Skip to content

Cochineal

Ch. 1 of 8
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Contents

Cochineal

8 sections
  • Cochineal is a scale insect, and it takes about 70,000 of them to make a single pound of its famous red dye. That is a staggering body count for a color. Yet this tiny parasite of cactus pads, known to science as Dactylopius coccus, once ranked among the most valuable goods crossing the Atlantic. Its price was posted on commodity exchanges. Its color dressed popes and soldiers. How did a speck clinging to a prickly pear end up shaping trade between continents? Why did people on three continents try to smuggle it, farm it, or stamp it out? And why, after nearly vanishing from the market, is it back in lipstick and food labels today?

  • A female cochineal is only about 5 mm long, wingless, and almost motionless for most of her life. She pushes beak-like mouthparts into a cactus pad, drinks its juices, and stays put unless something disturbs her. After mating she swells in size and gives birth to tiny nymphs. Those nymphs coat themselves in a white waxy layer that guards against water loss and harsh sun.

    The wax is why a living colony looks white or grey. Crush one of the insects, though, and the red pigment inside makes the body look dark purple. That pigment, carminic acid, also helps deter other insects from eating it.

    The young travel in a stage called the crawler. A juvenile finds a feeding spot and spins long wax filaments. Later it walks to the edge of the pad, where wind catches the filaments and carries it off to a fresh host.

    Males are a different story. They are much smaller than females and they have wings. A male nymph feeds on the cactus until it matures, and then it can no longer feed at all. It lives just long enough to fertilize eggs, which is why people rarely see one. Females typically outnumber males anyway.

    The cactus pays a price. About 200 species of Opuntia cactus are known, and cochineal can be raised on almost all of them, though Opuntia ficus-indica is the most common host. Heavy feeding can damage and even kill the plant.

    Cochineal has plenty of enemies. Pyralid moths, ladybugs, lacewings, ants, and numerous parasitic wasps all go after it, along with birds, reptiles, and rats. Insects seem to be the most important group of predators.

    Sorting out which cochineal is which is surprisingly hard. Other species in the genus Dactylopius yield the same kind of extract, and even expert taxonomists struggle to tell them apart from D. coccus. The long list of cacti recorded as its hosts probably reflects that confusion.

  • A nopal cactus farm built for cochineal has its own name: a nopalry. Farmers use one of two methods. In the traditional method, they plant cactus pads that already carry the insects, or they infest existing cacti, and then they harvest by hand.

    The controlled method relies on small baskets called Zapotec nests, set on the host cacti. Each basket holds clean, fertile females. The females crawl out, settle on the pad, and wait for the males to fertilize them.

    Either way, the insects need shelter from predators, cold, and rain. A full cycle lasts three months, and the cacti are held at a steady 27 degrees Celsius, or 81 degrees Fahrenheit. At the end, some of the new generation are left to breed. The rest are collected and dried for dye.

    The insects are picked at roughly 90 days of age. Gathering them is slow work, because each one must be knocked, brushed, or picked off the cactus and dropped into a bag. Small groups of collectors do the job and then sell their harvest to local processors or exporters.

    In regions that live off cochineal, pests get serious attention. On small plots, hand methods have proved the safest and most effective. Larger operations need more advanced tools, such as alternative bioinsecticides or traps baited with pheromones.

    This dependence on patient hand labor would later become the industry's greatest weakness.

  • Workers who gather the females face an immediate problem, which is how to kill and preserve them. Boiling water, sunlight, steam, and the heat of an oven all work. Each method gives a different tint, and that is why commercial cochineal comes in varied shades. The insects must dry to about 30 percent of their original weight before they can be stored without rotting.

    The dried body of a female contains between 14 and 26 percent carminic acid. This molecule belongs to a family of anthraquinone dyes. Two other red insect dyes share that chemistry: kermes dye, colored by kermesic acid, and lac dye, colored by laccaic acids.

    Producers sell the result in two main forms. Cochineal extract is simply the raw insect bodies, dried and pulverized. Carmine is a more purified product. To make it, the powder is boiled in ammonia or a sodium carbonate solution, and the leftover solids are filtered out. Alum is then added to the clear liquid, and a red aluminium salt precipitates out.

