Skip to content

Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester

Ch. 1 of 8
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Contents

Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester

8 sections
  • Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester, was buried with a letter. Queen Elizabeth I had received it six days before his death on the 4th of September 1588, and she never parted with it. She kept it in her bedside treasure box, writing "his last letter" on the outside in her own hand. It was still there when she died fifteen years later, on the 24th of March 1603. Her nickname for Dudley had been "Eyes", symbolised in their private correspondence by the sign of two small circles.

    For thirty years, Dudley stood closer to Elizabeth than almost any person alive. He was her Master of the Horse from the morning after her accession, her privy councillor, her dancing partner, her unofficial consort at state ceremonies, and, for most of that time, her suitor. When he was absent from court for a few weeks in 1578, Sir Christopher Hatton described a growing emergency: "This court wanteth your presence. Her majesty is unaccompanied and, I assure you, the chambers are almost empty."

    Yet Dudley's name has come down to us tangled in scandal. His first wife died at the bottom of a flight of stairs. His secret second marriage enraged the Queen. A vicious Catholic libel published in 1584 depicted him as a poisoner, an atheist, and a man plotting to seize the Crown. Sorting out what was true, what was slander, and what lay somewhere in between occupied historians for centuries. The answers, when they came, made him a far more substantial figure than the caricature suggested.

  • Edmund Dudley, Robert's paternal grandfather, had served King Henry VII as an adviser and was executed for treason in 1510 by Henry VIII. The family's pattern of proximity to power followed by catastrophic disgrace would repeat itself.

    Robert was born on the 24th of June 1532, the fifth son of John Dudley, who would become the 1st Duke of Northumberland. The household was, by contemporary accounts, a notably happy one; John and Jane Dudley had thirteen children in all. Among the tutors the siblings shared were John Dee, Thomas Wilson, and Roger Ascham. Ascham believed Robert possessed a rare talent for languages and writing, including in Latin, though he regretted that his pupil preferred mathematics.

    Robert came of age in the courts of Henry VIII and Edward VI, learning the craft of the courtier firsthand. In 1549 he helped suppress Kett's Rebellion, and the following year he married Amy Robsart on the 4th of June 1550, in the presence of the young King Edward himself. She was the daughter and heiress of Sir John Robsart, a Norfolk gentleman-farmer, and the match appears to have been a genuine love match. Robert served as a Member of Parliament for Norfolk in 1551-52, March 1553, and again in 1559.

    The crisis came on the 6th of July 1553, when Edward VI died. Robert's father tried to place Lady Jane Grey on the throne; Jane was married to Robert's younger brother Guildford. Robert led a force of three hundred men into Norfolk to secure towns for Jane. After about ten days, he took King's Lynn and proclaimed her queen in the marketplace. The very next day, the 19th of July, Jane's reign collapsed in London. The townspeople of King's Lynn seized Robert and sent him to Framlingham Castle.

    What followed was total ruin. Robert was imprisoned in the Tower, attainted, and condemned to death, alongside his father and four brothers. His father went to the scaffold. His brother Guildford was executed in February 1554. In the Tower, Dudley found himself imprisoned alongside his childhood friend, the future Elizabeth I, who had been sent there on suspicion of involvement in Wyatt's Rebellion. Their shared captivity in that bleak fortress was one of the formative experiences of both their lives.

    The surviving brothers were released in the autumn of 1554. Their mother, who died the following January, and their brother-in-law Henry Sidney had worked for their freedom by befriending the Spanish nobles around Philip of Spain, Mary's husband. Robert's rehabilitation was gradual; he and his brother Ambrose fought for Philip II at the Battle of St. Quentin in August 1557. Their youngest brother Henry was killed there by a cannonball, before Robert's own eyes, according to Robert himself. All surviving Dudley children were restored in blood by Mary's parliament in 1558, clearing the way for what came next.

  • Philip II's envoy counted Robert Dudley among Elizabeth's special friends a week before Queen Mary died. On the morning of the 18th of November 1558, the day after Elizabeth's accession, Dudley witnessed the surrender of the Great Seal at Hatfield and was made Master of the Horse that same day. It was an ideal post for a man described as an excellent horseman with serious professional interest in horse breeding and royal transport. He was also entrusted with organising a large portion of the Queen's coronation festivities.

    By April 1559 Dudley had been elected a Knight of the Garter. Philip II was already receiving detailed intelligence about the relationship: "Lord Robert has come so much into favour that he does whatever he likes with affairs and it is even said that her majesty visits him in his chamber day and night." Within a month the Spanish ambassador Count de Feria counted Dudley among three persons who ran the country.

