Viking art

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Viking art greets most museum visitors today as dull, gray metal - rings, brooches, axe heads stripped of color by a thousand years in the ground. That gray is a lie. Pigment traces found on Viking wood and ships reveal that the carved designs, shields, and longship timbers were painted with mixtures of natural pigments and oils or fats, and were likely far more vibrant than anything surviving today. The Norsemen who raided the monastery at Lindisfarne in 793 did not come from a drab world. They came from one drenched in color, pattern, and animal imagery so intricate it still takes trained eyes to untangle.

  What we call Viking art covers the 8th through 11th centuries, stretching across Scandinavia and the settlements Norse people established in the British Isles, Iceland, and beyond. It shares design DNA with Celtic, Germanic, Romanesque, and Eastern European traditions. Yet most of what survives the centuries is metal and stone - a fragment of a far richer whole. Wood, bone, ivory, and textiles rarely endure. The artistic record is, by the scholars' own admission, significantly incomplete.

  The questions this documentary pursues are the ones the gaps raise. How do art historians reconstruct a tradition when so much of it has dissolved into the soil? What drove the remarkable sequence of changing styles across three hundred years? And what happens to a visual language built from pagan animal imagery when Christianity begins its slow conquest of the north?

• 2. What Survives and What Does Not

  ›

  Wood was undoubtedly the primary material of choice for Viking artists. It was abundant across northern Europe, relatively easy to carve, and inexpensive. Woodworking appeared on ships, furniture, and ceremonial objects. The tragedy, from a historian's perspective, is that wood rarely lasts.

  The Oseberg ship-burial carvings of the early 9th century and the carved decoration of the Urnes Stave Church from the 12th century stand as the great bookends of Viking woodcraft. They are accidental survivors. As the scholar James Graham-Campbell observed, these remarkable survivals allow us to form at least an impression of what is missing from the original corpus, even as wooden fragments and small-scale carvings in antler, amber, and walrus ivory provide further hints.

  The textile arts present a similar problem. Weaving and embroidery were clearly well-developed crafts, yet textiles survive only under exceptional conditions. Painted interiors, embroidered hangings, and decorated household items would have been common in Norse halls. Most are gone.

  Metalwork fills the gap because metal endures. Decorated ornaments and weapons emerge from Viking graves regularly, since the widespread practice of burying the dead with grave goods dressed in their best clothing and jewelry has preserved what might otherwise have been lost entirely. Less commonly, treasure hoards surface - precious objects apparently hidden by owners who never returned to reclaim them, though some may have been deposited as offerings to the gods.

  More recently, the growing popularity and legality of metal-detecting has created a fast-expanding body of new material. Single chance finds of metal objects and ornaments, most probably representing accidental losses rather than deliberate deposits, are steadily enlarging what scholars have to work with. Stone carvings - runestones, picture stones, monumental grave markers - add another layer. Together, metal and stone give the field its backbone, while scholars keep watching for the next excavation to restore a little more of what the earth consumed.

• 3. Ornament, Jewelry, and Daily Life

  ›

  Jewelry was worn by both men and women in Viking society, though of different types. Married women fastened their overdresses near the shoulder with large matching brooches. Scholars call them tortoise brooches on account of their domed shape. Regional variation in these brooches was common, with many using openwork designs, and women often suspended metal chains or strings of beads between them, or hung ornaments from the bottoms.

  Men wore rings on fingers, arms, and necks, and kept their cloaks closed with penannular brooches that sometimes had extravagantly long pins. Their weapons were often richly decorated - sword hilts in particular received careful ornamentation. A small number of large pieces in solid gold have been found, almost certainly belonging to royalty or major figures.

  Beads occupied their own distinct place in Viking material culture. They were made primarily from glass, but also from metals and, more rarely, from amber, carnelian, and rock crystal. Most beads were globular and monochrome; the rarer and more prized ones were kaleidoscopic with unique patterns. Finds from the burial site at Birka and from the trading town of Hedeby confirm how widely beads circulated. As costly items, they signaled wealth and high social status. They also served as portable wealth in trade - the Norse used them across their expanding network of routes, and over time Eastern beads began to circulate more widely through those same networks, though beads retained their value as both currency and symbol throughout the Viking Age.

