Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back (1982 video game)
Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back arrived as a cartridge for the Atari 2600 in 1982, and with it came a distinction no other game could claim: the first licensed Star Wars video game ever released. Rex Bradford programmed it; Parker Brothers published it. The year it launched, it and Frogger together accounted for a combined three million cartridges sold, making it one of the two best-selling Parker Brothers games of the year. But commercial triumph and critical reception rarely move in lockstep. The same game that moved millions of units was called a "shamelessly exploitative little toy" by a reviewer who happened to be a celebrated science fiction author. How did a scrolling shooter set on the frozen planet Hoth become a flashpoint between commercial gaming and artistic credibility? And what was it about the game's ending, of all things, that drew the sharpest criticism?
On the icy surface of Hoth, the player takes the controls of Luke Skywalker's snowspeeder with a single objective: delay the Imperial AT-AT walkers long enough to protect the Rebels' Echo Base power generator. There is no winning condition in the traditional sense. The goal is survival, and the only question is how long the player can hold the line before it collapses.
The walkers are not passive targets. They return fire, and each hit the speeder takes shifts its color, giving the player a visible signal of approaching destruction. A pilot who lands a damaged speeder can repair it, buying more time in the fight. But some difficulty levels introduce walkers that are physically solid, meaning a collision destroys both the speeder and damages the walker simultaneously. On those levels, every movement carries extra risk.
The most unusual mechanic in the game is the Force bonus. A player who survives for two minutes earns the power of the Force, which lasts twenty seconds. During that window, the speeder flashes with color and becomes invulnerable. It is a narrow reprieve in a game designed to grind the player down over time.
Destroying a walker requires patience. On the Intellivision version, a walker requires thirty hits to take down; on the Atari 2600, that number climbs to forty-eight. A small flashing spot sometimes appears randomly on a walker, and hitting it destroys the machine immediately, offering a shortcut through the otherwise slow process of whittling away at the head or torso. Shots to the legs are entirely ineffective, a detail that rewards attentive players who learn where to aim.
Video magazine reviewed the game shortly after its release and found much to admire. Reviewers called the graphics "zingy" and the audio-visual effects "absolutely first-rate," concluding that it was "an entertaining fast-paced contest that belongs in the cartridge libraries of most (Atari)VCS owners." That same month, a very different verdict arrived from a rival publication.
Video Review magazine handed its review to Harlan Ellison, a science fiction author with a reputation for bluntness. Ellison did not approach the game charitably. He called it a "shamelessly exploitative little toy" and tagged it as "the latest icon of the Imbecile Industry" and a "time-wasting enterprise." The ferocity of the language was striking, but the specific complaint at the center of his review was structural rather than aesthetic.
Ellison's core objection was the game's ending. Neither of the two possible conclusions is a victory. The game ends when the player's fifth speeder is destroyed, or when the lead walker reaches Echo Base and destroys it. Both outcomes are failure states. There is no version of this game in which the player wins. For Ellison, that design choice was not merely frustrating. It was the root of his dissatisfaction, a game that offers no payoff for effort.
Ed Driscoll, writing in The Space Gamer No. 55, arrived at a far more measured judgment. Driscoll acknowledged flaws but concluded that the good points outweighed the bad and called it "an excellent start for a company new to the VCS scene," closing with a nod to the film's own mythology: "May the Force be with you."
Parker Brothers was not a company that had built its identity around video games, yet by 1982 it was moving cartridges in enormous volumes. The Empire Strikes Back and Frogger together sold a combined three million cartridges in that single year, a figure reported at the time as both games competed for space on store shelves. That made The Empire Strikes Back one of the company's two best-performing titles of the year, a result that stood regardless of what critics thought about the game's structure or ambitions.
An Intellivision version followed in 1983, extending the game's reach beyond the Atari 2600 audience. Computer and Video Games revisited the game years later in 1989, assigning it a retrospective score of 46%. That number, arriving well after the commercial moment had passed, reflects the distance between a game's impact at release and how time treats its design.
Up Next
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What was Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back 1982 video game?
Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back (1982) was a scrolling shooter for the Atari 2600, programmed by Rex Bradford and published by Parker Brothers. It was the first licensed Star Wars video game ever released. An Intellivision version followed in 1983.
Who programmed the 1982 Atari 2600 Empire Strikes Back game?
Rex Bradford programmed the Atari 2600 version of Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back, which Parker Brothers published in 1982.
How many copies did the Empire Strikes Back Atari game sell?
In 1982, Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back and Frogger together sold a combined three million cartridges for Parker Brothers, making them the company's two best-selling games that year.
What did Harlan Ellison say about the Empire Strikes Back Atari game?
Harlan Ellison reviewed the game in Video Review magazine and called it a "shamelessly exploitative little toy" and "the latest icon of the Imbecile Industry." His sharpest criticism centered on the game's lack of a winning condition, as both possible endings are failure states.
How do you win Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back on the Atari 2600?
The game cannot be won. It ends either when the player's fifth speeder is destroyed or when the lead AT-AT walker reaches and destroys Echo Base. Both outcomes are failure conditions; the objective is to survive as long as possible.
What is the difference between the Atari and Intellivision versions of the Empire Strikes Back game?
On the Intellivision, AT-AT walkers require thirty hits to destroy; on the Atari 2600, they require forty-eight hits. The Intellivision version was released in 1983, one year after the original Atari 2600 release.
All sources
9 references cited across the entry
- 1bookRacing the BeamNick Montfort et al. — MIT Press — 2009
- 4bookRacing the Beam: The Atari Video Computer SystemBogost, Ian et al. — The MIT Press — 2009
- 5newsCompetitors Claim Role in Warner SetbackRon Rosenberg — December 11, 1982
- 6magazineArcade Alley: Star Wars and Space CavernsBill Kunkel et al. — Reese Communications — September 1982
- 7magazineRolling That Ole Debbil StoneHarlan Ellison — IPC Business Press — September 1982
- 8journalCapsule ReviewsEd Driscoll — Steve Jackson Games — September 1982
- 9journalComplete Games Guide16 October 1989