004 case study involving 167 participants, believers in the paranormal showed higher scores for both psychological absorption and dissociation. Research by Bainbridge in 1978 and Wuthnow in 1976 found that people who are poorly educated, unemployed, or hold roles ranked low in social value are among the most susceptible to paranormal belief. Their alienation, these researchers argued, encourages an appeal to the magical or supernatural.

    At the neurological level, scientists have linked high dopamine levels to the tendency to find patterns and meaning where none exist. That same mechanism appears connected to paranormal belief. Oxford University researcher Justin Barrett proposed that the brain's capacity for "agency detection" - figuring out why people do what they do - is so valuable in everyday life that it sometimes misfires, perceiving human or ghost-like intent in random stimuli.

    Gender differences show up consistently across surveys. Women score higher than men on paranormal belief overall, while men show stronger belief specifically in UFOs and extraterrestrials. Research also points to a coping function: paranormal beliefs can offer a sense of control to people who feel they have little of it. Studies of survivors of childhood sexual abuse and violent home environments found higher levels of paranormal belief in those populations, with paranormal experiences frequently linked to histories of childhood trauma and dissociative symptoms.

  • In 1922, Scientific American made two offers of US$2,500 each: one for the first authenticated spirit photograph taken under test conditions, and one for the first psychic to produce a visible paranormal manifestation. Harry Houdini sat on the investigating committee. The first medium tested was George Valiantine, who claimed spirits would speak through a trumpet floating in a darkened room. For the test, his chair was rigged to signal an adjoining room if he left his seat. The signals were tripped during his performance, and Valiantine did not collect the prize. The last person examined by Scientific American in that series was Mina Crandon in 1924.

    The tradition of cash challenges continued. The James Randi Educational Foundation offered one million dollars to anyone who could demonstrate paranormal, supernatural, or occult ability under mutually agreed test conditions. Despite many attempts, the prize was never claimed. James Randi himself used his background in stage illusion to show that the spoon-bending attributed to psychic Uri Geller can be replicated by trained magicians without any paranormal ability at all.

    The Independent Investigations Group, founded in 2000, is among the largest organizations of paranormal investigators. It offers a $100,000 prize plus a $5,000 finder's fee to any claimant who can pass two scientifically controlled tests. Since its founding, no claimant has passed the first and lower-odds test. Combined, the prizes offered by various skeptic organizations total more than $2.4 million, all of it unclaimed.

Continue Browsing

Common questions

What does the word paranormal mean and where does it come from?

The term paranormal has existed in the English language since at least 1920. It combines para, meaning above or beyond, with normal, referring to the standard scientific understanding of the world. Anything that falls outside or runs contrary to that scientific picture is described as paranormal.

Who was Charles Fort and what did he contribute to paranormal research?

Charles Fort (1874-1932) is considered by many to be the father of modern paranormalism. He compiled as many as 40,000 notes on unexplained phenomena drawn from mainstream newspapers and scientific journals, and published four surviving books: The Book of the Damned (1919), New Lands (1923), Lo! (1931), and Wild Talents (1932). He is generally credited with coining the term teleportation and is thought to be the first person to propose alien abduction as an explanation for mysterious disappearances.

What percentage of people in the United States believe in the paranormal?

Polls show that about fifty percent of the United States population believes in the paranormal. The 2017 Chapman University Survey of American Fears found that 55% of respondents believed ancient advanced civilizations such as Atlantis once existed, and 52% believed places can be haunted by spirits. Only one quarter of respondents did not hold at least one paranormal belief.

What psychological factors are linked to paranormal belief?

Research has associated paranormal belief with cognitive bias, fantasy proneness, dissociation, and lower cognitive ability. Studies by Bainbridge (1978) and Wuthnow (1976) found that people who are poorly educated, unemployed, or hold low-status social roles are among the most susceptible. Scientists have also connected high dopamine levels to the tendency to detect patterns where none exist, which appears related to paranormal belief.

Has anyone ever won the James Randi million dollar paranormal prize?

No. The James Randi Educational Foundation offered one million dollars to anyone who could demonstrate paranormal, supernatural, or occult ability under test conditions agreed to by both parties. Despite many claims of supernatural ability, the prize was never claimed.

Why is paranormal research difficult to conduct using the scientific method?

