Art history

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Art history asks a question that sounds simple but has resisted easy answers for centuries: when a human being makes something, what does that act mean? The discipline dedicated to that question is art history, an academic field devoted to studying artistic production and visual culture across all of human history. It reaches back to ancient Greece, runs through Renaissance Italy and Imperial China, and today encompasses the arts of Europe, Asia, Africa, and Indigenous America. Yet the field almost did not exist. For most of recorded time, the impulse to write about art was scattered and informal, shaped more by personal taste than systematic thought. How a loose collection of observations became a rigorous academic discipline is a story of determined scholars, philosophical arguments, and, more than once, political exile. Who first put the phrase "history of art" in the title of a book? Who argued that great women artists had been excluded not by lack of talent but by deliberate cultural conditions? And what happens when a Marxist philosopher insists that a painting's "aura" is disappearing? The answers run from ancient Rome to a Hamburg library, from a Tuscan painter-biographer to a Princeton research institute.

• 2. Ancient Roots

  ›

  Pliny the Elder's Natural History, completed around AD 77-79, contains the earliest surviving passages that can genuinely be called art history. Pliny was primarily writing an encyclopaedia of the sciences, yet his discussion of Greek sculpture and painting preserved ideas traceable to Xenokrates of Sicyon, a Greek sculptor who lived around 280 BC and may have been the very first art historian. Pliny's account of the painter Apelles, active around 332-329 BC, became especially well known and circulated through the Renaissance and beyond. Running parallel to the Greek tradition, an independent body of writing on art developed in China during the 6th century. There, writers drawn from the scholar-official class compiled canons of worthy artists. Because these writers were themselves necessarily skilled in calligraphy, they were practitioners as well as critics. Their critical framework was organized around the Six Principles of Painting, formulated by Xie He, which gave Chinese art-historical writing a coherent evaluative vocabulary from very early on.

• 3. Vasari and Biography

  ›

  Giorgio Vasari, a Tuscan painter and sculptor, wrote what has been credited as the first true history of art in his Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects. Vasari's approach rested on the idea that art progressed and developed over time, a claim that was a milestone for the field. His book was both personal and historical: it gathered biographies of individual Italian artists, many of whom were Vasari's own contemporaries and personal acquaintances. The most celebrated of these was Michelangelo. Because Vasari knew his subjects directly, his accounts carried an intimacy no purely retrospective history could match. His work proved enormously influential and served as a model for writers who followed him. Yet the very quality that made Vasari compelling also drew criticism: his intense focus on individual artistic personalities was seen by later scholars as a distorting lens, one that celebrated genius at the expense of the broader social and formal forces shaping what artists actually made.

• 4. Winckelmann and Systematic Criticism

  ›

  Johann Joachim Winckelmann, born in 1717 and died in 1768, challenged the framework Vasari had established. Winckelmann argued that art study should centre on the learned beholder rather than the biography of the creator, a shift that effectively launched art criticism as a distinct practice. His 1755 publication Gedanken über die Nachahmung der griechischen Werke in der Malerei und Bildhauerkunst introduced this position to a wide audience. His 1764 work Geschichte der Kunst des Altertums carries a particular distinction: it was the first time the phrase "history of art" appeared in the title of a book. Winckelmann also used his platform to criticize the excesses of Baroque and Rococo forms, pushing taste toward Neoclassicism. His influence spread well beyond art. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and Friedrich Schiller both read him and began writing on art themselves. Winckelmann's account of the Laocoön group drew a direct response from Lessing, and the broader philosophical project he helped initiate culminated in Immanuel Kant's Critique of Judgment in 1790, followed by Hegel's Lectures on Aesthetics. Karl Schnaase built directly on Hegel; his Niederländische Briefe laid theoretical foundations for art history as a standalone discipline, and his Geschichte der bildenden Künste became one of the first historical surveys running from antiquity to the Renaissance.

• 5. Wölfflin and the Science of Style

  ›

  Heinrich Wölfflin, who lived from 1864 to 1945, studied under Burckhardt in Basel and went on to become one of the most influential scholars in the modern history of the field. Where Vasari had celebrated artistic personalities, Wölfflin proposed something he called an "art history without names." He wanted to treat style as a phenomenon that could be studied with the rigour of a science. His method operated on three fronts. He drew on psychology, particularly the work of Wilhelm Wundt, arguing for example that architecture registers as good when a building's facade resembles a human face. He also introduced systematic comparison: by placing individual paintings side by side, he could identify and define shifts in style across periods. His book Renaissance and Baroque was the first work to show clearly how those two stylistic periods differed from one another. His third concern was nationhood: he investigated whether there was a distinctly Italian versus a distinctly German visual sensibility, a question he pursued most fully in a monograph on the German artist Albrecht Dürer.

