Skip to content
— CH. 1 · CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE AND EXCLUSIONS —

Treaty of San Francisco

~5 min read · Ch. 1 of 5
5 sections
  • Forty-nine nations gathered inside the War Memorial Opera House in San Francisco on the 8th of September 1951. The room held delegates from Argentina to Venezuela, yet two major powers sat empty chairs. China remained absent because the United States and the United Kingdom could not agree on which government represented the Chinese people. Washington supported the Republic of China on Formosa while London recognized the People's Republic of China on mainland China. This diplomatic stalemate left Beijing without a voice at the table despite its status as one of the primary victims of Japanese aggression.

    Korea also received no invitation due to similar disagreements over representation between North and South Korean factions. Afghanistan, Burma, India, Nepal, Yemen, and Yugoslavia accepted invitations but chose not to participate in the proceedings. India later signed a separate peace treaty with Japan on the 9th of June 1952, arguing that certain provisions limited national sovereignty. Italy failed to attend even though it had declared war on Germany just weeks before the conflict ended. Portugal stayed away despite Japanese occupation of its colony East Timor during the war years.

  • Andrei Gromyko led the Soviet delegation through the conference halls with visible determination. From the opening day, the Soviet Union voiced vigorous opposition to every draft clause prepared by American and British officials. Gromyko made several procedural attempts to stall the voting process before finally delivering an eight-page statement on the 8th of September 1951. The document listed numerous objections including claims that the treaty created no safeguards against future Japanese militarism. It argued that China deserved participation as a main victim of Japanese aggression yet remained excluded from negotiations.

    The Soviet bloc lost all parliamentary votes during the dramatic session described by New York Times reporters. Gromyko asserted that the agreement effectively established Japan as an American military base while drawing Tokyo into a coalition directed against Moscow. He claimed the draft violated rights previously granted under the Yalta Agreement regarding South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands. Diplomatic relations between Japan and the Soviet Union would not resume until the 10th of October 1956 when both nations signed a Joint Declaration ending their state of war. This early Cold War friction set patterns for decades of regional tension in Asia.

  • Article Two of the treaty officially renounced Japan's treaty rights derived from the Boxer Protocol of 1901 and its claims over Korea, Formosa, and the Pescadores. The document also stripped Japan of sovereignty over the Kuril Islands, Spratly Islands, Antarctica, and South Sakhalin. Article Three left the Bonin Islands, Volcano Islands including Iwo Jima, and Ryukyu Islands under potential United Nations trusteeship status. That option never materialized as the Amami Islands returned to Japan on the 25th of December 1953.

    The Bonin and Volcano Islands were restored on the 5th of April 1968 following negotiations between Washington and Tokyo. In 1972, the United States transferred authority over the Ryukyu Islands to Japan along with control of nearby Senkaku Islands. Both the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China argue that this agreement did not determine ultimate sovereignty over the disputed islands. U.S. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles affirmed in 1955 that the treaty ceded Taiwan to no one since Japan merely renounced sovereignty over the territory.

  • Article Fourteen recognized that Japan should pay reparations for damage caused during the war but noted resources were insufficient for complete compensation. The treaty allowed Japan to enter negotiations with Allied Powers whose territories had been occupied by Japanese forces. These talks aimed to assist countries through services like production work or salvaging operations rather than direct cash payments. The Philippines received compensation in May 1956 while South Vietnam obtained funds in 1959 after signing bilateral agreements.

    Burma and Indonesia were not original signatories yet later signed treaties according to Article Fourteen provisions. A table from 1945 showed Japanese overseas assets valued at approximately twenty-five billion US dollars across various regions including Korea, North East China, and Central South China. The last payment to the Philippines concluded on the 22nd of July 1976. In 1998 a Tokyo court ruled against lawsuits filed by former Allied prisoners of war citing the San Francisco Treaty as legal bar. The government of the People's Republic of China declared in September 1972 that it renounced demands for war reparations from Japan in the interest of friendship between the two peoples.

