Skip to content
— CH. 1 · THE BANISHMENT DECREE —

Exile of Ovid

~4 min read · Ch. 1 of 6
6 sections
  • In the year 8 AD, the Roman poet Ovid stood before Emperor Augustus and received a sentence that would end his life in Rome. The decree came without any Senate vote or judicial trial. It was an exclusive intervention by the emperor himself. Ovid was banished from the city to Tomis, a remote town on the Black Sea coast now known as Constanța in Romania. At that time, Tomis lay loosely under the authority of the Kingdom of Thrace, a satellite state of Rome. The place was superficially Hellenized but remained far from the center of imperial power. For Ovid, who had been one of the most famous poets of his age, this move marked the ruin of all his ambitious hopes.

  • Ovid later wrote that the cause of his exile was carmen et error, meaning a poem and an error. He identified the poem as the Ars Amatoria, written seven years before his banishment. Yet he expressed surprise that only he suffered punishment for such content when others wrote similar obscene verse with apparent imperial approval. Scholars have long debated whether the real crime was lèse-majesté, an offense against the majesty of the emperor. Augustus presented himself as the restorer of Roman public morality and could not ignore an author who promoted adultery in defiance of his laws. Speculations about the nature of the mistake include sexual scandals involving Julia the Elder or Julia the Younger, political opposition through circles like that of Lucius Aemilius Paullus, or intellectual objection to authoritarianism. Some argue the Art of Love served merely as a pretext while the true reason remained hidden.

  • Tomis sat on the edge of the civilized world where none of its citizens spoke Latin. Ovid found this condition trying as an educated Roman accustomed to the language of empire. The town lay near the Black Sea frontier under the loose authority of Thrace. There he encountered the Getae, a nomadic people related to the Dacians or Thracians. His poems depict harsh treatment by these groups and describe hazards and conditions that left him old, sick, and far from family. He portrayed himself as suffering physical and emotional wounds while writing letters pleading for return. Despite the distance, some scholars suggest he may have accessed local knowledge, perhaps even information from fishers regarding Halieutica, though authorship remains debated.

  • During exile, Ovid produced three major works: Ibis, Tristia, and Epistulae ex Ponto. The five books of Tristia were dated between 9 AD and 12 AD during his first four years away from Rome. These elegies expressed despair and advocated for his return to the capital. The tenth elegy in the fourth book contains many particulars about his life before banishment. Epistulae ex Ponto followed as a series of letters addressed to friends, his wife, and the emperor himself. The first three books appeared in 13 AD with the fourth published later between 14 AD and 16 AD. One line reads: Where's the joy in stabbing your steel into my dead flesh? There's no place left where I can be dealt fresh wounds. Ibis, an elegiac curse poem attacking an unnamed adversary, was written during the journey to Tomis or shortly after arrival.

  • A more recent thesis suggests that Ovid never actually left Rome for exile at all. Early in the 20th century, J. J. Hartman argued that all references to banishment were imaginative fiction rather than historical fact. This theory gained debate among Dutch authors during the 1930s and resurfaced in 1951 when O. Janssen proposed similar ideas. A.D. Fitton Brown expanded the argument in 1985 by noting that no historian mentioned the event until the beginning of the fifth century except for doubtful passages in Pliny the Elder and Statius. Brown claimed descriptions of Tomis were already available from Roman authors before Ovid arrived. He suggested the poet projected a persona separate from personal life and invented poetic fiction instead of documenting real events. Orthodox scholars oppose this view, arguing Ovid would not have allowed Fasti to remain unfinished if he truly intended to seal his consecration as imperial poet.

  • Ovid's exile works became fundamental sources for studying the Roman aristocracy under Augustus and Tiberius. They furnished precious pieces of information about events and persons of the era. His writing continued to influence Latin writers who experienced displacement themselves, ranging from Seneca to Boethius. Medieval thinkers used these texts as central points of reference for their own imaginings of exile. Romantic portrayals of misunderstood genius also drew heavily from Ovid's accounts. Modern classicists continue to question whether the entire episode was merely a farce or rhetorical device designed to manipulate readers. Despite debates over authenticity, the poems remain essential reading for understanding how literature functioned within imperial power structures during the early first century AD.

Continue Browsing

Common questions

When was Ovid exiled from Rome to Tomis?

Ovid was exiled in the year 8 AD. The decree came without any Senate vote or judicial trial and was an exclusive intervention by Emperor Augustus.

What were the reasons for Ovid's exile according to his own writings?

Ovid stated that the cause of his exile was carmen et error, meaning a poem and an error. He identified the poem as the Ars Amatoria written seven years before his banishment.

Where is the town of Tomis located today?

Tomis is now known as Constanța in Romania. It lies on the Black Sea coast under the loose authority of Thrace during the time of Ovid.

Which major works did Ovid produce during his exile period?

During exile Ovid produced three major works: Ibis, Tristia, and Epistulae ex Ponto. The five books of Tristia were dated between 9 AD and 12 AD while the first three books of Epistulae ex Ponto appeared in 13 AD.

Who argued that Ovid never actually left Rome for exile?

J. J. Hartman argued early in the 20th century that all references to banishment were imaginative fiction rather than historical fact. A.D. Fitton Brown expanded this argument in 1985 by noting no historian mentioned the event until the beginning of the fifth century except for doubtful passages.