New World

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The New World arrived in print in the spring of 1503, announced in a single letter written in Lisbon by a Florentine explorer named Amerigo Vespucci. He addressed it to his friend and former patron, Lorenzo di Pier Francesco de' Medici, and its opening paragraph upended five centuries of European assumptions about the shape of the Earth. Vespucci wrote that the ancients believed the southern half of the globe was nothing but sea, "which they have called the Atlantic". His last voyage, he declared, had proved them wrong. He had found a continent there, populated by more people than Europe, Asia, or Africa, and more pleasant than any region he had ever known. The letter was published in Latin under the title Mundus Novus, and it spread across Europe with startling speed, reprinted immediately in country after country. Before that moment, educated Europeans had divided the world into three parts: Africa, Asia, and Europe. What Vespucci named would eventually carry his own name, though he never claimed that honor for himself. The questions this documentary will answer reach in several directions at once. How did the phrase "New World" actually originate? Why did geographers disagree for decades about where the Americas ended and Asia began? And what does it mean today that a colonial-era label still shapes how we talk about wine, biology, and agriculture?

• 2. Before Vespucci

  ›

  Credit for the phrase tends to go to Vespucci, but the language had been circling for years before his famous letter. The Venetian explorer Alvise Cadamosto used the Italian phrase "un altro mondo" to describe sub-Saharan Africa, which he explored in 1455 and 1456 on behalf of the Portuguese. Cadamosto knew perfectly well that sub-Saharan Africa was part of the African continent. For him, the phrase was a literary flourish, not a geographical claim about a fourth part of the world. An Italian chronicler named Peter Martyr d'Anghiera, serving the Spanish crown, went considerably further. Peter Martyr doubted from the outset that Christopher Columbus had reached East Asia, and his private letters began reaching for new language almost immediately after Columbus returned. On the 14th of May 1493, just weeks after Columbus's first voyage, Martyr wrote to describe the newly discovered lands as the "western antipodes". By the 13th of September of the same year, he had refined his phrase to "new hemisphere of the earth". In a letter dated the 1st of November 1493, he called Columbus the "discoverer of the new globe". Columbus himself used related language, though with a very different intent. Writing to the Catholic Monarchs of Spain in 1499, reporting on his third voyage, Columbus described how the immense freshwater outflow of the Orinoco delta into the Gulf of Paria implied a continent behind it. Yet Columbus did not call it a new continent. He proposed that the South American landmass was the terrestrial paradise of Biblical tradition, a place known in scripture but never reached. In a letter written in 1500 to the nurse of Prince John, Columbus described having found a "new heavens and world" and claimed to have placed "another world" under the dominion of the Spanish kings. These were spiritual and rhetorical framings, not geographical ones. Peter Martyr later used the term Orbe Novo, meaning "New Globe", in the title of his history of the Americas, which began appearing in 1511, and he often shares credit with Vespucci for giving the concept its shape.

• 3. The Letter That Renamed a Continent

  ›

  Vespucci arrived in Brazil in August 1501, and the encounter that changed everything happened not on the Brazilian coast but at a watering stop called Bezeguiche, located in present-day Dakar, Senegal. Two expeditions crossed paths there by chance: Vespucci's, which was charting the coast of newly discovered Brazil, and the ships of the Second Portuguese India armada, commanded by Pedro Alvares Cabral, which were returning from India. Vespucci had already visited the Americas in prior years. The sailors coming back from the East Indies were describing a world he could not reconcile with what he had seen in the West Indies. He wrote a preliminary letter to Lorenzo di Pier Francesco de' Medici while still anchored at Bezeguiche, describing his puzzlement, and sent it back with the Portuguese fleet. The conviction came later, during the mapping expedition along eastern Brazil from 1501 to 1502. After returning to Lisbon in the spring of 1503, Vespucci composed the Mundus Novus letter and sent it on to Lorenzo in Florence. Its core claim was precise and bold: the lands to the west were not the eastern edges of Asia, as Columbus had insisted, but an entirely different continent. The letter described a land full of animals, more populous than Europe, Asia, or Africa, and more temperate and pleasant than any other region known. The printing presses of Europe seized on it. The letter was a publishing sensation, immediately and repeatedly reprinted across multiple countries. Vespucci's claim contained a wrinkle that would take years to resolve. He applied the "New World" label to the continental landmass of South America specifically. Most of North America had not yet been explored, and his argument left open the possibility that the Caribbean islands Columbus had found earlier might still be the eastern edges of Asia, exactly as Columbus kept insisting until he died in 1506.

