Shakespearean comedy

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Shakespearean comedy arrived at the world's attention not through a single celebrated play, but through an act of editorial sorting. When Shakespeare's fellow actors John Heminges and Henry Condell compiled the First Folio in 1623, they divided his collected works into three neat columns: comedies, histories, and tragedies. That tripartite division shaped how readers, scholars, and audiences would think about Shakespeare's output for centuries. Yet the sorting was never quite as clean as it looked. Some plays slipped between categories, and later scholars found themselves inventing an entirely new label to describe what Shakespeare had been writing in his final creative years.

  The questions that grouping raises are still alive today. What made a comedy a comedy in Shakespeare's hands? Why does Cymbeline appear on the tragedies shelf when readers and scholars overwhelmingly treat it as comic? And what is a romance, exactly, if the word did not even exist as a dramatic category when Shakespeare wrote?

• 2. The First Folio's Categories

  ›

  John Heminges and Henry Condell published the First Folio in 1623, roughly seven years after Shakespeare's death. Their editorial decisions fixed the canon in ways that still echo. The Folio listed fourteen plays under the comedy banner, and each one was placed there by men who had worked alongside Shakespeare and performed his work on stage.

  Not every choice was obvious. Cymbeline was placed among the tragedies in the Folio, yet modern scholars widely regard it as a comedy, or at least as something closer to comedy than to tragedy. That single misplacement hints at how unstable the boundary was between comic and tragic in Shakespeare's later output. The two plays left out of the Folio entirely, The Two Noble Kinsmen and Pericles, Prince of Tyre, circulated as quartos and are generally recognised as Shakespeare's own work; they simply did not make the cut for the collected edition.

• 3. Problem Plays and Romances

  ›

  Modern scholars recognised that not all of Shakespeare's comedies felt the same, and two informal sub-labels emerged to carve up the category further. Three plays are sometimes called the problem plays: All's Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure, and The Winter's Tale. The label points to an unease within those works, a sense that they resist the comfortable resolution associated with straightforward comic endings.

  A separate and distinct grouping carries the label romances. Cymbeline, Pericles, Prince of Tyre, The Tempest, The Two Noble Kinsmen, and The Winter's Tale all fall under this heading. The romance designation is a scholarly invention; Shakespeare himself never used it. What the category tries to capture is a particular tone and structure found in his later plays: stories involving long separations, near-disasters, and improbable recoveries. The Winter's Tale sits in both groups, carrying both asterisks in the scholarly record.

• 4. The Full Comic Catalogue

  ›

  Across the full list, seventeen plays carry the comedy designation or are generally accepted into it. Titles like A Midsummer Night's Dream, Much Ado About Nothing, As You Like It, and Twelfth Night represent what many listeners would think of as the core of Shakespeare's comic work. The Merry Wives of Windsor, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, The Comedy of Errors, The Taming of the Shrew, and Love's Labour's Lost complete a group of plays that sit comfortably within the Folio's original comedy column.

  The Merchant of Venice carries both the comedy label and the problem-play asterisk, reflecting the difficulty of pinning down its tone. All's Well That Ends Well shares that double marking. The breadth of the list, from the knockabout mistaken-identity plot of The Comedy of Errors to the enchanted forest of A Midsummer Night's Dream to the sea-voyage magic of The Tempest, suggests that the word comedy, in Shakespeare's hands, covered far more territory than a simple requirement to make the audience laugh.

• 5. A Category Always in Motion

  ›

  The scholarly category of romance did not spring into existence overnight. It was a gradual recognition that plays like The Tempest and Pericles, Prince of Tyre required a framework the original Folio editors had not supplied. The process of naming and renaming reflects how living the discussion around Shakespeare's comedies has remained.

  Pericles, Prince of Tyre sits in a particularly interesting position: a quarto play generally accepted into the canon but excluded from the Folio, carrying the romance label, and linked to the late period of Shakespeare's career alongside The Tempest and Cymbeline. That The Tempest, long read as a kind of artistic farewell, ended up in the romance category rather than in the plain comedy column points to how much work a single word like comedy was being asked to do across a writing career that stretched over roughly two decades.