William Baumol

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  William Jack Baumol was born on the 26th of February 1922 in the South Bronx, to immigrant parents who had come from Eastern Europe. His father Solomon and mother Lillian could not have predicted that their son would one day become one of the most influential economists in the world, according to the IDEAS/RePEc rankings. He would outlive nearly every contemporary, dying on the 4th of May 2017 at the age of 95. Over those nine and a half decades he published more than eighty books and several hundred journal articles, a pace that left colleagues in awe.

  What drew Baumol to economics was not a neat set of answers but a persistent set of nagging problems. Why do health care and education keep getting more expensive even as technology makes other things cheaper? What role does the entrepreneur actually play in an economy if mainstream theory has no formal slot for them? How do performing arts organizations survive in a world where productivity gains bypass them entirely? These were not abstract puzzles to Baumol. They were structural features of real economic life, and he spent decades building the theoretical tools to address them. The questions he planted would take root in fields as different as finance, environmental policy, and innovation studies.

• 2. An Unlikely Path to Economics

  ›

  City College of New York awarded Baumol his bachelor's degree in 1942, and from there his path ran through the U.S. Army during World War II before landing him at the Department of Agriculture, where he worked as an economist. Those early postings gave him a practical grounding before he turned to graduate study.

  His first attempt to enter doctoral study at the London School of Economics was rejected. He was admitted only to the master's program. What changed his trajectory was a seminar run by Lionel Robbins, one of the most prominent economists of the era. Baumol's debating skills there were striking enough that within weeks he was switched into the doctoral program and given an appointment as an Assistant Lecturer on the faculty. That rapid reclassification tells something about the force of his intellectual presence even as a student. He went on to Princeton University, where he supervised graduate students who would themselves become leading figures in economics, among them Burton Malkiel, William G. Bowen, and Harold Tafler Shapiro.

• 3. Cost Disease and the Service Trap

  ›

  Baumol's cost disease is among his most widely cited ideas and one of the most counterintuitive observations in all of economics. The central claim is that service industries face a structural problem that manufacturing does not. A string quartet performing a Beethoven piece takes roughly the same number of player-hours in the twenty-first century as it did in the nineteenth. No productivity gain is available. Yet the musicians must be paid wages that keep pace with an economy where productivity gains elsewhere push compensation upward. Costs rise not because of waste or mismanagement but because of the fundamental nature of labor-intensive services.

  Baumol applied this logic well beyond the concert hall. His 2012 book, The Cost Disease: Why Computers Get Cheaper and Health Care Doesn't, brought the argument to a general audience. The title itself captures the paradox precisely. He had originally developed the framework in a 1967 paper titled "Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The anatomy of urban crisis," published in the American Economic Review. The urban crisis framing mattered because it connected rising municipal costs to the same underlying dynamic. Schools, hospitals, and government services share the same structural bind as orchestras. His earlier work with W.G. Bowen, including the 1966 book Performing Arts: the economic dilemma, had laid the empirical groundwork that the later theoretical architecture would explain.

• 4. Contestable Markets

  ›

  In 1982, Baumol published "Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure" in the American Economic Review, and co-authored Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure with J.C. Panzar and R.D. Wilig. The word "uprising" in the title was deliberate. The theory challenged assumptions that had organized industrial economics for decades.

  A contestable market, in Baumol's framework, is one where the threat of entry disciplines existing firms even when actual competition is absent. A monopolist in a truly contestable market cannot sustain monopoly pricing because a rival could enter, undercut, collect profits, and exit before the incumbent could respond with a price cut. The conditions required are demanding: free entry and costless exit, with no sunk costs to trap a new entrant. But the theoretical implication was striking. Market structure alone does not predict competitive behavior. The possibility of entry, not the number of existing firms, is what matters. This provided a new analytical lens for antitrust policy and regulatory economics.

• 5. The Entrepreneur's Missing Seat

  ›

  Baumol's 1990 paper in the Journal of Political Economy, "Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive and Destructive," framed a question that conventional microeconomics had quietly avoided. Standard theory described prices and firms but had no formal role for the entrepreneur, the person who actually introduces something new. Baumol argued that entrepreneurial talent is always present in an economy. What varies is where institutions direct it. When rules and incentives reward productive innovation, that is where entrepreneurial energy flows. When rent-seeking or politically connected extraction pays better, talent flows there instead.

  The 2006 Annual Meetings of the American Economic Association held a special session in his honor on this body of work, where twelve papers on entrepreneurship were presented. In 2003, he received the Global Award for Entrepreneurship Research, with the citation crediting him specifically for his persistent effort to give the entrepreneur a key role in mainstream economic theory, his theoretical and empirical studies of the nature of entrepreneurship, and his analysis of how institutions shape the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. The Economist, in a March 2006 article, credited Baumol directly: "Thanks to Mr. Baumol's own painstaking efforts, economists now have a bit more room for entrepreneurs in their theories." His book The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship was the first formal theoretical treatment of innovative entrepreneurs as a distinct object of study. The Baumol Research Centre for Entrepreneurship Studies at Zhejiang Gongshang University is named after him.

• 6. A Body of Work Without a Nobel

  ›

  By 1971, Baumol had been elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Fellowship of the American Philosophical Society followed in 1977, and in 1987 he was elected to the United States National Academy of Sciences. He served as President of the American Economic Association in 1981, and the Association named him a Distinguished Fellow in 1982. Honorary degrees arrived from institutions across multiple continents: the Stockholm School of Economics, the University of Basel, Knox College, Princeton University, and the University of Limburg in Maastricht, among others. The Guggenheim Foundation had recognized him as early as his 1957-58 fellowship year.

  Thomson Reuters cited him as a potential Nobel Prize recipient in 2014, and he had been considered a candidate for the prize in 2003. He died on the 4th of May 2017 without receiving it. The omission remained a subject of discussion among economists. His textbook Economic Theory and Operations Analysis, first published in 1961, was used by nearly every economics department that offered operations research methods in the 1960s and 1970s; an entire generation of students knew his work before they knew his name. His introductory macroeconomics textbook, co-authored with Alan Blinder under the title Macroeconomics: Principles and Policy, reached students who might never encounter the technical journals where his deeper contributions lived. That combination of theoretical depth and pedagogical reach across more than eighty books and several hundred articles is the monument he left behind.