Special relativity
Special relativity is a theory that Albert Einstein published on the 26th of September 1905, in a paper titled "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies." It rests on just two assumptions, and yet it overthrows ideas about time and space that humans had taken for granted for centuries. How can a theory built on only two postulates change everything? What does it actually claim? And why did it take until 1905 for someone to put it together, even though the pieces had been lying around for decades?
The first postulate says that the laws of physics look identical to every observer moving at a constant speed. You can verify this yourself: if you drop a ball on a train traveling at constant speed, it falls straight down exactly as it would on the platform. Galileo Galilei had already described this principle in 1632 using a thought experiment on a moving ship. The second postulate is far stranger. It says that light always travels through a vacuum at the same speed, no matter how fast the source of that light is moving or how fast the observer is moving. A signal fired from a stationary lantern and a signal fired from a lantern on a train traveling at high speed both arrive at you moving at exactly the same speed. That seems to contradict every intuition we have about how speeds add together. The rest of this documentary unpacks what follows from those two deductions.
Galileo Galilei laid the first stone in 1632, but the foundation cracked badly in 1864. That year, James Clerk Maxwell published a theory of electromagnetism that explicitly predicted a constant speed of light in vacuum, regardless of the motion of the source or receiver. The problem was that Maxwell's theory did not obey the Galilean rules of relative motion that underpinned all of Newtonian mechanics. Physicists assumed the contradiction would be resolved by an invisible medium filling the universe, something they called the aether, through which light waves propagated the way sound waves propagate through air.
The 1887 Michelson-Morley experiment was designed to detect Earth's motion through the aether by measuring tiny differences in the speed of light along different directions. It found no such difference. The aether appeared not to exist. Several physicists tried to patch the aether theory anyway. George Francis FitzGerald, Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, and Jules Henri Poincare each proposed adjustments that pointed in the direction of what would eventually become special relativity, but none of them discarded the aether entirely. Poincare went further than most: he provided the mathematical framework for relativity theory by proving that the Lorentz transformations are a subset of a larger group of symmetry transformations, now called the Poincare group.
Einstein's contribution in 1905 was to abandon the aether altogether and treat both postulates as foundational. He applied the Lorentz transformations to classical mechanics, changing Newton's picture of motion for all speeds, especially speeds close to that of light. Hermann Minkowski then extended the picture in 1907, publishing papers that reframed space and time as a single unified geometry called spacetime. From that point, the theory was essentially complete.
Moving clocks run slower. That sentence is one of the most verifiable and most counterintuitive results in all of physics. In the language of the theory, if a clock travels between two events at high speed, it measures a shorter elapsed time than a clock that stays at rest between those same two events. The discrepancy is negligible at everyday speeds but grows large near the speed of light.
Paul Langevin, an early advocate who did much to spread the theory in the face of resistance, made time dilation concrete in 1911 through a thought experiment that has become famous: a traveler boards a vessel capable of reaching 99.995 percent of the speed of light, makes a round trip to a nearby star lasting two years of his own proper time, and returns to an Earth that is two hundred years older. This is not fiction. It follows directly from the mathematics of the Lorentz transformation.
But there is a subtlety that puzzled many readers. If motion is relative, why does the traveler age less rather than the Earth-bound observer? The asymmetry arises because the traveler must turn around, which breaks the symmetry of the situation. At least one of the two must change their state of motion to bring them back to the same location for a side-by-side comparison, and that change is not symmetric. A specific worked example in the literature considers a traveler flying at 0.6 times the speed of light to and from a star 3 light-years away. After that trip, both twins agree, using their own signals and their own clocks, on exactly how much each has aged. There is no contradiction, only unfamiliar arithmetic.
A real-world confirmation of time dilation comes from high-speed muons. These particles are produced when cosmic rays collide with particles in Earth's outer atmosphere. Moving toward Earth's surface at near-light speeds, their measured lifetimes are far longer than the lifetimes of slowly moving muons created in a laboratory. The clocks inside them are running slower.
Length contraction is the spatial partner to time dilation. An object moving at high speed past an observer appears shorter along its direction of motion than it would measure in its own rest frame. The ladder paradox, a well-known puzzle in the literature, makes this vivid: a long ladder traveling near the speed of light can be contained within a garage that would normally be too short to hold it, but only from the perspective of someone standing in the garage.
