Portrait of Thomas Cromwell

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Portrait of Thomas Cromwell began as a small oil panel painted by Hans Holbein the Younger, a German-Swiss artist working at the English court. Historians usually date it to between 1532 and 1534. At the time, Cromwell was around 48 years old, serving as chief minister to Henry VIII, a post he held until 1540. It is one of only two portraits Holbein made of him. The other is a small round medallion, part of a set depicting figures at the Tudor court. The original panel does not survive. It survives today only through three later copies, in New York's Frick Collection, London's National Portrait Gallery, and the Chichester Constable collection in Yorkshire. What happened to the painting Holbein actually made, and why did it vanish so completely from the historical record? What does a portrait commissioned by one of the most powerful men in England reveal about how he wanted to be seen? And how did he actually look to those around him? Those questions run through the story of a man who rose from an ordinary trade to command the machinery of Henry VIII's court. They also run through the fortunes of the artist who painted him.

• 2. A Modest Commission

  ›

  In 1532, Holbein gained a footing at the English court, painting under the patronage of both Cromwell and Anne Boleyn. By 1535 he had been named King's Painter to Henry VIII. Cromwell commissioned this portrait of himself directly. Art historians believe he asked Holbein to depict him modestly. That was a striking contrast to the artist's other English court portraits, which tend toward lavish, flattering treatment.

  The border inscription reads, "To our trusty and right well, beloved Councillor, Thomas Cromwell, Master of our Jewel House." Cromwell sits on a bench before a table holding a legal document. His left hand bears a patterned gold ring, set with a large green gemstone. He wears sober colors, a black fur lined overcoat, a black hat, and a severe expression. The table is draped in green cloth, a symbolic nod to the Board of Green Cloth. Scattered across it are a quill, a devotional book, a pair of scissors, and a leather bag. That devotional book, resting quietly among his effects on the table, would not be identified for centuries.

• 3. Cromwell's Rise and Fall

  ›

  Thomas Cromwell started life as the son of a blacksmith in Putney, a lawyer and statesman with no inherited standing at court. He rose through his association with Cardinal Wolsey, attaching himself to one of the most powerful churchmen in England. When Wolsey fell from favor, Cromwell faced a period when Henry VIII's trust in him was far from certain. He worked his way past that distrust to become one of the King's closest confidants. He went on to hold the roles of vicegerent, Lord Chancellor, and Lord Great Chamberlain, among other posts.

  A shrewd politician, Cromwell understood the power of propaganda and put Holbein to work on his behalf. He commissioned anti-clerical woodcuts and the title page for Myles Coverdale's English translation of the Bible, casting himself as both reformist and royalist. Henry VIII wanted to glorify his position as Supreme Head of the Church of England. That drive reached its peak in the building of Nonsuch Palace, begun in 1538. Cromwell was forward-thinking and politically astute, and he supported that grand programme of artistic patronage.

  Cromwell engineered Henry's divorce from Catherine of Aragon, a legal and political maneuver that reshaped the English church. He had been an early ally of Anne Boleyn, yet later played a central role in her downfall. For years he remained one of the most significant forces in the Tudor court. That standing collapsed after he advised Henry to marry Anne of Cleves, hoping to strengthen a political alliance with the Protestant cause in Germany. The marriage proved unpopular, and his many enemies seized the opening to bring charges of treason against him. He was arrested and ultimately beheaded. That fall would ripple outward, threatening the standing of the very artist who had painted him.

• 4. Holbein After Cromwell

  ›

  Holbein's guile had already carried him safely through the downfalls of Thomas More and Anne Boleyn. Neither collapse did lasting damage to his own position at court. Cromwell's fall was different, striking close enough to badly damage Holbein's own reputation. He managed to keep his title as King's painter, but his standing among patrons never fully recovered. The portrait he had made of Cromwell would go on to outlive them both, carrying its own uneasy reputation.

• 5. A Cold Likeness

  ›

  During Holbein's second stay in England, Cromwell was acting directly on Henry VIII's behalf, commissioning a run of propagandistic portraits of favoured courtiers. His own reputation stood at its highest point yet. He had emerged as what one account called the "Protestant counterweight to Thomas More in the Privy council." He had also sealed Anne Boleyn's position amid bitter, high-stakes politics, and become one of the most influential men in England. He was also, by all accounts, a cultured man. The portrait's origins are tangled in the bloody politics of an unsteady reign. Perhaps because of that, no record survives of what Holbein himself thought of the man he painted.

