Joan Kelly

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Joan Kelly asked a simple question in 1976, and the field of history has never been quite the same. That question was: Did women have a Renaissance? The answer she gave was no. And in making that argument, Kelly did something that historians had rarely done before: she insisted that a celebrated era of human flourishing might look entirely different depending on who you were.

  Kelly was born in Brooklyn on the 29th of March, 1928. She went on to earn a doctorate from Columbia University, join the faculty at City College of New York, and become a founding force in women's history as an academic discipline. She died of cancer on the 15th of August, 1982, at the age of fifty-four. But the questions she planted in that 1976 essay kept growing long after her death.

  This documentary follows the life, the scholarship, and the lasting reach of a historian who refused to let the past be told from only one point of view.

• 2. Brooklyn to Columbia

  ›

  George V. and Ruth Kelly raised their daughter in Brooklyn, and that borough would eventually send her toward one of the most distinguished academic careers of her generation. Joan Kelly received her bachelor's degree from St John's University in 1953, the same year she was awarded a Woodrow Wilson fellowship for 1953-54.

  She then enrolled in the doctoral program in history at Columbia University. Her supervisor there was Garret Mattingley, a scholar known for his work on Renaissance diplomacy and Tudor England. Kelly completed her PhD in 1963. Even before that degree was finished, she had already taken a position at City College of New York, where she began as a lecturer in 1956.

  Once she had the doctorate in hand, her rank advanced to assistant professor. By 1972 she had been promoted twice more, reaching both associate professor and full professor in that same year. She remained on the City College faculty until the end of her life, a span of more than two decades.

• 3. Politics and a New Field

  ›

  The 1960s pulled Kelly's attention toward questions she had not set out to study. Her growing engagement with Marxist theory and the civil rights movement reshaped how she thought about history itself, and gradually drew her toward women's history as a serious scholarly field.

  That shift produced concrete institutional results. Kelly joined forces with Gerda Lerner, another pioneering figure in women's history, and together they founded the first master's program in women's history at Sarah Lawrence College. That program gave women's history a formal home inside the American university.

  Kelly also served as chair of the American Historical Association's Committee on Women Historians from 1975 to 1977. From 1973 to 1974, she co-chaired the Coordinating Committee for Women in the Historical Profession through its New York City chapter. She sat on advisory boards for the City University of New York's Center for the Study of Women and Sex Roles and for the Feminist Press. In 1967-68, she received a junior fellowship from the National Foundation for the Arts and Humanities.

• 4. The Renaissance Question

  ›

  Kelly's training had centered on the Italian Renaissance, specifically on the architect and humanist Leon Battista Alberti. That specialization put her in an unusual position when she began to ask how women fit into a period historians had long celebrated as a high point of individual freedom and cultural achievement.

  Her 1976 essay took direct aim at what she called traditional periodization. Historians had divided the past into eras, and the Renaissance was one of the great turning points. Kelly's challenge was to show that this framework assumed a male subject. For women, she argued, the Renaissance was not a period of expanding possibility. It was the opposite.

  Drawing on the courtly literature of the period, she traced how ideals of courtly love worked in practice. Her reading was that those ideals placed growing emphasis on women's passivity and their virginity, narrowing rather than widening what women were expected to be. The celebrated culture of the Renaissance, on this account, was partly built on a sharper confinement of women.

• 5. Ripples Across the Discipline

  ›

  Historians of women and gender took Kelly's argument seriously enough to apply its core method to other periods and places. The method was straightforward: ask whether any given historical turning point was actually a turning point for women. The answer was often surprising.

  Kelly's insistence that women's historical experience differed from men's was not merely a corrective note. It was a challenge to the architecture of historical knowledge itself. If periodization depended on a male subject, then the entire calendar of historical change needed to be examined again.

  A collection of Kelly's essays, published posthumously under the title Women, History and Theory, appeared in 1984. That volume gathered her thinking in one place and made it available to a wider readership after she was no longer alive to extend the arguments herself.

• 6. The Prize That Carries Her Name

  ›

  The American Historical Association established the Joan Kelly Memorial Prize in 1984, the same year her essay collection appeared. The prize is awarded annually for the book in women's history and/or feminist theory that best reflects, in the Association's own words, "the high intellectual and scholarly ideals exemplified by the life and work of Joan Kelly."

  The prize ties Kelly's name to the future of the field she helped build. Each year it names a work that advances the kind of scholarship she practiced: rigorous, politically engaged, and unwilling to treat received periodization as neutral ground. The question she asked in 1976 about the Renaissance continues to be asked, in different forms, about almost every era historians study.