In 1959, James Terrell and Roger Penrose independently pointed out that what an observer actually sees with their eyes is different from what measurements yield. Visual appearance is shaped by the varying lengths of time light takes to travel from different parts of a moving object to the observer's eye. A receding object appears contracted while an approaching one appears elongated. A sphere in motion retains a circular outline at all speeds and angles, though its surface appears distorted. A cube viewed from a distance of four times its side length at high speed appears to have hyperbolic sides, not because it is rotating but because light from the rear of the cube takes longer to reach the eye than light from the front, during which time the cube has moved. This effect is now called Terrell rotation or the Terrell-Penrose effect.
Apparent superluminal motion is another optical consequence. Radio galaxies, BL Lac objects, quasars, and other objects that eject jets of matter at relativistic speeds sometimes appear to be moving faster than light. Galaxy M87 streams out a high-speed jet of subatomic particles nearly directly toward us, and Penrose-Terrell rotation causes the jet to appear to be moving sideways at a pace that seems to exceed the speed of light. Nothing is actually moving faster than light; the geometry of light travel creates the illusion.
If information could travel faster than light, the structure of cause and effect would collapse. Special relativity makes this precise. Two events can be separated in spacetime in one of three ways: by more time than space, in which case they are timelike separated and their causal order is the same in every reference frame; by more space than time, in which case they are spacelike separated and their temporal order can flip depending on the observer's frame; or by exactly the light-travel separation, in which case they are lightlike separated.
For spacelike-separated events, it is possible to find a frame in which the two events happen at the same time. That alone does not create paradoxes. The danger arises when a signal could actually travel between two spacelike-separated events, because in some frames that signal would arrive before it was sent. A thought experiment in the literature illustrates this with two observers standing by a railway track as a high-speed train passes, another riding in the last car, and a fourth in the leading car. If a fictitious instantaneous communicator were used to pass a message from one end of the train to the other and then back along the tracks, it would be possible for the message to arrive at its starting point before it was sent. Increasing the train's speed toward that of light sharpens the effect: even signals only slightly faster than light would violate causality in this setup.
The conclusion is direct. If causality is preserved, nothing carrying information can move faster than light in vacuum. Trivial situations exist where imaginary points move faster, such as the spot where a rapidly sweeping searchlight beam hits the bottom of a cloud, but the beam is not a solid object and carries no signal, so no violation occurs.
Einstein's fourth paper of 1905, titled "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its Energy Content?", presented the argument that mass and energy are equivalent. The famous relationship, energy equals mass times the speed of light squared, is a consequence of special relativity rather than an independent discovery. Energy and momentum, which appear as entirely separate quantities in Newtonian mechanics, combine in relativity into a single four-vector. For an object at rest, that four-vector has an energy component and three spatial components all equal to zero.
Einstein's 1905 argument used his newly derived formula for relativistic Doppler shift, the conservation laws for energy and momentum, and the relationship between the frequency of light and its energy. He imagined a body emitting two equal light pulses in opposite directions and compared the energy accounting in two different reference frames. The result was the equivalence of mass and energy. Einstein himself acknowledged in a 1907 survey paper that the derivation had limitations and relied on some implicit assumptions, and many authors since then have proposed alternative derivations. Despite those debates, the conclusion has stood without exception.
The equivalence of mass and energy has the practical implication that a small amount of mass corresponds to an enormous amount of energy, because the speed of light squared is a very large number. The result also makes explicit something that Newtonian mechanics left opaque: the Newtonian mass of an object, defined as the ratio of momentum to velocity at slow speeds, is equal to the object's energy divided by the speed of light squared.
Special relativity sits between two other great frameworks. Galilean relativity, formulated by Galileo Galilei and embedded in Newtonian mechanics, is the low-speed limit of special relativity. At speeds far below that of light, the predictions of special relativity reduce to Newton's predictions, which is why centuries of physics experiments were consistent with both. Einstein specifically named his earlier work "special theory of relativity" in papers published in November 1915 and in a long review article published in 1916, to distinguish it from his general theory, which extends the framework to include gravity and accelerating frames.