  Cromwell is given a measure of respect in the painting, yet he appears sour and somewhat stiff. His eyes sit narrowly set, and he grips the seal in his hand tightly. His reputation stayed poor for centuries, only undergoing serious revision in the 1960s. Today, he is seen as a reformer, a highly capable and supreme political operator.

  "Of all the portraits that Holbein did at the English court, the portrait of Cromwell has always seemed the least flattering to its subject, the most viciously mocking," one earlier assessment stated. Henry Clay Frick asked visitors to "imagine Thomas More, the beautiful saint, and Cromwell, the monster, united in art and history, now facing each other, through Holbein and time and chance."

  Compared with Holbein's other portraits of Tudor politicians, Cromwell appears reduced, placed low in the frame and deep in the pictorial space. That placement puts distance between him and the viewer, diminishing his presence. The table itself reaches into the immediate foreground, as if pressing into the viewer's own space. Despite the cold, sour, grim treatment, the portrait has been described as "a softened version of the subject." The historian R. B. Merriman described Cromwell as "a short, stoutly built man, with a large face, smooth shaven, with close-cropped hair, and a heavy double chin, with a small and cruel mouth, an extraordinary long upper lip, and a pair of gray eyes set closely together, and moving restlessly under his light eyebrows." That likeness, however Holbein and his workshop rendered it, was itself a physical object that would not survive far beyond Cromwell's own downfall.

• 6. The Book of Hours

  ›

  As a devout man, Cromwell would have wanted his Book of Hours prominently displayed within his own portrait. His personal copy was identified in 2023, found in the Wren Library at Trinity College, Cambridge, by researchers from Hever Castle. It had been donated to Trinity College by Anne Sadleir, who lived from 1585 to around 1671. She was the widow of Ralph Sadleir, who lived from 1579 to 1661. He, in turn, descended from Cromwell's own protégé, Sir Ralph Sadleir, who lived from 1507 to 1587. The book's original silver-gilt mounts were the work of Pierre Mangot.

  The book itself was printed in Paris by Gilles and Germain Hardouyn in 1527, the same year Henry VIII first sought a divorce. Two other surviving copies of that edition once belonged to Henry's first wife, Catherine of Aragon, and his second wife, Anne Boleyn. The Tudor historian Tracy Borman called it "the most exciting Cromwell discovery in a generation; if not more." That book survived intact into the twenty-first century; the portrait sitting behind it in Cromwell's hands did not fare nearly as well.

• 7. Lost Original, Surviving Copies

  ›

  An undated inventory from Cromwell's London home lists "2 tables of my master his (vis)namy painted." That is one of the few clues to the painting's early life. Little else is known of the original after that entry. Cromwell was taken to Traitors' Gate on the 1st of June 1540. Only hours later, soldiers arrived at his house to carry his belongings to the treasury. Holbein's portrait most likely was destroyed or sold in that same period; no later royal inventory records it. Historians assume it was destroyed shortly after Cromwell's execution by beheading on the 28th of July 1540, at the Tower of London.

  In the Frick Collection, the surviving copy hangs opposite Holbein's own Portrait of Thomas More, the two rivals facing each other across the gallery. A second copy, dated to the early seventeenth century, hangs in London's National Portrait Gallery. A third belongs to the Chichester Constable collection in Yorkshire. All three are in poor condition, though the Frick panel is the best preserved and generally considered superior in quality. The original almost certainly carried a painted scroll above Cromwell's head, matching the same border text used on the Frick version. An early twentieth century restoration later removed it. That wording is known only from a 1915 photograph, taken before the removal.

  The Frick panel underwent extensive technical analysis in 1952 and was cleaned again in 1966. That work "did not substantiate an attribution to Holbein," pointing instead to the hand of a "less skilled, workshop member." The London copy was likely commissioned by Cromwell's own descendants. The National Portrait Gallery suggests it was "probably produced either when the original portrait was sold, or for display in a different family property." The Frick copy itself is dated to around 1532-33. The earliest recorded mention of any of the copies comes from 1866. That year, the Countess of Caledon lent her version, now in the Frick Collection, to the National Portrait Exhibition.

  The art historian Roy Strong believed all three surviving portraits are copies, none of them Holbein's own hand. The historian John Rowlands drew a different conclusion. Reading the pentimenti, the alterations revealed by X-ray photographs, he took them as evidence that the Frick version is Holbein's original. The art historian Stephanie Buck agrees with that attribution, although the question remains highly contentious. Strong counters that Cromwell's personal effects, as those of a supposed traitor, were destroyed soon after his execution, the original portrait very likely among them. That argument leaves every surviving version, however finely painted, standing in for a portrait that may have vanished within days of Cromwell's arrest.