• 6. The Vienna School

  ›

  Toward the end of the 19th century, a distinctive way of thinking about art history took shape at the University of Vienna. The first generation of what became known as the Vienna School was led by Alois Riegl and Franz Wickhoff, both students of Moritz Thausing. Their shared project was rehabilitation: they took periods that scholars had dismissed as decadent or inferior and argued for their historical value. Late antiquity, long regarded as a slide from classical heights, was the period both Riegl and Wickhoff wrote about most extensively. Riegl also turned his attention to the Baroque. The next generation at Vienna included Max Dvořák, Julius von Schlosser, Hans Tietze, Karl Maria Swoboda, and Josef Strzygowski. Ernst Gombrich, who would become one of the most widely read art historians of the 20th century, took his degree in Vienna during this period. The generation that followed, often called the Second Vienna School, included Hans Sedlmayr, Otto Pächt, and Guido Kaschnitz von Weinberg. Working in the 1930s, they returned to Riegl's concept of Kunstwollen and tried to build it into a complete methodology. Sedlmayr's version of this approach rejected iconography and historical context entirely, concentrating instead on pure aesthetic qualities, a stance that earned the school a reputation for what critics called irresponsible formalism. Otto Pächt, who was Jewish, was forced to leave Vienna in the 1930s.

• 7. Panofsky, Warburg, and Iconography

  ›

  In 1920, a group of scholars came together in Hamburg to work on iconography, the study of symbols in art. The core group included Erwin Panofsky, Aby Warburg, Fritz Saxl, and Gertrud Bing. Together they built much of the vocabulary that art historians still use today. "Iconography," rooted in the Greek for symbols from writing, referred specifically to subject matter drawn from written sources such as scripture and mythology. "Iconology" was their broader term for all symbolism, whether traceable to a text or not. Warburg, the son of a wealthy family, had assembled a private library in Hamburg devoted to the study of the classical tradition in later art and culture. Under Saxl's direction, this library grew into a research institute affiliated with the University of Hamburg, where Panofsky taught. Warburg died in 1929. Then, in the 1930s, Saxl and Panofsky were forced to leave Germany because both were Jewish. Saxl moved to London and brought Warburg's library with him, founding what became the Warburg Institute. Panofsky settled at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. They were part of a larger wave of German art historians who relocated to the English-speaking world in that decade. Panofsky's methods in particular shaped the direction of American art history for a generation.

• 8. Marxism and Feminist Art History

  ›

  Georgi Plekhanov's 1899 essay "Historical Materialism and the Arts" argued that materialism could cut through idealist interpretations of art and reveal its social determinants. Marxists following his lead held that artistic periods obey their own internal logic but ultimately remain bounded by the mode of production of the society that generates them. Art, in this view, expresses the competing classes of the society in which it is made. Walter Benjamin developed a related but distinct line of thinking within the Frankfurt School. His 1935 essay "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" introduced the concept of an artwork's "aura," which he defined as its original presence in time and space. Benjamin argued that this aura was in a state of decay as it became harder and harder to apprehend the specific time and place in which a work was created. The feminist strand of art history gained momentum through a single essay. Linda Nochlin's "Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?" remains one of the most widely read essays ever written about female artists. Nochlin argued that women were excluded from art training by cultural conditions, not by any lack of ability, and that the few who succeeded were treated as anomalies rather than as models for future artists. In 1972, the College Art Association hosted a panel chaired by Nochlin titled "Eroticism and the Image of Woman in Nineteenth-Century Art." The momentum sustained by papers, articles, and essays over the following decade was fueled by the Second-wave feminist movement. Griselda Pollock became another prominent figure in the field, bringing psychoanalytic theory to bear on the canon. Carol Duncan's re-reading of Les Demoiselles d'Avignon became an influential example of feminist critical practice. Mary Garrard and Norma Broude co-founded the Feminist Art History Conference and edited three anthologies, among them Feminism and Art History: Questioning the Litany and Reclaiming Feminist Agency: Feminist Art History After Postmodernism, that helped establish feminist perspectives as a permanent part of the field.