Battle of Smolensk (1941)

• 1. Operation Barbarossa Context

  ›

  On the 22nd of June 1941, Axis nations invaded the Soviet Union in Operation Barbarossa. The campaign met with spectacular success as surprised Soviet troops could not offer coordinated resistance. After three weeks of fighting, German forces reached the Dvina and Dnieper rivers. They planned for a resumption of the offensive against Moscow. Army Group Centre under Fedor von Bock targeted Smolensk next. The city sat about west of Moscow on their path to the capital. The German plan called for the 2nd Panzer Group to cross the Dnieper from the south. Simultaneously, the 3rd Panzer Group would encircle the town from the north. This strategy aimed to trap Soviet defenses before advancing further east.

• 2. Encirclement And Counterattacks

  ›

  Prior to the main German attack, Soviets launched a counter-offensive on the 6th of July. The 7th and 5th Mechanized Corps attacked with about 1,500 tanks near Lepiel. The offensive ran directly into anti-tank defenses of the German 7th Panzer Division. Both Soviet mechanized corps were virtually wiped out. On the 10th of July, Guderian's 2nd Panzer Group began a surprise attack over the Dnieper. His forces overran the weak 13th Army by the 13th of July. Guderian had passed Mogilev, trapping several Soviet divisions. His spearhead unit, the 29th Motorised Division, was already within range of Smolensk. From the 11th of July, Soviets tried concerted counter-attacks against Vitebsk and Bobruisk. These efforts slowed the Germans but results remained marginal. Finally, on the 27th of July, German pincers linked up east of Smolensk. They trapped large portions of the 16th, 19th, and 20th Armies.

• 3. German Strategic Divergence

  ›

  Under Fuhrer Directive 33 issued on the 14th of July, the main effort shifted away from Moscow. The Wehrmacht re-oriented toward a deep encirclement of Kiev in Ukraine instead. Fedor von Bock became impatient wanting to link up with Hoth's Panzer Group. He ordered them to mop up resistance in the city rather than push further east. On the 27th of July, Bock held a conference at Novy Borisov attended by Walther von Brauchitsch. A memorandum instructed generals to strictly follow the directive without comment. They were ordered to concentrate on mopping up and restocking supplies. Guderian wrote in his journal that night that Hitler preferred destroying small enemy forces piecemeal. All officers present believed this approach was incorrect. This meeting marked a critical point where Wehrmacht leadership broke trust with Hitler. Guderian conspired with Hoth and Bock to delay implementation of Directive 33 in defiance of orders. They hastily put together an attack plan for the 1st of August called the Roslavl-Novozybkov Offensive Operation.

• 4. Small Unit Combat Tactics

  ›

  Soviet small unit tactics were implemented with depleted companies even before operations began. The 900th Rifle Regiment part of the 242nd Rifle Division attacked village of Svity with only 79 rifles. Night operations yielded good results allowing Soviets to close in on enemy positions. Clandestine movement got as close as possible to German positions before engagement. Attacks included rifle fire and bayonet attacks supported by artillery groups like ASG 900. Specific data shows 200 Soviet soldiers involved in one unsuccessful night attack. The 5th Rifle Company reported 18 missing, 11 wounded from that single action. The 519th Anti-Aircraft Artillery Battalion attacking German positions lost 4 killed and 7 wounded. Total casualties for that specific assault reached 7 killed, 18 missing, 18 wounded. These figures contradict earlier assessments suggesting Soviet attacks were much bloodier due to bombing or artillery bombardment. Small unit losses accumulated over days rather than sustained in a single attack. This suggests Soviet methodology was not as ignorant or casualty-producing as originally thought.

• 5. Casualty Data Analysis

  ›

  Official Soviet data on losses in the Battle of Smolensk remained undisclosed until 1993. A study led by Grigori F. Krivosheev revealed troops lost 486,171 people irrevocably including dead, missing and captured. Another 273,803 people were wounded bringing total losses to 759,947. Germans reported capturing 350,000 prisoners after final cleaning of the pocket near Smolensk. Additional captures included 38,561 near Roslavl and 78,000 at Krichev and Gomel. Western researcher Nigel Askey argues official Soviet data is greatly underestimated. He claims actual casualties amount to 1,000,000 men including 565,000 prisoners. German losses according to one Russian archive document amounted to only 101,000 men. Historian David Glantz notes this number seems too low for killed personnel alone. His own estimate gives around 115,500 killed and wounded compared with 760,000 Soviet losses during the same period.

• 6. Logistical Strain And Stalemate

  ›

  The rapid advances into Soviet territory led to supply and logistics crises of increasing severity. German supply lines stretched to their limit as they pushed eastward. The Ostheer advanced into the USSR in just 18 days after invasion began on the 22nd of June 1941. Following the encirclement, much of Army Group Centre became mired in positional warfare. They suffered significant losses in defensive battles throughout late summer of 1941. These factors seriously depleted offensive strength of German divisions before winter arrived. Von Bock wrote that he was forced to commit all combat-capable divisions from reserve into combat. He noted enemies attacked daily in several sectors preventing regrouping of forces. Despite huge losses, the enemy continued attacking so it remained impossible to bring up reserves. This exhaustion contributed to disastrous setbacks later suffered in the Battle of Moscow in December 1941. The time and resources consumed at Smolensk delayed the German advance toward Moscow significantly.