    Iron is the enemy of a pure color, so its absence matters. Stannous chloride, citric acid, borax, or gelatin can be added to control how the precipitate forms. Add lime to the alum, and the shade turns toward purple.

    Artists wanted this red too, but it let them down. A dye dissolves in liquid, while a pigment is an insoluble powder suspended in a vehicle, and carmine behaves unpredictably as a pigment. Its solubility shifts with acidity. Red lake pigments in general had a reputation for instability by the 1400s.

    When cochineal lakes reached Europe, painters found that they faded. The paint turned brown in sunlight, though oil held up somewhat better than watercolor. The chemist Arthur Herbert Church put it bluntly: "Beautiful and rich as are the colours prepared from cochineal, not one of them should ever find a place upon the palette of the artist."

    By then the insect had been making color for people for well over a thousand years, and the first of them lived in the Americas.

  • In the second century BC, people in Mesoamerica were already dyeing with cochineal. The Mixtec, Zapotec, Aztec, and Otomi all used it on fabric and on amate paper. By the thirteenth century, scribes were painting codices with it.

    Wild insects could be collected, but growers began raising cochineal in gardens. This semi-domesticated stock carried more dye, which made it more valuable to artists.

    The Matrícula de Tributos shows how much the Aztec state prized it. Eleven towns in the Oaxacan province of Coixtlahuaca, conquered by the Aztec Empire in the 15th century, each owed a yearly tribute of 2000 decorated cotton blankets and 40 bags of cochineal dye. One of them was Nochistlan, today Asuncion Nochixtlan. Its name comes from the Nahuatl word for cochineal, nocheztli.

    Far to the south, the Andes had their own tradition. People in Peru were making cochineal dyes for textiles early in the Middle Horizon period, which ran from 600 to 1000 CE. These cloths were often ceremonial, or made for rulers. The craft was well developed under the Nazca culture, and lovely cochineal-dyed weaving survives from the Moche and the Wari. Some of it came through in extremely dry parts of Peru.

    The dye clings best to animal fibers. Wool from alpacas and other camelids took it well, as did rabbit fur and feathers. Cotton and other plant fabrics accepted it less readily.

    The Florentine Codex, from the 16th century, shows the Aztec painters' skill with red. Technical analysis of its achiotl, a light red, reveals several layers of pigment that the naked eye cannot see. The method of layering mattered more than the finished shade. Bolder applications drew the eye, and weaker ones drew less attention. That suggests the Aztecs linked the intensity of a pigment with power and life.

  • In the 1520s, cochineal began arriving in Spain from the New World. Europe already had a red. Kermes, made from scale insects that form galls on oaks around the Mediterranean, had colored cloth for centuries. It had served in ancient Egypt, Greece, Armenia, and the Near East. Polish cochineal and Armenian cochineal were also in use.

    The words themselves carry the story. English took cochineal from French cochenille, which came from Spanish cochinilla. That traces back to Latin coccinus and the Greek kokkinos, meaning scarlet. The Greek root referred to the oak galls, or to a dye made by crushing them. Some sources instead tie cochinilla to the wood louse, a diminutive of cochino, meaning pig.

    The Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire in the 16th century let Spain exploit the new color quickly. Growers raised cochineal for export across Mesoamerica, especially in Tlaxcala, Puebla, and Oaxaca. When sheep arrived in Latin America, the dye found a new partner. It set more firmly on wool than on cotton, agave, or yucca fibers. Europeans came to prize the best grade, called grana fina.

    Carmine became the region's second-most-valuable export, behind silver. Its price was regularly quoted on the London and Amsterdam commodity exchanges, and Amsterdam began recording it in 1589. In the 17th century the dye was traded as far away as India.

    Power wore it. Spain and Italy regulated luxury colors and textiles, and cochineal dyed the clothes of kings, nobles, and clergy. In 1454, Pope Paul II changed the color of cardinals' robes from Cardinal's purple to a vibrant red. By 1558, those robes would have been made with American cochineal. In the 1600s it also gave English officers their distinctive scarlet uniforms. In oriental rugs, it almost completely displaced lac.

    Paying for all this was a system called Repartimiento de Mercancías. A trader lent money to producers in advance, with a call option to buy the harvest. Communities with a history of cochineal production show lower poverty rates and higher female literacy. They also have smaller indigenous populations.

