We choose to go to the Moon

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  On the 12th of September 1962, John F. Kennedy stood before roughly 40,000 people at Rice University Stadium in Houston, Texas, on a warm and sunny afternoon, and made one of the most audacious public commitments any American president had ever uttered. He was there to sell a dream that many considered reckless, expensive, and possibly impossible. The Soviet Union had already beaten the United States into orbit. A Gallup Poll taken just the year before showed that 58 percent of Americans were opposed to the Moon-landing effort. And yet Kennedy chose this moment not to retreat, but to double down.

  The speech he delivered that day was largely written by presidential advisor and speechwriter Ted Sorensen, though Kennedy added at least one line himself by hand. Its central phrase, "We choose to go to the Moon," was repeated three consecutive times before Kennedy arrived at his famous climax: that the goal was chosen not because it was easy, but because it was hard. What made the speech remarkable was not just the rhetoric, but the political situation it was trying to overcome. The questions it raised have echoed for decades. Why did Kennedy pick the Moon? Who pushed him toward it? And did the speech actually change anything? The answers involve a cosmonaut, a vice president, a football joke, and a deadline that outlasted Kennedy himself.

• 2. A Race Already Lost

  ›

  Yuri Gagarin became the first human in space on the 12th of April 1961, beating the United States before it could launch its first Project Mercury astronaut. The blow to American prestige was sharpened five days later by the failed Bay of Pigs invasion. Two setbacks within a single week left the new Kennedy administration searching urgently for a way to demonstrate that the United States could lead.

  Kennedy turned to Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, who was serving as chairman of the National Aeronautics and Space Council. The president wanted to know specifically whether the United States could beat the Soviet Union in three areas: putting a laboratory in space, orbiting a man around the Moon, or landing a man on the Moon. He also asked Johnson to find out what any of those efforts would cost.

  Johnson consulted with NASA's new administrator, James E. Webb. Webb told him plainly that there was no chance of beating the Soviets to a space station, and he was uncertain about orbiting a man around the Moon first. The remaining option was also the most costly: a lunar landing. Webb estimated it would require $22 billion to achieve before 1970. Johnson also sought advice from Wernher von Braun, military leaders including Lieutenant General Bernard Schriever, and business executives Frank Stanton of CBS, Donald C. Cook of American Electric Power, and George R. Brown of Brown and Root.

  Kennedy brought this conclusion before Congress on the 25th of May 1961, proposing that the United States commit to landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to Earth before the decade was out. That goal gave NASA's Apollo program a specific direction and forced the expansion of NASA's Space Task Group into a new facility that would become the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston.

• 3. The Stadium, the Crowd, the Joke

  ›

  Rice University was not a random venue. Houston had been selected as the site for the new Manned Spacecraft Center, and the Humble Oil and Refining Company had donated the land through Rice University as an intermediary in 1961. Kennedy visited the facility over two days in September 1962. Scott Carpenter and John Glenn, both Mercury Seven astronauts, escorted him through the complex. He viewed models of the Gemini and Apollo spacecraft, and also saw Friendship 7, the capsule in which Glenn had completed America's first orbital flight.

  The speech that followed drew about 40,000 people to Rice Stadium. Many were Rice students. Initial drafts had come from Ted Sorensen, but Kennedy himself made revisions, including one that became unexpectedly memorable. In the middle of the speech, as Kennedy listed the great challenges humans had chosen to pursue, he asked: "Why does Rice play Texas?" It was a reference to the fierce football rivalry between Rice and the University of Texas, and Kennedy wrote the line in by hand.

  At the time of the speech, the rivalry was genuinely competitive, with Rice holding an 18-17-1 edge over Texas between 1930 and 1966. The crowd laughed and cheered. Since then, Rice has defeated Texas only twice: in 1965 and in 1994. The joke still draws attention in accounts of the speech, partly because it shows Kennedy reading his audience with precision, and partly because it stands in such contrast to the sweeping historical claims on either side of it.

