Legacy of Napoleon

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Napoleon Bonaparte died on the 5th of May, 1821, and within a generation the arguments about what he had meant had spread across Europe. France marked the bicentennial of that date in 2021 as a country still genuinely divided. The historiography, carried in French, English, Russian, Spanish, and other languages, has grown for two centuries without producing a verdict. Historians place him at both extremes: an enlightened architect of modern Europe on one reading, someone who caused suffering on a scale unprecedented before the twentieth century on the other. His military career ended in total defeat. His legal code outlived his empire by two centuries. His portraits were tools of political control. What does it mean when a life leaves behind contradictions that large?

• 2. The Contested Verdict

  ›

  Victor Davis Hanson counted the cost in plain terms: seventeen years of wars, perhaps six million Europeans dead, France bankrupt, and her overseas colonies lost. The military record ends in total defeat. Napoleon lost the last four wars he waged: the Peninsular War, the French invasion of Russia, the War of the Sixth Coalition, and the War of the Seventh Coalition. The Treaty of Paris in 1815 formalized that collapse.

  French liberal intellectual Benjamin Constant, born in 1767, watched the Napoleonic regime from close range and condemned it in two books. The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation appeared in 1814, followed by Principles of Politics Applicable to All Representative Governments in 1815. Constant's charge was that Bonaparte's state was more tyrannical than the Bourbon monarchy it replaced. It compelled the masses to endorse its agenda through imperialism and jingoism.

  British military historian Correlli Barnett called Napoleon "a social misfit" who exploited France for his own purposes. American historian Paul Schroeder, born in 1927, was willing to grant Napoleon genius across military, administrative, organizational, and literary domains. But Schroeder's charge was that the genius served criminal ends. Napoleon repeatedly violated the neutrality of small states, used preventive terror through his generals, and subordinated the interests of every people he ruled to those of France, and ultimately to himself.

  The comparison to Hitler shadowed his reputation through the twentieth century. Claude Ribbe argued in 2005 that Napoleon's racism toward Black people inspired Hitler's treatment of Jews. David G. Chandler, a historian of Napoleonic warfare, rejected that comparison in 1973. "Nothing could be more degrading to the former and more flattering to the latter," Chandler wrote. "The comparison is odious." French scholar Jean Tulard gave the counter-image its most influential form, praising the legal and educational changes that Napoleon left behind. Vincent Cronin added a structural argument: France, he wrote, was the victim of successive coalitions whose real aim was to destroy the ideals of the Revolution, making Napoleon not simply the author of the wars that bear his name.

• 3. Propaganda and Self-Portraiture

  ›

  Strict censorship of the press, books, theatre, and art formed the core of Napoleon's image-making apparatus. The purpose was to portray him as delivering peace and stability to a country exhausted by revolution. His messaging shifted with events: it began with his identity as a soldier and general, then pivoted to his role as emperor and civil leader.

  Napoleon took an active role in commissioning and controlling art to serve his political goals. He institutionalized the plunder of occupied territories, loading French museums with art taken from across Europe. Pieces were brought to the Musee du Louvre to build a grand central collection. That model of imperial accumulation was later followed by others.

  In Britain, Russia, and across Europe outside France, Napoleon was a popular subject of caricature. After Nazi Germany conquered France in 1940, Hitler marched in triumph through Paris and paid homage to Napoleon at Les Invalides. That gesture illustrated how durable the Napoleonic image had become, compelling even to an adversary.

  Rumors of Napoleon's return from Saint Helena circulated during the Bourbon restoration. Supporters organized to mark anniversaries of his reign and to disrupt royal celebrations. Hazareesingh, writing in 2004, showed that Napoleonic veterans and people across France drew on his memory as a tool of organized political defiance, displaying the tricolor as a symbol of the revolutionary republic he had claimed to embody. By the late 1880s, the collapse of militaristic Boulangism had drained the Napoleonic legend of its direct political charge, leaving it to find new uses in popular culture.

• 4. Art as Argument

  ›

  Antoine-Jean Gros, born in 1771, witnessed the Battle of Arcole in 1796 and painted a portrait of Napoleon that won the general's personal approval. Traveling with the army, Gros produced large-scale paintings of battles that gave the public a picture of campaigns they had not witnessed. His Napoleon on the Battlefield of Eylau brought a realistic portrayal of the horrors of war.

  Napoleon commissioned Gros to paint Bonaparte Visiting the Plague Victims of Jaffa in 1804. The commission was a direct response to reports of French atrocities during the Egyptian campaign of 1798-1800. Those reports concerned two episodes: the massacre of Ottoman prisoners on Napoleon's orders, and orders to poison French soldiers dying of plague. The resulting painting showed a compassionate Napoleon moving among the sick. Scholar Jill Morris reads the disease as a metaphor for the vanity of Napoleon and his First Empire.