    The trade changed how artists worked as well. A 16th century image of Moctezuma's death uses both indigenous and Spanish pigments. The scholar Diana Magaloni Kerpel reads the mix of cochineal and minium there as a sign of cultural transition and influence.

    Spain's grip on this red could not last, because other empires wanted a share.

  • In 1777, the French botanist Nicolas-Joseph Thiéry de Menonville posed as a botanizing physician and smuggled cochineal insects and Opuntia pads to Saint Domingue. The collection failed to thrive and died out. The Mexican monopoly survived intact.

    A different scheme began in 1788, when Captain Arthur Phillip collected cochineal-infested plants in Brazil. He was on his way to found the first European settlement at Botany Bay, part of which is now Sydney. Spain and Portugal held a worldwide monopoly on the dye, and Britain wanted a source it controlled for its clothing and garment industries.

    The plan failed twice over. The Brazilian insects soon died, but the cacti flourished. They eventually overran about 100,000 square miles of eastern Australia. Control came only in the 1920s, when people deliberately introduced a South American moth, Cactoblastis cactorum, whose larvae feed on the cactus.

    The Mexican monopoly finally ended after the Mexican War of Independence, which ran from 1810 to 1821. Large-scale production grew up in Guatemala and the Canary Islands, and the insect was also cultivated in Spain and North Africa.

    Northern Ethiopia repeated the Australian mistake in the early 2000s. Communities there already ate the nopal pear, and carmine cochineal was introduced for farming. The company Foodsafe exported 2000 tons of dried cochineal over three years. Then a conflict of interest among the communities closed the business.

    The insect kept spreading anyway. Control efforts did not work, and by 2014 about 16,000 hectares of cactus land were infested.

    In South Africa, cochineal species were brought in on purpose as a biocontrol against invasive cacti. Dactylopius insects live on prickly pears around Cuyler Manor in Uitenhage.

    The insect that Europeans once guarded so jealously had become, in some places, a weapon against the plant it lives on.

  • In the middle of the 19th century, artificial dyes such as alizarin crimson appeared, and demand for cochineal fell sharply. Spain took a serious financial blow, since a major industry nearly ceased to exist. Delicate hand breeding could not compete with modern methods or with falling production costs.

    The dye, nicknamed "tuna blood" after the Mexican name for the Opuntia fruit, went out of use. Through the 20th century, trade almost disappeared. For a time, people bred cochineal mostly to keep the tradition alive.

    Then worry about synthetic red dyes and food colorings, some suspected of being carcinogenic, pushed buyers back toward natural options. Natural does not guarantee safe. Still, studies show cochineal is neither carcinogenic nor toxic, though it carries a slight potential to trigger an allergy.

    By 2005, Peru was producing 200 tons of cochineal dye per year, and the Canary Islands 20 tons. Chile and Mexico also export it. France is believed to be the largest importer, with Japan and Italy also buying. Natural cochineal cost between US$50 and 80 per kilogram that year, while synthetic raw food dyes sold for as little as $10-20.

    The dye is unusually tough. It is one of the few water-soluble colorants that resists degradation over time, and it holds up against light, heat, and oxidation better than many synthetic food colors. Cochineal extract goes into beverages, and carmine into a huge range of products, including sausages, surimi, marinades, bakery toppings, jams, cheddar cheese, and sweets. It is also used in lipsticks, rouges, and blushes, and it is considered safe near the eyes. Pharmaceutical makers use it to color pills and ointments, and histologists use it to stain tissue.

    It also raises ethical questions at the table. Vegetarian and vegan consumers may reject it. Many Muslims consider carmine-containing food haram, because all insects except the locust are forbidden. Jews avoid the additive too, though it is not treif, and some authorities permit it because the insect is dried and powdered.

    A small number of people experience occupational asthma, food and cosmetic allergies, and in rare cases anaphylactic shock. In 2006, the FDA said it found no evidence of a significant hazard to the general population. In 2009, it ruled that food and cosmetic labels must name "cochineal extract" or "carmine". In the EU, the additive is E 120, while an artificial, non-allergenic cochineal dye is labeled E 124.

    Tradition survives too. Some towns in the Mexican state of Oaxaca still produce and use cochineal for handmade textiles, and in Guatemala, Heifer International has partnered with women who want to revive artisanal cochineal production.

