Vissarion Belinsky

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Vissarion Belinsky died on the eve of his arrest. The Tsar's police were coming for him on account of his political views, but consumption took him first in 1848. He was one of the most influential literary critics Russia had ever produced, and the authorities considered him dangerous enough to detain. What made a literary critic so threatening? And how did a man born without wealth or aristocratic connections come to reshape the moral and social outlook of an entire generation of Russian writers?

  Belinsky worked most of his short life not as a politician, not as a revolutionary, but as a reviewer of books. He believed that literature was the one domain that the repressive reign of Nicholas I could not fully silence. He chose his battlefield carefully, and the battles he fought there reverberated far beyond the pages of any magazine. The story of how he got there begins in a small town in what is now Penza Oblast.

• 2. An Unlikely Critic

  ›

  Belinsky was born in Sveaborg, a part of Helsinki, and grew up in the town of Chembar, now renamed Belinsky in his honor. His father was a rural medical doctor, not a nobleman. That distinction mattered enormously in the Russia of the 1830s and 1840s, where most intellectuals came from wealthy aristocratic families.

  He studied at gymnasia in Penza from 1825 to 1829, then enrolled at Moscow University in 1829. He did not finish his degree there. He was expelled for political activity, and the gap left by a formal education he never completed pushed him toward self-teaching. That self-education shaped his voice more than any university curriculum might have.

  What his peers admired in him was not philosophical precision. Isaiah Berlin, writing about Belinsky in his 1978 book Russian Thinkers, noted that Belinsky was "wildly erratic" and that his enthusiasms did not always make up for lapses in critical insight. Berlin pointed out that Belinsky declared Dante was not a poet, that Fenimore Cooper was the equal of Shakespeare, and that Othello was the product of a barbarous age. Yet Berlin also acknowledged that Belinsky was "naturally responsive to everything that was living and genuine," and that this quality ultimately mattered more than any individual misjudgment.

  Belinsky himself explained his method in a phrase he liked to repeat: "For me, to think, to feel, to understand and to suffer are one and the same thing." That fusion of reason and emotion was not a flaw in his character but a deliberate position, rooted in the Romantic belief that genuine understanding requires intuitive insight alongside rational thought.

• 3. The Idea of the Individual

  ›

  At the center of Belinsky's thinking was a single concept: lichnost, the individual self. He shared this value with most of the Westernizer intelligentsia, but he held it with what observers described as exceptional intellectual and moral passion.

  He put the stakes plainly in his own words: "What is it to me that the Universal exists when the individual personality is suffering." And more sharply still: "The fate of the individual, of the person, is more important than the fate of the whole world."

  From this position he launched a wide-ranging critique of Russian society. He attacked autocracy and serfdom, which he described as "trampling upon everything that is even remotely human and noble." He did not stop there. Poverty, prostitution, drunkenness, bureaucratic coldness, and cruelty toward the less powerful, including women, all fell under his criticism.

  He agreed with his Slavophile opponents on one point: that society had precedence over individualism. But he parted company with them sharply on the role of the Orthodox Church, which he considered a retrograde force. Where the Slavophiles saw Orthodoxy as a foundation for Russian life, Belinsky saw it as an obstacle to the expression of individual ideas and rights. By 1841, these convictions had led him to call himself a socialist.

• 4. Literature as the Battlefield

  ›

  Belinsky worked primarily as a literary critic because that arena was less heavily censored than political pamphlets. This was a strategic choice as much as a professional one.

  What he demanded from literature above all was "truth." He was not interested in fantasy, escapism, or pure aestheticism. He wanted writing that probed real life and committed itself to correct moral ideas, which for him meant a genuine concern for the dignity of individual people. He told Nikolai Gogol directly, in a letter that became famous across Russia, that the reading public "is always ready to forgive a writer for a bad book, but never for a pernicious one."

  The letter to Gogol was a direct attack on Gogol's book Correspondence with Friends, which Belinsky found pernicious because it renounced the need to awaken in people a sense of their human dignity, "trampled down in the mud and the filth for so many centuries." Belinsky's letter called for the end of serfdom.

  Fyodor Dostoevsky read that letter aloud at several public events. A secret press was assembled to print and distribute it. For these acts Dostoevsky was arrested, convicted, and condemned to death in 1849. That sentence was later commuted to four years in the prison camps of Siberia. The letter Belinsky wrote circulated with enough force to nearly cost another man his life.

  Belinsky had hailed Dostoevsky's first novel, Poor Folk, published in 1845. Dostoevsky broke with Belinsky shortly afterward.

• 5. The Magazine World

  ›

  In 1839, Belinsky left Moscow for St. Petersburg, where he became an editor and critic at two of the major literary magazines of the era: Otechestvennye Zapiski, known in English as Notes of the Fatherland, and Sovremennik, meaning The Contemporary.

  At both publications he worked alongside the younger Nikolay Nekrasov, the poet and publisher. That collaboration proved lasting and significant. Belinsky played a key role in Nekrasov's career and in building the reputation of Sovremennik as a leading literary magazine.

  Toward the end of his life, Belinsky devoted particular energy to The Contemporary. He published his Literary Review for the Year 1847 there, and together with Nekrasov he helped establish it as the new literary center of St. Petersburg and, by extension, of Russia. In 1848, shortly before his death, he granted Nekrasov and The Contemporary full rights to publish articles and other material he had originally planned for an almanac he had named the Leviathan.

  Belinsky also supported Ivan Turgenev early in his career. The two became close friends. Turgenev later recalled Belinsky warmly in his book Literary Reminiscences and Autobiographical Fragments, a tribute that suggests how much the critic's attention meant to younger writers trying to find their footing.

• 6. Afterlife and Legacy

  ›

  Russia celebrated the centenary of Belinsky's birth in 1910 with what observers described as enthusiasm and appreciation. His works, collected in twelve volumes, had first appeared between 1859 and 1862. When the copyright expired in 1898, several new editions followed. The most valued of those editions was the one prepared by S. Vengerov, which came supplied with extensive notes.

  Belinsky Street and Belinsky Lane, located close to Red Square in Moscow, bore his name from 1920 to 1994.

  Isaiah Berlin's 1978 essay on Belinsky offered perhaps the clearest summary of why the man's influence outlasted his critical missteps. Berlin wrote that Belinsky "transformed the concept of the critic's calling in his native country" and that his lasting effect was in "altering and altering crucially and irretrievably, the moral and social outlook of the leading younger writers and thinkers of his time."

  That essay introduced Belinsky to a new audience. The British playwright Tom Stoppard read Berlin's Russian Thinkers and made Belinsky one of the principal characters in his trilogy about Russian writers and activists, The Coast of Utopia, which premiered in 2002. A man who died before his arrest, whose books came out more than a decade after his death, found himself on stage in London more than a century and a half later.