Hieronymus Bosch

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Hieronymus Bosch died on the 9th of August 1516, and the church of Saint John in 's-Hertogenbosch held a memorial funeral mass in his honour. That much is recorded. But almost everything else about the man himself has been lost. No letters survive. No diaries. The municipal records of a small Dutch city and the account books of a local religious confraternity are nearly all we have. What does survive, and survives in extraordinary abundance, is the work: paintings crowded with tortured figures, hybrid creatures, oversized fruit, and hellscapes lit by distant explosions. Who was the painter behind these images? What did he believe? What was he trying to say? Those questions have occupied scholars for five centuries, and they have not yet been fully answered.

• 2. A Life in 's-Hertogenbosch

  ›

  's-Hertogenbosch means 'Duke's forest', and the Dutch commonly shorten it to 'Den Bosch', 'the forest'. That name is where Hieronymus Bosch took his surname. He was born there, in his grandfather's house, around 1450. His birth name was Jheronimus van Aken, the Van Aken reflecting family roots in the cities of Nijmegen and Aachen.

  Painting ran deep in the family. His grandfather Jan van Aken died in 1454, but records show Jan was already working as a painter by 1430. Jan had five sons, and four of them became painters too. Bosch's father, Anthonius van Aken, who died around 1478, served as artistic adviser to the Illustrious Brotherhood of Our Blessed Lady, a local devotional organisation. Scholars generally believe Bosch learned his craft from his father or one of his uncles, though none of their works have survived.

  Bosch first appears in the municipal record on the 5th of April 1474, named alongside two brothers and a sister. Sometime between 1479 and 1481, he married Aleid Goyaerts van den Meervenne, a woman a few years his senior. The couple moved to Oirschot, a nearby town where Aleid had inherited property from her wealthy family.

  In 1463, when Bosch was around thirteen years old, a catastrophic fire destroyed 4,000 houses in 's-Hertogenbosch. He almost certainly witnessed that disaster. Later, in 1486 or 1487, he joined the Brotherhood of Our Lady, a respected confraternity of roughly 40 influential local citizens, with around 7,000 outer-members drawn from across Europe. The Brotherhood was the same organisation his father had served. Bosch remained in and around 's-Hertogenbosch for his entire life.

• 3. How He Painted

  ›

  Bosch worked almost exclusively on oak panels, using oil as his medium. His palette was comparatively limited. For blue skies and distant landscapes, he relied on azurite. Copper-based glazes made from malachite or verdigris covered his foliage and foreground landscapes. Lead-tin-yellow, ochres, and red lake pigments such as carmine or madder lake coloured his figures.

  What set him apart technically was surface texture. Most Early Netherlandish painters applied multiple transparent glazes to achieve a smooth finish, deliberately hiding their brushwork. The goal was to make the paint surface seem almost divine, as though the image had not been made by human hands. Bosch did the opposite. His surfaces were rough, built up in what painters call impasto, and the marks of the brush remained visible. He was working against the dominant convention of his time.

  He did not date his paintings, which has made sequencing his output extremely difficult. Unusually for a painter of his era, he did sign several works, though some signatures claiming to be his are now considered forgeries. His signature appears on only seven of his surviving paintings. The Bosch Research and Conservation Project has used dendrochronological analysis, studying the growth rings of the oak panels themselves, to establish more precise dates for the majority of his works.

• 4. The Garden of Earthly Delights

  ›

  The Garden of Earthly Delights was painted somewhere between around 1495 and 1505, and art historian Stefan Fischer places it as a transitional work sitting between Bosch's middle and late periods. It is a triptych: three panels meant to be read together.

  The outer panels, when the altarpiece is closed, frame the whole composition. When opened, the left panel shows God presenting Eve to Adam in the Garden of Eden. Bosch made an unusual choice in giving God a youthful appearance rather than the more conventional older, bearded figure. Exotic animals and strange semi-organic, hut-shaped forms populate the landscape around them.

  The central panel spreads across a wide panorama. Nude figures move through the scene in states of innocent, self-absorbed joy, surrounded by fantastical compound animals, fruit enlarged to architectural scale, and hybrid stone formations. The nakedness here carries an air of ease.

  The right panel is something else entirely. Set at night, it is a hellscape: cold colours, frozen waterways, and figures twisted in torment. The nakedness that read as joyful in the central panel has been stripped of anything erotic. Large explosions in the background throw light through a city gate and across the water in the midground. Humankind, the panel argues, has given in to temptation and is now receiving eternal damnation. The Prado Museum in Madrid holds this triptych, along with three other Bosch works acquired by Philip II of Spain in the late 16th century.

• 5. Monsters, Morality, and Meaning

  ›

  Felipe de Guevara, a Spanish writer, described Bosch in 1560 as regarded merely as "the inventor of monsters and chimeras". In the early 17th century, the artist-biographer Karel van Mander called Bosch's paintings "wondrous and strange fantasies", then added that they were "often less pleasant than gruesome to look at". These were not intended as dismissals exactly, but they framed Bosch as a curiosity, a producer of spectacle rather than meaning.

  In the 20th century, as taste shifted, some scholars proposed that Bosch's imagery drew on heretical ideas, including those of the Cathars, the Adamites, or the Brethren of the Free Spirit. The town of 's-Hertogenbosch had a reputation for religious progressiveness. Erasmus himself had been educated at one of the houses of the Brethren of the Common Life there, and some writers found it natural to draw parallels between the caustic prose of Erasmus and the bold paintings of Bosch.

  Others saw the work as little more than entertainment, comparable to the decorative grotesque imagery of the Italian Renaissance.

  The art historian Walter Gibson described the experience of Bosch's paintings as confronting the viewer with "a world of dreams and nightmares in which forms seem to flicker and change before our eyes". More recently, scholars have moved toward a different position altogether: that Bosch's imagery is not heretical or merely fantastical, but is entirely consistent with orthodox late medieval religious belief. His visions of sin, heaven, and hell, in this reading, reflect the teaching literature and sermons of his era. Dirk Bax has argued that the paintings often function as visual translations of verbal metaphors and puns drawn from both biblical and folkloric sources. Joseph Koerner has suggested that the cryptic qualities of Bosch's work stem from his focus on social, political, and spiritual enemies, with symbolism deliberately obscured to protect the artist from retaliation.

• 6. Attribution and Its Difficulties

  ›

  Early 20th-century art historians Tolnay and Baldass believed between thirty and fifty paintings were by Bosch's hand. Gerd Unverfehrt's 1980 monograph brought that number down to twenty-five paintings and fourteen drawings. Today, roughly twenty-five paintings are confidently attributed to him, along with eight drawings, and about half a dozen more are attributed to his workshop rather than to Bosch himself.

  The shrinking of the catalogue reflects both better scholarship and better technology. Infrared reflectography has allowed researchers to examine the underdrawing beneath a painting's surface, revealing whether the hand matches what is known of Bosch's technique. His style was widely imitated from the early 16th century onward, and numerous copies and variations circulated in the decades after his death. Pieter Bruegel the Elder, his most celebrated follower, drew directly on Bosch's visual vocabulary.

  In early 2016, a small panel called The Temptation of St. Anthony, held at the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City, Missouri, was reassigned. It had long been listed as the work of Bosch's workshop. Intensive forensic study by the Bosch Research and Conservation Project concluded it was by Bosch himself. The same project has raised doubts in the opposite direction about two well-known works: The Seven Deadly Sins in the Prado, and Christ Carrying the Cross in the Museum of Fine Arts in Ghent, both long accepted as autograph works, may instead belong to the workshop. The question of what Bosch actually made with his own hands remains open.