General relativity incorporates non-Euclidean geometry to represent gravitational effects as the curvature of spacetime. Special relativity, by contrast, is restricted to flat spacetime, known as Minkowski space, named for Hermann Minkowski whose 1907 papers gave the theory its geometric foundation. For regions of spacetime where gravitational effects are weak enough that tidal forces can be ignored, the special relativistic picture remains an accurate approximation.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What are the two postulates of special relativity?
Special relativity rests on two postulates stated by Albert Einstein in his 1905 paper. The first is the principle of relativity: the laws of physics are identical for all observers moving at a constant speed. The second is the principle of light speed invariance: light travels through vacuum at the same speed for all observers, regardless of the motion of the source or the observer.
When did Albert Einstein publish the theory of special relativity?
Einstein published special relativity on the 26th of September 1905 in a paper titled "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies." The theory became essentially complete in 1907 when Hermann Minkowski published his papers on spacetime.
What did the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887 discover?
The 1887 Michelson-Morley experiment was designed to detect Earth's motion through the proposed aether, a medium thought to carry light waves. It found no difference in the speed of light along different directions, confirming the constant speed of light and showing that the aether did not exist.
What is time dilation in special relativity?
Time dilation is the effect by which a moving clock runs slower than a stationary one. The effect is negligible at everyday speeds but becomes large near the speed of light. It has been confirmed experimentally through the extended lifetimes of high-speed muons produced by cosmic rays in Earth's outer atmosphere.
What is the twin paradox in special relativity?
The twin paradox, articulated by Paul Langevin in 1911, involves a traveler who makes a high-speed round trip and returns to find far more time has passed on Earth than in their own experience. The asymmetry arises because the traveler must turn around and change their state of motion, breaking the symmetry between the two observers. Both twins agree on exactly how much each has aged once the trip is complete.
What is the relationship between mass and energy in special relativity?
Special relativity predicts that mass and energy are equivalent, as expressed in the mass-energy equivalence formula. Einstein presented this argument in his 1905 paper "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its Energy Content?" using conservation of energy and momentum and the relativistic Doppler shift formula. The Newtonian mass of an object equals its energy divided by the speed of light squared.
All sources
107 references cited across the entry
- 1bookIntroduction to ElectrodynamicsDavid J. Griffiths — Pearson — 2013
- 2bookClassical ElectrodynamicsJohn D. Jackson — John Wiley & Sons — 1999
- 3webWhat is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?Tom Roberts et al. — October 2007
- 4bookRelativity: The Special and the General TheoryAlbert Einstein — Routledge — 2001
- 6bookThe illustrated a brief history of timeStephen W. Hawking — Bantam Books — 1996
- 7journalThe invisibility of time dilationTheo Hughes et al. — 2021-03-01
- 8bookDialogue Concerning the Two Chief World SystemsGalileo Galilei — 1632
- 9bookGravitation and cosmologySteven Weinberg — John Wiley & Sons — 1972
- 11bookEssential Relativity: Special, General, and CosmologicalWolfgang Rindler — Springer Science & Business Media — 1977
- 12bookClassical MechanicsHerbert Goldstein — Addison-Wesley Publishing Company — 1980
- 13bookThe Variational Principles of MechanicsCornelius Lanczos — Dover Publications — 1970
- 14citationZur allgemeinen RelativitätstheorieAlbert Einstein — 1915
- 15citationDie Feldgleichungen der GravitationAlbert Einstein — 1915
