Exile of Ovid

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  In 8 AD, the most celebrated poet in Rome was put on a ship and sent to the edge of the world. Ovid, whose verses had charmed the Roman aristocracy for decades, found himself banished by imperial decree to Tomis, a remote town on the Black Sea, in what is now Constanta, Romania. No trial was held. No senate vote was taken. No judge pronounced the sentence. The emperor Augustus acted alone.

  Ovid would spend the rest of his life in Tomis, writing letters and poems begging to come home. He described the town as a place where no one spoke Latin, where the Scythians and the Getae, a nomadic people related to the Dacians or Thracians, pressed close to the city walls. For an educated Roman, it was a kind of living death.

  Before the exile, Ovid had already written works that would outlast the empire: the Heroides, the Amores, the Ars Amatoria, the Remedia Amoris, the Medicamina Faciei Femineae, a lost tragedy called Medea, and the ambitious Metamorphoses and Fasti. Two of these he left unfinished. In exile, he produced the Ibis, the Tristia, and the Epistulae ex Ponto. These are the works of a man trying to write his way back to Rome.

  Why did Augustus send him away? What exactly was the poem and the mistake Ovid blamed? And did the exile even happen? Those are the questions this documentary sets out to answer.

• 2. Carmen et Error

  ›

  Ovid gave his own explanation for the exile in a phrase that classicists have puzzled over for centuries: carmen et error, meaning a poem and an error. He named the poem. It was the Ars Amatoria, a guide to seduction he had written roughly seven years before the sentence fell.

  But he was cagey about the error. In the Tristia, he repeated over and again that what he had done was not a crime. It was a mistake caused by stupidity, he wrote, done without premeditation. Its nature, he said, was that he had seen something. Augustus, Ovid reasoned, must understand this, because the emperor had only exiled him without putting him to death, confiscating his property, or stripping him of Roman citizenship. The punishment, in Ovid's accounting, matched a mistake, not a felony.

  Scholars have proposed that Ovid's real offense was something closer to lèse-majesté, an insult to the dignity of the ruler. Augustus was publicly presenting himself as the restorer of Roman morality. An author of Ovid's reputation promoting adultery in the Ars Amatoria was an embarrassment the emperor could not ignore forever.

  Yet Ovid pointed out a problem with this explanation. Many other poets had written obscene verse, apparently with Augustus's blessing. Propertius, Tibullus, and Horace had all circulated works no more indecent than the Ars Amatoria, and none of them was banished. The poem, Ovid implied, was a pretext. The years that elapsed between its publication and the sentence seemed to confirm this.

• 3. The Speculation About Error

  ›

  Because Ovid said only that he had seen something, the speculation about his personal mistake has ranged across centuries and covered ground from the scandalous to the political. Sexual theories hold that Ovid had witnessed, or participated in, adultery involving women closely connected to Augustus. The names put forward are Julia the Elder, the emperor's daughter, and Julia the Younger, his granddaughter. Both women were eventually disgraced by Augustus himself.

  A different line of interpretation points away from private conduct and toward political allegiance. One theory holds that Ovid had moved in circles hostile to the emperor, specifically the circle of Lucius Aemilius Paullus, who was involved in a conspiracy to restore the succession rights of Agrippa Postumus, a grandson of Augustus. If this reading is correct, then the Ars Amatoria was never the real issue.

  Some scholars have read Ovid's later career as a bid to reposition himself politically. After his early erotic poetry, he had turned to the Metamorphoses, a poem that included the deification of Julius Caesar and praise of Augustus, and to the Fasti, dedicated to Roman festivals. This shift, proponents argue, shows a poet who understood the risk of his earlier work and tried to change course. The sentence arrived anyway.

  One further theory frames Ovid simply as an intellectual who objected to authoritarianism, a man whose artistic independence made him a target regardless of the specific offense. The Tristia, written after the exile, contain passages where Augustus appears more as a literary character than as the actual addressee, which has led modern readers to wonder whether Ovid was ever truly asking the emperor for mercy, or writing for posterity.

• 4. Was the Exile Real?

  ›

  Early in the 20th century, a Dutch scholar named J. J. Hartman proposed something startling: Ovid never left Rome at all. His exile poems, in this reading, were imaginative and humorous fiction. The theory was debated during the 1930s, and in 1951 O. Janssen advanced a similar argument.