• 4. Rhetoric as Architecture

  ›

  Scholars have identified three interlocking strategies in Kennedy's speech: characterizing space as a beckoning frontier, locating the moment within a sense of historical urgency, and inviting the audience to live up to their pioneering heritage. Each strategy reinforced the others.

  The frontier framing allowed Kennedy to echo his own inaugural address, which had declared "Together let us explore the stars," and to tap into what he called the pioneer spirit that had dominated American folklore since the nation's founding. Space became the next chapter in a story Americans already believed about themselves.

  The urgency was manufactured through a striking rhetorical compression of time. Kennedy condensed all of human history to fifty years, in which, he said, "only last week did we develop penicillin and television and nuclear power." Then he turned that momentum forward: if America's new spacecraft succeeded in reaching Venus, "we will have literally reached the stars before midnight tonight." The spacecraft he was referring to was Mariner 2.

  The phrase "We choose to go to the Moon" was repeated three consecutive times and followed by a rising declaration: the challenge was "one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win." Kennedy also used the first-person plural "we" throughout, making the goal collective rather than governmental. He had told Congress, "whatever mankind must undertake, free men must fully share." That framing emphasized choice and freedom, positioning the Moon program not as a government directive but as the expressed will of a free people. Paul Burka, the executive editor of Texas Monthly magazine and a Rice alumnus who was in the crowd that day, recalled fifty years later that the speech "speaks to the way Americans viewed the future in those days." He described it as one that "encapsulates all of recorded history and seeks to set it in the history of our own time."

• 5. Disquiet and Opposition

  ›

  The speech did not silence the critics. Former President Dwight D. Eisenhower stated bluntly that spending $40 billion to reach the Moon was "just nuts." Senator Barry Goldwater argued that the civilian space program was crowding out the more important military one. Senator William Proxmire worried that scientists would be pulled away from military research into space exploration. A budget cut was only narrowly avoided.

  The political situation was complicated further by Kennedy's parallel attempt at cooperation. When he met Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev in June 1961, Kennedy had proposed making the Moon landing a joint project. Khrushchev did not take up the offer. Kennedy tried again in a speech before the United Nations General Assembly on the 20th of September 1963. Khrushchev remained cautious, and in October 1963 declared that the Soviet Union had no plans to send cosmonauts to the Moon. His military advisors, however, were quietly persuading him that the offer was worth accepting, since it would give the Soviet Union access to American technology.

  Kennedy ordered reviews of the Apollo project in April, August, and October 1963. The final report reached his desk on the 29th of November 1963, a week after his assassination. The question of a joint mission died with him. Rice faculty members Ron Sass and Robert Curl, both present at the 1962 speech, later recalled that Kennedy's address had not seemed so different at the time from a speech President Eisenhower had delivered at Rice's Autry Court in 1960. Eisenhower's speech has been forgotten. Kennedy's, Curl noted, was set apart most sharply by the sheer cost of the ambition it announced.

• 6. The Goal Outlives Its Author

  ›

  Kennedy's deadline survived him. On the 20th of July 1969, the Apollo 11 mission landed on the Moon, fulfilling the commitment Kennedy had made before the decade was out. The Apollo Project became, in effect, a memorial to him. Yet his narrow deadline had a narrowing consequence: it provided little direction for what should come after.

  Apollo did not open an era of sustained lunar exploration. Six additional crewed missions followed Apollo 11, ending with Apollo 17 in 1972. Planned subsequent missions were canceled. Neither the Space Shuttle nor the International Space Station generated the same hold on public imagination that the Apollo program had. NASA found itself trying to advance ambitious visions with what those working within it described as inadequate resources.

  Later presidents proposed successors to Apollo's ambition. George H. W. Bush put forward the Space Exploration Initiative in 1989. George W. Bush proposed the Constellation program in 2004. Constellation was canceled, and the future direction of American human spaceflight remained unsettled. The lectern Kennedy spoke from at Rice University Stadium is preserved at Space Center Houston, a permanent marker at the site where one specific sentence, written by Sorensen and sharpened by Kennedy, became the stated purpose of a decade of national effort.