Napoleonic Code

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Napoleonic Code, officially the Civil Code of the French, arrived in the world on the 21st of March 1804 and has never left. More than two centuries later it remains in force in France, amended and re-amended but still standing. Historian Robert Holtman regards it as one of the few documents that have influenced the whole world. That is a striking claim. Most laws govern a country; some govern a continent. But a handful shape how human societies organize property, families, contracts, and courts across generations and across oceans. This documentary asks how a document drafted by four jurists under the shadow of Napoleon's ambitions became one of them. Why did so many earlier attempts fail? What did the Code actually say about marriage, divorce, and the power of judges? And how did a French legal text end up shaping the law of Louisiana, Romania, Mauritius, and dozens of other places that Napoleon never conquered?

• 2. A Century of Failed Drafts

  ›

  Before 1804, France did not have a single set of laws. Local custom ruled most of daily life, sometimes compiled into official "custumals" called coutumes, the most important being the Custom of Paris. Kings and feudal lords had layered on top exemptions, privileges, and special charters of their own. The Revolution swept the last vestiges of feudalism away, but replacing the patchwork proved far harder than abolishing it.

  The Constituent Assembly voted on the 5th of October 1790 for a codification of French laws. The Constitution of 1791 promised one. The National Assembly adopted a unanimous resolution on the 4th of September 1791 providing that there would be a code of civil laws common for the entire realm. For all these promises, nothing materialized. In 1793 the National Convention finally established a special commission and placed it under Jean-Jacques-Regis de Cambaceres, giving him one month to produce a draft.

  Cambaceres delivered in 1793-1794, and again in 1796. Each attempt failed in a different direction. The first draft contained 719 articles and struck critics as too technical; opponents also complained, somewhat contradictorily, that it was not radical or philosophical enough. The second draft shrank to only 297 articles and was rejected as too brief, dismissed as a mere manual of morals. The third expanded back to 1,104 articles and arrived under the conservative Directory regime; it never even came up for discussion. A fourth attempt, the so-called loi Jacqueminot, drafted in part by a jurist born in 1754, focused almost exclusively on persons. It too was rejected.

  By the time Napoleon consolidated power after his victory at the Battle of Marengo, the project was already a decade old and had produced nothing but rejection slips. The Directory had been far more preoccupied with the turmoil of wars and strife with other European powers than with legal reform. That political exhaustion turned out to be the precondition for success.

• 3. Napoleon and the Commission

  ›

  On the 12th of August 1800, Napoleon appointed a commission of four distinguished jurists: Jacques de Maleville, Francois Denis Tronchet, Felix-Julien-Jean Bigot de Prameneu, and Jean-Etienne-Marie Portalis. Cambaceres, now serving as Second Consul, joined Napoleon in chairing the plenary sessions. Napoleon's personal involvement in drafting was limited; the four jurists did the technical work. His role was political: he showed up at the sessions, and his support was what made the Code possible.

  Even so, passage was not guaranteed. The completed Code was sent to the Legislative Body as a preliminary bill in December 1801 and was rejected by a vote of 142 to 139. Napoleon responded on the 2nd of January 1802 by announcing that he was suspending all projects, effectively closing the assemblies' sessions. He then went to the Senat conservateur and berated its members directly. The tactics worked. The legislature fell into line, and Napoleon secured the majority he needed. The Code came into effect on the 21st of March 1804.

  The intellectual framework the commission chose looked backward to antiquity rather than forward to revolution. The structure of the Napoleonic Code derived not from earlier French law but from Justinian's sixth-century codification of Roman law, the Corpus Juris Civilis, specifically the Institutes, which divided law into the law of persons, things, and actions. The Napoleonic Code followed that architecture, dividing into persons, property, acquisition of property, and civil procedure, though civil procedure was moved into a separate code in 1806.

• 4. What the Code Said

  ›

  The preliminary article of the Code established rules about transparency that were unusual for their time. No secret laws were authorized. A law could apply only if it had been duly promulgated and officially published; the Code even included provisions for publishing delays given the means of communication then available. Ex post facto laws, meaning laws applied to events that occurred before their introduction, were prohibited. Judges were forbidden from refusing to do justice on grounds of the insufficiency of the law; they were required to interpret and fill gaps. But Article 5 prohibited them from deciding cases by way of introducing a general rule, since creating general rules belongs to legislative rather than judicial power.

  This last provision produced a paradox. In theory, France had no case law. In practice, courts still had to fill gaps, and both the Code and later legislation required interpretation. A vast body of judicial decisions accumulated over time, but without any rule of stare decisis, meaning earlier rulings did not formally bind later courts.

  On family matters, the Code established the supremacy of the husband over his wife and children, which was the accepted status quo across Europe at the time. Women held even fewer legal rights than children. Divorce by mutual consent, which had briefly existed, was abolished in 1804.

  The Code's stress on clearly written and accessible law was a deliberate break from the previous patchwork of feudal arrangements. It also resolved a conflict that had festered before the Revolution: the tension between royal legislative power and judges who represented the views and privileges of their own social class. The Revolutionaries had developed a negative view of judge-made law for exactly that reason, and Article 5 encoded that suspicion into the law itself.

• 5. Other Napoleonic-Era Codes

  ›

  The Civil Code was the centerpiece but not the only legal project of the Napoleonic era. In 1791, Louis Michel le Peletier de Saint-Fargeau presented a new criminal code to the National Constituent Assembly, explaining that it outlawed only "true crimes" and not what he called phony offences created by superstition, feudalism, the tax system, and royal despotism. The new penal code omitted blasphemy, heresy, sacrilege, witchcraft, incest, and homosexuality, effectively decriminalizing all of them. A revised criminal code issued in 1810 under Napoleon maintained this approach, again containing no provisions for religious crimes, incest, or homosexuality.