  In a 1985 article, A. D. Fitton Brown laid out the case more systematically. Brown noted that no historian mentioned the exile until the beginning of the 5th century, except for doubtful passages in Pliny the Elder and Statius. He also pointed out that Ovid's descriptions of Tomis could have been drawn from Roman authors already available to him in Rome. And he observed that Ovid was a poet already skilled at constructing a persona separate from his actual life.

  Orthodox scholars pushed back hard. Their central argument concerned the Fasti. Ovid had designed that poem as the work that would confirm his standing as an imperial poet; he would never have left it half-finished by choice. Only the first six books survive, covering January through June. The Metamorphoses also appears to lack a final revision, which Ovid himself acknowledged in the Tristia.

  But even this argument has complications. The encyclopaedic poem Ibis, packed with Alexandrian mythological knowledge, would have required access to exactly the kind of library Ovid supposedly lacked in Tomis. If he could write the Ibis in exile, the argument about lost library access grows weaker.

  B. R. Nagle offered a different reason for the Fasti being unfinished. Nagle suggests Ovid may have begun conceiving the work as early as 8 BC, when Augustus corrected the Julian calendar in his new role as Pontifex Maximus. Nagle also argues that Ovid may have tied the poem to the year 4 AD, when Tiberius was adopted as Augustus's successor. If Ovid's enthusiasm for the Julian dynasty later collapsed, he may have abandoned the Fasti for political reasons, not because he was stranded in Tomis.

• 5. Writing from the Edges

  ›

  Whatever the truth of his location, the works Ovid produced after 8 AD belong to a distinct category in his output. The Ibis was written during the journey to the place of exile. It is an elegiac curse poem, a venomous attack on an unnamed enemy back in Rome. Callimachus had written a poem with the same title attacking Apollonius of Rhodes, and Ovid's work self-consciously placed itself in that tradition. Caelius Rhodiginus, citing the authority of Caecilius Minutianus Apuleius, identified the target as Marcus Valerius Messalla Corvinus, though scholars have questioned this.

  The Tristia, five books of elegies, were composed during the first four years of the exile, dated to 9-12 AD. These poems express despair and argue for Ovid's return to Rome. In them, Ovid described himself as old, sick, and isolated from his family and the pleasures of the city. He sought to arouse pity, defend his conduct as stupid rather than criminal, and flatter Augustus directly or through praise of the emperor's family and military campaigns. The tenth elegy of the fourth book is especially valued because it contains substantial detail about Ovid's own life.

  The Epistulae ex Ponto followed. These verse letters are explicitly addressed to named people in Rome, asking them to intercede on Ovid's behalf. The first three books were published in 13 AD, and a fourth book appeared between 14 and 16 AD. Among the addressees were friends, Ovid's wife, and Augustus himself. One passage reads: "Where's the joy in stabbing your steel into my dead flesh? / There's no place left where I can be dealt fresh wounds."

  Pliny the Elder records that Ovid also wrote a poem about fishing while in Tomis. A fragmentary work called the Halieutica survives, dealing with rules for fishing in rocky, sandy, and open waters and describing local species of fish, possibly drawing on knowledge from local fishers. Scholars remain divided on whether Ovid actually wrote it.

• 6. Afterlife of the Exile

  ›

  Long after Ovid died in Tomis, the exile poems became reference points for writers and thinkers who found themselves outside the world they had once belonged to. Latin authors who experienced exile, from Seneca to Boethius, returned to Ovid's work as a literary model and a source of consolation.

  In the medieval period, the exile poetry shaped how educated Europeans imagined what it meant to be cast out, stripped of one's place in the order of things. Romantic writers of later centuries read Ovid's banishment as the archetype of the misunderstood genius, punished for expressing what polite society preferred to suppress.

  For modern classicists, the exile writings have come to serve a different function. They are treated as primary evidence for understanding the Roman aristocracy under Augustus and Tiberius, offering, as scholars have put it, precious pieces of information about events and persons that would otherwise be lost. The question of whether the poems are autobiography or fiction has itself become a field of inquiry, because the gap between a poet's persona and lived experience is one that Roman writers themselves discussed.

  Ovid's own testimony about the exile amounts to a statement that his mistake was seeing something he should not have seen. The emperor chose not to execute him, not to take his property, and not to cancel his citizenship. He chose instead to place the most famous poet in Rome at the edge of the Latin-speaking world, in a town on the Black Sea where, by Ovid's account, no one spoke his language. The passage 3.371-80 of the Fasti, which orthodox scholars read as testimony to Ovid's ordeal, has also been read as evidence of resistance to the Augustan succession itself.