  Jacques-Louis David was already well established when Napoleon sought his services in 1799. His commission was to commemorate the Alpine crossing that enabled France to surprise the Austrian army. The decisive confrontation came at the Battle of Marengo on the 14th of June, 1800. Napoleon had crossed on a mule but wanted to be depicted "calm upon a fiery steed." David produced five separate versions of Napoleon Crossing the Saint-Bernard. After the proclamation of the Empire in 1804, he became the regime's official court painter.

  Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, born in 1780, took a different approach in his 1806 portrait Napoleon I on his Imperial Throne. The painting arranges the emperor's symbols with precise care. The scepter of Charles V, the sword of Charlemagne, rich furs and capes, a crown of gold leaves, and golden chains fill the canvas. The emperor's face and hands are nearly hidden within the ceremonial costume. Art historian Susan Siegfried, writing in 2006, argued that the painting captured a transformation the Revolution had made inevitable. Before 1789, she contends, royal portraiture placed authority in the king's body. Afterward, it migrated to the symbols and trappings of rule. In Ingres's portrait, Siegfried argues, the state is no longer the person but the nation and its history. The same emperor who requested a fiery steed also wanted to claim Charlemagne's sword.

• 5. The Law That Outlived Him

  ›

  After Napoleon's fall, the Napoleonic Code was not dismantled. Countries that had been under French control, including the Netherlands, Belgium, and parts of Italy and Germany, chose to retain it. Beyond Europe, the code became the basis for law in the Dominican Republic, in the American state of Louisiana, and in the Canadian province of Quebec. It served as a model across much of Latin America.

  Everett Rummage argues that Napoleon is nearly synonymous with the spread of the modern bureaucratic state. Not just institutions, but an entire governing outlook: meritocracy, liberal property rights, public service, and equality before the law. These were the principles his regime exported, even into territories where his armies were unwelcome.

  President Emmanuel Macron credited Napoleon with giving shape to France's political and administrative organization, calling him the man who could "incarnate order" when France was besieged. The remarks drew criticism on the questions of Haiti, slavery, and race. Macron clarified afterward that the restoration of slavery in 1802 was "a mistake, a betrayal of the spirit of the Enlightenment." The forced clarification showed that the legal code and the restored slavery cannot be evaluated on separate tracks.

• 6. Reshaping Nations

  ›

  When Napoleon invaded Spain in 1808, the abdication of King Charles IV and his son Ferdinand VII created a power vacuum across Spain's American empire. Native-born political leaders, including Simon Bolivar and Jose de San Martin, filled that vacuum. Shaped by French nationalism, they pursued independence and ultimately succeeded. Napoleon had set the process in motion without intending it as an outcome.

  In Poland, his memory is warmer than almost anywhere else in Europe. The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth had been partitioned between Austria, Prussia, and Russia in 1795. Napoleon created the Duchy of Warsaw after defeating Prussia and declared Polish independence a personal goal. Polish generals Jozef Poniatowski and Jan Henryk Dabrowski, counted as national heroes, fought alongside him. Poniatowski died fighting for Napoleon at Leipzig. Napoleon is mentioned in the second stanza of the Polish national anthem "Poland Is Not Yet Lost."

  In Germany, 1806 proved transformative. It brought military humiliation for Prussia, the end of the Holy Roman Empire, and a complete territorial reorganization of central Europe. British historian T. C. W. Blanning argues that Napoleon's actions accelerated the emergence of German national consciousness. German Romantic thinkers including Ernst Moritz Arndt, born in 1769, and Johann Gottlieb Fichte, born in 1762, became hostile to French liberalism and cosmopolitanism. Heinrich von Kleist, born in 1777, and Friedrich Schleiermacher, born in 1768, joined that current. German politician Carl Theodor Welcker, born in 1790, called Napoleon "the greatest Maestro of Machiavellism."

  Napoleon agreed to sell the colony of Louisiana to the United States for fifteen million dollars during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson. His motivation was the belief that he could not defend Louisiana against British attack. That sale opened the territory west of the Mississippi River and nearly doubled the size of the United States. Jefferson, despite accepting the territory, hated Napoleon for what he regarded as the destruction of French republicanism and the return to monarchy.

• 7. French Memory

  ›

  Two plays and two novels from the Belle Epoque defined the shape Napoleon's legend took once it left the political arena. Victorien Sardou's Madame Sans-Gene appeared in 1893, followed by Maurice Barres's Les Deracines in 1897, Edmond Rostand's L'Aiglon in 1900, and Andre de Lorde and Gyp's Napoleonette in 1913. Scholar Datta, writing in 2005, shows how writers and critics of this period exploited the Napoleonic legend for diverse political and cultural ends. Each text found different purposes in the same story.

  International Napoleonic Congresses continue to convene regularly, drawing members of the French and American military, French politicians, and scholars from different countries. The scale of that engagement reflects the fact that the argument remains genuinely open. President Charles de Gaulle, conceding Napoleon's genius, wrote that "he left France smaller than he had found her." Nearly a century later, President Macron called Napoleon the man who shaped France's political and administrative organization. But Macron had to clarify his own remarks after criticism over Haiti and slavery. The conversation about what Napoleon meant, and what he cost, has not closed.