Arthur Eddington

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Arthur Stanley Eddington stood at the center of one of the most dramatic moments in twentieth-century science. On the 29th of May 1919, during a total solar eclipse observed from the island of Príncipe off the west coast of Africa, he pointed his camera at a cluster of stars near the Sun and waited. What he was testing was a theory so radical that many in England had barely heard of it, dreamed up by a German physicist named Albert Einstein. And the result, published the following year, was announced in newspapers all over the world.

  How did a Quaker astrophysicist from Kendal, in the north of England, come to stand at this crossroads? What drove him to champion ideas that crossed enemy lines during wartime? And beyond that single famous eclipse, what was the full shape of a life that touched stellar physics, cosmology, philosophy, and even cycling statistics? Those are the questions this documentary will answer.

• 2. A Quaker Scholar's Ascent

  ›

  Eddington was born on the 28th of December 1882 in Kendal, Westmorland, the son of Arthur Henry Eddington, headmaster of the Quaker School, and Sarah Ann Shout. His father died in the typhoid epidemic that swept England in 1884, leaving his mother to raise two children on a modest income.

  The family settled in Weston-super-Mare, where young Stanley, as his mother and sister always called him, was first educated at home before attending a preparatory school. A commemorative plaque now marks the family's house at 42 Walliscote Road. In 1893 he entered Brynmelyn School, where he showed a particular gift for mathematics and English literature.

  That gift earned him a scholarship to Owens College, Manchester, in 1898. There he fell under the influence of two teachers, the physicist Arthur Schuster and the mathematician Horace Lamb. He also lived at Dalton Hall, where a Quaker mathematician named J. W. Graham left a lasting mark on him. Eddington graduated with a first-class BSc in physics in 1902, and the same year won a scholarship to Trinity College, Cambridge.

  At Cambridge his tutor was Robert Alfred Herman, and in 1904 Eddington made history as the first ever second-year student to be placed as Senior Wrangler, the top mathematics graduate of his year. After receiving his MA in 1905 he tried research on thermionic emission in the Cavendish Laboratory, but it did not go well. His salvation came through a recommendation by the mathematician E. T. Whittaker, who helped him secure a position at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich. The seeds of that move had been planted in childhood, when he would often try to count the stars.

• 3. Reading the Interior of Stars

  ›

  In January 1906, Eddington was nominated as chief assistant to the Astronomer Royal at Greenwich, and he quickly proved his worth. He devised a statistical method for analysing the parallax of the asteroid 433 Eros from photographic plates, winning him the Smith's Prize in 1907 and a fellowship at Trinity College.

  After the sudden death of George Darwin, son of Charles Darwin, in December 1912, Eddington was appointed Plumian Professor of Astronomy and Experimental Philosophy at Cambridge in early 1913. The following year, on the death of Robert Ball, he also became director of the Cambridge Observatory. By May 1914 he was a fellow of the Royal Society.

  His most sustained scientific work, however, was on the interior of stars, which he began in earnest in 1916. Starting from Karl Schwarzschild's work on radiation pressure, he built mathematical models that treated a star as a gas sphere held up against gravity by internal thermal pressure, with radiation pressure preventing its collapse. He was candid that he lacked a firm grasp of stellar opacity and energy generation, yet insisted his models were useful enough to retain. James Jeans contributed the insight that stellar matter would be ionized, but the two men became famous for their long-running debates rather than any collaboration.

  In 1924, Eddington published the mass-luminosity relation for stars, showing that virtually all stars, giants and dwarfs alike, behaved as ideal gases. His theory appeared in mature form in his 1926 book The Internal Constitution of the Stars, which trained an entire generation of astrophysicists. Michelson's confirmation of his estimated stellar diameters in 1920 helped convince astronomers who were sceptical of his exploratory style.

• 4. The Hydrogen Wager

  ›

  Around 1920, Eddington published a paper called "The Internal Constitution of the Stars" that contained a prediction both daring and correct: the energy source of stars was the fusion of hydrogen into helium. At the time this was extraordinary. Neither fusion nor thermonuclear energy had been discovered, and the fact that stars are composed largely of hydrogen was not yet established.

  His reasoning built on several converging threads. The dominant theory, the Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction hypothesis, predicted that stars should spin faster over time as they shrank, by conservation of angular momentum. But observations of Cepheid variable stars showed no such speedup. The only remaining candidate was the conversion of matter into energy, which Einstein had shown was possible through his equation relating mass and energy.

  Francis Aston had recently measured that a helium atom weighs roughly 0.8 percent less than the four hydrogen atoms that would combine to form it. That missing mass, Eddington reasoned, had to go somewhere: it became energy. He further argued that if a star contained just five percent fusible hydrogen, that would be enough to account for its luminosity. We now know most ordinary stars contain far more than five percent hydrogen.

  Eddington also demonstrated, from these assumptions, that the interior temperatures of stars must be in the millions of degrees. All of his speculations were confirmed in the decades that followed. His 1920 paper did not simply guess correctly; it assembled a chain of evidence from independent observations, each of which pointed toward the same answer.

• 5. Eclipse, Pacifism, and Einstein

  ›

  During World War I, Eddington served as secretary of the Royal Astronomical Society, which placed him first in line for correspondence from Willem de Sitter, who was relaying Einstein's theory of general relativity from continental Europe. Most English astronomers lacked the mathematics to follow the theory; Eddington was one of the few who had both the skill and the inclination, the latter driven by his Quaker pacifist convictions. He saw no reason to ignore a German physicist's breakthrough.