  Beyond formal jewelry, everyday decorated metalwork is frequently recovered from graves. Items were produced by casting, inlay, and engraving. The ridges of metalwork designs were often nicked to imitate the filigree wire used in the finest pieces - a subtle illusion that expensive technique was at work even on more modest objects.

• 4. The Animal Ornament Tradition

  ›

  The roots of Viking visual art reach back to the 4th century CE, well before the Viking Age itself. A broad artistic tradition common to most of north-western Europe was already producing convoluted animal ornamentation - bodies of beasts twisted, interlaced, and made to grip one another across the surfaces of objects. Scandinavian artists worked within this tradition for centuries before the raids on Lindisfarne.

  The art historian Bernhard Salin was the first to bring systematic order to this earlier Germanic animal ornament, dividing it into three styles. His colleague Arwidsson later subdivided the latter two into further phases. Style C flourished during the 7th century and into the 8th, before being largely replaced in southern Scandinavia by Style D. These two styles provided the direct inspiration for Style E - the initial Viking Age expression of animal ornament, commonly called the Oseberg or Broa Style.

  A figure that recurs across multiple Viking styles is the gripping beast: a creature whose ribbon-shaped body twists so that its limbs grab at the borders of the composition, at other animals, or at itself. The Carolingian animal-head post recovered from the Oseberg ship burial depicts a snarling beast, possibly a wolf, with surface ornamentation consisting of interwoven animals that twist and turn as they grip and snap. This figure carries forward into the Borre Style and beyond, mutating in subtle ways as styles evolve but never fully disappearing.

  Skaldic verse adds an unexpected dimension to what we know about Viking visual art. This complex form of oral poetry was composed during the Viking Age and passed down until written centuries later. The 9th-century skald poet Bragi Boddason cited four apparently unrelated scenes painted on a shield, one of which depicted the god Thor's fishing expedition. That same motif reappears in a 10th-century poem by Ulfr Uggason, who described paintings in a newly constructed hall in Iceland. The verses confirm that painted decoration existed in forms that wood and stone rarely preserved.

• 5. Six Styles, Three Centuries

  ›

  Viking art is organized into six overlapping stylistic phases. Their names mostly come from the locations where key objects were found, and scholars continue to debate the boundaries between them. Outside Scandinavia itself, local influences often blur the distinctions further.

  The Borre Style prevailed in Scandinavia from the late 9th through to the late 10th century - a timeframe confirmed by dendrochronological data from sites with characteristic Borre artefacts, notably brooches. Named after gilt-bronze harness mounts from a ship grave in Borre, Vestfold, Norway, it combined geometric interlace with zoomorphic motifs. Its most diagnostic feature is a symmetrical double-contoured ring-chain: interlaced circles separated by transverse bars and a lozenge overlay, sometimes terminating in an animal head in high relief. Animal bodies are arranged into tight, closed compositions with almost no background visible.

  The Jellinge Style emerged in the late 10th century as a bridge between Borre and the later Mammen phase. It takes its name from objects made in Jelling, Denmark - among them a cup attributed to King Gorm and the great runestone of Harald Bluetooth. Ribbon-like, band-shaped animal bodies are its signature.

  The Mammen Style is named after an iron axe recovered from the burial mound at Mammen in Jutland, Denmark. Dendrochronology dates the wood of that grave chamber to winter 970-971. The axe was probably a ceremonial parade weapon belonging to a man of princely status - his burial clothes bore elaborate embroidery and were trimmed with silk and fur. On one face, a large bird with a pelleted body, crest, and upright beak occupies the design field; on the other, a spreading foliate pattern of thin pelleted tendrils emanates from spirals at the base.

