Penal transportation

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Penal transportation was the practice of sending convicted criminals, and those deemed otherwise undesirable, to distant colonies for a fixed term or for life. Picture a courtroom in 18th-century England where a man convicted of stealing food heard a sentence that amounted to exile across an ocean. He might survive the voyage. He might serve his time. But he almost certainly would never see home again, because he would never have the resources to return.

  From the 5th century BC in Ancient Greece, societies have cast out those they considered threatening or burdensome. But Britain refined exile into a bureaucratic machine, and at its peak, that machine shipped somewhere between 50,000 and 120,000 people to the Americas alone, then redirected its output to Australia for another eighty years. What drove those numbers? Who actually got sent, and why? And when the system finally ended, what did it leave behind in the places it had filled with people who never chose to go there?

• 2. The Bloody Code and Its Escape Valve

  ›

  England's criminal justice in the 17th and 18th centuries ran on a punishing logic later called the Bloody Code. An enormous range of offences carried the death penalty, typically by hanging, yet judges had almost no middle ground between execution and release. The only traditional release valve was the benefit of clergy, a medieval relic that had originally protected clergymen from secular courts but had mutated into a fiction by which many ordinary offenders could avoid the rope by passing a reading test.

  The problem was obvious: executing a man for stealing a coat seemed excessive, but letting him walk free seemed equally wrong. Transportation slid into that gap. Legally it was not a sentence at all at first, but a condition of a royal pardon. Convicts who represented a danger to the community were dispatched to distant lands, and the practice was dressed up in the language of mercy. The king was not punishing, the official line went; he was sparing.

  In 1615, during the reign of James I, a council committee was already selecting prisoners for transportation based on their physical fitness for colonial labor. The Acts of the Privy Council recorded that prisoners "for strength of bodie or other abilities shall be thought fit to be employed in foreign discoveries or other services beyond the Seas." The logic was circular in the most useful way: the empire needed workers, the courts needed somewhere to put offenders, and a pardon could satisfy both needs at once.

• 3. Transportation as Commerce

  ›

  By the late 17th century, sending convicts abroad had become a business. Merchants reviewed prisoners much as a buyer might review livestock, selecting those most likely to fetch a good price in the colonies as indentured servants. The merchant obtained a contract from the sheriff, arranged the voyage, and on arrival sold the convicts' labor. The fee covered jail costs, pardon fees, clerical fees, and the merchant's profit.

  Colonies were not passive recipients. Maryland and Virginia enacted laws in 1670 to block the arrival of convicts, and the king was persuaded to honor those prohibitions. Wars disrupted the trade further: King William's War (1688-1697) and the War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714) disrupted merchant shipping and reduced the practical ability to move prisoners. In the reigns of Queen Anne (1702-1714) and George I (1714-1727), transportation became difficult to arrange, yet imprisonment alone was considered insufficient for serious offenders.

  The solution arrived in 1717 with the Transportation Act, introduced into the House of Commons under the Whig government by William Thomson, the Solicitor General. Thomson was simultaneously Recorder of London and the man who supplied the cabinet with intelligence about serious offenders at the Old Bailey. He became a judge in 1729. His act did something simple and consequential: it made transportation a direct sentence rather than a condition of pardon, cutting through layers of legal fiction. Non-capital convicts were now sentenced directly to seven years in the American colonies; those pardoned from capital offences received fourteen years. Returning early was itself a capital offence.

• 4. Women, Children, and Unequal Exile

  ›

  Between 1660 and 1670, the offences most commonly punished by transportation for men were highway robbery, burglary, and horse theft. Women faced a different calculus. Benefit of clergy was not available to women convicted of simple larceny until 1692, which meant five of the nine women transported after a death sentence in that decade were guilty of exactly that crime. Merchants actively preferred young, able-bodied men, since colonial demand was shaped by agricultural and construction labor.

  Children were transported too. Some were as young as 10 when convicted and sent to Australia. Most transported convicts, regardless of sex or age, had committed relatively minor offences such as theft of food, clothes, or small items; a smaller number had been convicted of rape or murder.

  Women who could not be transported were largely left in jail. A proposal to release such women was rejected outright, and the Lords Justices ordered that no distinction be made between men and women for sentencing purposes. In practice the only colony willing to accept women was the Leeward Islands, and the government had to subsidize their transport. In 1696, Jamaica refused a shipment of prisoners because most were women. Barbados accepted convicts but explicitly not "women, children nor other infirm persons." The result was that whipping and discharge remained more common for women, while women sentenced for capital offences could sometimes use the benefit of clergy to avoid both execution and transportation in a way men could not.

