Jules Michelet

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Jules Michelet died on the 9th of February 1874, in the southern French town of Hyères, from a heart attack. He left behind nineteen volumes of French history, a second wife still preparing a new manuscript, and a single borrowed word that would reshape how the entire Western world thinks about art, learning, and time itself.

  The word was "Renaissance."

  Michelet did not invent the idea, but he was the first historian to apply the French term to an entire era rather than a narrow artistic moment. That act of naming locked something into place in the European imagination. It also tells you a great deal about the man: someone who believed that history was not a ledger of kings and battles but a living record of ordinary people struggling against nature, against authority, and against time.

  Who was Jules Michelet? He was the son of a master printer, a child of Paris streets who grew up to occupy the most prestigious academic chairs in France. He was a republican who married a teacher from Saint Petersburg. He was a man who wrote thirty years of history only to lose his professorship for refusing to swear an oath. And he was, as historian François Furet put it, the author of what Furet called "the cornerstone of revolutionary historiography" and "a literary monument."

  What follows traces how a printer's son became France's defining national historian, what he actually believed about the past, and why his monument at Le Père Lachaise Cemetery was built through public subscription nearly two decades after he was first buried somewhere else.

• 2. A Printer's Son

  ›

  Pauline Rousseau became Michelet's first wife in 1824, the same year their daughter Adèle was born. Five years later their son Charles arrived. The family arc begins, however, not with a wedding but with a printing press, because Michelet's father ran the shop and Jules worked alongside him as a boy.

  That practical upbringing did not point toward a career at the Lycée Charlemagne, the prestigious Paris secondary school Michelet chose over an offered position at the imperial printing office. The choice announced something about his character: he preferred the life of the mind, even when the steadier path was available.

  He passed his university examination in 1821 and was quickly appointed to a professorship of history at the Collège Rollin. By 1827 he had published Précis d'histoire moderne, an influential overview of contemporary history, and had been made a maître de conférences at the École normale supérieure. His early academic supporters included Abel-François Villemain and Victor Cousin, patrons who helped propel a young man with republican instincts into the French establishment.

  His first books were school textbooks. Between 1825 and 1827 he produced drafts, chronological tables, and preparatory materials on modern history, the kind of unglamorous groundwork that rarely appears in retrospective accounts of great scholars. Introduction à l'histoire universelle followed in 1831. His career was assembling itself methodically, one appointment and one publication at a time, before the July Revolution of 1830 opened a door that would define the rest of his life.

• 3. The Record Office Years

  ›

  The July Revolution of 1830 repositioned Michelet within French institutions. He secured a place at the Record Office and served as deputy professor under historian François Guizot in the literary faculty of the University of France. Access to archives suited a man who would spend extensive time researching printed authorities and manuscripts for a single project.

  That project was the Histoire de France, which he began shortly after arriving at the Record Office. It would take thirty years to complete.

  In 1838, Michelet was appointed to the chair of history at the Collège de France, a position he prized above any other. His friend Edgar Quinet joined him in a sustained polemic against the Jesuits, whose renewed activity in France he found politically alarming. His 1838 appointment deepened his opposition to ecclesiastical authority, a conviction already visible in his earlier writing and one that would color his historical judgments for decades.

  His first wife died in 1839 of tuberculosis at the age of 48, the same year he published Histoire Romaine. The lecture courses he gave during these years produced the volumes Du prêtre, de la femme et de la famille and Le peuple. Those books, he acknowledged, lacked the dramatic style of his later work, though they already carried his core beliefs: a mixture of sentimentalism, communism, and anti-sacerdotalism.

  Michelet propagated the principles that fed the upheavals of 1848. When revolution came, he did not try to enter active political life. He kept writing. Between the fall of Louis Philippe and the consolidation of Napoleon III's power, he produced the Histoire de la Révolution française, the work Furet would later call a literary monument.

• 4. Naming the Renaissance

  ›

  Giorgio Vasari used the Italian concept of a revival of classical art as early as 1550, when he described Giotto as standing at the beginning of a rebirth. Michelet's contribution was different in scope and consequence: he took the French word "Renaissance" and applied it systematically to a whole historical era, not just a trend in painting.

  His use of the term established what the modern world now accepts as given: that there was a distinct period of renewed humanism, artistic flourishing, and intellectual transformation that separated medieval Europe from something genuinely new. Before Michelet made that argument inside the Histoire de France, historians did not routinely speak of the Renaissance as a coherent historical chapter.

  Michelet's interest in this transition was personal as well as scholarly. He abhorred the Middle Ages and celebrated their end as a radical transformation. He wanted to explain how a lively Renaissance could emerge from what he called an ossified medieval culture, which was itself one of the themes he wove through the Histoire de France.