A paranormal phenomenon cannot be confirmed using the scientific method because successfully confirming it would reclassify the phenomenon as part of science, removing it from the paranormal category by definition. Paranormal sightings and events are also typically brief and non-repeatable, which prevents the controlled re-testing that scientific investigation requires.

All sources

85 references cited across the entry

  1. 3webParanormalAsk.com
  2. 4webParanormalMerriam-Webster — August 2023
  3. 5bookThe Paranormal: An Illustrated EncyclopediaStuart Gordon — Trafalgar Square — 1993
  4. 6journalThe Psychology of Paranormal BeliefsD.F. Marks — April 1988
  5. 7webThe Haunted BrainRichard Wiseman — 2011
  6. 11bookPseudoscience and the ParanormalTerence Hines — Prometheus Books — 2003
  7. 12newsParanormalParapsychological Association
  8. 13webGhost
  9. 14bookEncyclopedia of Occultism & ParapsychologyGale Research & Cengage Learning — 1996
  10. 15bookThe Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and ReligionJames George Frazer — Wordsworth Editions Ltd — 1993
  11. 17webHow SETI WorksCraig Freudenrich — 2001-05-08
  12. 18bookThe Lure of the Edge: Scientific Passions, Religious Beliefs, and the Pursuit of UFOsBrenda Denzler — University of California Press — 2001
  13. 19bookEncyclopedia of Science and Technology CommunicationSusanna H. Priest — Sage Publications — 2010
  14. 21journalExtra-Sensory Perception: What Is It?Harold O. Gulliksen — January 1938
  15. 22bookQuantum Leaps in the Wrong Direction: Where Real Science Ends... and Pseudoscience BeginsCharles Wynn et al. — Joseph Henry Press — 2001
  16. 23bookAn Introduction to ParapsychologyHarvey J. Irwin et al. — McFarland — 2007
  17. 24journalSumming Up Thirty Years of the Skeptical InquirerPaul Kurtz — September–October 2006
  18. 25bookPhilosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation ProblemMassimo Pigliucci et al. — University Of Chicago Press — 2013
  19. 26bookPopular Psychology: An EncyclopediaLuis A. Cordón — Greenwood Press — 2005
  20. 27journalThe lab that asked the wrong questionsL Oling-Smee — 2007-03-01
  21. 28bookLogical InvestigationsEdmund Husserl — Routledge Kegan Paul Books — 1970
  22. 29bookProblems of Inference and Proof in Participant ObservationHoward S. Becker — Irvington — 1993
  23. 30webParanormal GroupsGhostvillage.com
  24. 31journalThree Skeptics' Debate Tools ExaminedAlvaro Caso — January–February 2002
  25. 32bookParapsychology – Science or Magic?: A Psychological PerspectiveJames E. Alcock — Pergamon Press — 1981
  26. 33bookA Concise Introduction to LogicPatrick J. Hurley — Wadsworth Publishing — 2010
  27. 35bookAnomalistic Psychology (Palgrave Insights in Psychology)Nicola Holt et al. — Palgrave Macmillan — 2012
  28. 37journalParanormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skepticsMichiel van Elk — September 2013
  29. 38bookTall Tales About the Mind and Brain: Separating Fact From FictionC.C. French et al. — Oxford University Press — 2007
  30. 39journalCognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life's purposeAiyana K. Willard et al. — November 2013
  31. 40journalInvestigating the personality correlates of paranormal belief and precognitive experienceShelley L. Rattet et al. — August 2001
  32. 41journalBelief in the paranormal and suggestion in the seance roomRichard Wiseman et al. — 2003
  33. 42journalDissociative experiences, trait anxiety and paranormal beliefsUwe Wolfradt — July 1997
  34. 43bookThe Psychology of Paranormal Belief: A Researcher's HandbookHarvey J. Irwin — University Of Hertfordshire Press — 2009
  35. 44journalChariots of the gullibleWilliam Sims Bainbridge — Winter 1978
  36. 45journalAstrology and MarginalityRobert Wuthnow — June 1976
  37. 46journalFactors affecting extraordinary beliefLaura P. Otis et al. — 1982
  38. 47journalIntelligence and paranormal belief: Examining the role of contextMatthew D. Smith et al. — March 1998