  • Forty-eight nations signed the treaty while Czechoslovakia, Poland, and the Soviet Union refused to participate. The document came into force on the 28th of April 1952 ending the Allied post-war occupation of Japan and returning full sovereignty to Tokyo. This agreement along with the Security Treaty signed that same day marked the beginning of what historian John W. Dower called the San Francisco System. That system defines Japan's relationship with the United States and characterizes its role in the international arena throughout modern history.

    Article Eleven required Japan to accept judgments from the International Military Tribunal for the Far East and other Allied War Crimes Courts. The document nullified prior treaties and laid down frameworks for retaining purely defensive military capabilities. Historian Rana Mitter noted that the absence of contact between the United States and China made establishing shared norms impossible. The lack of Chinese participation later played significant roles in South China Sea disputes regarding diplomatic relationships between Washington and Beijing. The treaty established long-term security structures still visible in contemporary East Asian geopolitics today.

Continue Browsing

Cold War treatiesJapan–Soviet Union relationsPeace treaties of Japan1950s in San Francisco1951 in California1951 in Japan1951 in Japanese politicsAftermath of World War II in JapanApril 1952 in the United StatesCold War history of JapanForeign relations of postwar JapanHistory of San FranciscoJapan–United States relationsPeace treaties of NorwayPeace treaties of PakistanPeace treaties of the NetherlandsPeace treaties of the United KingdomPeace treaties of the United StatesPolitics of San FranciscoSeptember 1951 in the United StatesTreaties concluded in 1951Treaties entered into force in 1952Treaties of ArgentinaTreaties of AustraliaTreaties of BelgiumTreaties of BoliviaTreaties of CanadaTreaties of ChileTreaties of ColombiaTreaties of Costa RicaTreaties of CubaTreaties of EcuadorTreaties of El SalvadorTreaties of GuatemalaTreaties of HaitiTreaties of HondurasTreaties of IndonesiaTreaties of LebanonTreaties of LiberiaTreaties of LuxembourgTreaties of MexicoTreaties of New ZealandTreaties of NicaraguaTreaties of Pahlavi IranTreaties of PanamaTreaties of ParaguayTreaties of PeruTreaties of Saudi ArabiaTreaties of the Dominican RepublicTreaties of the Dominion of CeylonTreaties of the Ethiopian EmpireTreaties of the French Fourth RepublicTreaties of the French protectorate of CambodiaTreaties of the Kingdom of EgyptTreaties of the Kingdom of GreeceTreaties of the Kingdom of IraqTreaties of the Kingdom of LaosTreaties of the PhilippinesTreaties of the Second Brazilian RepublicTreaties of the State of VietnamTreaties of the Syrian Republic (1930–1963)Treaties of the Union of South AfricaTreaties of TurkeyTreaties of UruguayTreaties of VenezuelaWorld War II treaties

Common questions

When did the Treaty of San Francisco come into force?

The document came into force on the 28th of April 1952 ending the Allied post-war occupation of Japan and returning full sovereignty to Tokyo.

Which nations refused to sign the Treaty of San Francisco in 1951?

Forty-eight nations signed the treaty while Czechoslovakia, Poland, and the Soviet Union refused to participate. China remained absent because the United States and the United Kingdom could not agree on which government represented the Chinese people.

What happened to Japanese claims over Korea and Formosa under Article Two of the Treaty of San Francisco?

Article Two of the treaty officially renounced Japan's treaty rights derived from the Boxer Protocol of 1901 and its claims over Korea, Formosa, and the Pescadores. The document also stripped Japan of sovereignty over the Kuril Islands, Spratly Islands, Antarctica, and South Sakhalin.

Why did India choose not to participate in the Treaty of San Francisco proceedings?

Afghanistan, Burma, India, Nepal, Yemen, and Yugoslavia accepted invitations but chose not to participate in the proceedings. India later signed a separate peace treaty with Japan on the 9th of June 1952 arguing that certain provisions limited national sovereignty.

When did diplomatic relations between Japan and the Soviet Union resume after the Treaty of San Francisco?

Diplomatic relations between Japan and the Soviet Union would not resume until the 10th of October 1956 when both nations signed a Joint Declaration ending their state of war.