  That nineteen-volume work structured the period across its pages with considerable precision. The first volume covered early French history up to the death of Charlemagne. The second treated feudal France in its flourishing. Volumes four, five, and six addressed the Hundred Years' War. The 16th and 17th centuries each received four volumes, and two of those volumes were titled Renaissance and Reforme. The last three volumes carried French history through the eighteenth century to the outbreak of the Revolution, which Michelet completed in 1867.

• 5. Athénais and the Natural World

  ›

  Athénaïs Mialaret had been teaching in Saint Petersburg when she began writing to Jules Michelet out of admiration for his ideas. The correspondence lasted years. The couple became engaged before they had ever met in person. She was 23 when they married in 1849; he was 51.

  She was a natural history writer and memoirist with republican sympathies, and her influence on Michelet's later work was substantial enough that he openly acknowledged it, even though she received no formal credit in his publications. Their son Yves Jean Lazare was born in 1850. She introduced Michelet to natural history as a subject, and the books that followed show her fingerprints clearly.

  L'Oiseau appeared in 1856, beginning a series that continued with L'Insecte in 1858, La Mer in 1861, and La Montagne in 1868. These books came out of a pantheistic worldview rather than strict science. In La Montagne, Michelet shifted style noticeably, using short, fragmented sentences to build emotional tension in a way his historical prose rarely attempted.

  L'Amour in 1859 and La Femme in 1860 opened a different vein entirely. The exploration of personal relationships and the changing role of women generated debate. La Femme reached at least one unexpected reader: Vincent van Gogh cited it in his drawing Sorrow, inscribing the work with a line from the book in French. In 1862, Michelet published La Sorcière, a historical study of witchcraft that reflected his unconventional thinking; in 1973, more than a century after his death, it was adapted into an animated art film titled Belladonna of Sadness, directed by Eiichi Yamamoto.

• 6. Exile and Ideology

  ›

  Napoleon III's rise to power in 1852 cost Michelet his position at the Record Office. He refused to swear loyalty to the new emperor, and the institution removed him. His professorship at the Collège de France, which he had always contended was taken from him unjustly, was never returned, even after the new republic that followed Napoleon's fall in 1870.

  During the Second Empire he lived partly in France and partly in Italy, spending winters frequently in Hyères on the French Riviera. He worked throughout both decades of that period, completing the Histoire de France and producing the supplementary books, including Les Femmes de la Révolution in 1854, which examined women's roles in France from 1780 to 1794.

  Michelet's intellectual framework for history was not politically neutral, and scholars have examined it with increasing scrutiny. He framed all of history as a struggle: he wrote, "With the world began a war which will end only with the world: war of man against nature, spirit against matter, liberty against fatality. History is nothing other than the record of this interminable struggle." Intellectual historian David Nirenberg describes this as a "Manichaean dualism." Nirenberg identifies Michelet's framing of Christian spirit and liberty against Jewish matter and fatality as an example of anti-Judaism functioning as a conceptual tool in western thought.

  Michelet also wrote about industrialization with unexpected nuance. In a pamphlet on France's popular masses and machinery, he argued that machines had made it possible for working families to possess household goods they had never been able to afford before, including curtains, body linen, and table linen. He quoted himself on the point directly, writing that once a woman wore a single blue or black gown for ten years without washing for fear it would disintegrate, while her husband could now cover her with a garment of flowers for a single day's wages.

• 7. Legacy and the Fight Over Credit

  ›

  Athénaïs Michelet outlived her husband by twenty-five years, dying in 1899. Before Jules died, he bequeathed her the literary rights to his books and papers, a formal acknowledgment of her role in his later career. That bequest was contested. After winning a court challenge, she retained the papers and publishing rights and went on to publish several books about her husband and his family, drawing on the journals and extracts he had left her.

  She later passed that literary legacy to Gabriel Monod, a historian who founded the Revue historique journal. The transfer set the terms for how Michelet's archive would be managed by professionals, and what followed was, by historian Bonnie Smith's account, a systematic effort to minimize Athénaïs's contributions. Smith writes: "Michelet scholarship, like other historiographical debates, has taken great pains to establish the priority of the male over the female in writing history."

  Michelet himself was first buried in Hyères, where he died. At Athénaïs's request, a Paris court granted permission on the 13th of May 1876 for his body to be exhumed and moved. His coffin arrived in Paris on the 16th of May for reburial at Le Père Lachaise Cemetery. The monument erected over his grave, designed by architect Jean-Louis Pascal, was not built by the state: it went up in 1893 through public subscription, nearly two decades after his death.

  At the time of Michelet's death in 1874, Athénaïs was at work on a new manuscript she had titled La nature, a project she never completed under his direction. The Œuvres complètes, the collected edition of Michelet's work edited by Paul Viallaneix, began publication in 1971 and extended across more than twenty volumes.