Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Simon Fish

~7 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
7 sections
  • Simon Fish died in 1531, having never stood trial. He had been arrested in London on charges of heresy, but the plague reached him first. For a man who had spent years writing some of the most incendiary anti-clerical prose in England's history, the end was quietly anticlimactic. His sixteen-page pamphlet, though, would outlive him by centuries.

    Fish was a Protestant rebel and propagandist at a moment when those words carried genuine danger. He helped spread William Tyndale's New Testament and wrote a pamphlet so threatening to the Roman Catholic Church that it was condemned as heretical on the 24th of May 1530. That pamphlet, Supplication for the Beggars, smuggled across the Channel from Antwerp, accused the Church of everything from avarice to murder to treason.

    How did a sixteen-page document written in exile manage to disturb the most powerful religious institution in England? What arguments did Fish deploy, and who felt compelled to answer him? The answers lie in the economics of medieval England, in a sensational murder case, and in the unlikely figure of Sir Thomas More.

  • Fish wrote Supplication for the Beggars during his second exile in Antwerp, far from the reach of English ecclesiastical authorities. The pamphlet was dedicated to King Henry VIII himself, a calculated gesture that aimed the document directly at the throne.

    According to the chronicler John Foxe, the Supplication arrived in England on the 2nd of February 1529. It crossed the border despite being prohibited, smuggled in from Antwerp where it had probably been printed by Joannes Grapheus, though that attribution remains unconfirmed. The fact that it penetrated English borders at all speaks to the determination of those who carried it and the appetite among readers for exactly this kind of challenge to clerical authority.

    Fish had also been involved in spreading William Tyndale's New Testament, another work moving through clandestine channels at precisely this moment. Fish was not operating alone but as part of a network of Protestant agitators working across the Channel, feeding forbidden texts into a country that was, whether it knew it or not, approaching a turning point.

  • The most striking passages in Supplication for the Beggars are not theological at all. They are arithmetic. Fish calculated that the English clergy owned one third of England's land and one tenth of all farm produce and livestock. They simultaneously received one tenth of all servants' wages within England. By his reckoning, the clergy represented just one hundredth of the male population, and only one four-hundredth of the total population, yet held a disproportionate share of the nation's resources.

    Fish pushed the numbers further. He proposed that if ten households existed for each of the 52,000 parish churches in England, then just one of the five orders of mendicant friars alone would collect an annual income of £43,333 6 shillings 8 pence. Whether or not these figures were accurate, the very act of quantifying clerical wealth was provocative.

    The pamphlet opens in the voice of England's poor, describing lepers, the blind, the lame, and the sick who "live onely by almesse" and whose numbers had grown so large that all the charity of the realm could not sustain them. Fish's argument was that the monasteries compounded this suffering by taxing the poor rather than relieving them. An economic crisis had already crippled Europe by 1529, and Fish was addressing a population primed to hear these complaints.

  • Alongside the economic assault, Fish lodged theological objections that cut to the heart of Catholic doctrine. His two principal targets were the existence of purgatory and the sale of indulgences.

    On purgatory, Fish was blunt: "there is not one word spoken of it in all holy scripture." He followed this with the claim that "we have no command from God to pray for the dead." This was an argument rooted in Sola scriptura, the Reformation principle that scripture alone constitutes religious authority. Fish did not develop the point at length; he simply stated it as self-evident.

    The attack on indulgences was sharper. Fish argued through a logical chain: if the pope could release one soul from purgatory through paid pardons, he could release a thousand; if a thousand, then all. The conclusion followed that any pope who kept souls in purgatory until families paid for their release was, in Fish's words, "a cruell tyraunt without all charitie." He extended this to all Catholic clerics, calling them "tyrauntes" who "lakke charite" because they withheld prayers from those who could not afford to pay. This framing turned what the Church presented as spiritual service into something closer to extortion.

  • The most explosive section of Fish's pamphlet concerns a case that had scandalized London: the death of Richard Hunne. Fish used Hunne's story to argue that the brand of heresy was the Church's weapon against anyone who challenged its authority.

    The controversy began in 1514 when Hunne, a wealthy Londoner, refused to pay a burial fee to his parish priest for the burial of his child. The priest sued Hunne in ecclesiastical court. Hunne countered by insisting the matter fell under common law, not Church jurisdiction. Shortly after filing his suit, Hunne was seized on charges of heresy and imprisoned in the Bishop of London's jail. Two days later, he was found dead in his cell, hanging by a rope.