  39. 48journalDo's and Dont's: An Informal Study of some Prevailing SuperstitionsStuart H. Blum et al. — 1974-08-01
  40. 49journalSupernatural Beliefs and Changing Cognitive Structures among Ghanaian University StudentsGustav Jahoda — June 1970
  41. 50journalSuperstitiousness and IntelligencePat Killen et al. — 1974-06-01
  42. 51journalParanormal Belief and College Grade Point AverageJerome Tobacyk — 1984-02-01
  43. 52journalStudent belief and involvement in the paranormal and performance in introductory psychologyWayne S. Messer et al. — 1 December 1989
  44. 53journalFantasy proneness, paranormal beliefs and personality features in out-of-body experiencesKathryn M. Gow et al. — 2004
  45. 54journalParanormal Belief and Proneness to DissociationHarvey J. Irwin — 1994-12-01
  46. 55journalPersonality and paranormal belief: a study among adolescentsEmyr Williams et al. — 15 August 2007
  47. 56journalBelief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioningJerome Tobacyk et al. — 1983
  48. 57journalBelief in the paranormal and its association with irrational thinking controlled for context effectsMiguel Roig et al. — February 1998
  49. 58journalReasoning errors and belief in the paranormalMichael Wierzbicki — 1985
  50. 59journalNarcissism and Belief in the ParanormalChris A. Roe et al. — 2002-04-01
  51. 61journalReasoning in believers in the paranormalEmma Lawrence et al. — November 2004
  52. 62journalPsychological aspects of the alien contact experienceC.C. French et al. — November 2008
  53. 63journalChildhood Physical Abuse and Differential Development of Paranormal Belief SystemsStefanie L. Perkins et al. — May 2006
  54. 64journalModelling childhood causes of paranormal belief and experience: Childhood trauma and childhood fantasyTony Lawrence et al. — August 1995
  55. 65journalParanormal Experiences in the General PopulationChristopher A. Ross et al. — June 1992
  56. 66journalBelief in the paranormal: probability judgements, illusory control and the 'chance baseline shift'S. J. Blackmore et al. — November 1985
  57. 68journalBelief in the paranormal: a New Zealand surveyDave Clarke — 1991
  58. 69journalBelieve It Or Not: Religious and Other Paranormal Beliefs in the United StatesTom W. Rice — March 2003
  59. 70journalParanormal Beliefs and Locus of Control: A Multidimensional ExaminationJerome Tobacyk et al. — June 1988
  60. 71journalExtraordinary beliefs among students in Singapore and CanadaLaura P. Otis et al. — 1984
  61. 72bookParanormal America: Ghost Encounters, UFO Sightings, Bigfoot Hunts, and Other Curiosities in Religion and CultureChristopher D. Bader et al. — NYU Press — 2011
  62. 73newsDo Paranormal Phenomena exist?Kenneth Chang — 11 November 2003
  63. 74journalSchizophrenia and the paranormal: More psi belief and superstition, and less déjà vu in medicated schizophrenic patientsY.J. Shiah et al. — April 2014
  64. 75journalParanormal experience and the COMT dopaminergic gene: A preliminary attempt to associate phenotype with genotype using an underlying brain theoryAmir Raz et al. — September 2008
  65. 76journalBrain electric correlates of strong belief in paranormal phenomena: intracerebral EEG source and regional Omega complexity analysesDiego Pizzagalli et al. — 22 December 2000
  66. 77journalBelieving in paranormal phenomena: Relations to asymmetry of body and brainGünter Schulter et al. — August 2008
  67. 79journalOccult Beliefs: Media distortions, social uncertainty, and deficiencies of human reasoning seem to be at the basis of occult beliefsBarry Singer et al. — January–February 1981
  68. 80bookSkepticism and Humanism: The New ParadigmPaul Kurtz — Transaction Publishers — 2001
  69. 81web'Spooky survey' gets big responseABC Science Online — 2006-11-17
  70. 82newsThree in Four Americans Believe in ParanormalDavid W. Moore — 16 June 2005
  71. 85webRandi $1,000,000 paranormal challengeThe Skeptic's Dictionary
  72. 86newsGet Rich Quick or Save the WorldClaus Larsen — Skeptic Report — September 2003
  73. 87webInvestigationsIndependent Investigations Group