- 16citationDie Grundlage der allgemeinen RelativitätstheorieAlbert Einstein — 1916
- 17bookIt's about time: understanding Einstein's relativityN. David Mermin — Princeton University Press — 2009
- 18bookSpacetime PhysicsEdwin F. Taylor et al. — W. H. Freeman — 1992
- 19bookIntroducing special relativityWilliam S. C. Williams — Taylor & Francis — 2002
- 20bookThe Special Theory of Relativity: A Mathematical ApproachFarook Rahaman — Springer Nature — 2022
- 21webJames Clerk Maxwell: a force for physics2006-12-01
- 24bookA Most Incomprehensible Thing: Notes Towards a Very Gentle Introduction to the Mathematics of RelativityPeter Collier — Incomprehensible Books — 2017
- 25bookPhysical Applications of Homogeneous BallsYaakov Friedman — 2004
- 26bookIntroduction to Classical Mechanics: With Problems and SolutionsDavid Morin — Cambridge University Press — 2012-06-05
- 27journalA constructive approach to the special theory of relativityD. J. Miller — 2010
- 28bookThe Geometry of Spacetime: An Introduction to Special and General RelativityJames J. Callahan — Springer — 2011
- 29bookSpace and Time in Special RelativityN. David Mermin — McGraw-Hill — 1968
- 30bookIntroduction to special relativityRobert Resnick — Wiley — 1968
- 31bookEssential RelativityWolfgang Rindler — Springer-Verlag — 1977
- 32journalRelativity in the Global Positioning SystemNeil Ashby — 2003
- 33journalSensitivity analysis of the Sagnac-effect optical-fiber ring interferometerShih-Chun Lin et al. — 1979
- 34bookAn Introduction to MechanicsDaniel Kleppner et al. — McGraw-Hill — 1973
- 35bookSpecial RelativityA. P. French — W. W. Norton & Company — 1968
- 37journalPaul Langeyin and the Theory of RelativityCamillo Cuvaj — 1971
- 38bookUnderstanding PhysicsDavid C. Cassidy et al. — Springer-Verlag — 2002
- 39bookAstronomy, A Physical PerspectiveMark Leslie Cutner — Cambridge University Press — 2003
- 40bookFlat and Curved Space-timesGeorge F. R. Ellis et al. — Oxford University Press — 2000
- 41bookThe feynman lectures on physics; vol I: The new millennium editionRichard P. Feynman et al. — Basic Books — 2011
- 42bookFundamental Physics: Extended Third EditionDavid Halliday et al. — John Wiley & sons — 1988
- 43bookRelativity: An introduction to space-time physicsSteve Adams — CRC Press — 1997
- 45journalThe twin "paradox" and the conventionality of simultaneityDebs, Talal A. et al. — 1996
- 46journalLength Contraction ParadoxR. Shaw — 1962
- 47bookThe Theory of the Relativity of MotionRichard C. Tolman — University of California Press — 1917
- 48journalThe Tachyonic AntitelephoneG. A. Benford et al. — 1970
- 49webSpecial Relativity Lecture Notes – Section 10Tatsu Takeuchi — Virginia Tech
- 50bookSpecial Relativity for the Enthusiastic BeginnerDavid Morin — CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform — 2017
- 51webIs Faster-Than-Light Travel or Communication Possible?Philip Gibbs — Department of Mathematics, University of California, Riverside
- 52bookApplications of Electrodynamics in Theoretical Physics and AstrophysicsDavid Ginsburg — CRC Press — 1989
- 53bookFour Decades of Scientific ExplanationWesley C. Salmon — University of Pittsburgh — 2006
- 54journalMeasuring Speed of Light: Why? Speed of what?P. Lauginie — 2004
- 55journalFresnel's coefficient for light of different colours. (First part)Zeeman, Pieter — 1914
- 56journalFresnel's coefficient for light of different colours. (Second part)Zeeman, Pieter — 1915
- 57bookThe universe of general relativityJ. Stachel — Birkhäuser — 2005
- 58bookBasic RelativityRichard A. Mould — Springer — 2001
- 59bookExplanatory Supplement to the Astronomical AlmanacUniversity Science Books — 1992
- 60journalEuropean Physical Society logo Arago (1810): the first experimental result against the etherRafael Ferraro et al. — 2005
- 61webAiry's Water Telescope (1870)Graham Dolan — The Royal Observatory Greenwich
- 62journalAiry's water telescopeH. P. Hollis — 1937
- 63bookGoing CriticalJanssen, Michel et al. — Springer — 2004
- 64journalThe Relativistic Doppler EffectD. Sher — 1968
- 65bookThe Doppler EffectT. P. Gill — Logos Press Limited — 1965
