Protagoras

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Protagoras of Abdera, born around 490 BC in the coastal city of Thrace opposite the island of Thasos, came to be one of the most provocative thinkers of the ancient world. He is the man who declared that man is the measure of all things. That single sentence set philosophers against him for centuries and still sparks argument today. How did a porter from a provincial city become the intellectual equal of Pericles? What did he actually mean by that infamous claim? And why did the Athenians allegedly gather his books and burn them in the marketplace? Those are the questions this documentary will answer.

• 2. From Porter to Philosopher

  ›

  Protagoras was spotted not in a lecture hall but on a road, carrying a load of small pieces of wood. According to Aulus Gellius, the philosopher Democritus noticed that Protagoras had tied that bundle together with such perfect geometric accuracy that the young man must be a mathematical prodigy. Democritus promptly brought Protagoras into his own household and taught him philosophy.

  The journey from that roadside encounter to the courts of Athens was remarkable. Protagoras became well known in the city and counted Pericles himself among his friends. Plutarch records that Pericles and Protagoras once spent an entire day debating a single legal puzzle: a man had been accidentally struck and killed by a javelin at an athletic contest. Was his death the fault of the javelin, the man who threw it, or the officials who ran the games? That one afternoon of talk reveals both how seriously Athens took philosophical argument and how central Protagoras had become to its intellectual life.

  Plato, in the dialogue that bears Protagoras's name, records him saying before a gathering that included Socrates, Prodicus, and Hippias that he was old enough to be the father of any of them. That remark places his birth no later than 490 BC. The Meno adds that he died at roughly the age of 70, after forty years as a practising Sophist, placing his death around 420 BC. Plato also credits Protagoras with something no one before him had done: inventing the role of the professional sophist.

• 3. The Measure of Man

  ›

  The statement that made Protagoras famous appeared at the opening of his work Truth, also known as Refutations. "Of all things the measure is Man, of the things that are, that they are, and of the things that are not, that they are not." That sentence has been shortened ever since to "Man is the measure of all things," but the shortening loses something.

  What Protagoras seems to have meant is not that reality is a free-for-all fantasy. He argued that each person's own history, experiences, and expectations shape their judgments about what is true. Consider his own example of temperature: one person finds the weather cold while another finds it hot. Neither is lying. According to Protagoras, no absolute measurement of that temperature exists outside the experiencing person.

  The idea was meant to be provocative. Plato interpreted it as a denial of objective truth, and both Plato and Aristotle pushed back hard. Their objection was pointed: if all truth is relative, then Protagoras's own theory is relative too, which gives him a very convenient escape from any challenge. His claim would be true for him but false for those who reject it. Protagoras seems to have anticipated this kind of tension, because his argument was not simply that all views are equally valid. He stressed that while all perceptions may deserve respect, they are not of equal usefulness. A belief born from a sick or disordered mind deserves the same acknowledgment but not the same weight. The sophist's job, in his view, was to teach students how to tell the difference, and in that way to teach virtue itself.

• 4. Democracy and Debate

  ›

  Protagoras did not propose relativism as an excuse for doing nothing. He argued that recognizing the validity of others' experiences is precisely what makes democratic debate possible. If each person's view carries its own internal logic, rooted in that person's life, then a community cannot simply decree what is true from on high. It must argue, weigh, and deliberate.

  This had a practical edge. Protagoras claimed to teach, in his own words as recorded in the Platonic dialogue, "the proper management of one's own affairs, how best to run one's household, and the management of public affairs, how to make the most effective contribution to the affairs of the city by word and action." That curriculum was not abstract. Athens was a city that ran on speech: in courts, in assemblies, in public contests.

  Diogenes Laertius states that Protagoras was one of the first to compete in rhetorical contests at the Olympic games. His book Technique of Eristics, whose title translates roughly as Practice of Wranglings, used the language of wrestling as a metaphor for intellectual combat. He also taught the correct use of words, what the Greeks called orthoepeia, and devised a taxonomy of speech acts that grouped statements into assertions, questions, answers, and commands. Aristotle notes that he also worked on the classification of grammatical gender. These were not decorative studies. They were tools for a world where argument was power.

• 5. Against the Gods

  ›

  Protagoras carried his skepticism toward religion with the same rigor he applied to temperature and legal responsibility. In his lost work On the Gods, he wrote: "Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not, nor of what sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and the brevity of human life."

  That statement, reported by Diogenes Laertius, placed Protagoras in territory that ancient Athens found dangerous. Whether he was a committed agnostic or something closer to what Tim Whitmarsh calls an atheist, the effect was the same: he refused to affirm the gods, and Athens apparently could not tolerate it. According to Diogenes Laertius, the city expelled him and ordered that all copies of his books be collected and burned in the marketplace.

  The classicist John Burnet doubts the full account. Both Diogenes Laertius and Cicero, who also mentions the destruction of the books, wrote hundreds of years after the events they describe, and no contemporary source that discusses Protagoras at length mentions any such prosecution. Burnet adds a practical note: even if some copies were burned, enough survived to be read and debated in the following century. The story of the burning may be legend, but the position that provoked it was real. His death around 420 BC was attributed in some ancient accounts to drowning after the alleged trial for impiety, a charge the Greeks called asebeia. That account, too, is considered unreliable.

• 6. A Lost Library

  ›

  Protagoras spent forty years at the forefront of Greek intellectual life, and almost none of his writing survived. What remains are fragments and quotations preserved in the works of people who often disagreed with him.

  His known titles offer a window onto the range of his thinking. Beyond Truth and On the Gods, Diogenes Laertius lists Art of Eristics, Imperative, On Ambition, On Incorrect Human Actions, On Those in Hades, On Sciences, On Virtues, On the Original State of Things, and Trial over a Fee. That last title alone raises questions that no surviving text can answer.

  His skepticism about mathematics is documented through Aristotle's Metaphysics, which quotes him arguing that perceptible lines are not what the geometer talks about. No visible, physical line is truly straight or perfectly curved in the way geometry demands, and a circle drawn on the ground does not touch a ruler at a single point. Philodemus records his verdict on the subject more bluntly: the subject matter is unknowable and the terminology distasteful. He also argued that art without practice and practice without art are nothing, a remark preserved by Stobaeus. Eusebius, quoting Aristocles of Messene, placed him in a philosophical lineage running from Xenophanes and ending in Pyrrhonism, the ancient tradition of radical skepticism. That lineage suggests his influence ran far beyond his own lifetime, even through texts that no longer exist.