    His apartments at court were next to the Queen's. He was perceived as knowing "the Queen and her nature best of any man", and foreign princes visited on state occasions partly to bid for his goodwill. When several European rulers were vying for Elizabeth's hand in the autumn of 1559, their frustrated envoys concluded that the Queen was stalling them until, as one dispatch put it, "this wicked deed of killing his wife is consummated."

    This was the world Dudley occupied: intimate enough to be assumed to be king-in-waiting, prominent enough to attract murderous enemies. He took to wearing a light coat of mail under his clothing. Plans to kill him circulated among the nobility, who could not tolerate the prospect of him becoming king. Gossip spread, in England and on the Continent, that the Queen had children by him, rumours that never fully died for the rest of her life.

    In October 1562, Elizabeth fell gravely ill with smallpox. Believing she was dying, she asked the Privy Council to make Dudley Protector of the Realm and to grant him a suitable title together with £20,000 a year. She recovered, and he was made a privy councillor. In 1564 he was created Earl of Leicester, partly to make him a more credible candidate as a husband for Mary, Queen of Scots. He was not, as Elizabeth's political manoeuvrings required, going to cooperate with that plan. He was never merely her instrument.

  • Amy Dudley had been living in different parts of the country since her ancestral manor house was uninhabitable. Her husband visited her for four days at Easter 1559 and she spent a month near London in early summer of the same year. They never saw each other again.

    On the 8th of September 1560, Amy was found dead at her residence, Cumnor Place near Oxford, at the bottom of a flight of stairs. Dudley, who had been with the Queen at Windsor Castle, wrote immediately to his contact: "There came to me Bowes, by whom I do understand that my wife is dead and as he sayeth by a fall from a pair of stairs. Little other understanding can I have of him. The greatness and the suddenness of the misfortune doth so perplex me, until I do hear from you how the matter standeth, or how this evil should light upon me, considering what the malicious world will bruit, as I can take no rest."

    He retreated to his house at Kew and pressed for an impartial inquiry. A coroner's jury had already convened. Their verdict was accident: Lady Dudley, staying alone in a chamber, had fallen down the adjoining stairs, sustaining two head injuries and breaking her neck. The scandal, however, was devastating. Those who wanted to prevent Elizabeth from marrying Dudley exploited it fully. Most historians have since considered murder unlikely.

    The coroner's report came to light in The National Archives in 2008, and it is compatible with an accidental fall, suicide, or other violence. A medical theory first proposed in 1956 by Ian Aird, a professor of surgery, suggested that Amy Dudley had suffered from breast cancer, which through metastatic deposits in the spine could have caused her neck to break under only limited strain, such as a short fall. This explanation has been widely accepted, though suicide has also been considered, given evidence that she was ill and possibly depressed.

    A detail that appeared for the first time in the libel Leicester's Commonwealth in 1584, describing Amy's headdress still standing undisturbed on her head when she was found, was satirical in origin but was long repeated as fact. The shadow of that morning at Cumnor Place never left Dudley. For eighteen years he did not remarry, partly for the Queen's sake. Whether or not he was guilty of anything, he was never free of the accusation.

  • After the Duke of Northumberland's attainder, the Dudley family had lost everything. Robert financed his early years as a royal favourite through large loans from City of London merchants until, in April 1560, Elizabeth granted him his first export licence, worth £6,000 per year. In June 1563 she granted him Kenilworth Manor, Castle, and Park, along with the lordships of Denbigh and Chirk in North Wales. Further grants followed, and eventually Leicester and his elder brother Ambrose came to preside over the greatest aristocratic interest in the West Midlands and North Wales.

    At Denbigh, Dudley inherited a region in tenurial chaos that had persisted for more than half a century. He negotiated settlements with the tenants, raising copyholders to the status of freeholders in exchange for newly agreed rents and securing tenants' rights of common, in what the historian Simon Adams called "an ambitious resolution of a long-standing problem... without parallel in Elizabeth's reign". He also began large building projects in the town of Denbigh, including a church planned on a scale that would have been the largest post-Reformation church in England and Wales. It was never finished. He tried, and failed, to have the nearby episcopal see of St Asaph transferred to Denbigh. He supported the translation of the Bible and Common Prayer Book into Welsh.