• 5. Australia and the First Fleet

  ›

  The American Revolutionary War (1775-1783) cut off the primary destination for transported convicts. Parliament passed the Criminal Law Act 1776, redirecting convicts to hard labor at home, but prisons quickly filled. Decommissioned ships moored in ports across Britain were turned into floating gaols called hulks. The search for an alternative destination ran through West Africa, where an earlier experiment had used Cape Coast Castle in modern Ghana and Goree in Senegal, before settling on the eastern coast of New South Wales, claimed for Britain in 1770 but as yet uncolonized.

  In 1787, the First Fleet departed England. It arrived at Botany Bay, Sydney on the 18th of January 1788, then relocated to Sydney Cove (modern-day Circular Quay) to establish the first permanent European settlement in Australia. The distance from Britain made this transportation categorically more severe than American exile. Officials acknowledged that the greater distance made the sentence harder than the hard labor that had substituted for it during the preceding decade.

  Violent conflict between indigenous Australians and the colonists began within months of the First Fleet's landing and lasted over a century. Convicts were sometimes the victims of indigenous attacks when forced to work on the frontier; in other instances, convicts and ex-convicts attacked indigenous people. In the Hawkesbury and Nepean Wars, a group of Irish convicts joined the Aboriginal coalition of Eora, Gandangara, Dharug, and Tharawal nations fighting the colonists. Norfolk Island functioned as a convict settlement from 1788 to 1794, then again from 1824 to 1847. Van Diemen's Land (modern Tasmania) was settled as a penal colony in 1803, and the Moreton Bay Settlement (modern Brisbane, Queensland) followed in 1824.

  During the 80 years of transportation to Australia, roughly 162,000 men and women were sent there in total. By 2015, an estimated 20% of the Australian population had convict ancestry.

• 6. India, France, and Soviet Deportations

  ›

  Britain was not the only empire to run such a system. In British India, independence activists were transported to the Andaman Islands, where a penal colony was established in 1857 following the Indian Rebellion of that year. The Cellular Jail in Port Blair, South Andaman Island, known as Kala Pani (Hindi for "black waters"), was constructed between 1896 and 1906. It held 698 individual cells designed for solitary confinement. An estimated 80,000 political prisoners passed through the jail; prisoners who went on hunger strike were force-fed. The settlement was shut down in 1945, and surviving prisoners had been repatriated in 1937.

  France transported convicts to Devil's Island in French Guiana from 1852 to 1953, and to New Caledonia from the 1860s until 1897. Approximately 22,000 criminals and political prisoners, most notably Communards, were sent to New Caledonia. The most prominent individual case from the French system was that of army officer Alfred Dreyfus, wrongly convicted of treason in 1894 in an atmosphere of antisemitism. Dreyfus was sent to Devil's Island and became the center of a cause that would be known as the Dreyfus Affair. He was fully exonerated in 1906.

  The Soviet Union applied a different logic. During the Second World War, the Soviet government transported up to 1.9 million people from its western republics to Siberia and the Central Asian republics, targeting populations accused of collaborating with Nazi Germany or of anti-Soviet activity. The groups included Volga Germans, Chechens, and Caucasian Turkic populations. The stated objectives were both military (removing potential liabilities from the war front) and economic (providing labor for the industrialization of underpopulated eastern regions). The policy continued until February 1956, when Nikita Khrushchev's speech "On the Personality Cult and Its Consequences" condemned it as a violation of Leninist principles. The transported populations did not begin to return until after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

• 7. The Sentence Ends

  ›

  Britain's system effectively ended in two legislative steps. The Penal Servitude Act 1853 substituted imprisonment with labor for transportation in lesser cases, those carrying sentences of less than 14 years. To house the resulting prison population, Parliament simultaneously passed the Convict Prisons Act 1853, providing new facilities specifically for women under transportation orders. The Penal Servitude Act 1857 ended transportation in virtually all remaining cases, though it initially set prison terms equal in length to the transportation sentences they replaced.

  The last convicts sentenced to transportation arrived in Western Australia in 1868. By that point, the Anti-Transportation League and shifting sentiment in Australia had already made the practice uncommon. With complaints about the system's failures mounting since the 1830s, and transportation becoming less common in 1840, the formal end of the sentence in the 1850s reflected a broader recognition that the system had not worked as intended: crime had continued, offenders had not been deterred, and conditions in the colonies had been widely condemned as inhumane.

  The Short Titles Act 1896 lists seven additional laws relating to penal transportation from the first half of the 19th century alone, an index of how many legislative adjustments the system had required over its life. The musical and literary record of transportation, from broadside ballads collected from traditional singers such as "Van Diemen's Land" and "The Fields of Athenry" to Abel Magwitch's sentence in Great Expectations and Veer Savarkar's memoir of the Cellular Jail (where he was imprisoned from 1911 to 1921), preserves a civilian accounting of what the statutes could not fully capture.