  When conscription was introduced in Britain on the 2nd of March 1916, Eddington planned to claim exemption as a conscientious objector. Cambridge University pre-empted him by securing an exemption on grounds of national interest. That exemption was contested in 1918 by the Ministry of National Service, and Eddington appeared before multiple tribunals in June and July of that year. He stated his religious objection to war clearly, and offered to serve instead in the Friends' Ambulance Unit under the British Red Cross, or as a harvest labourer. Astronomer Royal Frank Dyson submitted a written statement at the July hearing arguing that Eddington was essential to the forthcoming eclipse expedition. The tribunal extended his exemption by twelve months, tied to astronomy work. The war ended before that period expired.

  Eddington and Dyson then organised two expeditions to observe the solar eclipse of the 29th of May 1919. Eddington went to Príncipe; a second team went to Sobral, Brazil. During the eclipse he photographed stars in the Hyades cluster, including Kappa Tauri of the constellation Taurus, whose positions relative to the Sun would reveal whether gravity bent light by the Newtonian amount or the larger amount predicted by Einstein.

  His results, published in 1920, supported Einstein. Critics later claimed he had unjustly set aside the Sobral data, which appeared closer to the Newtonian model. A re-analysis in 1979, using modern equipment and software, validated Eddington's conclusions. The Sobral rejection had been due to a defect in those telescopes, which contemporary astronomers had already understood and accepted.

  The physicist Ludwik Silberstein, meeting Eddington at the Royal Society on the 6th of November 1919, remarked wryly that only three men in the world truly understood Einstein's theory. When Eddington stayed silent, Silberstein pressed him not to be so shy. Eddington replied: "Oh, no! I was wondering who the third one might be!" Einstein himself later called Eddington's 1923 book The Mathematical Theory of Relativity "the finest presentation of the subject in any language."

• 6. The Chandrasekhar Dispute

  ›

  Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar arrived in Cambridge as a student and showed mathematically that stars above a certain mass could not simply cool and settle into stability. They would collapse catastrophically, into what we now call black holes. Eddington rejected this conclusion outright, insisting that a purely mathematical derivation from relativity theory could not have the seemingly absurd physical consequences Chandrasekhar claimed.

  Chandrasekhar's own account of the episode portrays Eddington as cruel and dogmatic. The physicist Thanu Padmanabhan later wrote that Eddington had "raised irrelevant objections" alongside whatever genuine scepticism he held. Whatever his motivation, he was wrong, and the controversy damaged his scientific reputation in later years.

  Yet the relationship was not simply adversarial. It was Eddington, together with Edward Arthur Milne, who put Chandrasekhar's name forward for fellowship of the Royal Society. Chandrasekhar was elected, which gave him a seat at Cambridge's high table alongside the leading scientists of the day and a comfortable endowment for research. Eddington's obstruction on the theoretical question and his support for Chandrasekhar's career existed side by side, a pairing that still puzzles historians of science.

• 7. Numbers, Mind, and the Universe

  ›

  From the 1920s until his death, Eddington devoted increasing effort to what he called "fundamental theory": an attempt to unify quantum mechanics, relativity, cosmology, and gravitation into a single framework. His method was unusual. He combined fundamental constants to produce dimensionless numbers and noticed that many of them clustered near 1040, or its square root, or its square. He believed the mass of the proton and the charge of the electron were not accidental values but a natural and complete specification for constructing a universe.

  This line of thinking led him to the fine-structure constant. When measurements placed it close to 1/136, he argued it should be exactly 1/136 for epistemological reasons. When later measurements put it closer to 1/137, he adjusted his reasoning and declared the true value was 1/137, thereafter called the Eddington number. Critics began calling him "Arthur Adding-one." The episode weakened his standing in the physics community. His book Fundamental Theory, left unfinished at his death, was published posthumously in 1948.

  Alongside this numerological programme, Eddington also developed a serious philosophical idealism. In The Nature of the Physical World, published in 1928, he wrote that "the stuff of the world is mind-stuff." He argued that because mechanical theories of matter had been discarded by both relativity and quantum physics, a materialist metaphysics was no longer tenable. He did not deny the existence of an objective world; rather, he held that its structure was precisely mirrored in consciousness, and that we had no evidence the objective world was anything other than mind-stuff.

  He was careful to note that physics could not explain the leap to consciousness itself: light waves travel to the eye, chemical changes occur in the retina, signals propagate through the optic nerve and arrive in the brain, and somewhere in that chain a physical message becomes a sensation. Where exactly that happens, he admitted, was entirely unclear. Ian Barbour, writing in Issues in Science and Religion in 1966, cited Eddington's Science and the Unseen World from 1929 as a key text supporting philosophical idealism.

• 8. Legacy and the Measure of Distance

  ›

  Eddington died of cancer at the Evelyn Nursing Home in Cambridge on the 22nd of November 1944. He was unmarried. His body was cremated at Cambridge Crematorium on the 27th of November 1944, and his remains were buried in the Ascension Parish Burial Ground alongside his mother. Time magazine had placed him on its cover on the 16th of April 1934, during the years when his popular books and radio broadcasts made him a household name across Britain between the wars.

  His honours were substantial: the Smith's Prize in 1907, the Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society and the Bruce Medal and the Henry Draper Medal all in 1924, the Royal Medal in 1928, a knighthood in 1930, and the Order of Merit in 1938. A lunar crater, the asteroid 2761 Eddington, and a new suburb of Cambridge opened in 2017 all carry his name.

  One of the more unexpected parts of his legacy is a cycling metric. Eddington devised a measure of long-distance riding defined as the maximum number E such that a cyclist has ridden at least E miles on at least E separate days. Moving from one level to the next is progressively harder, because shorter rides stop counting toward the new threshold. Eddington's own lifetime cycling E-number was 84, a figure that places him among serious long-distance riders. The metric has since been compared to the h-index used to measure scientific productivity, a parallel Eddington himself did not live to see.