    Kenilworth Castle became the centre of his territorial ambition. He added a gatehouse, a formal garden, and a residential wing whose thin walls and grids of windows became characteristic of Elizabethan architecture. His fascination with the Beauchamp inheritance, which he and his brother Ambrose shared through their paternal grandmother, gave the West Midlands a special personal significance; they adopted the ancient heraldic device of the earls of Warwick, the Bear and Ragged Staff. He also founded Lord Leycester's Hospital in Warwick, a charity for aged and injured soldiers that still functions today.

    The climax of Kenilworth was a nineteen-day festival in July 1575. There was a Lady of the Lake, a swimming papier-mache dolphin with a small orchestra in its belly, fireworks, masques, hunts, and bear baiting. The source reads this extravaganza simultaneously as a final allegorical bid for the Queen's hand and as an oblique request for leave to marry someone else. In either reading, the spectacle was extraordinary enough to resonate in the memory of Elizabeth's court for years.

  • Around a hundred books were dedicated to Robert Dudley during Elizabeth's reign. In 1564 and 1567 Arthur Golding dedicated his popular translation of Ovid's Metamorphoses to him. Dudley suggested to the tailor John Stow in 1559 that he should become a chronicler, which Stow recalled in print in 1604.

    As Chancellor of Oxford University, Dudley enforced the Thirty-nine Articles, obtained an incorporation by Parliament under the Oxford and Cambridge Act 1571, and was instrumental in founding the official Oxford University Press. He installed the pioneer of international law Alberico Gentili and the controversial theologian Antonio del Corro at Oxford; over del Corro's case he sacked the university's Vice-Chancellor.

    His theatre patronage was equally vigorous. From at least 1559 he maintained his own company of players. In 1574 he obtained for them the first royal patent issued to actors to allow them to tour the country without interference from local authorities. He also protected the Children of St. Paul's and of the Royal Chapel against hostile bishops and landlords. His separate company of musicians performed before the King of Denmark in 1586; travelling with them was William Kempe, described as "the Lord Leicester's jesting player".

    Leicester possessed one of the largest private collections of paintings in Elizabethan England. He was a principal patron of Nicholas Hilliard and took a wide interest in Italian culture. The circle at Leicester House on the Strand included his nephew Philip Sidney, his niece Mary Sidney Herbert, John Dee, the secretaries Edward Dyer and Jean Hotman, John Florio, and Gabriel Harvey. Through Harvey, Edmund Spenser found employment at Leicester House, where he wrote his first poetry. Spenser recalled that time in his Prothalamion and in 1591 honoured the late Earl in his poem The Ruins of Time.

    In exploration and trade, Dudley was an enthusiastic backer of the Muscovy Company and the Merchant Adventurers. He was a principal funder of Francis Drake's circumnavigation of the world and, with his brother Ambrose, a principal patron of Martin Frobisher's 1576 search for the Northwest Passage. He later acquired his own ship, the Galleon Leicester. He also handled English relations with Morocco and supported Dom António, the exiled claimant to the Portuguese throne after 1580, in a policy shaped as much by Protestant solidarity and English seapower as by commercial calculation.

    A talk with Leicester about the sanitary conditions at the royal palaces inspired John Harington to construct a water closet, one of the more unexpected products of their acquaintance.

  • Leicester built a relationship with Prince William of Orange throughout the 1570s and became genuinely popular in the Dutch provinces. After the Prince of Orange was murdered in 1584 and Antwerp fell to the Duke of Parma in August 1585, an English intervention became unavoidable. Leicester had been pressing for it since 1577.

    On the 9th of December 1585, he set sail from Harwich and crossed the Channel in less than twenty-four hours, landing at Flushing. His reception was remarkable; one correspondent described it as resembling a second Charles V's progress. On the 1st of January 1586, the States General of the United Provinces urged him to accept the title of governor-general in The Hague. He accepted on the 25th of January, having received no word from England because of persistent adverse winds.

    Elizabeth was furious. She had expressly declined to accept sovereignty over the Netherlands while still expecting her lieutenant-general to direct their government. She sent Sir Thomas Heneage to read her letters of disapproval before the States General, with Leicester required to stand nearby. She demanded he resign the post in a formal ceremony at the very place where he had taken it. "My credit hath been cracked ever since her Majesty sent Sir Thomas Heneage hither", Leicester wrote in October 1586.

    Elizabeth also instructed her Lieutenant-General to avoid any decisive engagement with the Duke of Parma, the opposite of what Leicester and the Dutch wanted. His forces were small and chronically underfinanced. A long-running quarrel with Sir John Norris, his own deputy, undermined cohesion. In September 1586 there was a skirmish at Zutphen in which Philip Sidney was wounded; Sidney died a few weeks later. His uncle's grief was considerable.