  A new code of civil procedure was adopted in 1806. The commercial code followed in 1807, with its kernel drawn from Book III of the Napoleonic Code, which set out norms for contracts and transactions. In 1808 the code d'instruction criminelle was published, laying out criminal procedure. It generated considerable debate and became the basis of the modern inquisitorial system of criminal courts in France and in many civil-law countries, though it has changed significantly since, especially regarding the rights of the defendant.

  Criminal procedure drew particular criticism from common-law countries, which objected to the combining of magistrate and prosecutor into a single role, and to the possibility of lengthy periods of remand before trial. Napoleon himself acknowledged the risk, remarking that care should be taken to preserve personal freedoms, especially before the Imperial Court, arguing that these courts would have great strength and should be prohibited from abusing the situation against weak citizens without connections. One comparative point worked in the Code's favor: it was only in 1836 that prisoners charged with a felony were given a formal right to counsel in England. Article 294 of the Napoleonic Code of Criminal Procedure had already given defendants access to a lawyer before a Cour d'assises, and mandated the court to appoint one for those who lacked representation. Failing to do so nullified the entire proceedings.

  A draft Military Code was presented to Napoleon in June 1805 by a special commission headed by Pierre Daru, but as the War of the Third Coalition progressed, it was set aside and never implemented.

• 6. Global Reach

  ›

  The Napoleonic Code was not the first civil code in Europe. The Codex Maximilianeus bavaricus civilis had been established in Bavaria in 1756, the Allgemeines Landrecht in Prussia in 1794, and the West Galician Code in Galicia in 1797, when it was part of Austria. What distinguished the Napoleonic Code was scope. It was the first modern legal code adopted with a pan-European reach, and it shaped the legal systems of many countries formed during and after the Napoleonic Wars.

  In the German regions on the west bank of the Rhine, including the Rhenish Palatinate, the Prussian Rhine Province, the former Duchy of Berg, and the Grand Duchy of Baden, the Napoleonic Code remained influential until the introduction of the Burgerliches Gesetzbuch in 1900, the first common civil code for the entire German Empire. Researchers Arvind and Stirton identified several factors that pushed German states toward receiving the Code: territorial concerns, Napoleonic control, the strength of central state institutions, a feudal economy, rule by liberal or enlightened despotic rulers, and popular anti-French sentiment among governing elites.

  Romania adopted a civil code with Napoleonic influences in 1864, and it remained in force until 2011. In Mauritius, the French Civil Code was extended by decree of Charles Mathieu Isidore Decaen, Capitaine-General, on the 21st of April 1808. It was subsequently modified and embodied in Chapter 179 of the Revised Laws of Mauritius 1945, edited by Sir Charlton Lane, former Chief Justice of Mauritius. The 1808 decree was repealed by Act 9 of 1983, but the Revision of Laws Act of 1974 had already provided for publication of the Code under the title Code Civil Mauricien, ensuring its survival under a new name.

  The Civil Code of Lower Canada, later replaced in 1994 by the Civil Code of Quebec, was mainly derived from the Coutume de Paris, which the British continued using in Canada following the 1763 Treaty of Paris. In Latin America, the Spanish and Portuguese had established their own versions of the civil code, so countries such as Chile, Mexico, and Puerto Rico built their legal foundations on those traditions rather than directly on the French model.

  Louisiana stands apart from every other U.S. state. Spanish and French colonial forces quarreled over the territory for most of the 1700s; Spain ultimately ceded it to France in 1800, and France sold it to the United States in 1803. The 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gave states authority over laws not assigned to the federal government, allowing Louisiana to retain many French legal elements. The practical differences are concrete: the bar exam and legal standards for attorneys in Louisiana differ significantly from those in other states; Louisiana is the only U.S. state to practice forced inheritance of an estate; and some Louisiana laws conflict directly with the Uniform Commercial Code practiced by the other 49 states.

• 7. The Code at Two Hundred Years

  ›

  France now has more than 60 legal codes in force, all frequently amended and judicially re-interpreted. For over a century, the authoritative reference has been the annually revised editions published by Dalloz in Paris, which contain thorough annotations with references to other codes, relevant statutes, judicial decisions including unpublished ones, and international instruments. The small version of the Civil Code in this form runs to nearly 3,000 pages, available both in print and online. Larger expert and mega versions, containing scholarly articles as well, are available in print and on searchable CD-ROM. By this point, it has been suggested that the Civil Code has become less a book than a database.

  The sheer accumulation of codes prompted the Commission superieure de codification to reflect in its annual report for 2011 that the age of drawing up new codes was probably reaching its end. The Commission identified three reasons: digital delivery now gives users access to legal texts comparable to what a code provides; diminishing returns make it increasingly difficult to determine which code a given provision belongs in; and certain kinds of provision are simply unsuitable for codification because codification only makes sense when provisions possess sufficient generality.

  A year later the Commission recommended that no further codes be created after its current projects were completed. The government responded encouragingly in March 2013. By 2014, the Commission was complaining that the response had not been followed through, specifically that the government had abandoned its plan for a public service code, the code general de la fonction publique. The document that Napoleon's jurists fought to pass by 142 to 139 votes in December 1801 had outlasted empires, republics, and two world wars; now its descendants faced a different kind of limits: the practical ceiling of codification itself.