    Replacing the insect has proved extremely difficult, because the molecule's structure is complicated. Chemists first synthesized carminic acid in the laboratory in 1991. In 2018, researchers engineered the fungus Aspergillus nidulans to make it. In 2021, they did the same with the bacterium Escherichia coli, a step toward a red made without a single insect.

Updated

Common questions

What is cochineal?

It is a scale insect, Dactylopius coccus, that lives on prickly pear cacti. Its body contains carminic acid, which is turned into the red dye carmine.

How many insects does it take to make a pound of dye?

It takes about 70,000 insects to make one pound of cochineal dye.

Where did people first use cochineal?

Mesoamerican peoples such as the Mixtec, Zapotec, Aztec, and Otomi used it for fabrics and paper, and cochineal dye was in use as early as the second century BC. People in Peru were also making cochineal dyes for textiles by the Middle Horizon period.

Why was cochineal so valuable to Spain?

Carmine became the second-most-valuable export of the region, after silver, and its price was quoted on the London and Amsterdam commodity exchanges.

What happened when cochineal was taken to Australia and Ethiopia?

In Australia in 1788 the insects died but the cacti spread across about 100,000 square miles. In Ethiopia the cochineal business closed, but the insect kept spreading and about 16,000 hectares of cactus land were infested by 2014.

Why did demand for cochineal fall and then recover?

Artificial dyes such as alizarin crimson cut demand sharply in the middle of the 19th century. Later, consumer worries about synthetic red dyes brought natural cochineal back into favor.

Is cochineal safe to use?

Studies show it is neither carcinogenic nor toxic, but a small number of people have allergic reactions. In the United States, labels must name it as cochineal extract or carmine.