    In his absence in December 1586, two Catholic officers Leicester had placed in command of Deventer and the fort of Zutphen, William Stanley and Rowland York, defected to Parma along with their key fortresses. When Leicester returned to the Netherlands in June 1587, the port of Sluis fell to Parma because Dutch allies refused to cooperate in relieving it. By December 1587 the political differences had become insurmountable; he asked to be recalled and gave up his post. He was irredeemably in debt, having mortgaged his estate to £25,000 to finance the expedition personally. The campaign was a military and political failure by every measure.

  • Leicester was in overall command of the English land forces during the Spanish Armada. At Tilbury on the Thames he erected a camp for London's defence, vigorously counteracting the disorganisation he found there. On the day Elizabeth gave her famous speech to the troops he walked beside her horse, bare-headed. After the Armada passed, he rode through London in visible triumph and for his last weeks dined regularly with the Queen, a unique favour.

    He died on the 4th of September 1588, at Cornbury Park near Oxford, on his way to take the baths at Buxton in Derbyshire. His health had been declining; historians have considered malaria and stomach cancer as possible causes. His death came unexpectedly. Elizabeth locked herself in her apartment for several days until Lord Burghley had the door broken open. Leicester was buried, as he had requested, in the Beauchamp Chapel of the Collegiate Church of St Mary, Warwick on the 10th of October 1588, in the same chapel as Richard Beauchamp and his own small son. His widow Lettice was buried there beside him when she died in 1634, under an epitaph describing him as "the best and dearest of husbands".

    The libel Leicester's Commonwealth, printed anonymously in 1584 by Catholic exiles in Paris, established a very different image. It presented him as an atheistic hypocrite, a perpetual dictator, an expert poisoner of high-profile figures, and a man plotting to seize the English throne. Smuggled into England, it became an underground best-seller and was translated into French the following year. Many of the most familiar characterisations of Leicester, including his nickname "the Gypsy" and the reprimand attributed to Elizabeth, "I will have here but one mistress and no master", were set down by Sir Henry Wotton and Sir Robert Naunton nearly half a century after his death.

    The Victorian historian James Anthony Froude called him Elizabeth's "soft plaything", while Conyers Read in 1925 contrasted "a selfish, unscrupulous courtier" with Burghley the wise patriot. Geoffrey Elton in 1955 described him simply as "a handsome, vigorous man with very little sense."

    Since the 1950s the academic consensus has shifted substantially. Eleanor Rosenberg established his importance in literary patronage in 1955. Patrick Collinson's reassessment of Elizabethan Puritanism in the 1960s and 1970s gave better purchase on Dudley's genuine religious convictions. Alan Haynes called him "one of the most strangely underrated of Elizabeth's circle of close advisers". Simon Adams, who researched many aspects of Leicester's career from the early 1970s onward, concluded that Leicester was as central a figure to the first reign of Elizabeth as Burghley himself, a verdict that thirty years of scholarship has done nothing to contradict.

Updated

Common questions

Who was Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester?

Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester, was an English statesman born on the 24th of June 1532 and the lifelong favourite of Queen Elizabeth I from her accession in 1558 until his death on the 4th of September 1588. He served as Master of the Horse, privy councillor, and Lord Steward of the Royal Household, and was one of the dominant political figures of the Elizabethan era alongside William Cecil and Sir Francis Walsingham.

How did Amy Robsart die and was Robert Dudley responsible?

Amy Robsart, Robert Dudley's first wife, was found dead at the bottom of a flight of stairs at Cumnor Place near Oxford on the 8th of September 1560. A coroner's jury returned a verdict of accident. Most historians have considered murder unlikely; a theory first proposed in 1956 by Ian Aird, a professor of surgery, suggested that metastatic breast cancer could have caused her neck to break from a short fall or even from coming down the stairs.

What was the Kenilworth festival organised by the Earl of Leicester?

The Kenilworth festival was a nineteen-day celebration staged by the Earl of Leicester in July 1575 at Kenilworth Castle in the English West Midlands, during a visit by Queen Elizabeth I. It featured a Lady of the Lake, a papier-mache dolphin with a small orchestra inside it, fireworks, masques, hunts, and bear baiting, and was interpreted as both a final bid for the Queen's hand and a request for leave to marry someone else.

Why did the Earl of Leicester's campaign in the Netherlands fail?

