Enabling Act of 1933
The Enabling Act of 1933 carried an official title that translated, roughly, as the Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Reich. That name was almost everything the act was not. Far from remedying distress, the Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich stripped the German parliament of its legislative power, handed it to a cabinet led by Adolf Hitler, and dissolved nearly every constitutional check that had kept a single man from ruling Germany alone. What followed was not remedy. It was the legal architecture of a totalitarian state. How did a democracy vote itself out of existence in a single afternoon? And who, if anyone, stood up to say no?
On the 27th of February 1933, the Reichstag building caught fire. Hitler, who had been chancellor for less than a month, immediately accused the Communist Party of starting the blaze as the opening move of a plot to overthrow the government. Within days he had persuaded President Paul von Hindenburg to sign the Reichstag Fire Decree, abolishing most civil liberties in Germany: the right to speak, to assemble, to protest, and the right to due process were all suspended. A state of emergency was declared, and a violent crackdown on the Nazis' political enemies began, targeting the Communist Party above all. Yet Hitler almost immediately declared the decree insufficient. He wanted something broader, something permanent. He submitted to the Reichstag a proposal for an enabling law that would give his cabinet essentially unlimited power to make law without parliamentary approval. The fire had provided the pretext. Now he needed the votes.
The Enabling Act, as a constitutional amendment, required the support of two-thirds of Reichstag members present, with at least two-thirds of the full membership in the chamber. The Nazi Party held 288 seats, not enough on its own. The Communists and Social Democrats were expected to vote against, and the government had already arrested Communist and some Social Democrat deputies under the Fire Decree to thin their ranks. The conservative parties representing business interests, landowners, and the middle class were expected to vote in favour. That still left the Catholic Centre Party as the swing bloc. Hitler negotiated directly with the Centre Party's chairman, Ludwig Kaas, a Catholic priest, and finalized a deal on the 22nd of March. Kaas agreed to deliver his party's votes in exchange for assurances that Catholic civil liberties, Catholic schools, and party-affiliated civil servants would be protected. Some historians, including Klaus Scholder, have argued that Hitler also privately promised to negotiate a formal concordat between Germany and the Holy See. Kaas was a close associate of Cardinal Pacelli, the Vatican Secretary of State who later became Pope Pius XII, and Pacelli had long sought such a treaty. The day after the vote, Kaas travelled to Rome, explaining he intended to investigate the possibilities for an agreement between church and state. The written guarantees Hitler had promised Kaas, however, were never actually delivered.
Late on the 23rd of March, the Reichstag convened not in its fire-damaged home but at the Kroll Opera House, where it had relocated temporarily. SA men were stationed inside and outside the chamber. Hermann Göring, as Reichstag president, had already changed the body's rules of procedure to ease the bill's passage. Under the Weimar Constitution, a quorum of two-thirds of the full 647-member Reichstag was required to bring a constitutional amendment to a vote. That meant 432 deputies had to be present. Göring reduced this figure to 378 by simply not counting the 81 absent KPD deputies, treating them as though they did not exist. The British historian Richard J. Evans, writing in his 2003 book The Coming of the Third Reich, argued this was an illegal act. Göring was not required to count the Communists as voting, Evans maintained, but he was required to count them for purposes of the quorum. Only one party leader rose to speak against the bill. Otto Wels, leader of the Social Democrats, defended his party's record in rebuilding Germany after the First World War and rejected the Nazis' claim that special powers were necessary. Surrounded by SA men who had spent the day intimidating deputies, Wels declared: "No Enabling Act gives you the power to destroy ideas that are eternal and indestructible." Hitler's own speech ended with a thinly veiled demand that parliament vote itself into irrelevance: he told the chamber it would be inconsistent with the aim of the national uprising to ask the Reichstag for approval of government measures case by case. The Centre Party's Kaas spoke to voice support amid, in his own phrase, "concerns put aside".
