Victor Davis Hanson

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Victor Davis Hanson grew up on a farm outside Selma, California, in the San Joaquin Valley, on land his family had worked since the 1870s. That is not a minor biographical footnote. It is the thread that runs through almost everything he has written, argued, and fought for across four decades as a classicist, military historian, and political commentator.

  He is the kind of figure who can spend a morning picking almonds and an afternoon writing about the Peloponnesian War. He is also a figure who generates fierce admiration and fierce criticism in roughly equal measure. His 2001 book Carnage and Culture became an international argument. His 2019 book The Case for Trump became a flashpoint. His 1991 teaching award recognized him as one of the nation's top undergraduate instructors of Greek and Latin.

  How does a man who spent four years running an orchard and vineyard end up shaping debates about Western military culture, the decline of classical education, and the politics of immigration? What does a farmer from the Central Valley see in the battles of ancient Greece that a university professor might miss? And what happens when a scholar known for rigorous sourcing enters the combat zone of contemporary politics? Those are the questions this documentary sets out to answer.

• 2. Roots in Selma

  ›

  Selma, California, sits in the heart of the San Joaquin Valley, surrounded by stone fruit orchards and grape vineyards. Hanson has never really left. He received his undergraduate degree in classics from the University of California, Santa Cruz in 1975 and his PhD from Stanford in 1980. Then, rather than taking an academic post, he went home and farmed.

  For four years, from 1980 to 1984, Hanson worked full-time as an orchard and vineyard grower. That stretch of manual labor was not a detour from his intellectual life. It became the foundation of it. He would later argue, in books like Fields Without Dreams and The Land Was Everything, that the family farm was not just an economic unit but the seedbed of democratic values. The agrarian voter, in his view, was disappearing from American political life, and that disappearance carried real costs.

  The personal stakes were not abstract. His family farm outside Selma has been in continuous operation since the 1870s. Hanson named himself for a paternal cousin who was killed in the Battle of Okinawa. That link between the land, the family, and the sacrifice required to defend both ran through his understanding of history from the beginning.

  He joined California State University, Fresno in 1984, not to escape the valley but to build something there: a classical studies program at a regional university serving Central Valley students, many of them the first in their families to attend college.

• 3. The Farmer's Argument for Greece

  ›

  Hanson's PhD thesis, published in 1983 as Warfare and Agriculture in Classical Greece, made a claim that cut against the consensus in the field. Most historians assumed that ancient Greek warfare devastated the agriculture that fed the city-states. Hanson argued that assumption was vastly overestimated. The crops and the soldiers were intertwined in ways that prior scholarship had missed.

  That thesis became the launchpad for a broader argument he developed over the next decade. In The Other Greeks, published in 1995, he contended that it was not the aristocrats or the philosophers who built the Greek city-state. It was a middling class of small family farmers who brought with them a distinct set of values: consensual government, sanctity of private property, civic militarism, and individualism. Yale lecturer Donald Kagan called this work "the most important work in Greek history in my lifetime."

  The Western Way of War, published by Alfred Knopf in 1989, pushed that argument further. Hanson examined what it felt like to stand in a Greek battle line, shield to shield with a neighbor, and argued that the ancient Greeks created a tradition of citizen-soldiers whose influence on Western military practice never faded. His framing was direct: European and European-descended countries became, in his phrase, "the most deadly soldiers in the history of civilization" because of that inheritance.

  The American Philological Association recognized his teaching in 1991 with its Excellence in Teaching Award, given each year to the nation's top undergraduate instructor of Greek and Latin. He had won that recognition while still farming part-time and teaching at a regional university in the Central Valley.

• 4. Carnage and Culture

  ›

  Doubleday published Carnage and Culture in 2001, and published it in Britain and the Commonwealth as Why the West Has Won. The book asked a question that made many historians uncomfortable: why have Western armies, across more than two millennia, won so many of the decisive battles that shaped world history?

  Hanson's answer was not racial. He was explicit on that point, rejecting any biological explanation for military outcomes. Nor did he accept the environmental determinism advanced by Jared Diamond in Guns, Germs, and Steel, published in 1997. His answer was cultural: consensual government, secular rationalism, individual freedom, free markets, and a tradition of self-critique had produced militaries that fought differently, and often more lethally, than their opponents.