Leicester's campaign in the Netherlands between 1585 and 1587 failed because of persistent underfinancing, Elizabeth I's orders to avoid decisive engagement with the Duke of Parma, quarrels with his own deputy Sir John Norris, and the defection of two Catholic officers with key fortresses to the enemy in late 1586. Leicester mortgaged his estate to £25,000 to fund the expedition personally and returned irredeemably in debt.

What was Leicester's Commonwealth and how did it affect Robert Dudley's reputation?

Leicester's Commonwealth was an anonymous libel written by Catholic exiles in Paris and printed in 1584. It depicted Robert Dudley as an atheist, hypocrite, and expert poisoner plotting to seize the English Crown. Smuggled into England, it became an underground best-seller and was translated into French the following year. It formed the basis of a literary and historical tradition that portrayed Leicester as a Machiavellian villain, a characterisation that dominated his reputation for centuries.

Who did Robert Dudley secretly marry and what were the consequences?

On the 21st of September 1578, Robert Dudley secretly married Lettice Knollys, widow of Walter Devereux, 1st Earl of Essex, at his country house at Wanstead. When Elizabeth I learned of the marriage nine months later, she was furious. Lettice Dudley was permanently banished from court, and the Queen never fully forgave the Earl, humiliating him in public and using his marriage as grounds to withdraw favour.