When voting proceeded, SA men remained present throughout, and SPD deputies faced active intimidation. The final count was 444 in favour and 94 opposed, with 109 absent. Every party except the Social Democrats voted yes. All 94 votes against came from SPD deputies; 26 SPD members were arrested or in hiding and could not vote. The Reichstag had adopted the bill with the support of 83% of deputies present. Evans calculated that even if every SPD member had been in the chamber and voted against, the act would still have passed with 78.7% support. That same evening, the Reichsrat, the upper chamber representing Germany's state governments, gave its unanimous assent without prior debate. President Hindenburg signed the Enabling Act into law before the night was out. The law was set to expire after four years unless the Reichstag chose to extend it.
The Enabling Act was renewed twice, first in 1937 and again in 1939. By that point, renewal was a formality: all other political parties had been banned since the 14th of July 1933, when the Law Against the Formation of Parties made the NSDAP the only legally permitted party in Germany. Hitler had promised exactly this outcome in earlier speeches, declaring he had set himself one aim, which was to sweep thirty parties out of Germany. The act's own provisions were soon violated by the government it empowered. On the 30th of January 1934, a law dissolved Germany's state parliaments and subordinated the state governments to the Reich, effectively gutting the Reichsrat, whose continued existence Article 2 of the Enabling Act had explicitly guaranteed. Two weeks later, on the 14th of February, the Reichsrat itself was abolished by cabinet decree, contrary to Article 63 of the Weimar Constitution. In August 1934, President Hindenburg died of lung cancer. Hitler seized the president's powers the following day, confirmed by referendum, even though Article 2 of the act stated the president's powers were to remain undisturbed. A 1932 constitutional amendment had made the president of the High Court of Justice, not the chancellor, first in the line of succession to the presidency; this was never observed. None of these apparent violations was challenged in court. The cabinet that the act had empowered gradually stopped meeting in any meaningful sense. After 1934, full cabinet sessions became increasingly rare. After 1938, the full cabinet did not meet at all. On the 25th of January 1943, Hitler extended the term of Reichstag members until the 30th of January 1947 by enacting a separate law, effectively stretching the act's provisions through the end of the war.
The Enabling Act was formally repealed by the Allied Control Council in Control Council Law No. 1, following Germany's surrender at the end of World War II. The consequences it had set in motion were staggering. Hitler used the powers it granted to begin German rearmament and pursue an aggressive foreign policy that led to World War II and the death of one-tenth of Germany's own population. By mid-March 1933, the government had already begun sending communists, trade union leaders, and political dissidents to Dachau, the first Nazi concentration camp. Germany's Basic Law of 1949 was written to make a recurrence structurally impossible. It stipulates that only bodies constitutionally endowed with legislative power may enact laws. It also establishes that political parties can be declared enemies of the constitution only by the Federal Constitutional Court, the Bundesverfassungsgericht, not by a parliamentary majority. This clause makes explicit that even a popular majority cannot be permitted to install a totalitarian regime as was achieved through the Enabling Act of 1933. The signatories of the act each met a distinct fate: Hindenburg died of lung cancer sixteen months after signing it; Hitler committed suicide in 1945 to avoid Allied capture; Reich Interior Minister Frick was executed after his Nuremberg conviction; Foreign Minister von Neurath received a fifteen-year Nuremberg sentence; Finance Minister Schwerin von Krosigk received a ten-year sentence.
Common questions
What was the Enabling Act of 1933 and what did it do?
The Enabling Act of 1933 was a German law that gave the cabinet, headed by Adolf Hitler, the power to enact and enforce laws without the involvement of the Reichstag or President Paul von Hindenburg. It effectively bypassed the checks and balances of the Weimar Constitution and transformed Hitler's government into a legal dictatorship.
How was the Enabling Act of 1933 passed despite requiring a two-thirds majority?
The Nazis secured the required two-thirds majority through a combination of coercion, bribery, and manipulation. Communist deputies were excluded from the quorum count by Reichstag president Hermann Göring, many SPD deputies were arrested or in hiding, and the Catholic Centre Party was persuaded to vote in favour after Hitler's negotiations with its chairman Ludwig Kaas on the 22nd of March 1933.
Who voted against the Enabling Act of 1933?
Only the Social Democratic Party (SPD) voted against the Enabling Act. The final tally was 444 in favour and 94 opposed, with all 94 no votes coming from SPD deputies. Twenty-six additional SPD members could not vote because they had been arrested or had fled into exile.