  The thesis drew a pointed public challenge from Robert L. Bateman, an American military officer who published a critique in 2007. Bateman argued that Hanson's claim about Western armies preferring decisive battles of annihilation was flatly contradicted by the Second Punic War. At the Battle of Cannae, Hannibal's Carthaginians destroyed the Romans, not the other way around. The Romans ultimately won, Bateman argued, through the Fabian strategy of avoiding battle rather than seeking it.

  Hanson responded on his personal website, arguing that Bateman had misread the thesis. The Romans, Hanson said, did initially seek decisive engagement but were forced to retreat to the Fabian approach after suffering defeats at the hands of a tactical genius. Once they had rebuilt their capacity, they returned to decisive battle and won. He also noted that Hannibal himself had adopted many Greek methods of warfare, which accounted for his own preference for annihilating battles.

• 5. The Defense of Classical Education

  ›

  Who Killed Homer? appeared in 1998, co-written with John Heath. The title carried its own accusation. Classical education, Hanson and Heath argued, was dying in American universities, and the loss mattered because knowledge of Greece and Rome was necessary for a full understanding of Western culture.

  The political scientist Francis Fukuyama reviewed the book favorably in Foreign Affairs, writing that the great thinkers of the Western tradition, from Hobbes and Burke to Weber and Nietzsche, were so thoroughly steeped in Greek thought that they scarcely needed to refer back to original texts. That tradition, Fukuyama agreed, had come under fire from two directions: a postmodern camp seeking to deconstruct the classics on grounds of gender, race, and class, and a pragmatic camp asking what value the ancients could have in a computer-driven society.

  The reception was not entirely warm. Victoria Cech, a classicist, argued that Hanson and Heath were not actually comparing modern academia to ancient Athens. They were comparing it to "the myth that arose about them over the last couple of millennia." Joy Connolly, professor of classics at New York University, challenged the book's treatment of women in antiquity, noting that the authors dismissed feminist scholarship as concerned merely with "demarcating the exact nature of the sexism of the Greeks and the West."

  Those criticisms pointed to a tension that would follow Hanson through subsequent work: the difficulty of using antiquity as a standard by which to judge modernity when antiquity itself was far less tidy than the argument required.

• 6. Political Voice

  ›

  Hanson was once a registered Democrat. By 2000 he was voting for George W. Bush, and he would do so again in 2004. By 2020 he was registered as an independent. That trajectory tracks a broader shift in his public role, from a scholar whose politics were mostly implied by his historical arguments to one who stated those positions explicitly in weekly columns.

  Since 2004, he has written a weekly column syndicated by Tribune Content Agency. From 2001 to 2021 he wrote a weekly column for National Review Online. He received the Eric Breindel Award for Excellence in Opinion Journalism in 2002 and the Bradley Prize from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation in 2008, both recognizing work that aligned with conservative positions on culture, foreign policy, and governance.

  His support for the Iraq War was loud and early. He described Donald Rumsfeld as "a rare sort of secretary of the caliber of George Marshall" and praised him as a "proud and honest-speaking visionary." His 2002 essay collection An Autumn of War called for going to war "hard, long, without guilt, apology or respite until our enemies are no more." He acknowledged having supported neoconservative approaches to the wars against the Taliban and Saddam Hussein.

  The Case for Trump, published in 2019, applied the same historical framing to a contemporary subject. Trump praised the book. Hanson defended Trump's combative rhetoric as "uncouth authenticity" and described Trump's ability to provoke media reaction as an "uncanny" political skill. President George W. Bush awarded Hanson the National Humanities Medal in 2007, and in 2007-2008 Hanson served as a presidential appointee on the American Battle Monuments Commission.

• 7. Farms, Family, Loss

  ›

  Hanson married Cara Webb on the 18th of June, 1977. They had two daughters and a son before divorcing in 2005. In 2013 he married Jennifer Heyne.

  In 2014, his youngest daughter, Susannah, died of leukemia. His mother, sister-in-law, and maternal aunt have also died of cancer. Those losses sit behind his public writing without often appearing in it, the kind of grief that a man who thinks in long historical time does not always translate into the first person.

  On the 31st of December, 2025, Hanson had surgery at Stanford to remove a mucinous adenocarcinoma from his lung. Complications from an arterial aneurism followed and led to an extended recovery.

  He continues to live on the family farm outside Selma, on land that has been in his family since the 1870s. The proximity to that place, to the soil his relatives worked and the cousin whose name he carries, remains the organizing fact of a life spent arguing that those who till the land and fight its wars understand history more clearly than those who only read about it. The farm that shaped the scholar is still there, outlasting the arguments it generated.