All sources

287 references cited across the entry

  1. 3Haynes 1992 p. 12; Wilson 1981 pp. 151–152
  2. 4Adams 2002 pp. 145, 147
  3. 5Adams 2002 p. 52
  4. 6Adams 2008b
  5. 7Adams 2002 p. 133
  6. 8Wilson 1981 p. 16
  7. 9Chamberlin 1939 pp. 55–56
  8. 10Chamberlin 1939 p. 55; Adams 2008b
  9. 11Wilson 1981 pp. 23, 28–29; Adams 2008b; Loades 1996 p. 225
  10. 12Wilson 1981 pp. 31, 33, 44
  11. 13Adams 2002 pp. 135, 159
  12. 14Loades 1996 pp. 179, 225, 285; Haynes 1987 pp. 20–21
  13. 15Virgoe 1982 p. 66
  14. 16Loades 1996 pp. 225–226; Wilson 1981 pp. 45–47
  15. 17Loades 1996 pp. 256–257, 238–239
  16. 18Ives 2009 pp. 199, 209; Haynes 1987 pp. 23
  17. 19Haynes 1987 pp. 23–24; Chamberlin 1939 pp. 68-69
  18. 20Loades 1996 pp. 266, 270–271
  19. 21Adams 2002 p. 134
  20. 22Loades 1996 p. 280
  21. 23Adams 2002 pp. 161–162
  22. 24Loades 1996 p. 273
  23. 25Adams 2002 p. 158; Wilson 1981 p. 71
  24. 26Loades 1996 pp. 238, 273
  25. 27Adams 2002 p. 134; Chamberlin 1939 pp. 87–88
  26. 29Wilson 1981 pp. 78, 83–92
  27. 30Wilson 1981 p. 96
  28. 31Hume 1892–1899 Vol. I pp. 57–58; Wilson 1981 p. 95
  29. 32Owen 1980 p. 9
  30. 33Skidmore 2010 pp. 166, 162
  31. 34Chamberlin 1939 p. 118
  32. 35Chamberlin 1939 pp. 116–117; Doran 1996 p. 42
  33. 36Adams 1995 p. 78; Wilson 1981 p. 100; Chamberlin 1939 p. 117
  34. 37Adams 1995 p. 151
  35. 38Wilson 1981 p. 114; Doran 1996 p. 72
  36. 39Wilson 2005 p. 261
  37. 40Adams 2011
  38. 41Adams 1995 pp. 380–382
  39. 42Adams 1995 p. 378
  40. 43Adams 1995 p. 383
  41. 44Adams 2002 p. 136
  42. 45Doran 1996 p. 43; Skidmore 2010 p. 382
  43. 46Skidmore 2010 p. 378
  44. 47Owen 1980 p. 10; Doran 1996 p. 45
  45. 48Doran 1996 p. 44
  46. 49Adams 2011; Skidmore 2010 pp. 230–233
  47. 50Doran 1996 pp. 42–44
  48. 51Jenkins 2002 p. 65
  49. 52Jenkins 2002 p. 291
  50. 53Gristwood 2007 pp. 115, 120–123; Doran 1996 p. 44
  51. 54Doran 1996 p. 45–52; Adams 2008b
  52. 56Wilson 1981 p. 136
  53. 57Adams 2002 p. 137
  54. 58Wilson 1981 pp. 140–141
  55. 59Chamberlin 1939 pp. 138–139
  56. 60Chamberlin 1939 pp. 136, 160, 144–145
  57. 61Chamberlin 1939 pp. 140, 146, 147
  58. 62Chamberlin 1939 pp. 151–152
  59. 63Chamberlin 1939 p. 158
  60. 64Chamberlin 1939 pp. 143–144, 152, 158, 168; Wilson 1981 p. 141; Jenkins 2002 p. 119
  61. 65Chamberlin 1939 p. 152; Wilson 1981 p. 142
  62. 66Adams 2008b; Chamberlin 1939 pp. 155, 156–157, 159–161
  63. 67Fraser 1972 p. 267; Wilson 1981 p. 243
  64. 68Doran 1996 p. 65
  65. 69Hume 1904 p. 90; Doran 1996 p. 65
  66. 70Hume 1904 pp. 90–94, 99, 101–104; Jenkins 2002 p. 130
  67. 71Doran 1996 p. 212
  68. 72Hume 1904 pp. 94, 95, 138, 197; Doran 1996 p. 124
  69. 73Doran 1996 pp. 212–213
  70. 74Adams 2002 p. 139
  71. 75Watkins 1998 p. 163
  72. 76Gristwood 2007 p. 151; Girouard 1979 p. 111
  73. 77Adams 2002 p. 140; Wilson 1981 p. 305
  74. 78Wilson 1981 p. 230
  75. 79Wilson 1981 p. 305
  76. 80Adams 2002 p. 120; Wilson 1981 pp. 78, 305
  77. 81Adams 2002 p. 43
  78. 82Haynes 1987 pp. 141–144; Wilson 1981 pp. 326–327
  79. 83Adams 1996
  80. 84Loades 2004 p. 271
  81. 85Adams 2002 p. 319
  82. 86Adams 2008b; Adams 1996
  83. 87Adams 2002 p. 163; Adams 2008b
  84. 88Haynes 1987 p. 59; Adams 2002 p. 235
  85. 89Adams 2002 p. 310; Wilson 1981 p. 170
  86. 90Adams 2002 pp. 3, 264, 272, 275
  87. 91Adams 2002 pp. 268–269, 275–276
  88. 92Adams 2002 pp. 3, 276–277
  89. 93Wilson 1981 pp. 171–172
  90. 94Adams 2002 p. 225
  91. 95Wilson 1981 p. 172; Adams 2002 p. 225
  92. 96Wilson 1981 p. 173
  93. 97Morris 2010 p. 27
  94. 98Adams 2002 pp. 322, 3
  95. 99Wilson 1981 pp. 1, 3