- 66bookThe Feynman Lectures on Physics: Volume 1Richard P. Feynman et al. — Addison-Wesley — February 1977
- 67journalInvisibility of the Lorentz ContractionJames Terrell — 15 November 1959
- 68journalThe Apparent Shape of a Relativistically Moving SphereRoger Penrose — 24 October 2008
- 69webRelativistic DistortionHelen Cook — Mathematics Department, University of British Columbia
- 70webAppearances at Relativistic SpeedsPeter Signell — Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
- 71webThe Ball is RoundUte Kraus — Institut für Physik Universität Hildesheim
- 72journalApparent Shape of Large Objects at Relativistic SpeedsMary L. Boas — 1961
- 73journalVisual appearance of wireframe objects in special relativityThomas Müller et al. — 2014
- 74bookSuperluminal Radio SourcesJ. Anton Zensus et al. — Cambridge University Press — 1987
- 75webApparent Superluminal Velocity of GalaxiesScott I. Chase — Department of Mathematics, University of California, Riverside
- 76web"Superluminal" motions in astronomical sourcesMichael Richmond — School of Physics and Astronomy, Rochester Institute of Technology
- 77webJets, Superluminal Motion, and Gamma-Ray BurstsBill Keel — Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama
- 79bookConcepts of Mass in Classical and Modern PhysicsMax Jammer — Courier Dover Publications — 1997
- 80bookEinstein from B to ZJohn J. Stachel — Springer — 2002
- 82bookEinstein's Mass–Energy Equation, Volume I: Early History and Philosophical FoundationsFrancisco Fernflores — Momentum Pres — 2018
- 83webAcceleration in special relativity: What is the meaning of "uniformly accelerated movement" ?Julien Baglio — Physics Department, ENS Cachan — 26 May 2007
- 84webThe Relativistic RocketPhilip Gibbs et al.
- 86webMechanics and Relativity. Chapter 14: Relativistic CollisionsTimon Idema — California State University Affordable Learning Solutions Program — 17 April 2019
- 87journalThe elementary process of bremsstrahlungWerner Nakel — 1994
- 88bookThe Two-Body Force in NucleiM.L. Halbert — Springer — 1972
- 89journalOn some close collisions of fast β-particles with electrons, photographed by the expansion method.Frank Clive Champion — The Royal Society Publishing — 1932
- 90bookThomas' Calculus: Early TranscendentalsGeorge B. Thomas et al. — Pearson Education, Inc. — 2008
- 91bookGravitationJ.A. Wheeler et al. — W.H. Freeman & Co — 1973
- 92bookDynamics and RelativityJ.R. Forshaw et al. — Wiley — 2009
- 93bookThe Road to RealityR. Penrose — Vintage books — 2007
- 94bookFormal Structure of Electromagnetics: General Covariance and ElectromagneticsE. J. Post — Dover Publications Inc. — 1962
- 95bookA first course in general relativityBernard F. Schutz — Cambridge University Press — 1985
- 96bookRelativity Made Relatively EasyAndrew M. Steane — OUP Oxford — 2012
- 97bookExplorations in Mathematical Physics: The Concepts Behind an Elegant LanguageDon Koks — Springer Science & Business Media — 2006
- 98webCan Special Relativity Handle Acceleration?Philip Gibbs — math.ucr.edu
- 99webBell’s spaceships: a useful relativistic paradoxFranscisco J Flores — California Polytechnic State University
- 100journalLorentz contraction, Bell's spaceships, and rigid body motion in special relativityFranklin, Jerrold — 2010
- 101bookVery Special Relativity: An Illustrated GuideSander Bais — Harvard University Press — 2007
- 102bookQuantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei and ParticlesR. Resnick et al. — John Wiley & Sons — 1985
- 103journalA Theory of Electrons and ProtonsP.A.M. Dirac — 1930
- 104journalThe Positive ElectronC.D. Anderson — 1933
- 105bookEinstein's general theory of relativity: with modern applications in cosmologyØyvind Grøn et al. — Springer — 2007
- 106journalCosmic Ray and Neutrino Tests of Special RelativitySidney Coleman et al. — 1997
- 107webExperiments that Apparently are NOT Consistent with SR/GRTom Roberts et al. — University of California at Riverside
- 108journalEinstein's Investigations of Galilean Covariant Electrodynamics prior to 1905John D. Norton — 2004
- 109journalOn the role of the Michelson–Morley experiment: Einstein in ChicagoJeroen van Dongen — 2009