    The clergy ruled it a suicide. The coroner disagreed: the investigation found signs of foul play. Evidence pointed to the chancellor of the Bishop of London, Dr. Horsey, as responsible. But Dr. Horsey never faced trial; the Bishop of London secured a royal pardon on his behalf. Fish's reading of this outcome was unsparing. Hunne was murdered, Fish argued, precisely because he had correctly recognised that the king's authority stood above that of the Church. Sir Thomas More, in his eventual response to Fish, devoted more attention to the Hunne case than to any of Fish's other historical arguments.

  • Within months of the Supplication's circulation, Sir Thomas More produced a formal rebuttal entitled The Supplycatyon of Soulys. Printed by October 1529, it arrived in two books: the first addressed Fish's social and economic arguments; the second defended the doctrine of purgatory.

    The contrast in scale was striking. Fish's pamphlet ran sixteen pages. More's response was ten times longer, a lengthy, legalistic, and logic-driven document aimed at dismantling Fish's claims point by point. The Hunne case, which Fish had used as his central anti-clerical exhibit, drew more of More's ink than any other of Fish's historical contentions.

    According to More, Fish eventually recanted. Whether this is accurate or not, Fish died before the year 1531 was out, carried off by bubonic plague while awaiting trial on heresy charges. His widow subsequently married the reformer James Bainham, only to become a widow again in April 1532 when Bainham was burned at the stake as a heretic. The pair of losses bracketing her life in those years captures how thoroughly the religious conflicts Fish had helped ignite were tearing through the people around him.

  • The Supplication for the Beggars did not disappear after Fish's death. Its banned status may have amplified rather than suppressed interest in it. The pamphlet is known to have been reprinted five times in the nineteenth century and twice in the twentieth, not counting its repeated inclusion across multiple editions of John Foxe's Acts and Monuments.

    Foxe's Acts and Monuments, which had itself become a foundational Protestant text, carried Fish's work into successive generations of readers. The pamphlet's arguments, framed around poverty and Church corruption, gave it a kind of durability that purely theological tracts rarely achieve. Fish had written for an immediate audience, using the language of economic crisis, but the structural critique of clerical wealth translated across time.

    Historians have read Supplication for the Beggars as a precursor to both the English Reformation and the broader Protestant Reformation. Fish was not the only voice in the anti-clerical movement, but his sixteen-page pamphlet, written in Antwerp and smuggled past English border controls, placed a set of arguments before Henry VIII at a moment when the king was already in conflict with Rome over his marriage. Foxe had recorded the exact date the pamphlet crossed into England: the 2nd of February 1529, roughly three years before the break with Rome began to take institutional form.

Common questions

Who was Simon Fish and why is he significant?

Simon Fish was a 16th-century English Protestant propagandist who died in 1531. He is significant for helping spread William Tyndale's New Testament and for writing Supplication for the Beggars, an anti-clerical pamphlet condemned as heretical on the 24th of May 1530 and considered a precursor to the English Reformation.

What did Simon Fish argue in Supplication for the Beggars?

Fish argued that the Roman Catholic Church held a disproportionate share of England's wealth, owning one third of its land and receiving one tenth of all farm produce, livestock, and servants' wages, while representing only one four-hundredth of the total population. He also contested the doctrines of purgatory and the sale of indulgences, and accused the clergy of treason and corruption.

Where and when was Supplication for the Beggars written and smuggled into England?

Fish wrote the pamphlet during his second exile in Antwerp, where it was probably printed by Joannes Grapheus. According to John Foxe, it arrived in England on the 2nd of February 1529, smuggled across the border despite being prohibited.

How did Simon Fish die?

Fish was arrested in London on heresy charges but died of bubonic plague in 1531 before he could stand trial.

Who was Richard Hunne and how did Simon Fish use his case?

Richard Hunne was a wealthy Londoner who died in 1514 in the Bishop of London's prison after being seized on heresy charges when he challenged ecclesiastical court jurisdiction. A coroner found signs of foul play suggesting the bishop's chancellor, Dr. Horsey, was responsible, but Dr. Horsey never stood trial because the Bishop of London obtained a royal pardon for him. Fish cited Hunne's case to argue that the Church used heresy charges to persecute those who recognised royal authority over clerical power.

How did Thomas More respond to Simon Fish's pamphlet?

Sir Thomas More wrote The Supplycatyon of Soulys, printed by October 1529, as a direct rebuttal to Fish. More's response was ten times longer than Fish's sixteen-page pamphlet and addressed both its social and economic arguments and its attack on the doctrine of purgatory. More also claimed that Fish eventually recanted.

All sources

2 references cited across the entry

  1. 2bookThe vvorkes of Sir Thomas More Knyght, sometyme Lorde Chauncellour of England, wrytten by him in the Englysh tongeThomas More — 1557