  96. 100Adams 2002 pp. 312–313, 321
  97. 101Adams 2002 p. 312–313, 320–321, 326
  98. 102Jenkins 2002 pp. 179–181
  99. 103Adams 2002 p. 327
  100. 104Adams 2002 p. 312
  101. 105Molyneux 2008 pp. 58–59
  102. 106Morris 2010 pp. 47–48
  103. 107Doran 1996 pp. 67–69; Jenkins 2002 pp. 205–211
  104. 108Henderson 2005 pp. 90–92
  105. 109Gristwood 2007 p. 249
  106. 110Gristwood 2007 pp. 249–250
  107. 111Rickman 2008 p. 49
  108. 112Read 1936 p. 24
  109. 113Read 1936 p. 25
  110. 114Read 1936 pp. 23, 26
  111. 115Warner 1899 pp. iii–iv
  112. 116Jenkins 2002 pp. 124–125
  113. 117Adams 2008a
  114. 118Jenkins 2002 p. 212
  115. 119Freedman 1983 pp. 33–34, 22
  116. 120Freedman 1983 pp. 33; Jenkins 2002 p. 217
  117. 121Adams 2008d; Adams 2008c
  118. 122Warner 1899 p. vi; Wilson 1981 p. 246
  119. 123Warner 1899 p. ix
  120. 124Warner 1899 p. xxxix
  121. 125Warner 1899 p. xl; Adams 2008d
  122. 126Warner 1899 p. vi, vii
  123. 127Jenkins 2002 pp. 234–235
  124. 128Doran 1996 p. 161
  125. 129Wilson 1981 pp. 229–230
  126. 130Hammer 1999 p. 35
  127. 131Jenkins 2002 p. 287
  128. 132Nicolas 1847 p. 382
  129. 133Jenkins 2002 p. 362
  130. 134Jenkins 2002 pp. 280–281
  131. 135Adams 1995 p. 182
  132. 136Hammer 1999 pp. 34–38, 60–61, 70, 76
  133. 137Wilson 1981 pp. 228, 230–231
  134. 138Nicolas 1847 p. 97; Jenkins 2002 p. 247
  135. 139Owen 1980 p. 44; Jenkins 2002 pp. 263, 305
  136. 140Hume 1892–1899 Vol. III p. 477; Jenkins 2002 p. 279
  137. 141Wilson 2005 p. 358; Jenkins 2002 p. 280
  138. 142Jenkins 2002 p. 305
  139. 143Wilson 1981 p. 247
  140. 144Hammer 1999 p. 46
  141. 145Adams 2002 pp. 17–18
  142. 146Wilson 1981 p. 195
  143. 147Doran 1996 p. 59
  144. 148Wilson 1981 p. 215; Collinson 1960 pp. xxv–xxvi
  145. 149Rosenberg 1958 p. 23
  146. 150Adams 2002 p. 121
  147. 151Adams 2002 p. 18; Alford 2002 p. 30; Doran 1996 p. 216
  148. 152Wilson 1981 p. 217
  149. 153Wilson 1981 p. 216
  150. 154Adams 2002 pp. 18–19, 59
  151. 155Jenkins 2002 p. 247
  152. 156Doran 1996 p. 190
  153. 157Adams 2002 p. 34
  154. 158Adams 2002 pp. 104, 107
  155. 159Adams 2002 pp. 137–138, 141
  156. 160Adams 2002 p. 18
  157. 161Jenkins 2002 pp. 159, 169
  158. 162Wilson 1981 p. 243
  159. 163Jenkins 2002 p. 298
  160. 164Adams 2008b; Collinson 2007 p. 75
  161. 165Collinson 2007 p. 75
  162. 166Jenkins 2002 pp. 323–324
  163. 167Hammer 1999 pp. 59–61; Gristwood 2007 p. 322
  164. 168Gristwood 2007 p. 292
  165. 169Wilson 1981 p. 146; Adams 2002 p. 337
  166. 170Adams 2002 pp. 142, 337
  167. 171Wilson 1981 p. 165
  168. 172Haynes 1987 pp. 88–94
  169. 173Wilson 1981 pp. 164–165; Gristwood 2007 p. 198
  170. 174Haynes 1987 pp. 145–149
  171. 175Wilson 1981 p. 169
  172. 176Adams 2002 p. 250
  173. 177Wilson 1981 pp. 131–132, 168–169
  174. 178Chamberlin 1939 pp. 177–178
  175. 179Haynes 1987 pp. 75–76; Jenkins 2002 p. 178
  176. 180Rosenberg 1958 pp. 295–296
  177. 181Rosenberg 1958 p. 137; Haynes 1987 p. 77
  178. 182Rosenberg 1958 p. xiii; Adams 2008b
  179. 183Rosenberg 1958 pp. 156–158; Jenkins 2002 p. 143
  180. 184Rosenberg 1958 p. xvi
  181. 185Adams 2008b; Rosenberg 1958 p. 64; Wilson 1981 pp. 160–161
  182. 186Rosenberg 1958 pp. 301–307
  183. 187Adams 1995 p. 56
  184. 188Wilson 1981 p. 153
  185. 189Rosenberg 1958 p. 305
  186. 190Morris 2010 p. 34; Wilson 1981 illustration caption
  187. 191Hearn 1995 p. 96; Haynes 1987 p. 199
  188. 192Hearn 1995 p. 124; Haynes 1992 p. 12
  189. 193Haynes 1987 pp. 76–78, 125–126; Wilson 1981 p. 307
  190. 194Jenkins 2002 pp. 254–257
  191. 195Jenkins 2002 p. 261
  192. 196Adams 2002 p. 149