All sources

77 references cited across the entry

  1. 1BookNahuatl Community: Cultivation of cacti for the production of the red dye cochineal. Codex Osuna: Seven documents presented as evidence against the Viceroy Luis de Velasco during the 1563-1566 inquiry by Jeronimo de Valderrama. Folio 500vBiblioteca Nacional, Madrid — 1565
  2. 2JournalNatural Enemies of Cochineal (Dactylopius coccus Costa): Importance in MexicoLiberato Portillo Martinez et al. — 1998-04-15
  3. 3BookFor Love of InsectsT. Eisner — Belknap Press of Harvard University Press — 2003
  4. 4CochinealC. Olson
  5. 6BookCacti: Biology and UsesP. S. Nobel — University of California Press — 2002
  6. 8BookAtlas of the Scale Insects of North America, Volume VIIG. Floyd Ferris — Stanford University Press — 1955
  7. 11Prickly Pear in AustraliaNorthwestweeds.nsw.gov.au — June 26, 1987
  8. 13Tesfay Belay Reda. 2014. Cactus Pear & Carmine Cochineal: introduction & use in Ethiopia. Lambert Academic Publishing.
  9. 14ReportCochineal insects (Dactylopius species)Hildegard Klein — Agricultural Research Council (South Africa) - PPRI Leaflet Series: Weeds Biocontrol, No. 2.2 — 2002
  10. 15JournalThe red insect dyes: carminic, kermesic and laccaic acids and their derivativesC. J. Cooksey — 17 February 2019
  11. 16JournalCharacterization of a membrane-bound C-glucosyltransferase responsible for carminic acid biosynthesis in Dactylopius coccus CostaRubini Kannangara et al. — 7 December 2017
  12. 18BookCochineal: A Bright Red Animal DyeLaVerne M. Dutton — Master's Thesis, Baylor University
  13. 19BookRojo mexicano: la grana cochinilla en el arteMiguel Fernandez Felix — National Institute of Fine Arts — 2017
  14. 20BookThe Secret Lives of ColourKassia St. Clair — John Murray — 2016
  15. 21JournalThe Materiality of Color in Pre-Columbian Codices: Insights from Cultural HistoryElodie Dupey Garcia — 2017
  16. 22JournalA Reconstructed Chaîne Opératoire for Mesoamerican Cochineal: Implications for the Archaeological Analysis of Insect Dye ProductionSamantha Nadel — 2024
  17. 24Time line of fabricsThreads In Tyme, LTD
  18. 25Codice MendozaNational Institute of Anthropology and History, Mexico
  19. 27BookA Red Like No Other: How Cochineal Colored the WorldRizzoli and Museum of International Folk Art, Santa Fe, New Mexico — 2015
  20. 28JournalChemistry and Art: Ancient textiles and medieval manuscripts examined through chemistryMary Virginia Orna — 1 July 2011
  21. 31JournalTowards hydrophobic carminic acid derivatives and their incorporation in polyacrylatesLuca Gabrielli et al. — 2018
  22. 34JournalAn innovative surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) method for the identification of six historical red lakes and dyestuffsAlyson V. Whitney et al. — 2006
  23. 35JournalChange is permanent: thoughts on the fading of cochineal-based watercolor pigmentsBarbara H. Berrie et al. — 26 July 2017
  24. 36BookThe chemistry of paints and paintingA. H. Church — Seeley and Co., Ltd. — 1890
  25. 37JournalA farther account of the Polish cochinealD. Wolfe et al. — 1766
  26. 38JournalThe Insect Dyes of Western and West-Central AsiaR.A. Donkin — Anthropos Institute — 1977
  27. 39Barber, E. J. W. (1991). Prehistoric Textiles. Princeton University Press.
  28. 41BookHandbook to Life in the Aztec WorldMoreno Dr. Aguilar — California State University — 2006
  29. 43Dyeing RedL. Meyer
  30. 44BookThe colors of the new world: artists, materials, and the creation of the Florentine codexDiana Magaloni Kerpel — The Getty Research Institute — 2014
  31. 46CochinealO. Hernández
  32. 50JournalFood Colour Additives: A Synoptical Overview on Their Chemical Properties, Applications in Food Products, and Health Side EffectsMaria Manuela Silva et al. — January 2022
  33. 51JournalCarcinogenicity study of cochineal in B6C3F1 miceH. Mori et al. — January 1991
  34. 52JournalCochineal, a red dye from bugs, moves to the labBrittney J. Miller — 25 March 2022
  35. 56Pischei Teshuvah Yoreh Deah 87-20
  36. 57E120 CochinealWild Flavors, Inc
  37. 58Summary of Color Additives for Use in United States in Foods, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Medical DevicesU.S. Food and Drug Administration — U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — June 9, 2015
  38. 59Wood, W. W. (2008). Made in Mexico: Zapotec weavers and the global ethnic art market. Indiana University Press.
  39. 60BookCochineal Red: The Art History of a ColorElena Phipps — Metropolitan Museum of Art — 2010
  40. 63JournalThe First Total Synthesis of Carminic AcidAllevi, P. — 1991
  41. 64JournalNext-Generation Genetic and Fermentation Technologies for Safe and Sustainable Production of Food Ingredients: Colors and FlavoringsSeung-Oh Seo et al. — 25 March 2022
  42. 65JournalNew risks from ancient food dyes: cochineal red allergyVoltolini S, Pellegrini S, Contatore M, Bignardi D, Minale P — 2014
  43. 66BookFood Safety: Contaminants and ToxinsJ. P. Felix D'Mello — CABI Pub. — 2003
  44. 67JournalAnaphylaxis After Ingestion of Carmine Colored Foods: Two Case Reports and a Review of the LiteratureMichael C. DiCello et al. — 1999
  45. 72BookIndians, Merchants and Markets: A Reinterpretation of the Repartimiento and Spanish-Indian Economic Relations in Colonial Oaxaca, 1750–1821Jeremy Baskes — Stanford University Press — 2000
  46. 73JournalSpanish Red: An Ethnogeographical Study of Cochineal and the Opuntia CactusR. A. Donkin — 1977
  47. 74BookOriental CarpetsMurray L. Jr. Eiland et al. — Little, Brown and Company — 1998
  48. 75BookA Perfect Red: Empire, Espionage, and the Quest for the Color of DesireAmy Butler Greenfield — Harper Collins Press — 2005
  49. 76BookPolitics and Trade in Southern Mexico, 1750–1821Brian Hamnett — Cambridge University Press — 1971
  50. 77BookRural Guatemala 1760–1940David McCreery — Stanford University Press — 1996
  51. 78BookPlants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic WorldL. L. Schiebinger — Harvard University Press — 2004

Queue