  The Ringerike Style takes its name from a district north of Oslo, where the local reddish sandstone was used for carved stones. Its type object is a 2.15-meter-high carved stone from Vang in Oppland. A striding animal in double-contoured rendering surmounts a balanced tendril ornament springing from two shell spirals. Lions, birds, band-shaped animals, and spirals are the most common motifs, alongside elements appearing for the first time in Scandinavian art: crosses, palmettes, and pretzel-shaped nooses tying motifs together. Most of these novelties have counterparts in Anglo-Saxon, Insular, and Ottonian art.

  The Urnes Style, the last phase, covers the second half of the 11th century and the early 12th. It takes its name from the northern gate of the Urnes stave church in Norway, though most objects in the style are runestones in Uppland, Sweden - which is why some scholars prefer to call it the Runestone style. Slim, stylised animals interwoven into tight patterns, heads seen in profile with slender almond-shaped eyes and upwardly curled appendages on noses and necks, define the phase. The runemaster Opir became famous for a late variant in which animals grow extremely thin and make circular patterns in open compositions. His approach also appears on a plank from Bolstad and a chair from Trondheim, Norway.

• 6. Scholarship and the Field

  ›

  The systematic study of Viking art took shape slowly. Preliminary formulations appeared in the late 19th century, but the field first achieved maturity in the early 20th century with the detailed publication of the wood carvings discovered in 1904 as part of the Oseberg ship-burial. The Norwegian archaeologist Haakon Shetelig led that work.

  The foundations that scholars rely on today were laid in 1966, when the English archaeologist David M. Wilson and his Danish colleague Ole Klindt-Jensen published their survey work Viking Art. That volume created the chronological framework and systematic characterization of styles still in use. Wilson continued producing English-language studies in the decades that followed, joined over time by the Norwegian art historian Signe Horn Fuglesang, whose own series of publications added important depth. Together, their work combined authority with accessibility in ways that expanded the field's reach.

  One persistent challenge the field faces is what happens to Viking art outside Scandinavia. In the British Isles, art historians identify distinct Insular versions of Scandinavian motifs, often placed directly alongside purely Norse decoration. The Urnes-Romanesque Style offers a striking example: it does not appear on runestones, which suggests the runestone tradition had already died out by the time this mixed style emerged. It can be dated independently through examples from Oslo in the period 1100-1175, through dendrochronological dating of the Lisbjerg frontal in Denmark to 1135, and through Irish reliquaries from the second half of the 12th century. The Fot-Balli type of mid-Urnes Style, named for two identifiable runemasters, was the strain that ultimately mixed with Romanesque art as the Viking Age closed.

• 7. Art and the Coming of Christianity

  ›

  On late Viking Age runestones, crosses appear alongside the usual animal designs. The old patterns did not vanish when Christianity spread through Scandinavia - they persisted, and artists mixed them with the new symbolic vocabulary rather than replacing one with the other. The transition was gradual and uneven.

  The royal monuments at Jelling in Denmark, created at the mid-10th century, mark one of the clearest intersections of the two worlds. Harald Bluetooth's great runestone bears Jellinge Style animal ornament alongside its Christian imagery. Stone crosses and church decorations became new forms that Viking craftsmen adapted to their existing visual habits.

  With regard to stone carving, the practice apparently did not take hold outside Sweden's Gotlandic picture stone tradition until the mid-10th century - the Jelling monuments in Denmark represent the moment when carved stone for permanent memorials began to spread. That spread was itself likely driven by Christianity's arrival, since Christian funerary practice placed new emphasis on marked, permanent graves.

  The Urnes stave church in Norway, which gives the final Viking style its name, stands as a physical monument to this blending. Its carved gate carries the sinuous animal interlace of the Urnes tradition into a fully Christian building. The Jarlabanke Runestones in Sweden show traits from both the late Urnes style of Opir and the mid-Urnes style of Fot and Balli, suggesting that individual runemasters drew from multiple phases simultaneously as the tradition wound down. When the Fot-Balli type finally merged with Romanesque forms in the 12th century, three hundred years of Norse animal ornament quietly dissolved into the broader current of European medieval art.