  193. 197Starkey 2001 pp. 230, 231
  194. 198Doran 1996 pp. 66–67; Skidmore 2010 pp. 129, 128; Porter 2007 p. 412
  195. 199Doran 1996 pp. 59, 67
  196. 200Collinson 1971 p. 53
  197. 201MacCulloch 2001 pp. 213, 249; Adams 2002 pp. 141–142
  198. 202Adams 1995 p. 463; Adams 2002 p. 190
  199. 203Adams 2002 pp. 230–231
  200. 204Wilson 1981 pp. 198–205; Adams 2002 p. 231
  201. 205Adams 2002 p. 231
  202. 206Wilson 1981 p. 205
  203. 207Adams 2002 pp. 231, 143, 229–232; Collinson 1960 p. xxx
  204. 208Collinson 1960 pp. xxi–xxiii, xxxviii
  205. 209Strong and van Dorsten 1964 pp. 7–15; Wilson 1981 p. 238; Haynes 1987 p. 158
  206. 210Strong and van Dorsten 1964 pp. 20, 24
  207. 211Adams 2002 p. 147
  208. 212Strong and van Dorsten 1964 p. 25
  209. 213Gristwood 2007 pp. 307–308; Hammer 2003 p. 125
  210. 214Strong and van Dorsten 1964 p. 53
  211. 215Wilson 1981 pp. 276–278
  212. 216Strong and van Dorsten 1964 pp. 55, 73
  213. 217Strong and van Dorsten 1964 p. 54
  214. 218Haynes 1987 pp. 158–159; Bruce 1844 p. 17; Strong and van Dorsten 1964 pp. 23, 25
  215. 219Bruce 1844 p. 15
  216. 220Gristwood 2007 pp. 311, 313; Chamberlin 1939 p. 263
  217. 221Bruce 1844 p. 105
  218. 222Gristwood 2007 p. 313
  219. 223Strong and van Dorsten 1964 p. 59
  220. 224Hammer 2003 p. 127
  221. 225Bruce 1844 p. 424
  222. 226Strong and van Dorsten 1964 p. 72
  223. 227Gristwood 2007 pp. 316–317
  224. 228Bruce 1844 p. 309; Wilson 1981 pp. 282–284
  225. 229Adams 2002 p. 147; Gristwood 2007 p. 307; Hammer 2003 pp. 125–126
  226. 230Adams 2002 p. 180; Hammer 2003 p. 126
  227. 231Hammer 2003 pp. 132–133
  228. 232Wilson 1981 p. 282; Hammer 2003 p. 133
  229. 233Gristwood 2007 pp. 315–316
  230. 234Strong and van Dorsten 1964 p. 75
  231. 235Strong and van Dorsten 1964 pp. 75–76; Haynes 1987 p. 175
  232. 236Haynes 1987 pp. 172–173; Adams 2008b
  233. 237Haynes 1987 pp. 173–174
  234. 238Strong and van Dorsten 1964 pp. 43, 50
  235. 239Haynes 1987 pp. 170–171
  236. 240Wilson 1981 p. 291
  237. 241Wilson 1981 pp. 291–294
  238. 242Wilson 1981 p. 294
  239. 243Wilson 1981 pp. 294–295
  240. 244Haynes 1987 p. 191
  241. 245Jenkins 2002 pp. 349–351
  242. 246Haynes 1987 pp. 191–195
  243. 247Hume 1892–1899 Vol. IV pp. 420–421; Jenkins 2002 p. 358
  244. 248Adams 1996; Gristwood 2007 pp. 333–334
  245. 249Wilson 1981 p. 302
  246. 251Wilson 1981 p. 303
  247. 252Adams 2002 p. 149; Gristwood 2007 p. 340
  248. 253Gristwood 2007 p. 340
  249. 254Wilson 1981 pp. 262–265
  250. 255Jenkins 2002 p. 294
  251. 256Bossy 2002 p. 126; Wilson 1981 p. 251
  252. 257Wilson 1981 pp. 253–254
  253. 258Burgoyne 1904 p. 225
  254. 259Wilson 1981 pp. 254–259; Jenkins 2002 pp. 290–294
  255. 260Adams 1996; Wilson 1981 p. 268
  256. 262Gristwood 2007 p. 9
  257. 263Adams 2002 pp. 53–55; Adams 2008b
  258. 264Adams 2002 pp. 55, 56
  259. 265Adams 2002 p. 57
  260. 266Haynes 1987 p. 11
  261. 267Chamberlin 1939 p. 103
  262. 268Wilson 1981 p. 304
  263. 269Adams 2002 p. 176
  264. 270Adams 2002 pp. 226–228
  265. 271Haynes 1992 p. 15
  266. 272Gristwood 2007 p. 372; Adams 2002 p. 2
  267. 273Adams 2002 p. 7
  268. 274Hardy, Robert (1925-) BiographyRichard Hewett — British Film Institute
  269. 275Interview: Good kismet for HardyMatt Wolf — 15 January 2006
  270. 276Jeremy Irons19 December 2025
  271. 279Klossner 2002 p. 141
  272. 280Klossner 2002 p. 404
  273. 281Klossner 2002 p. 250
  274. 282ElizabethRoger Ebert — 20 November 1998
  275. 287BookThe History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1509–1558Roger Virgoe — Boydell and Brewer — 1982

Queue