The Evolution of Physics

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Evolution of Physics appeared in 1938, a book by Albert Einstein and Leopold Infeld that set out to explain the entire sweep of physical thought to readers with no mathematics beyond multiplication tables. It was published by Cambridge University Press and then by Simon and Schuster in the United States. The book earned a cover story in Time and drew reviews from publications on both sides of the Atlantic. What makes it unusual is not just its famous authorship. It is a book with a hidden argument, one that Einstein used to defend a view of reality that most of his contemporaries in quantum mechanics had already abandoned. How did a collaboration born from financial necessity become a statement of scientific philosophy? And what exactly is Einstein defending, and why does it matter?

• 2. An Unlikely Partnership

  ›

  Leopold Infeld had worked briefly at Cambridge with Max Born before moving to Princeton, where he joined Einstein at the Institute for Advanced Study. Einstein tried and failed to secure Infeld a permanent post there. Facing an uncertain future, Infeld devised a plan: co-author a history of physics with Einstein, split the royalties, and rely on Einstein's name to guarantee commercial success. When Infeld went to pitch the idea, he became so flustered he could barely speak. He stammered out his proposal. Einstein's response was immediate: "This is not at all a stupid idea. Not stupid at all. We shall do it." The financial motive was real and frankly stated, and it shaped everything about the book's conception. Infeld needed income; Einstein needed a vehicle for ideas he wanted to put before a broad public.

• 3. Physics as Detective Work

  ›

  Chapter one opens with a striking analogy. Einstein and Infeld compare science to detective fiction, invoking Conan Doyle by name. The scientist, they write, cannot flip to the back of the book for the answer. The detective must collect disordered facts and make them coherent through creative thought. From that frame, the authors pick up their first clue: Galileo's law of inertia, later codified by Isaac Newton as the principle that every body perseveres in uniform motion unless a force acts on it. They trace the kinetic theory of matter next, showing how it resolves the puzzle of Brownian motion. The chapter establishes a rhythm the book will follow throughout: observe a mystery, collect the clues, and follow the logic wherever it leads, even if it means discarding a framework that had served for generations.

• 4. The Collapse of the Mechanical View

  ›

  Charles Augustin de Coulomb, Luigi Galvani, Alessandro Volta, and Hans Christian Orsted each appear in chapter two as investigators of electricity. Newton's corpuscular theory of light faces off against Christiaan Huygens's wave theory in a Socratic dialogue Einstein and Infeld stage between imaginary advocates of each camp. The dialogue crystallizes the problem: if light is a wave, it needs a medium to travel through. That medium was called the luminiferous aether. Experiments to detect the aether returned null results every time. The chapter closes with an admission of defeat for the mechanical worldview: the aether cannot be found, the mechanical view cannot explain light, and so it must be abandoned. That conclusion sets up everything that follows.

• 5. Fields, Maxwell, and Relativity

  ›

  Oersted's experiment and Michael Faraday's experiment each receive explicit treatment in chapter three, demonstrating how changing electric and magnetic fields coil around each other in a reciprocal relationship. James Clerk Maxwell's field theory supplied the mathematical framework that explained both results. Maxwell's equations predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves, and Heinrich Hertz confirmed that prediction experimentally. Maxwell further predicted these waves travel at the speed of light, identifying light itself as an electromagnetic wave. The Michelson-Morley experiment then established the speed of light as a universal constant, independent of the motion of any observer. From that result, Einstein and Infeld derive the two postulates of special relativity. The precession of Mercury's perihelion and the gravitational lensing of light by massive bodies emerge as consequences of the general theory, closing the field-theory chapter on phenomena that Newtonian mechanics could not explain.

• 6. Einstein's Quarrel With Quantum Mechanics

  ›

  Einstein accepted the experimental successes of quantum theory. J. J. Thomson's discovery of the electron, Max Planck's energy quanta, the photoelectric effect explained by photons, Niels Bohr's atomic model, Erwin Schrodinger's matter waves, and Louis de Broglie's contributions all receive coverage in the book's final chapter. But Einstein resisted the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics that most physicists had embraced. The book's philosophical core is his insistence on what he calls objective reality: the belief that a real world exists independent of the observer, and that science can grasp it with theoretical constructions. The authors write that without this belief, and without belief in the inner harmony of the world, there could be no science at all. That conviction, Einstein maintained, had driven every great advance in physics throughout history, and the success of quantum theory as a predictive tool did not, in his view, prove that objective reality was an unnecessary concept.

• 7. Reception and Legacy

  ›

  The New York Times reviewed the book favorably in 1938, observing that Einstein and Infeld wrote with remarkable simplicity and clarity, though the reviewer noted the prose lacked the literary art of contemporaries such as James Jeans and Arthur Eddington. The reviewer credited Einstein as the clearest and simplest exploiter of his own theories. J. A. Crowther, writing in Nature, called it a very distinguished book, praising its focus on the intellectual content of physics as the chief source of interest for a thoughtful non-technical reader. Reviews appeared across nearly twenty publications through 1938 and into 1939, including the Manchester Guardian, the Spectator, the Yale Review, and the Times Literary Supplement. The book's argument that objective reality is a necessary working assumption for science would remain a minority position in physics; Einstein spent the rest of his career refining it, most famously in his debates with Niels Bohr that continued long after The Evolution of Physics was published.