Fifth Council of the Lateran

• 1. Papal Politics And War

  ›

  Pope Julius II stood at the head of an army in Northern Italy during 1510. He had become a soldier-pope who sought to free the Italian Peninsula from foreign powers. The Republic of Venice had encroached on papal rights by filling vacant episcopal sees independently. In 1509, Julius II joined the League of Cambrai to restore lands conquered by Venice. He censured Venice with an interdict and deployed armies alongside the coalition forces. Venetian troops suffered a complete defeat at the Battle of Agnadello on the 14th of May 1509. King Louis XII of France demanded that Florence declare allegiance to him in 1510. Niccolò Machiavelli traveled to France in July 1510 as a diplomatic envoy for Florence. He found Louis XII eager for war and inclined toward calling a general council to depose Julius II. The pope deposed Alfonso I d'Este, Duke of Ferrara, for supporting France. Louis XII retaliated in September 1510 by convoking a synod of French bishops at Tours. That synod judged the pope had no right to make war upon a foreign prince. It threatened Julius II with a general council if he continued his military campaigns. The pope ignored the French synod and assumed personal command of the army again. He became dangerously ill at Bologna in August 1510 but recovered quickly. An anti-French alliance formed in October 1510 including the Papal States, Venice, Spain, England, the emperor, and Switzerland. The Papal States captured Mirandola on the 20th of January 1511. French contingents took back Bologna from papal troops on the 23rd of May 1511. They reinstated Annibale II Bentivoglio there. Gaston of Foix led French forces initially to success before his death. After the Battle of Ravenna in 1512, French armies retreated beyond the Alps. Parma, Reggio, and Piacenza then became part of the Papal States.

• 2. The Schism At Pisa

  ›

  French politicians decided to convene a schismatic council at Pisa in 1511. Florence permitted this council to use their city as a location. Both Florence and Pisa were placed under an interdict for allowing it. Only a few prelates attended the gathering including Cardinals Bernardino López de Carvajal, Guillaume Briçonnet, Francesco Borgia, Federico Sanseverino, and René de Prie. Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, initially gave protection to these participants. He later withdrew that support when German bishops refused to engage with such schismatic tendencies. Julius II summoned a general council by papal bull on the 18th of July 1511. It assembled at Rome on the 19th of April 1512 with only Italian prelates present. The pope deprived four leading schismatic cardinals of their dignities and excommunicated all participants. The schismatic council moved from Pisa to Milan due to popular opposition. They possibly elected Carvajal as Antipope Martin VI there. Participants departed to Asti and then Lyon, France, abandoning the council in 1512. This entire matter represented a futile attempt to revive fifteenth-century conciliarism for political purposes. Thomas Cajetan, Dominican Master General, waged a war of polemics against Jacques Almain, spokesman of the University of Paris. At the seventh session in 1513, Carvajal and Sanseverino separated from French colleagues. They formally renounced the schism and were restored to their offices by Leo X.

• 3. Reform Decrees And Legislation

  ›

  Cardinal Egidio da Viterbo delivered an inspiring opening address on the 3rd of May 1512 about urgent reform needs. His speech was widely printed and put many concerns of Catholic reformists into circulation. Fifteen cardinals attended alongside Latin patriarchs of Alexandria and Antioch. Ten archbishops and fifty-six bishops also participated in these sessions. The Council published decrees focused on institutional reform and political peace rather than doctrinal clarification. It rejected and condemned everything done by the schismatic council at Pisa. A Papal election became nullified if simony was exposed during its proceedings. Hussites received an invitation to attend and negotiate re-integration with better security guarantees. Age limits over thirty years were established for bishops to reduce nepotism and absenteeism. The Council encouraged cardinal-nephews while establishing better criteria for abbots. Peer review by cardinals of each other's visitation reports became mandatory. Stricter regulation of the Roman curia followed these measures. Sumptuary regulations restricted luxury spending by cardinals and bishops. Leo X promulgated a Bull on the 4th of May 1515 sanctioning monti di pietà financial institutions. These provided no-interest microfinance loans to the needy under strict ecclesiastical supervision. A decree confirmed the immortality of the soul, likely directed against Pietro Pomponazzi. Another section asserted that lay people held no power over clerics. Bishops gained authority over friars within their churches. Local bishops required permission before printing new books could proceed. The 1516 Concordat of Bologna between Holy See and Kingdom of France was confirmed. Abrogation of the 1438 Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges occurred simultaneously. A lengthy section called for peace between princes and urged everyone with influence to act accordingly. War against Turks to reclaim the Holy Land received advocacy funding through three years of tax levies. Apocalyptic preaching became forbidden as preachers must not declare fixed times for future evils.

• 4. Implementation And Failure

  ›

  Little work went into putting council decisions into practice during the early sixteenth century. The Vatican website notes reform of the curia failed despite suppression of the Pisa pseudo-council succeeding. Small numbers of attending bishops raised questions about true ecumenical status throughout history. Pope Leo X needed money to finance military operations against Turks in the Holy Lands. He sought to re-establish Rome's prestige and centrality behind several Council discussions. These financial pressures underpinned the so-called sale of indulgences scandal. Council recommendations applied partially in Italy, Spain, and parts of France. They remained blocked in England entirely. No implementation occurred at all in Germany. Johann Eck believed Protestant Reformation might have been avoided if reforms had taken effect. Alessandro Geraldini attended the eleventh session as first Archbishop of Santo Domingo. He likely represented the first prelate from Western Hemisphere to attend an Ecumenical Council. Paride de Grassi arranged council logistics by constructing a main chamber inside Lateran Basilica nave. A wall surrounded this space to protect proceedings privacy. Rooms for eating and latrines were built within it since participants could not leave premises. A second smaller room existed in aula concilii but housed only one meeting. Nelson Minnich reconstructed details relying heavily on diaries written by Paride De Grassi himself.

• 5. Precipitating The Reformation

  ›

  Martin Luther published his Ninety-five Theses just seven months after the council closed. His shock stemmed from believing the Lateran Council abrogated decisions of previous councils. He adopted specific theological positions following that perception. Pope Julius II promised under oath to convoke a general council when elected pope in 1503. That promise went unfulfilled initially until political circumstances forced action. The schismatic council at Pisa intended to restrain Julius II politically. It sought recognition of principles drawn from 1438 Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges articles. Dissatisfaction with treatment by Julius II led Carvajal toward rebellious attitudes. Subsidiary to excommunicate Louis XII also influenced that decision. Maximilian I planned since 1507 to procure his own papacy election after Julius died. German bishops refused engagement with French schismatic tendencies later. Thomas Cajetan argued against conciliarist positions advanced by Jacques Almain throughout polemical exchanges. Alessandro Geraldini's attendance marked historical significance for Western Hemisphere representation. The Council's financial policies and unimplemented promises connected directly to subsequent events. Luther's reaction reflected broader European discontent with Church authority structures. Historical debate continues regarding whether Protestant Reformation could have been avoided entirely.