What speech did Otto Wels give against the Enabling Act of 1933?
Otto Wels, leader of the SPD, was the only party leader to speak against the bill in the Kroll Opera House on the 23rd of March 1933. He defended the Social Democrats' record after the First World War and declared: "No Enabling Act gives you the power to destroy ideas that are eternal and indestructible."
Was the Enabling Act of 1933 considered legally valid?
The act's legal validity has been disputed. British historian Richard J. Evans argued in his 2003 book The Coming of the Third Reich that the act was legally invalid because Göring illegally reduced the quorum by refusing to count the 81 absent KPD deputies, and because the Reichsrat's assent was tainted by the prior overthrow of state governments.
How did the Enabling Act of 1933 shape Germany's post-war constitution?
Germany's Basic Law of 1949 was written specifically to prevent a recurrence. It stipulates that only constitutionally empowered bodies may enact laws, and it requires that political parties be declared enemies of the constitution only by the Federal Constitutional Court, not by a parliamentary majority, preventing any popular majority from legally installing a totalitarian regime as occurred in 1933.
All sources
32 references cited across the entry
- 1webReichsgesetzblatt Teil I, 1933, Nr. 25: Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und ReichÖsterreichische Nationalbibliothek — 1933-03-24
- 2bookThe Third Reich SourcebookAnson Rabinbach et al. — University of California Press — 2013
- 3journalEnabling Act Exhibition
- 5webThe Reichstag Fire Decree (1933)2012-07-25
- 6bookThe Reichstag Fire: The Case Against the Nazi ConspiracySven Kellerhoff — Stroud: History Press — 2016
- 7webReichstag Fire DecreeUnited States Holocaust Memorial Museum
- 8bookA/AS Level History for AQA Democracy and Nazism: Germany, 1918–1945 Student BookNick Pinfield — Cambridge University Press — 2015
- 9journalFranz von Papen, Catholic Conservatives, and the Establishment of the Third Reich, 1933–1934Larry Jones — June 2011
- 10bookDie Steuerung der Wirtschaft durch Recht im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland. Das Beispiel der Reichsgruppe IndustrieDaniela Kahn — Klostermann — 2006
- 11bookDie Quandts. Ihr leiser Aufstieg zur mächtigsten Wirtschaftsdynastie DeutschlandsRüdiger Jungbluth — Campus Verlag — 2002
- 13bookThe Coming of the Third ReichRichard J. Evans — Penguin Press — 2003
- 14webThe 'Enabling Act' (March 24, 1933)German History in Documents and Images (GHDI)
- 15bookHitler: Speeches and Proclamations 1932–1945. 1932–1934. Vol. 1M. Domarus et al. — Tauris — 1990
- 18bookThe Nazi Revolution 1933–35Eliot Barculo Wheaton — 1968
- 20webThe law that 'enabled' Hitler's dictatorshipMarc von Lüpke-Schwarz — 23 March 2013
- 21bookRepublic to Reich: A History of Germany 1918–1945K. J. Mason — McGraw-Hill
- 22bookGermany, 1858–1990: Hope, Terror, and RevivalAlison Kitson — Oxford University Press — 2001
- 23webResearch Starters: Worldwide Deaths in World War IIThe National World War II Museum, New Orleans
- 24journalGerman Social Democracy and Hitler's 'National Revolution' of 1933: A Study in Democratic LeadershipLewis J. Edinger — April 1953
- 26bookThe Fateful Alliance: German Conservatives and Nazis in 1933: TheMachtergreifungin a New LightHermann Beck — Berghahn Books — 2010
- 27webCommunists to be interned in Dachau1933-03-21
- 28webÖNB-ALEX – Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt Teil I, 1933, Nr. 81: Gesetz gegen die Neubildung von ParteienÖsterreichische Nationalbibliothek — 1933-07-15
- 29bookThe Rise and Fall of the Third ReichWilliam Shirer — Simon & Schuster — 1990
- 31webControl Council Law No. 1 – Repealing of Nazi Laws1945-09-20
- 32newsTV Weekend; Architect of Atrocity, The Formative YearsAlessandra Stanley — 2003-05-16