• 4. Maps at War with Each Other

  ›

  A globe produced in 1504, possibly created by Leonardo da Vinci, depicted the New World as only South America, cutting out North America and Central America entirely. The cartographic situation across Europe was far from settled. The Cantino planisphere of 1502 and the Canerio map of 1504 placed a large open ocean between China on the eastern side and the newly discovered lands on the western side, but covered their uncertainty by extending a finger of Asian landmass across the top of the map, suggesting it wrapped around into the western hemisphere. The Cantino Planisphere labeled Greenland "Punta d'Asia", meaning "edge of Asia". Some cartographers leaned the other way. The Contarini-Rosselli map of 1506 and the Johannes Ruysch map of 1508 bowed to Ptolemaic authority and Columbus's claims, drawing the northern Asian landmass well into the western hemisphere and merging it with North America, Labrador, and Newfoundland. Those maps placed Japan near Cuba and left South America floating alone beneath everything else. The Waldsemuller map of 1507 came closest to the modern picture. Produced alongside the famous Cosmographiae Introductio volume, which also reprinted Vespucci's letters, it placed a completely open sea between Asia and the New World with no land bridge connecting them. It also depicted two versions of the western side, one with a sea passage through what is now Central America, one without. On the southern continent, it placed a single word: America. Martin Waldsemuller's own revised map of 1516 walked much of this back. He returned to classical authority, merged the Asian landmass into North America, renamed that region Terra de Cuba Asie partis, and quietly removed the label "America" from the southern continent, calling it merely Terra incognita. The Pacific coast of the Americas was discovered in 1513 by Vasco Nunez de Balboa, twenty years after Columbus's first voyage. Ferdinand Magellan's circumnavigation, completed between 1519 and 1522, settled the larger question by confirming that the Pacific Ocean was a single continuous body of water separating Asia from the Americas. The discovery of the Bering Strait in the early 18th century confirmed that Asia and North America were not connected by land. Yet even after Magellan, a Johannes Schoner globe from 1533 still showed North America joined to Asia by a land bridge.

• 5. Navigators in Conference

  ›

  Spanish monarchs called together a conference of navigators known as the Junta de Navegantes, first at Toro in 1505, then continuing at Burgos in 1508, to consolidate everything known about the Indies and chart the course of future exploration. Amerigo Vespucci attended both sessions. At Burgos, his influence over the assembled navigators was substantial enough that he was appointed the first piloto mayor, the chief navigator of Spain. The proceedings of the Toro-Burgos conferences did not survive, but the outcome left a clear trail. Spanish officials seem to have accepted at those meetings that the Antilles and the known stretch of Central America were not the Indies they had originally sought. The new goal they adopted was to find a sea passage or strait through the Americas, a route to Asia proper. That directive drove the next generation of exploration. In 1524, Giovanni da Verrazzano used the term "New World" in the written record of his voyage along the Atlantic coast, traveling through what is now Canada and the United States. The phrase was spreading outward from its origins in Vespucci's Lisbon letter, finding its way into the languages and maps of several European nations, though it entered English only relatively late.

• 6. What the Label Still Carries

  ›

  Contemporary usage of "New World" spreads across several fields, and each use carries its own set of assumptions. Critics of the term argue that it applies a colonial perspective of discovery, erasing both the historical and geographic complexity of the Americas. The argument is that what Europeans called a new world was not new to the people already living there, and that what changed was not the world itself but the stage of Western colonialism. In wine terminology, the label takes on a definition that has nothing to do with European discovery. New World wines include not only those from North and South America but also wines from South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand, along with any other wine-growing region outside the traditional zones of Europe, North Africa, and the Near East. Even that usage has been questioned as arbitrary and overly generalized. Biologists use the Old World and New World labels to distinguish species. Taxonomists attach the New World designation to species found exclusively in the Americas, setting them apart from their counterparts in Europe, Africa, and Asia. New World monkeys, New World vultures, and New World warblers are all named on this principle. Agriculture may carry the most consequential version of the distinction. Asia, Africa, and Europe share a common agricultural history rooted in the Neolithic Revolution, with the same domesticated plants and animals spreading across all three continents thousands of years before European contact with the Americas. Common Old World crops such as barley, lentils, oats, peas, rye, and wheat, along with domesticated animals including cattle, chickens, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep, did not exist in the Americas until post-Columbian contact in the 1490s. Running in the other direction, the Americas were the source of what are still called New World crops. Mesoamerican peoples domesticated common beans, maize, and squash, known collectively as the three sisters, as well as the avocado, tomato, and the full range of capsicum peppers, including bell peppers and chili peppers, and also the turkey. The Andean region of South America produced the cassava, peanut, potato, and quinoa, along with domesticated animals including the alpaca, guinea pig, and llama. Other crops that originated in the Americas include the sweetpotato, cashew, cocoa, rubber, sunflower, tobacco, vanilla, guava, papaya, and pineapple. There are rare cases of overlap: the calabash, cotton, and yam are believed to have been domesticated independently in both hemispheres, or their early forms may have arrived in the Americas with Paleo-Indians during the last glacial period. The term Amerigo Vespucci coined from a watering stop in present-day Senegal continues to organize what people eat, drink, and study.